The Impossible Possibility of Community
In: Research in PhenomenologySearch for other papers by Jacob Rogozinski in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The author analyzes the deconstruction of the community carried out by Jean-Luc Nancy. For Nancy, the aim of the community has been historically accomplished by its self-destruction in the “work of death” of totalitarianism. This does not lead him to renounce the notion of community, like Derrida, but to highlight its paradoxical (im-)possibility. This is why Nancy proposes the concept of a “community without community” which would retain only the cum of the communitas, the with of being-with or being in-common. The author shows that this approach is subject to aporias. Indeed, Nancy wants to base being-with on an ontology of bodily touch. As he considers touching as distancing, displacement, he fails to understand the cum, that is to say the possibility of constituting a community.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 360 | 212 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 106 | 11 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 237 | 30 | 7 |
The Impossible Possibility of Community
In: Research in PhenomenologySearch for other papers by Jacob Rogozinski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The author analyzes the deconstruction of the community carried out by Jean-Luc Nancy. For Nancy, the aim of the community has been historically accomplished by its self-destruction in the “work of death” of totalitarianism. This does not lead him to renounce the notion of community, like Derrida, but to highlight its paradoxical (im-)possibility. This is why Nancy proposes the concept of a “community without community” which would retain only the cum of the communitas, the with of being-with or being in-common. The author shows that this approach is subject to aporias. Indeed, Nancy wants to base being-with on an ontology of bodily touch. As he considers touching as distancing, displacement, he fails to understand the cum, that is to say the possibility of constituting a community.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 360 | 212 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 106 | 11 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 237 | 30 | 7 |
