Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
The persistence of religion in the twenty-first century has renewed the importance of scholarships devoted to it. At the same time, the digital age has re-positioned and recentered the affordances of mediated circulations around "the religious." This increasing presence and significance of media and religion suggests that substantive scholarships of religion must necessarily articulate media as well. Religious controversies therefore present a special challenge and a special opportunity to scholarships of media and religion. New ways of doing scholarship, and doing so publicly, present themselves. All scholarships of mediated religion must necessarily be public, so scholarship is articulated into these circulations, and at the same time can build on and benefit from knowledge-building that occurs outside the formal boundaries of the academy. This paper explores emerging theories of digital mediation and proposes a circulation-focused understanding of the role, place, and potentials of scholarships today.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Boyd D. (2017). Did Media Literacy Backfire? Points: Experimental Collection from Data and Society, 5 January. Retrieved from: https://points.datasociety.net/did-media-literacy-backfire-7418c084d88d.
Bradley S. (2018). Facebook’s News-feed U-turn is All About Happiness (and Advertising). Wired Magazine, 12 January. Retrieved from: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/facebook-news-feed-change-interaction-publishers.
Couldry N. (2012). Media, Society, World. London: Polity Press.
Deleuze G. and Guattari F. (2008). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (Trans. Massumi Brian ). New York: Continuum.
Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hoover S. , Clark L. , and Alters D. (2003 ).Media, Home and Family. New York: Routledge.
Lim M. (2017). “Freedom to Hate: Social Media, Algorithmic Enclaves, and the Rise of Tribal Nationalism in Indonesia.” Critical Asian Studies 49(3), pp. 411–427.
Meyer B. (2018). Afterword: Media Dynamics of Religious Diversity. In Lundby K. , ed. Contesting Religion: The Dynamics of Cultural Conflicts in Scandinavia. Berlin: DeGruyter, pp. 333–338.
Meyer B. (2017). Comparison as Critique. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7(1), pp. 509–515.
Nail T. (2017). What is an Assemblage? SubStance 46(1), pp. 21–37.
Noble S. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: nyu Press.
Wright C. (1975). Mass Communication: A Sociological Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 218 | 35 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 49 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 58 | 14 | 0 |
The persistence of religion in the twenty-first century has renewed the importance of scholarships devoted to it. At the same time, the digital age has re-positioned and recentered the affordances of mediated circulations around "the religious." This increasing presence and significance of media and religion suggests that substantive scholarships of religion must necessarily articulate media as well. Religious controversies therefore present a special challenge and a special opportunity to scholarships of media and religion. New ways of doing scholarship, and doing so publicly, present themselves. All scholarships of mediated religion must necessarily be public, so scholarship is articulated into these circulations, and at the same time can build on and benefit from knowledge-building that occurs outside the formal boundaries of the academy. This paper explores emerging theories of digital mediation and proposes a circulation-focused understanding of the role, place, and potentials of scholarships today.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 218 | 35 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 49 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 58 | 14 | 0 |