A content analysis was conducted of televangelists’ Facebook and Twitter pages. Tweets and Facebook posts were coded for a period of two weeks. The posts/tweets were coded for a variety of categories including: dialogic features, content of the post, and theme. Televangelists tweet more often than they post to Facebook. Findings indicate most televangelists included links to their websites, an email address, links to other forms of social media, phone numbers, and additional content about their organizations. Only a third of the posts/tweets included a reference to the Lord/Jesus/Holy Spirit, and less than 90 percent of posts included specific scripture or Bible verses. Televangelists post different types of content on Facebook compared to Twitter. For example, it is more common for Christian leaders to include the terms Lord/God/Jesus in a tweet than a Facebook post. Tweets are more likely to contain an uplifting or inspirational message, promote an offer for a book/dvd produced by the televangelist, and include a stock photo with a message than Facebook posts.
boydd. (2011). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics and Implications. In PapacharissiZ. ed. A Networked Self: Identity Community and Culture on Social Network Sites
. New York ny: Routledge pp. 39–58.
BreenL.D. (2015). Newsmax’s Top 100 Christian leaders in America. Newsmax [online] April 20. Available at: http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/newsmax-top-100-Christian/2015/ 04/20/id/639492 [Retrieved 01 January 2018].
BroomG.CaseyS. & RitcheyJ. (2000). Toward a Concept and Theory of Organization-public Relationships: An Update. In LedinghamJ.A. & BruningS.D. eds. Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations
. Hillsdale nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates pp. 3–21.
ByrdS. (2012). Hi Fans! Tell Us Your Story!: Incorporating a Stewardship-based Social Media Strategy to Maintain Brand Reputation During a Crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal17(3) pp. 241–254.
EhlingW.P. (1992). Estimating the Value of Public Relations and Communication to an Organization. In GrunigJ.E.DozierD.M.EhlingW.P.GrunigL.A.RepperF.C. & WhiteJ. eds. Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management Hillsdale nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 617–638.
Fischer-NielsenP. (2012). Pastors on the Internet: Online Responses to Secularization. In CheongP.H.Fischer-NielsenP.GelfgrenS. & EssC. eds. Digital Religion Social Media and Culture: Perspectives Practices and Futures
. New York ny: Peter Lang Publishing Group pp. 115–130.
GreenwoodS.PerrinA. & DugganM. (2016 November 11). Social Media Update 2016: Facebook Usage and Engagement is on the Rise, While Adoption of Other Platforms Holds Steady. [online] Available at:http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/ [Accessed 01 January 2018].
HellandC. (2012). Scholar’s Top 5: Christopher Helland on Online Religion and Religion Online. Network for New Media Religion and Digital Culture Studies [online] May 14. Available at: http://digitalreligion.tamu.edu/blog/mon-051420121132/scholar%E2%80%99s-top-5-christopher-helland-online-religion-and-religion online [Accessed 01 January 2018].
HolmbergK.BastubackaJ. & ThelwallM. (2016). @God Please Open Your Fridge! Twitter Messages to @God in Content Analysis: Hopes, Humor, Spirituality, and Profanities. Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture5(2) pp. 339–355.
OwensS. (2012). Why Religious Facebook Pages See More Engagement Than Bieber, Gaga, Obama: Six of the 20 Most-engaged Pages are Religiously Affiliated? Why?’ u.s.
News & World Report [online] December 19.
Available at:https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/12/19/why-religious-facebook-pages-see-more-engagement-than-bieber-gaga-and-obama. [Accessed 01 January 2018].
Pew Research Center: Religion & Public Life. (2015). America’s Changing Religious Landscape. Pew Research Center [online] May 12. Available at:http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/. [Accessed 01 January 2018].
WarrenH. (2001). Televangelism. In SmelserN. & BaltesP. eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier pp. 15565–15568. Available at:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/referenceworks/9780080430768 [Accessed 01 January 2018].
WirtzJ.G.NgondoP.S. & PoeP. (2013). Talking With Us or At Us: How u.s. Religious Denominations Use Organizational Web Sites to Communicate With Their Constituents. Journal of Media and Religion12(4) pp. 165–180.