Save

Kokkinakis and the Narratives of Proper and Improper Proselytizing

In: Religion & Human Rights
Author:
Brett G. Scharffs Rex E. Lee Chair and Professor of Law, Brigham Young University Law School Provo, Utah United States

Search for other papers by Brett G. Scharffs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Online Publication Date:
07 Oct 2017
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart

Other access options

Rent on DeepDyve
Redeem Access Token

Abstract

This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) distinguishes between proper and improper proselytizing. It points out the importance of the competing factual narratives and how the way the facts are presented can determine how the Court responds to the proselytizing activity.

Title:
Kokkinakis and the Narratives of Proper and Improper Proselytizing
Article Type:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231156
Language:
English
Pages:
99–111
Keywords:
Kokkinakis; proselytizing; proselyting; proper proselyting; improper proselytism; European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR); Article 9
In:
Religion & Human Rights
In:
Volume 12: Issue 2-3
Publisher:
Brill
E-ISSN:
1871-0328
Print ISSN:
1871-031X
Subjects:
Human Rights, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Religion & Society, Social Sciences

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 199 46 3
Full Text Views 368 10 1
PDF Views & Downloads 217 17 3