Hyppolite stresses his proximity to Merleau-Ponty, but the received interpretation of his “anti-humanist” reading of Hegel suggests a greater distance between their projects. This paper focuses on an under-explored dimension of their philosophical relationship. I argue that Merleau-Ponty and Hyppolite are both committed to formulating a mode of philosophical expression that can avoid the pitfalls of purely formal or literal and purely aesthetic or creative modes of expression. Merleau-Ponty’s attempt to navigate this dichotomy, I suggest, closely resembles Hyppolite’s interpretation of Hegel’s “speculative” mode of expression. In particular, his emphasis on the “mediating” character of philosophical language, which moves between descriptive and creative expression, suggests a debt to Hyppolite. This reading provides more evidence to think that Hyppolite cannot be straightforwardly understood as an anti-humanist or post-phenomenological thinker, and paves the way for a rapprochement between his work and the broader phenomenological tradition.
BiancoGiuseppe. 2013. “La dialectique bavarde et le cercle antropologique: Michel Foucault et Jean Hyppolite.” In Jean Hyppolite entre structure et existence edited by GiuseppeBianco107–132. Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm.
FinkEugen. 1981. “The Problem of Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology.” In A priori and World: European Contributions to Husserlian Phenomenology. Edited and translated by W.McKennaR. M.Harlan and L. E.Winters21–55. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
GuttingGary. 2013. “French Hegelianism and anti-Hegelianism in the 1960s.” In The Impact of IdealismVolume 1: Philosophy and the Natural Sciences. Edited by NicholasBoyleLizDisley and KarlAmeriks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merleau-PontyMaurice. 2011. Le monde sensible et le monde de l’expression. Cours au Collége de France Notes 1953. Texte établi et annoté par Emmanuel de Saint Aubert et Stefan Kristensen. Genève: MetisPresses.