Integration of the Third-Person Effect and Uses and Gratifications: A Study of Negative News Media Coverage of Islam in Kuwait
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureSearch for other papers by Ali Alkandari in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Edward Frederick in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ahmad Al-Shallal in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ali A Dashti in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Husain A Murad in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The Third Person Effect (tpe) hypothesis postulates that individuals are likely to estimate that negative news media will have greater effects on others than on themselves. This study uses tpe to explore whether an individual’s religious predispositions and use of religious media influences the impact of negative news coverage on their perceptions of Islam. Furthermore, it tests whether religious predispositions, an individual’s use of religious media, and tpe influence a person’s support for censorship of negative media coverage of Islam. The researchers constructed two different scenarios in which differential estimates were used to evaluate the effect of tpe. The first scenario involved participants comparing the impact of negative news of Islam on others in society (close others) with the impact on themselves. In the second scenario, they compared the impact of negative news of Islam on Westerners (distant others) with the impact on themselves. Data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire administered to 652 Kuwaiti respondents. Results indicate that respondents perceive themselves to be less influenced by negative coverage of Islam than others in their society and Westerners. Religious predisposition and the “individual” use of religious media predicted a tpe contrast between the respondents and Westerners. Finally, religious predispositions, religious media use, and tpe contrasts between the respondents and Westerners predicted support for media censorship.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abelman, R. (1987). Religious Television Uses and Gratifications. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31 (3), pp. 293–307.
-
Al-Kandari, A. (2011). Predicting the Clash of Civilizations: The Use and Impact of Religious Media in Kuwait. Journal of Media and Religion, 10 (4), pp. 206–223.
-
Aly, A. (2007). Australian Muslim Responses to the Media Discourse on Terrorism: Pursuing Public Spheres in a Secular State. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42 (1), pp. 27–40.
-
Arab Barometer. (2022). 2022 Survey. Retrieved August 28, 2023, from https://www.arabbarometer.org/.
-
Ayatollahy, H. (2008). The Role of Media in the Threats and Opportunities of Globalization for Religion. Journal of Media and Religion, 7 (1–2), pp. 34–44.
-
Banning, S. A. (2007). Factors Affecting the Marketing of a Public Safety Message: The Third-Person Effect and Uses and Gratifications Theory in Public Reaction to a Crime Reduction Program. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15 (1), pp. 1–18.
-
Bentley, J. M. (2012). A Uses and Gratifications Study of Contemporary Christian Radio Web sites. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 19 (1), pp. 2–16.
-
Brubaker, P. J. & Haigh, M. M. (2017). The Religious Facebook Experience: Uses and Gratifications of Faith-Based Content. Social Media+ Society, 3 (2), pp. 1–11..
-
cia Factbook. (2022). Kuwait. Retrieved July 23, 2022, from https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/kuwait/.
-
Cooper, R. (1997). Japanese Communication Research: The Emphasis on Macro Theories of Media in an Information Based Environment. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41 (2), pp. 284–288.
-
Davison, W. P. (1983). The Third-Person Effect in Communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47 (1), pp. 1–15.
-
Drumheller, K. (2005). Millennial Dogma: A Fantasy Theme Analysis of the Millennial Generation’s Uses and Gratifications of Religious Content Media. Journal of Communication & Religion, 28 (1), pp. 47–70.
-
Duck, J. M. & Mullin, B. A. (1995). The Perceived Impact of the Mass Media: Reconsidering the Third Person Effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25 (1), pp. 77–93.
-
Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1995). Me, Us and Them: Political Identification and the Third-Person Effect in the 1993 Australian Federal Election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25 (2), pp. 195–215.
-
El-Farra, N. (1996). Arabs and the Media. Journal of Media Psychology, 1 (2), pp. 1–7. Retrieved July 20, 2022, from https://www.academia.edu/download/37620898/7Arabs.pdf.
-
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and Social Identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 (1), pp. 161–186.
-
Eveland Jr, W. P., Nathanson, A. I., Detenber, B. H., & McLeod, D. M. (1999). Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary: Perceived Likelihood of Exposure and the Third-Person Perception. Communication Research, 26 (3), pp. 275–302.
-
Ewart, J., Cherney, A., & Murphy, K. (2017). News Media Coverage of Islam and Muslims in Australia: An Opinion Survey among Australian Muslims. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 37 (2), pp. 147–163.
-
Frindte, W., Boehnke, K., Kreikenbom, H., & Wagner, W. (2012). Life Worlds of Young Muslims in Germany. Berlin, Germany: Bundesministerium des Inneren.
-
Giner-Sorolla, R. & Chaiken, S. (1994). The Causes of Hostile Media Judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30 (2), pp. 165–180.
-
Golan, G. (2002). Religiosity and the Third-Person Effect. Journal of Media and Religion, 1 (2), pp. 105–120.
-
Gunther, A. C. & Hwa, A. P. (1996). Public Perceptions of Television Influence and Opinions about Censorship in Singapore. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8 (3), pp. 248–265.
-
Hansen, G. J. & Kim, H. (2011). Is the Media Biased Against Me? A Meta-Analysis of the Hostile Media Effect Research. Communication Research Reports, 28 (2), pp. 169–179.
-
Hartmann, T. & Tanis, M. (2013). Examining the Hostile Media Effect as an Intergroup Phenomenon: The Role of Ingroup Identification and Status. Journal of Communication, 63 (3), pp. 535–555.
-
Heeren, J. & Zick, A. (2014). Misleading Images: Results from Interviews with Media Producers, Journalists and Consumers on Muslims and Islam in Germany. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 7 (1), pp. 46–63.
-
Hense, R. & Wright, C. (1992). The Development of the Attitudes toward Censorship Questionnaire 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (21), pp. 1666–1675.
-
Hoorens, V. & Ruiter, S. (1996). The Optimal Impact Phenomenon: Beyond the Third Person Effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26 (4), pp. 599–610.
-
Hosseini, S. H. (2008). Religion and Media, Religious Media, or Media Religion: Theoretical Studies. Journal of Media and Religion, 7 (1–2), pp. 56–69.
-
Kamalipour, Y. R. (1997). The US Media and the Middle East: Image and Perception. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.
-
Kruckeberg, D. (1996). A Global Perspective on Public Relations Ethics: The Middle East. Public Relations Review, 22 (2), pp. 181–189.
-
McLeod, D. M., Eveland Jr, W. P., & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics: An Analysis of the Third-Person Effect. Communication Research, 24 (2), 153–174.
-
Neumann, K., Arendt, F., & Baugut, P. (2018). News and Islamist Radicalization Processes: Investigating Muslims’ Perceptions of Negative News Coverage of Islam. Mass Communication and Society, 21 (4), pp. 498–523.
-
Neuwirth, K. & Frederick, E. (2002). Extending the Framework of Third, First and Second Person Effects. Mass Communication & Society, 5 (2), pp. 113–140.
-
Nor Afiah, M., Rahmah, M. A., Salmiah, M. S. & Fazilah, I. (2012). Religious Personality and Smoking among Two Students in Rural Schools in Malacca, Malaysia. iiumMedical Journal Malaysia, 11 (2), pp. 1–6.
-
Paul, B., Salwen, M. B. & Dupagne, M. (2000). The Third-Person Effect: A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3 (1), pp. 57–85.
-
Perloff, R. (1999). The Third Person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis. Media Psychology, 1 (4), pp. 353–378.
-
Perloff, R. M. (2002). The Third-Person Effect. In Media Effects (pp. 499–516). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
-
Perreault, G. (2014). “Islam is Everywhere”: Pre-Arab Spring Coverage of Islam in the English Egyptian Press. Journal of Media and Religion, 13 (2), pp. 97–113.
-
Pew Research Center (2021). Muslims are a Growing Presence in U.S., but Still Face Negative Views from the Public. Retrieved July 14, 2023, from https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/09/01/muslims-are-a-growing-presence-in-u-s-but-still-face-negative-views-from-the-public/.
-
Powell, K. A. (2011). Framing Islam: An Analysis of U.S. Media Coverage of Terrorism since 9/11. Communication Studies, 62 (1), pp. 90–112.
-
Ratcliff, A. J., McCarty, J., & Ritter, M. (2017). Religion and New Media: A Uses and Gratifications Approach. Journal of Media and Religion, 16 (1), pp. 15–26.
-
Retpitasari, E. & Oktavia, N. A. (2020). Preference of Social Media Usage in Teenagers Religion. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 31 (1), pp. 17–34.
-
Richter, C. & Kozman, C. (2021). Arab Media Systems. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
-
Rojas, H., Shah, D. V. & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the Good of Others: Censorship and the Third-Person Effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8 (2), pp. 163–186.
-
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication & Society, 3 (1), pp. 3–37.
-
Saeed, A. (2007). Media, Racism and Islamophobia: The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media. Sociology Compass, 1 (2), pp. 443–462.
-
Salwen, M. B. & Dupagne, M. (1999). The Third-Person Effect: Perceptions of the Media’s Influence and Immoral Consequences. Communication Research, 26 (5), pp. 523–549.
-
Shah, D. V., Faber, R. J. & Youn, S. (1999). Susceptibility and Severity: Perceptual Dimensions Underlying the Third-Person Effect. Communication Research, 26 (2), pp. 240–267.
-
Shahba, M. & Hammam, M. (2005). Iqra: Channel with a Mission. Transnational Broadcasting Studies, 14, pp. 1–10. Retrieved June 25, 2023, from https://www.arabmediasociety.com/iqra-channel-with-a-mission/.
-
Shaheen, J. G. (1984). The Arab tv. Ohio: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
-
Simon, B., Reichert, F., & Grabow, O. (2013). When Dual Identity Becomes a Liability: Identity and Political Radicalism among Migrants. Psychological Science, 24 (3), pp. 251–257.
-
Stout, D. A. & Buddenbaum, J. M. (2008). Approaches to the Study of Media and Religion: Notes from the Editors of the Journal of Media and Religion with Recommendations for Future Research. Religion, 38 (3), pp. 226–232.
-
Tsfati, Y. (2007). Hostile Media Perceptions, Presumed Media Influence and Minority Alienation: The Case of Arabs in Israel. Journal of Communication, 57 (4), pp. 632–651.
-
Wan, F. & Youn, S. (2004). Motivations to Regulate Online Gambling and Violent Game Sites: An Account of the Third-Person Effect. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5 (1), pp. 46–59.
-
Weaver, S. (2010). Liquid Racism and the Danish Prophet Muhammad Cartoons. Current Sociology, 58 (5), pp. 675–692.
-
White, H. (1986). Majorities for Censorship. Library Journal, 3 (12), pp. 31–38. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ339172.
-
Woods, R. H., Skarritt-Williams, K., Chan, C., Waters, K., & Agodzo, D. (2016). Motivations for Reading the Left Behind Book Series: A Uses and Gratifications Analysis. Journal of Media and Religion, 15 (2), pp. 63–77.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 243 | 243 | 207 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 7 | 4 |
Integration of the Third-Person Effect and Uses and Gratifications: A Study of Negative News Media Coverage of Islam in Kuwait
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureSearch for other papers by Ali Alkandari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Edward Frederick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmad Al-Shallal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ali A Dashti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Husain A Murad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The Third Person Effect (tpe) hypothesis postulates that individuals are likely to estimate that negative news media will have greater effects on others than on themselves. This study uses tpe to explore whether an individual’s religious predispositions and use of religious media influences the impact of negative news coverage on their perceptions of Islam. Furthermore, it tests whether religious predispositions, an individual’s use of religious media, and tpe influence a person’s support for censorship of negative media coverage of Islam. The researchers constructed two different scenarios in which differential estimates were used to evaluate the effect of tpe. The first scenario involved participants comparing the impact of negative news of Islam on others in society (close others) with the impact on themselves. In the second scenario, they compared the impact of negative news of Islam on Westerners (distant others) with the impact on themselves. Data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire administered to 652 Kuwaiti respondents. Results indicate that respondents perceive themselves to be less influenced by negative coverage of Islam than others in their society and Westerners. Religious predisposition and the “individual” use of religious media predicted a tpe contrast between the respondents and Westerners. Finally, religious predispositions, religious media use, and tpe contrasts between the respondents and Westerners predicted support for media censorship.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 243 | 243 | 207 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 7 | 4 |
