This article investigates how political strategies interrelate populist rhetoric with memory issues. By looking at the case of the Social Democratic Party (PSD) from Romania, between 2017–2019, this article reveals how the slide to populism, generated by cyclical confrontations with the rule of law institutions, steered the psd to adopt conspirational beliefs and appeal to traumatic memories to frame the judiciary as the new Securitate. Through the use of discourse analysis and virtual ethnography, this article analyses party resolutions and political rallies. This article explains how the populist rhetoric created a new hegemonic narrative of the judiciary, by intersecting its values and symbolism with the memory of the former Securitate from the Communist period.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abbott, Alison. “Romania after the Ceausescus”. Nature; London 372, no. 6507 (December 15, 1994): 605. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uio.no/10.1038/372605a0.
Adi, Ana, and Darren Lilleker. “#rezist—Romania’s 2017 Anti-Corruption Protests: Causes, Development, and Implications”. Monograph. Berlin, Germany: Quadriga University, July 20, 2017. http://www.romanianprotests.info/.
Alexander, Jeffrey C., Ron Eyerman, Bernard Giesen, Neil J. Smelser, and Piotr Sztompka. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Univ of California Press, 2004.
Assmann, Jan. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity”. New German Critique, no. 65 (1995): 125–133.
Balay, Sophie. “Romanian Politician Indicted for EU Funds Fraud”, November 14, 2017. https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/7256-romanian-politician-indicted-for-eu-funds-fraud.
Benhabib, Seyla. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Berezin, Mabel. Illiberal Politics in Neoliberal Times: Culture, Security and Populism in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press, 2009. http://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/10968.
Bernhard, Michael H., and Jan Kubik, eds. Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, USA, 2014.
Chiruta, Ionut. “Challenging the Rule of law in Romania: The Metamorphosis of Political Discourse towards Populism”. Forthcoming, 2020.
Christine. Hine. Virtual Ethnography. London;, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2000.
Ciobanu, Monica. “Conclusion: Post-Communist Romania at Twenty-Five and Hopes for the Future”. In Post-Communist Romania at Twenty-Five: Linking Past, Present and Future. Edited by Lavinia Stan and Diane Vancea., 259–271. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015.
Ciobanu, Monica. “Criminalising the Past and Reconstructing Collective Memory: The Romanian Truth Commission”. Europe-Asia Studies 61, no. 2 (March 1, 2009): 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802630870.
Deletant, Dennis. “Ghosts from the Past: Successors to the Securitate in Post-Communist Romania”. In Post-Communist Romania: Coming to Terms with Transition, edited by Duncan Lightand David Phinnemore, 35–58. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977910_3.
Deletant, Dennis. “Romania’s Commitment to the Rule of law?” In Post-Communist Romania at Twenty-Five: Linking Past, Present and Future. Edited by Lavinia Stan and Diane Vancea., 219–241. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015.
Deletant, Dennis. “The Securitate and the Police State in Romania: 1948–1964”. Intelligence and National Security 8, no. 4 (October 1, 1993): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684529308432223.
Deletant, Dennis. “The Securitate and the Police State in Romania, 1964–1989”. Intelligence and National Security 9, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684529408432238.
Deletant, Dennis. “The Securitate Legacy in Romania”. In Security Intelligence Services in New Democracies: The Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania, edited by Kieran Williams and Dennis Deletant, 159–210. Studies in Russia and East Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403905369_6.
Dragnea, Liviu. “Liviu Dragnea, Mihai Tudose Şi Marian Neacşu După CExN al PSD—17.11.2017”, November 17, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nFQ-M0fvyA.
Dragnea, Liviu. “Mitingul PSD Din Piața Victoriei, București—09.06.2018”, June 9, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etGzQ_ykbb8.
Eliasoph, Nina, and Paul Lichterman. “Making Things Political”. Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267784-50.
Gallagher, Tom. Modern Romania: The End of Communism, the Failure of Democratic Reform, and the Theft of a Nation. New York: University Press, 2005.
Gallagher, Tom. “Unsocial Democrats: The PSD’s Negative Role in Romania’s Democracy”. In Post-Communist Romania at Twenty-Five: Linking Past, Present and Future. Edited by Lavinia Stan and Diane Vancea., 171–193. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015.
Hawkins, Kirk A. Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730245.
Higgins, Andrew. “Spy Allegations in a Presidential Race Conjure Romania’s Authoritarian Past”. The New York Times, October 31, 2014, sec. World. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/01/world/europe/presidential-candidates-spy-allegations-in-romania-conjure-a-dystopian-past.html.
Hodgkin, Katharine. Contested Pasts: The Politics of Memory. 1st ed. Routledge, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391471.
Hoxhaj, Andi. The EU Anti-Corruption Report: A Reflexive Governance Approach. Routledge, 2019.
Janku, Peter. “Dungeon of Silence: Romania’s Struggle with the Past | DW | 10.02.2016”. DW.COM, 2016. https://www.dw.com/en/dungeon-of-silence-romanias-struggle-with-the-past/a-19041240.
Jasiewicz, Joanna. “When the Past Matters: Memory Politics and Ethnic Relations in Poland”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38, no. 9 (July 15, 2015): 1573–1590. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1005640.
Kansteiner, Wulf. “Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies”. History and Theory 41, no. 2 (2002): 179–197.
Kaya, Ayhan, and Ayşe Tecmen. “The Use of the Past in Populist Political Discourse: Justice and Development Party Rule in Turkey”. Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454813-4.
Korycki, Kate. “Memory, Party Politics, and Post-Transition Space: The Case of Poland”. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 31, no. 3 (August 2017): 518–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325417700263.
Lebow, Richard Ned, Wulf Kansteiner, Claudio Fogu, Richard J. Golsan, Regula Ludi, Heidemarie Uhl, Annamaria Orla-Bukowska, and Thomas Wolfe. The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe. Duke University Press, 2006.
Lührmann, Anna, and Staffan I. Lindberg, eds. “Autocratization Surges–Resistance Grows DEMOCRACY REPORT 2020 | Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem)”. V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg, 2020. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/f0/5d/f05d46d8-626f-4b20-8e4e-53d4b134bfcb/democracy_report_2020_low.pdf.
Maurantonio, Nicole. “The Politics of Memory”. The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, August 24, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.026.
Moffitt, Benjamin. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2016.
Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. “Romania’s Italian-Style Anticorruption Populism”. Journal of Democracy 27, no. 3 (2018): 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0048.
Nets-Zehngut, Rafi. “Origins of the Palestinian Refugee Problem: Changes in the Historical Memory of Israelis/Jews 1949–2004”. Journal of Peace Research 48, no. 2 (March 1, 2011): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310396112.
Nets-Zehngut, Rafi. “The Passing of Time and the Collective Memory of Conflicts: The Case of Israel and the 1948 Palestinian Exodus”. Peace & Change 37, no. 2 (2012): 253–285.
Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire”. Representations, no. 26 (1989): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520.
Olick, Jeffrey K. “Collective Memory: The Two Cultures”. Sociological Theory 17, no. 3(1999): 333–348.
Palonen, Emilia. “Performing the Nation: The Janus-Faced Populist Foundations of Illiberalism in Hungary”. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 26, no. 3 (July 3, 2018): 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2018.1498776.
Poenaru, Florin. Locuri comune: clasă, anticomunism, stânga. Tact, 2017.
Romania Insider. “Romania’s PSD and ALDE Sign Coalition Protocol”. Accessed June 6, 2020. https://www.romania-insider.com/romanias-psd-alde-sign-coalition-protocol.
Romano, Renee Christine, and Leigh Raiford. The Civil Rights Movement in American Memory. University of Georgia Press, 2006.
Roper, Stephen D. Romania: The Unfinished Revolution., 2004. http://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=201168.
Rosca, Iulia. “DOCUMENT PSD a adoptat o rezolutie impotriva ‘statului paralel si ilegitim’ care consuma resursele financiare ale Romaniei: ‘Presedintele Klaus Iohannis isi incalca atributiile’—Politic—HotNews.ro”, November 17, 2017. https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-politic-22118258-document-psd-adoptat-rezolutie-impotriva-statului-paralel-ilegitim-care-consuma-resursele-financiare-ale-romaniei-presedintele-klaus-iohannis-isi-incalca-atributiile.htm.
Rothe, Anne. Popular Trauma Culture: Selling the Pain of Others in the Mass Media. Rutgers University Press, 2011.
Rusu, Mihai Stelian. “Transitional Politics of Memory: Political Strategies of Managing the Past in Post-Communist Romania”. Europe-Asia Studies 69, no. 8 (September 14, 2017): 1257–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1380783.
Saftoiu, Adriana. Cronica de Cotroceni. Iasi: Polirom, 2015.
Siani-Davies, Peter. The Romanian Revolution of December 1989. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2005.
Smelser, Neil J. “Psychological Trauma and Cultural Trauma”. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity 4 (2004): 31–59.
Söyler, Mehtap. The Turkish Deep State: State Consolidation, Civil-Military Relations and Democracy. Vol. 73. Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Politics. London:Routledge, 2015.
Stan, Lavinia. Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Romania: The Politics of Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139104227.
Tismaneanu, Vladimir. “DEMOCRACY ON THE BRINK: A Coup Attempt Fails in Romania”. World Affairs 175, no. 5 (2013): 83–87.
Tismăneanu, Vladimir. Final Report—The Presidential Commission for the analysis and investigation of the Communist Regime—Romania. Humanitas, 2007.
Tismaneanu, Vladimir, and Marius Stan. Romania Confronts Its Communist Past: Democracy, Memory, and Moral Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139198929.
Verovšek, Peter J. “Collective Memory, Politics, and the Influence of the Past: The Politics of Memory as a Research Paradigm”. Politics, Groups, and Identities 4, no. 3 (July 2, 2016): 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1167094.
Voicu, Marian. Matrioska Mincinosilor: Fake News, Manipulare, Populism. Humanitas SA, 2018.
Voiculescu, Loredana. “Liviu Dragnea vede securiști și în stânga, și în dreapta: “Securiștii și-au făcut două partide””. Republica, 2019. https://republica.ro/liviu-dragnea-vede-securisti-si-in-stanga-si-in-dreapta-zsecuristii-si-au-facut-doua-partide.
Weyland, Kurt. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics”. Comparative Politics 34, no. 1 (2001): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412.
Weyland, Kurt. Populism. Edited by Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.2.
Wood, Nancy. Vectors of Memory: Legacies of Trauma in Postwar Europe. Bloomsbury Academic, 1999.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 795 | 116 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 61 | 5 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 103 | 11 | 2 |
This article investigates how political strategies interrelate populist rhetoric with memory issues. By looking at the case of the Social Democratic Party (PSD) from Romania, between 2017–2019, this article reveals how the slide to populism, generated by cyclical confrontations with the rule of law institutions, steered the psd to adopt conspirational beliefs and appeal to traumatic memories to frame the judiciary as the new Securitate. Through the use of discourse analysis and virtual ethnography, this article analyses party resolutions and political rallies. This article explains how the populist rhetoric created a new hegemonic narrative of the judiciary, by intersecting its values and symbolism with the memory of the former Securitate from the Communist period.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 795 | 116 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 61 | 5 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 103 | 11 | 2 |