This essay discusses the “cosmological” issue of the End in the second part of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. At stake is the problem of thinking, reflectively and according to the principle of nature’s formal purposiveness, the end of life and the end of Nature as a whole. The claim is that Kant’s transcendental investigation, generally oriented to the question of “origin,” labors to block out the issue of the End. This is particularly remarkable and indeed problematic in the Critique of Judgment, which is concerned thematically with the topic of life and living nature.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 252 | 252 | 63 |
Full Text Views | 11 | 11 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 25 | 25 | 3 |
This essay discusses the “cosmological” issue of the End in the second part of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. At stake is the problem of thinking, reflectively and according to the principle of nature’s formal purposiveness, the end of life and the end of Nature as a whole. The claim is that Kant’s transcendental investigation, generally oriented to the question of “origin,” labors to block out the issue of the End. This is particularly remarkable and indeed problematic in the Critique of Judgment, which is concerned thematically with the topic of life and living nature.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 252 | 252 | 63 |
Full Text Views | 11 | 11 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 25 | 25 | 3 |