The Islamic Veil and its Discontents: How Do They Undermine Gender Equality

in Religion & Human Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



The article addresses the use of notions of gender equality and non-discrimination in the discussions concerning the practice of Islamic veiling by the European Court of Human Rights as well as by French authorities in relation to the recent adoption of the law banning full face veils in public spaces in France. The author argues that the use of the rhetoric of gender equality without the required knowledge and understanding of the justifications for and discussions about this practice existing within Islam is in both cases very inadequate and leads to results opposite to those they intended to promote. Based on insights into the discussions of Muslims about the practice of veiling the author makes some proposals for a more adequate approach to this practice both from the point of view of women’s status as well as from the point of view of relationship between Islam and the West.

The Islamic Veil and its Discontents: How Do They Undermine Gender Equality

in Religion & Human Rights



  • 1

    Lizzy Davis‘French Woman Faces Fine for Tearing Niqab From Tourist’s Face’The Guardian15 October 2010 accessed 21 March 2011 or ‘Retired French Woman on Trial for Ripping Veil off a Muslim Woman’ France 24 15 October 2010 accessed 21 March 2011.

  • 22

    Law No. 2004–228 of 15 March 2004Journal Officiel de la République Française 17 March 2004 accessed 21 March 2011. This Law and the situation which led to its adoption was subject of many scholarly articles and books. See for example Dawn Lyon and Debora Spini ‘Unveiling the Headscarf Debate’ 12 Feminist Legal Studies (2004) pp. 333–345; Joan Wallach Scott Politics of the Veil (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2007); Ellen Wiles ‘Headscarves Human Rights and Harmonious Multicultural Society: Implications of the French Ban for Interpretations of Equality’ 41 Law and Society Review (2007) pp. 699–736; Adrien K. Wing and Monica Nigh Smith ‘Critical Race Feminism Lifts the Veil?: Muslim Women France and the Headscarf Ban’ 39 University of California at Davis Law Review (2005–2006) pp. 743–778; Bronwin Winter Hijab and the Republic: Uncovering the French Headscarf Debate (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press 2008).

  • 23

    Law No. 2010-1192 of 11 October 2010Journal Officiel de la République Française 12 October 2010 available at accessed 21 March 2011.

  • 24

    Decision No 2010-613 DC of 7 October 2010available at accessed 21 March 2011. The decision makes the law inapplicable only in places of worship open to the public (see para. 5 of the decision) since the application of the interdiction in places of worship would mean the impossibility for Muslim women wearing a face veil in mosques which would constitute a violation of religious freedom.

  • 37

    Angelique Chrisafis‘France’s Burqa Ban: Women are Effectively under House Arrest’The Guardian19 September 2011.

  • 42

    Baumeister Catanese and Vohssupra note 40 p. 243.

  • 43

    Seidlersupra note 41 p. 91 (references omitted).

  • 45

    Seidlersupra note 41 pp. 96–97 emphasis in original. This conclusion is made with reference to Susan Griffin Pornography and Silence (New York: Harper and Row 1981).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 91 81 2
Full Text Views 93 93 2
PDF Downloads 12 12 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0