The Paradox of Creation. Theology of (De)nature and Physics of Worship in the 3rd/9th Century Kalām and Falsafa
In: Quaderni di Studi ArabiSearch for other papers by Guillaume De Vaulx d’Arcy in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Debates over the existence or not of nature as a principle of movement during the 3rd/9th century can be understood as revolving around the implications of the concept of creation. On the one hand, the denial of nature among theologians was implied by their stressing on the dependency of creatures to their Creator, and resulted in occasionalism. If this history is well-known, the thinking of a denier of nature like Ṣāliḥ Qubba should not only be interpreted as a preliminary step of occasionalism, since his reduction of the properties of created beings is huger than causality. On the other hand, the affirmation of nature in the first falsafa may be understood in light of a second property of the concept of creation: the necessary independence of the created world from his Creator. It results in an original answer to the question: what is the cause of natural changes? According to al-Kindī and Rasāʾil Iḫwān al-Ṣafāʾ, the world is a universal worshiper who prostrates before God willingly. As we see, the affirmation or the denial of nature draw on both sides of the same theological issue.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
ʿAbd al-Ǧabbār, al-Qāḍī, Šarḥ al-uṣūl al-ḫamsa, edited by ʿAbd al-Karīm ʿUṯmān, al-Qāhira, Maktabat wahiba, 1965.
-
Aflāṭūn fī l-Islām, ed. ʿAbd ar-Raḥmān Badawī, Bayrūt, Dār al-Andalus, 1980.
-
Arisṭū, al-Ṭabīʿā, ed. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī, al-Qāhira, al-Dār al-qawmiyya li-l-ṭibāʿa wa-l-našr, 1964–1965.
-
al-Ašʿarī, Abū l-Ḥasan, Maqālāt al-Islamiyyīn wa-Iḫtilāf al-Muṣallīn, ed. Helmut Ritter, Wiesbaden, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1980.
-
Avicenna, The Physics of The Healing, transl. by Jon McGinnis, Brigham, Brigham Young University Press, 2009.
-
al-Balḫī, Abū l-Qāsim, Kitāb al-Maqālāt, edited by Ḥusayn Ḫaṣnū, Amman-Istanbul, Dār al-Fatḥ–Kuramer, 2018.
-
Balīnūs, al-Ḥakīm, Sirr al-ḫalīqa wa-ṣanʿat al-ṭabīʿa, Ispahan, Markaz al-qāʿima, undated.
-
al-Baġdādī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir, al-Farq bayn al-firaq, edited by Muḥammad ʿUṯmān al-Ḫišt, al-Qāhira, Maktabat Ibn Sīnā, undated.
-
Galen, Manāfiʿ al-Aǧzāʾ, Paris, Bnf, manuscript Arabic 2853.
-
Galen, Compendium Timaei Platonis, edition and Latin translation by Paul Kraus and Richard Walzer, London, Warburg Institute, 1951.
-
al-Ġazālī, Abū Ḥāmid, Kitāb al-Ḥikma fī maḫlūqāt Allāh, edited by Muṣṭafā al-Qabbānī al-Damašqī, al-Qāhira, Maṭbaʿ al-Nīl, 1903.
-
Ibn an-Nadīm, Kitāb al-Fihrist, edited by Riḍā Taǧaddud, Téhéran, Ǧāǧḫānah Bānk Bāzargānā, 1971.
-
Ibn Sīna, al-Išārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, edited by Sulaymān Duniyā, al-Qāhira, Dār al-Maʿārif, 1957–60.
-
al-Kindī, Yaʿqūb b. Isḥāq, Rasāʿil al-Kindī al-Falsafiyya, edited by ʿAbd al-Hādī Abū Rīḍa, al-Qāhira, Dār al-Fikr al-ʿarabī, 2nd edition, 1978.
-
al-Kindī, Yaʿqūb b. Isḥāq, The Philosophical Works of Al-Kindī, translation by Peter Adamson and Peter Pormann, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.
-
Rasāʾil Iḫwān al-Ṣafāʾ, edited by Buṭrus al-Bustānī, Bayrūt, Dār Ṣādir, 1957.
-
al-Rāzī, Abū Bakr, “Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa”, in Rasāʾil al-Rāzī al-falsafiyya, edited by Paul Kraus, al-Qāhira, Paul Barbier, 1939.
-
al-Ṣafadī, Ḫalīl b. Aybak, Kitāb al-Wāfī bi-l-wafayāt, edited by Aḥmad al-Arnāʾūṭ and Turkī Muṣṭafā, Beyrūt, Dār iḥyāʾ al-turāṯ, 2000.
-
Adamson, Peter, Al-Rāzī, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021.
-
Bernand, Marie, “La critique de la notion de nature (ṭabʿ) par le kalām”, SI, 51 (1980), p. 59–105.
-
Callataÿ, Godefroid de, “Magía en al-Andalus: Rasāʾil ijwān al-Ṣafaʾ, Rutbat al-ḥākim y Gāyat al-ḥakīm (Picatrix)”, al-Qantara, 34, 2 (2013), p. 297–344.
-
Dadikhuda, Davlat, “‘Not So Ridiculous’: Avicenna on the Existence of Nature (ṭabīʿa) contra Aristotle and the Ashʿarites”, in Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, ed. R. Pasnau, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019, vol. 7, p. 1–43.
-
Ess, Josef van, Theology and Society in the Second and Third Centuries of the Hijra, transl. Gwendolin Goldbloom, Leyden-Boston, Brill, 2017–19, vol. 2.
-
Genequand, Charles, “Quelques aspects de l’idée de nature dʿAristote à Ghazâlî”, Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie, 116, 2 (1984), p. 105–129.
-
Lammer, Andreas, “Defining nature: From Aristotle to Philoponus to Avicenna”, in Aristotle and the Arabic Tradition, eds. A. Alwishah & J. Hayes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. 121–142.
-
McGinnis, Jon, “Ibn Sina’s Natural Philosophy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Available on line at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/ibn-sina-natural/.
-
Nadler, Steven, “‘No Necessary Connection’: The Medieval Roots of the Occasional Roots of Hume”, The Monist, 79 (1996), p. 448–466.
-
Omari, Racha El, The Theology of Abū l-Qāsim al-Balkhī/al-Kaʿbī (d. 319/931), Leiden/Boston, Brill, 2016.
-
Perler, Dominik, and Rudolph, Ulrich, Occasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabischislamischen und im europäischen Denken, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000.
-
Rashed, Marwan, “Les débuts de la philosophie moderne,” in Les Grecs, les Arabes et nous : enquête sur l’islamophobie savante, ed. Philippe Büttgen, Paris, Fayard, 2009, p. 121–169.
-
Rudolph, Ulrich, “Occasionalism”, in The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Sabine Schmidtke, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 347–363.
-
Sabra, Abdelhamid, “The Simple Ontology of Kalām Atomism: An Outline”, Early Science and Medicine, 14 (2009), p. 68–78.
-
Vaulx d’Arcy de, Guillaume, “Presentation”, in Les Épîtres des Frères en Pureté – Mathématique et philosophie, Paris, Belles Lettres, 2019.
-
Vaulx d’Arcy de, Guillaume, “Presentation”, in Le procès animal de la domination humaine – fable-fleuve tirée des Épîtres des Frères en Pureté, Paris, Belles Lettres, 2021.
-
Vaulx d’Arcy de, Guillaume, “Can Animals be Called Muslims? Archaeology of the Statement: ʿWe, Animals, Are Monotheists, Muslims and Believers’ (Epistles of the Brethren in Purity)” (forthcoming).
-
Wakelnig, Elvira, “Medical knowledge as proof of the Creator’s wisdom and the Arabic reception of Galen’s On the Usefulness of the Parts”, in Greek Medical Literature and its Readers, eds. Petros Bouras-Vallianatos and Sophia Xenophontos, Oxfordshire, Routledge, 2018, p. 131–149.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 120 | 62 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 6 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 30 | 17 | 0 |
The Paradox of Creation. Theology of (De)nature and Physics of Worship in the 3rd/9th Century Kalām and Falsafa
In: Quaderni di Studi ArabiSearch for other papers by Guillaume De Vaulx d’Arcy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Debates over the existence or not of nature as a principle of movement during the 3rd/9th century can be understood as revolving around the implications of the concept of creation. On the one hand, the denial of nature among theologians was implied by their stressing on the dependency of creatures to their Creator, and resulted in occasionalism. If this history is well-known, the thinking of a denier of nature like Ṣāliḥ Qubba should not only be interpreted as a preliminary step of occasionalism, since his reduction of the properties of created beings is huger than causality. On the other hand, the affirmation of nature in the first falsafa may be understood in light of a second property of the concept of creation: the necessary independence of the created world from his Creator. It results in an original answer to the question: what is the cause of natural changes? According to al-Kindī and Rasāʾil Iḫwān al-Ṣafāʾ, the world is a universal worshiper who prostrates before God willingly. As we see, the affirmation or the denial of nature draw on both sides of the same theological issue.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 120 | 62 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 6 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 30 | 17 | 0 |