The Ugly Psyche: Arendt and the Right to Opacity
In: Research in PhenomenologySearch for other papers by Anne O’Byrne in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Arendt was famously dismissive of the work of psychologists, claiming that they did nothing more than reveal the pervasive ugliness and monotony of the psyche. If we want to know who people are, she argued, we should observe what they do and say rather than delving into the turmoil of their inner lives; if we want to understand humanity, we would be better off reading Oedipus Rex than hearing about someone’s Oedipus complex. The rejection has a certain coherence in the context of her understanding of public life as the realm of appearance and opinion, but examining it through the specific question of ugliness complicates that understanding. While beauty invites us to contemplate the world and admire it, ugliness repels our attention and sows the seed of a worry that the world might not want to be known. Working with Eichmann in Jerusalem, The Life of the Mind: Thinking, the Kant lectures and a striking Denktagebuch entry in which she reacts with revulsion to Matisse’s Heads of Jeannette, I argue that Arendt’s response to the ugly psyche requires a re-examination of the sensus communis. If the psyche does not want to be known, and if not all points of view are open to imaginative occupation, the ideal and practice of enlarged mentality must reckon with a right to opacity.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
-
Arendt, Hannah. Denktagebuch. Edited by Ursula Ludz and Ingeborg Nordmann. 2 vols. München and Zürich: Piper, 2003.
-
Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York: Penguin, 1963.
-
Arendt, Hannah. Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2011.
-
Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Edited by Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 2014.
-
Arendt, Hannah. Rahel Varnhagen: The Life of a Jewess. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
-
Arendt, Hannah. The Life of the Mind. New York, 1971.
-
Beiner, Ronald. “Interpretive Essay: Hannah Arendt on Judging.” In Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1982.
-
Glissant, Édouard. Poetics of Relation. Translated by Betsy Wing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
-
Guyer, Paul. “Kant and the Purity of the Ugly.” Kant E-Prints 3, no. 3 (2004).
-
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Hackett Publishing, 1987.
-
Kuplen, Mojca. “Disgust and Ugliness: A Kantian Perspective.” Contemporary Aesthetics 9 (2011).
-
McBreen, Ellen. “Exhibition Review of Matisse: Painter as Sculptor.” Nineteenth Century Art Worldwide 8, no. 1 (Spring 2009).
-
Norberg, Jakob. “The Political Theory of the Cliché: Hannan Arendt Reading Adolf Eichmann.” Cultural Critique 76 (Fall 2010): 74–97.
-
Phillips, James. “Placing Ugliness in Kant’s Third Critique: A Reply to Paul Guyer.” Kant-Studien 102, no. 3 (2011): 385–395.
-
Sjöholm, Cecilia. Doing Aesthetics with Arendt: How to See Things. Columbia University Press, 2015.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 520 | 93 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 89 | 25 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 161 | 37 | 0 |
The Ugly Psyche: Arendt and the Right to Opacity
In: Research in PhenomenologySearch for other papers by Anne O’Byrne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Arendt was famously dismissive of the work of psychologists, claiming that they did nothing more than reveal the pervasive ugliness and monotony of the psyche. If we want to know who people are, she argued, we should observe what they do and say rather than delving into the turmoil of their inner lives; if we want to understand humanity, we would be better off reading Oedipus Rex than hearing about someone’s Oedipus complex. The rejection has a certain coherence in the context of her understanding of public life as the realm of appearance and opinion, but examining it through the specific question of ugliness complicates that understanding. While beauty invites us to contemplate the world and admire it, ugliness repels our attention and sows the seed of a worry that the world might not want to be known. Working with Eichmann in Jerusalem, The Life of the Mind: Thinking, the Kant lectures and a striking Denktagebuch entry in which she reacts with revulsion to Matisse’s Heads of Jeannette, I argue that Arendt’s response to the ugly psyche requires a re-examination of the sensus communis. If the psyche does not want to be known, and if not all points of view are open to imaginative occupation, the ideal and practice of enlarged mentality must reckon with a right to opacity.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 520 | 93 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 89 | 25 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 161 | 37 | 0 |
