My goal is threefold. First, building on the basis of Husserl’s phenomenology of the imagination, I will argue that phantasy is a specific type of intentional experience, which intends its objects as neutralized presentifications (neutralisierte Vergegenwärtigungen). Second, I will turn to dreams and argue that non-lucid dreams are unconscious phantasies, which cannot be conceived in the above-mentioned way. This realization will bring us to the third task. When recognized as the most extreme form of unconscious phantasy, dreams compel us to raise anew the fundamental question: what is the nature of phantasy experience? According to the perspective I will here develop, phantasy is a specific field of experience that lies between two extremes: the fully translucent mode of the as if consciousness and the thoroughly opaque mode of absorption (Versunkenheit). Most of our phantasies, both conscious and unconscious, voluntary and involuntary, are lived somewhere between these two extremes.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bernet, Rudolf. 2002. “Unconscious consciousness in Husserl and Freud.” Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 1(3):327–351.
Borges, Jorge Luis. 1984. “Nightmares.” In: Seven Nights. Weinberger, E. (trans.). New York: New Directions Books, 24–35.
Brentano, Franz. 1988. Grundzüge der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Conrad, Theodor. 1968. Zur Wesenslehre des psychischen Lebens und Erlebens. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
De Warren, Nicolas. 2012. “The Third Life of Subjectivity: Towards a Phenomenology of Dreaming.” In: Breeur, R. and Melle, U. (eds.), Life, Subjectivity and Art: Essays in Honor of Rudolf Bernet. Dordrecht: Springer, 457–479.
Fink, Eugen. 1966. Vergegenwärtigung und Bild. In: Fink, E. Studien zur Phänomenologie 1930–1939. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hering, Jean. 1946. “La répresentation et le rêve.” Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuse 27: 193–206.
Hering, Jean. 1947. “Concerning Image, Idea, and Dream.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8: 188–205.
Hering, Jean. 1959. “Quelques thémes d’une phénoménologie du rêve.” In: For Roman Ingarden. Nine Essays in Phenomenology, ed. by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, 75–89. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Schuhmann, K. (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. English translation: Husserl, E. 1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Trans. F. Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (Quoted as Hua III/1).
Husserl, Edmund. 1980. Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Marbach, E. (ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nihjoff Publishers. English translation: Husserl, E. 2005. Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). Brough, J. B. (trans.), Dordrecht: Springer. (Quoted as Hua XXIII).
Husserl, Edmund. 1993. Briefwechsel. Schuhmann, K. and Schuhmann, E. (eds.). Vol. 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Husserl, Edmund. 2008. Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). Sowa, R. (ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. (Quoted as Hua XXXIX).
Husserl, Edmund. 2014. Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie: Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik (Texte aus dem Nachlass 1908–1937). Dordrecht: Springer. (Quoted as XLII).
Lanfredini, Roberta. “The Unconscious in Phenomenology.” In Stanghellini, G. et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 316–324.
Legrand, Dorothée, and Trigg, Dylan (eds.). 2017. Unconsciousness Between Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lohmar, Dieter, and Brudzinska, Jagna (eds.). 2012. Founding Psychoanalysis Phenomenologically. Dordrecht: Springer.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2007. The Fall of Sleep. Mandell, C. (trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2006. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Weber, J. (trans.). London and New York: Routledge.
Sepp, Hans Rainer. 2010. “The Dream.” In Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics. Embree, L. and Sepp, H.R. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, 75–80.
Thompson, Evan. 2015. Waking, Dreaming, Being: Self and Consciousness in Neuroscience, Meditation, and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1678 | 289 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 136 | 24 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 317 | 50 | 4 |
My goal is threefold. First, building on the basis of Husserl’s phenomenology of the imagination, I will argue that phantasy is a specific type of intentional experience, which intends its objects as neutralized presentifications (neutralisierte Vergegenwärtigungen). Second, I will turn to dreams and argue that non-lucid dreams are unconscious phantasies, which cannot be conceived in the above-mentioned way. This realization will bring us to the third task. When recognized as the most extreme form of unconscious phantasy, dreams compel us to raise anew the fundamental question: what is the nature of phantasy experience? According to the perspective I will here develop, phantasy is a specific field of experience that lies between two extremes: the fully translucent mode of the as if consciousness and the thoroughly opaque mode of absorption (Versunkenheit). Most of our phantasies, both conscious and unconscious, voluntary and involuntary, are lived somewhere between these two extremes.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1678 | 289 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 136 | 24 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 317 | 50 | 4 |