Nothingness and Being A Schelerian Comment
In: Research in PhenomenologySearch for other papers by Manfred Frings in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Heidegger's central question, "What is the meaning of Being?", is intertwined with the concept of nothingness, as it has been since Pre-Socratic thought. I wish to articulate "nothingness" by restricting myself to three aspects of this concept given by Scheler: 1.) the meanings with which the word "nothing" is used, 2.) the moral implication belonging to the question of "nothing," and 3.) the concept of reality. It is the purpose of this selection of Schelerian thought to furnish some distinctions to be made in Heidegger's central position.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 359 | 46 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 91 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 1 | 0 |
Nothingness and Being A Schelerian Comment
In: Research in PhenomenologySearch for other papers by Manfred Frings in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Heidegger's central question, "What is the meaning of Being?", is intertwined with the concept of nothingness, as it has been since Pre-Socratic thought. I wish to articulate "nothingness" by restricting myself to three aspects of this concept given by Scheler: 1.) the meanings with which the word "nothing" is used, 2.) the moral implication belonging to the question of "nothing," and 3.) the concept of reality. It is the purpose of this selection of Schelerian thought to furnish some distinctions to be made in Heidegger's central position.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 359 | 46 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 91 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 1 | 0 |
