The Expression of Religious Beliefs: In the Name of Pluralism, although Not Quite Religious
In: Religion & Human RightsSearch for other papers by Agnés Callamard in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The 25 years’ jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the intersection between expression and religion reveals that three main ideas of religion have coexisted alongside each other, for many decades predating the current era. The jurisprudence also shows that the Court somehow accommodated (and justified) these different ideas through a focus on democratic pluralism (not religious pluralism), a conception of pluralism which makes religion (including in its diverse expressions) subservient to democratic principles.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 252 | 32 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 550 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 347 | 6 | 0 |
The Expression of Religious Beliefs: In the Name of Pluralism, although Not Quite Religious
In: Religion & Human RightsSearch for other papers by Agnés Callamard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The 25 years’ jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the intersection between expression and religion reveals that three main ideas of religion have coexisted alongside each other, for many decades predating the current era. The jurisprudence also shows that the Court somehow accommodated (and justified) these different ideas through a focus on democratic pluralism (not religious pluralism), a conception of pluralism which makes religion (including in its diverse expressions) subservient to democratic principles.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 252 | 32 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 550 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 347 | 6 | 0 |