Save

Studying Up: Four Modalities, Two Challenges

In: Public Anthropologist
Author:
Hugh GustersonProfessor of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
George Washington University, Washington DC, USA, hugh.gusterson@ubc.ca

Search for other papers by Hugh Gusterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

In her 1973 article “up the anthropologist” Laura Nader called on anthropologists to engage in critical studies of the relationship between powerful institutions and the broader society, using a “vertical slice” approach. But Nader worried that participant observation was hard in the context of studying up, and yet it has been presented as definitive of anthropology’s methodology. This article discusses four methodological strategies for studying up in the light of this concern: insider ethnography; covert ethnography; remote ethnography; and adapted participant observation. The first two have intellectual or ethical liabilities. The last is increasingly normalized. Going forward, anthropologists studying up face two obstacles: first, the increasingly totalizing hold of corporate and government workplaces over their employees, even when they are not at work; and, second, university institutional review boards (irb s) concerned to avoid conflictual or critical research.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 655 451 64
Full Text Views 79 61 5
PDF Views & Downloads 183 132 12