Laws against the Denial of Historical Atrocities: A Human Rights Analysis

in Religion & Human Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This article ventures into the contentious question of whether the denial of historical atrocities is per se removed from the protection of freedom of expression and the related question if states may under international human rights law proactively combat, through criminal legislation (‘memory laws’), such types of extreme speech. In so doing, the article compares and contrasts approaches employed by the un Human Rights Committee that monitors the un International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with that of the European Court of Human Rights, regional watchdog of the European Convention on Human Rights. It is argued that both approaches are shifting—though not quite in converging directions. The article makes a case for a contextual rather than exclusively content-based approach. An approach in which the question of ‘likelihood of harm being done to the targeted group’ is guiding, best resonates with the necessity principle.

Laws against the Denial of Historical Atrocities: A Human Rights Analysis

in Religion & Human Rights




Commission of Human RightsMarais v. France Application No. 31159/96 admissibility decision of 24 June 1996; European Commission of Human Rights Friedrich Rebhandl v. Austria Application No. 24398/94 admissibility decision of 16 January 1996.


European Court of Human RightsHans Jorg Schimanek v. Austria Application No. 32307/96 admissibility decision of 1 February 2000.


European Commission of Human RightsF.P. v. Germany Application No. 19459 admissibility decision of 29 March 1993.


European Court of Human RightsHans-Jürgen Witzsch v. Germany [I] Application No. 41448/98 admissibility decision of 20 April 1999; European Court of Human Rights Hans-Jürgen Witzsch v. Germany [II] Application No. 7485/03 admissibility decision of 13 December 2005.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 89 89 2
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0