“No More Apologies”: Violence as a Trigger for Public Controversy over Islam in the Digital Public Sphere
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureSearch for other papers by Johanna Sumiala in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Anu A. Harju in
Current site
Google Scholar
This article investigates how violence associated with religion, here namely Islam, functions as a trigger for public controversy in the Turku stabbings that took place in Finland in 2017. We begin by outlining the Lyotard-Habermas debate on controversy and compound this with current research on the digital public sphere. We combine cartography of controversy with digital media ethnography as methods of collecting data and discourse analysis for analysing the material. We investigate how the controversy triggered by violence is constructed around Islam in the public sphere of Twitter. We identify three discursive strategies connecting violence and Islam in the debates around the Turku stabbings: scapegoating, essentialisation, and racialisation. These respectively illustrate debates regarding blame for terrorism, the nature of Islam, and racialisation of terrorist violence and the Muslim Other. To conclude, we reflect on the ways in which the digital public sphere impacts Habermasian consensus- and Lyotardian dissensus-oriented argumentation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Awan I. (2014). Islamophobia and Twitter: A Typology of Online Hate Against Muslims on Social Media. Policy & Internet 6 (2), pp. 133–150.
-
Bakardjieva M. (2011). The Internet in Everyday life: Exploring the Tenets and Contributions of Diverse Approaches. In: Consalvo M. and Ess C. , eds., The Handbook of Internet Studies, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 59–83.
-
Beaman L.G. (2013). The Will to Religion: Obligatory Religious Citizenship. Critical Research on Religion 1 (2), pp. 141–157.
-
Bozdag E. (2013). Bias in Algorithmic Filtering and Personalization. Ethics and Information Technology 15 (3), pp. 209–227.
-
Britton J. (2018). Muslim Men, Racialised Masculinities and Personal Life. Sociology, pp. 1–16.
-
Buonfino A. (2004). Between Unity and Plurality: The Politicization and Securitization of the Discourse of Immigration in Europe. New Political Science 26 (1), pp. 23–49.
-
Castells M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The Annals of the American Academy 616 (1), pp. 78–93.
-
Cottle S. (2006). Mediatized Conflict: Understanding Media and Conflicts in the Contemporary World. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
-
Crawford K. (2010). News to Me: Twitter and the Personal Networking of News. In: Meikle G. and Redden G. , eds., News Online: Transformations and Continuities, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 135–156.
-
Dunn K.M. , Klocker N. , and Salabay T. (2007). Contemporary Racism and Islamophobia in Australia. Ethnicities 7 (4), pp. 564–589.
-
Fairfield P. (1994). Habermas, Lyotard and Political Discourse. Reason Papers: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Normative Studies 19, pp. 58–80. Retrieved from: https://reasonpapers.com/pdf/19/rp_19_5.pdf.
-
Fraser N. (2014). Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World. In: Nash K. , ed., Transnationalizing the Public Sphere, Cambridge, UK: Polity, pp. 8–43.
-
Gripsrud J. , and Moe H. (2010). Introduction: The Digital Public Sphere. Challenges for Media Policy. In: Gripsrud J. and Moe H. , eds., The Digital Public Sphere. Challenges for Media Policy, Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 9–19.
-
Gunning J. , and Jackson R. (2011). What’s So ‘Religious’ About ‘Religious Terrorism’? Critical Studies on Terrorism 4 (3), pp. 369–388.
-
Habermas J. (1962/1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: The mit Press.
-
Hine C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet. Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
-
Hülsse R. , and Spencer A. (2008). The Metaphor of Terror: Terrorism Studies and the Constructivist Turn. Security Dialogue 39 (6), pp. 571–592.
-
Jiwani Y. (2006). Discourses of Denial: Mediations of Race, Gender, and Violence. Vancouver: ubc Press.
-
Jones R.H. , Chik A. , and Hafner C.A. (2015). Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age . London: Routledge.
-
Juergensmeyer M. (2017). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. 4th ed. Oakland, California. University of California Press.
-
Kilp A. (2011). Religion in the Construction of the Cultural ‘Self’ and ‘Other’. In: Saumets A. and Kilp A. , eds., Extremism Within and Around Us, endc Proceedings 2011, Vol 14, Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, pp. 197–222. Retrieved from: https://www.ksk.edu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/KVUOA_Toimetised_14_9_alar_kilp.pdf.
-
Latour B. (2005). Re-assembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Lyotard J.-F . (1979/1984). The Postmodern Condition. A Report on Knowledge . Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
-
Lundby K. (2018) Introduction: Religion and Media in Cultural Conflicts. In: Lundby K. , ed., Contesting Religion: The Media Dynamics of Cultural Conflicts in Scandinavia. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 3–9.
-
Lähdesmäki T. (2012). Rhetoric of Unity and Cultural Diversity in the Making of European Cultural Identity. International Journal of Cultural Policy 18 (1), pp. 59–75.
-
Malkki L. and Sallamaa D. (2018). To Call or Not to Call It Terrorism: Public Debate on Ideologically-Motivated Acts of Violence in Finland, 1991–2015. Terrorism and Political Violence.
-
Markham A. (2017). Ethnography in the Digital Internet Era: From Fields to Flow, Descriptions to Interventions. In: Denzin N. and Lincoln Y. , eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed. London: Sage, pp. 650–668.
-
Marres N. (2015). Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method. Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (5), pp. 655–686: doi:10.1177/0162243915574602.
-
Morris T. (2014). Networking Vehement Frames: Neo-Nazi and Violent Jihadi Demagoguery. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 6 (3), pp. 163–182.
-
Mouffe C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
-
Mouffe C. (2005). On the Political. London: Routledge.
-
Murthy D. (2018). Twitter: Social Communication in the Twitter Age. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
-
Papacharissi Z. (2010) A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
-
Powell K.A. (2011). Framing Islam: An Analysis of U.S. Media Coverage of Terrorism Since 9/11. Communication Studies 62 (1), pp. 90–112.
-
Rasmussen T. (2016). The Internet Soapbox: Perspective on a Changing Public Sphere. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Creative Commons License. Retrieved from: https://www.idunn.no/the-internet-soapbox.
-
Rathnayake C. and Suthers D.D. (2018). Twitter Issue Response Hashtags as Affordances for Momentary Connectedness. Social Media + Society 4 (3). doi:10.1177/2056305118784780.
-
Rorty R. (1985). Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity. In: Bernstein R. J. , ed., Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge, MA: mit Press, pp. 161–175.
-
Roy O. (2004). Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Saeed A. (2007). Media, Racism and Islamophobia: The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media. Sociology Compass 1 (2), pp. 443–462. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00039.x.
-
Semati M.M. (2010). Islamophobia, Culture, and Race in the Age of Empire. Cultural Studies 24 (2), pp. 256–275.
-
Semati M. (2011). Communication, Culture, and the Essentialized Islam. Communication Studies 62 (1), pp. 113–126.
-
Spencer A. (2010). The Tabloid Terrorist: The Predicative Construction of New Terrorism in the Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Sumiala J. , Valaskivi K. , Tikka M. , and Huhtamäki J. (2018). Hybrid Media Events. The Charlie Hebdo Attacks and the Global Circulation of Terrorist Violence. Bingley: Emerald.
-
Toosi N.R. and Ambady N. (2011). Ratings of Essentialism for Eight Religious Identities. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 21 (1), pp. 17–29.
-
Tucker D. (2001). What Is New About the New Terrorism and How Dangerous Is It? Terrorism and Political Violence 13 (3), pp. 1–14.
-
Van Dijck J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Venturini T. (2010a). Diving in Magma: How to Explore Controversies with Actor-Network Theory. Public Understanding of Science 18 (3), pp. 258–273.
-
Venturini T. (2010b). Building on Faults: How to Represent Controversies with Digital Methods. Public Understanding of Science 21 (7), pp. 796–812.
-
Venturini T. , Ricci D. , Mauri M. , Kimbell L. , and Meunier A. (2015). Designing Controversies and Their Publics. Design Issues 31 (3), pp. 74–88.
-
Vis F. (2013) Twitter as a Reporting Tool for Breaking News. Digital Journalism 1 (1), pp. 27–47.
-
Volkmer I. (2014). The Global Public Sphere. Public Communication in the Age of Reflective Interdependence. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
-
Zappavigna M. (2015) Searchable Talk: The Linguistic Functions of Hashtags. Social Semiotics 25 (3), pp. 274–291.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 878 | 108 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 78 | 7 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 104 | 10 | 4 |
“No More Apologies”: Violence as a Trigger for Public Controversy over Islam in the Digital Public Sphere
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureSearch for other papers by Johanna Sumiala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anu A. Harju in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article investigates how violence associated with religion, here namely Islam, functions as a trigger for public controversy in the Turku stabbings that took place in Finland in 2017. We begin by outlining the Lyotard-Habermas debate on controversy and compound this with current research on the digital public sphere. We combine cartography of controversy with digital media ethnography as methods of collecting data and discourse analysis for analysing the material. We investigate how the controversy triggered by violence is constructed around Islam in the public sphere of Twitter. We identify three discursive strategies connecting violence and Islam in the debates around the Turku stabbings: scapegoating, essentialisation, and racialisation. These respectively illustrate debates regarding blame for terrorism, the nature of Islam, and racialisation of terrorist violence and the Muslim Other. To conclude, we reflect on the ways in which the digital public sphere impacts Habermasian consensus- and Lyotardian dissensus-oriented argumentation.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 878 | 108 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 78 | 7 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 104 | 10 | 4 |