The broadening of the concept of religion from a substantive, anthropological definition to a more cultural, functional definition has enabled expansion of the study of media, technology and religion into a much wider field of social phenomena. It has Ben argued that this expansion has been so broad and unbounded that the more appropriate question in this field of study is no longer “What is religion?”, but “What isn’t religion?” This paper contends that the time is ripe to set aside a dualistic lens of religion and secular and look instead at embodie human reality as incorporating not only material, empirical and instrumental characteristics but also tanscendental, metaphysical and non-empirical characteristics that also need to be theorised in secular terms.
LynchG. (2007a). What is This ‘Religion’ in the Study of Religion and Popular Culture. In LynchG. ed. Between Sacred and Profane: Researching Religion and Popular Culture
London: I.B.Tauris & Co pp. 125–142.
WangaD.J.J.RaobH.KorczykowskibM.WinteringN.PlutabJ.KhalsaD.S. & NewbergA.B. (2011). Cerebral Blood Flow Changes Associated with Different Meditation Practices and Perceived Depth of Meditation. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging191 pp. 60–67.
YadenD.B.IwryJ.SlackK.J.EiechstaedtJ.C.ZhaoY.VaillantG.E. & NewbergA.B. (2016). The Overview Effect: Awe and Self-transcendent Experience in Space Flight. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research and Practice3(1) pp. 1–11.