The Dark Side of Nonviolent Action?
Right-wing Populism and the Use of Nonviolent Action
In: PopulismSearch for other papers by Daniel Petz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Given a perceived qualitative and quantitative shift in the use of nonviolent action by rightwing populist actors in recent years, this article based on case studies from Austria (the Identitarian movement) and Indonesia (the 2/12 movement) discusses the methods, legitimacy, and effectiveness of the use of nonviolent action by right-wing populist movements. It finds that the use of nonviolent action by those actors is largely pragmatic and tactical and that it often is borderline in terms of remaining nonviolent. It further identifies that in line with right-wing populist ideology, rather than only addressing state authorities and elites, the movements addressees of the nonviolent action are often minority groups or people supporting minority groups. Developing a classification of nonviolent action in democracies (dissent, civil disobedience, political disobedience) the article further finds that right-wing use of nonviolent action has a tendency towards transcending normal dissent towards political disobedience.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 961 | 329 | 53 |
| Full Text Views | 45 | 6 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 122 | 19 | 7 |
The Dark Side of Nonviolent Action?
Right-wing Populism and the Use of Nonviolent Action
In: PopulismSearch for other papers by Daniel Petz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Given a perceived qualitative and quantitative shift in the use of nonviolent action by rightwing populist actors in recent years, this article based on case studies from Austria (the Identitarian movement) and Indonesia (the 2/12 movement) discusses the methods, legitimacy, and effectiveness of the use of nonviolent action by right-wing populist movements. It finds that the use of nonviolent action by those actors is largely pragmatic and tactical and that it often is borderline in terms of remaining nonviolent. It further identifies that in line with right-wing populist ideology, rather than only addressing state authorities and elites, the movements addressees of the nonviolent action are often minority groups or people supporting minority groups. Developing a classification of nonviolent action in democracies (dissent, civil disobedience, political disobedience) the article further finds that right-wing use of nonviolent action has a tendency towards transcending normal dissent towards political disobedience.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 961 | 329 | 53 |
| Full Text Views | 45 | 6 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 122 | 19 | 7 |
