Zakir Naik and His Audiences: A Case Study of Srinagar, Kashmir

in Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Most literature on Mumbai-based Muslim tele-Islamicist Zakir Naik offers an organizational, biographical and ideological profile. This approach has concealed the symbolic significance attached to Naik by his audiences. This paper attempts to explore not only who and what Naik is, but how and where he is located. By incorporating ethnographic and cultural studies approaches, this paper offers fresh insight into Naik and his methods of communicating religion. Taking Srinagar, a city in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, as an ethnographic site, this paper explores how Muslim individuals or groups interpret Naik in relation to their religious worldviews. The articulation of Islam by Zakir Naik through media platforms such as television and social media has contributed to a religious trend in Kashmir, in which people have discovered new ways to think about themselves and to participate in discourses about religion that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago.

Zakir Naik and His Audiences: A Case Study of Srinagar, Kashmir

in Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture



Ali M. (2008). Dr Zakir Naik and the controversy. [Online] 12 November. Available from: [Accessed 1 August 2013].

Arabic Al-Jazeera (2016). Dr Zakir Naik. Belahodood.English copy. YouTube [Online] 18 July. Available from: [Accessed 13 May 2018].

Azam S. (2016). How Zakir Naik Appropriated Liberalism’s Flaws—and Won. Economic and Political Weekly Vol 51(32). [Online] Available from:—and-won.html [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Bennett C. (1996). The Legacy of Karl Gottlieb Pfander. International Bulletin of Mission Research20(2) pp. 7681.

Bhat T. (2017). Kashmir’s First Online Radio for Halal Entertainmet Launched. The Week [Online] 24 January. Available from: [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Carey J. W. (1967). Harold Adams Innis and Marshall McLuhan. The Antioch Review27(1) pp. 539.

Dehlvi G. (2016). Zakir Naik’s Islamic International School: Here’s What’s Part of its Salafi Curriculum. FirstPost [Online] 19 August. Available from: [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Dorman H.G. (1948). Toward Understanding Islam: Contemporary Apologetic of Islam and Missionary Policy. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Eisenlohr P. (2016). Reconsidering Mediatization of Religion: Islamic Televangelism in India. Media Culture & Society39(6) pp. 869884.

Furnham A. (1988). Lay Theories: Everyday Understandings of Problems in the Social Sciences. London: Whurr.

Hansen T. B. (2001). Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hansen T. B. & Stepputat F. (2001). States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham: Duke University Press.

Hirsch E. and Silverstone R. eds. (1992). Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge.

Hjarvard S. (2011). The Mediatization of Religion: Theorizing Religion, Media and Social Change. Culture and Religion12 (2) pp. 119135.

Hoover S. M. (2006): Religion in the Media Age. London: Routledge.

Hubbard B. (2015). Saudi Award Goes to Muslim Televangelist Who Harshly Criticizes U.S. New York Times [Online] 02 March. Available from: October 7 2016 from [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Islamic Fraternity (n.d.). About. Facebook [Online] n.d. Available from: [Accessed 13 May 2018].

Larkin B. (2008). Ahmed Deedat and the Form of Islamic Evangelism. Social Text26(3) pp. 101121.

Mehta N. (2008). Television in India: Satellites Politics and Cultural Change. Abingdon: Routledge.

Naik Z. (2010). Who is Ahmed Deedat-Zakir Naik. YouTube [Online] 10 August. Available from: [Accessed 13 May 2018].

Naik Z. (2013). Islamic Smartphone - Ready for Launch !! Facebook [Online] 04 August. Available from: [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Naik Z. (2014). Concept of God in World Major Religion by Dr Zakir Naik. YouTube [Online] 10 June. Available from: [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Rajagopal A. (2001). Politics after Television: Religious Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Indian Public. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Registrar General and Census Commissioner (2011). Provisional Population Totals. [Online] Available from: [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Reyaz M. (2016). Why Even Islamic Clerics Love to Hate Zakir Naik. [Online] 10 August. Available from: [Accessed 1 August 2017].

Sadouni S. (2013). Ahmed Deedat, Internationalisation, and Transformations of Islamic Polemic. Journal of Religion in Africa43(1) pp. 5373.

Schirrmacher C. (1997). The Influence of German Biblical Criticism on Muslim Apologetics in the 19th Century. Contra Mundum [Online] Available from: [Accessed 1 May 2018].

TheReligiousLecture. (2016). Dr. Zakir Naik | Exclusive Interview. Al Jazeera [Online] 15 July. Available from: [Accessed 07 September 2016].

Wagner R. (2012). You are What You Install: Religious Authenticity and Identity in Mobile Apps. In: Campbell H. ed. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Abingdon: Routledge199206.

Warner M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Quarterly Journal of Speech88 (4) pp. 413425.

Wajihuddin M. (2016). In ’07, Deoband had Issued Fatwa Against Zakir Naik. Times of India [Online] 10 July. Available from: [Accessed 20 September 2016].


  • View in gallery

    Malaysian Muslim preacher Shaykh Hussain Yee with Muhammad Amir and Mirwaiz Umar Farooq at Jama Masjid, Srinagar.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 130 130 50
Full Text Views 37 37 26
PDF Downloads 5 5 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0