The Habits and Hermeneutics of Digital Bible Readers: Comparing Print and Screen Engagement, Comprehension, and Behavior
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureChristians in general and American evangelicals in particular are increasingly using digital media to access Scripture, but it is unclear how this shift is influencing the behaviors they value most: regular reading and in-depth study. Using survey data, assessments of comprehension, and daily reading progress, this study examines how engagement with the Bible varies between print and screens. Results indicated that American evangelicals use a combination of print and digital forms of Scripture based on the kind of engagement they want to carry out (devotional reading, in-depth study, prayer, etc.). The data also suggest readers have lower comprehension when reading the Bible on screens compared to print. Readers using mobile devices are more likely to engage scripture daily than those using printed Bibles, and these effects are more pronounced in male readers than female readers.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ackerman R. , & Goldsmith M. (2011). Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen Versus On Paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 17(1), 18–32.
-
Ackerman R. , & Lauterman T. (2012). Taking Reading Comprehension Exams On Screen Or On Paper? A Metacognitive Analysis of Learning Texts Under Time Pressure. Computers in Human Behavior , 28(5), 1816–1828. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023.
-
Society American Bible (2014). The State of the Bible 2014. Retrieved from https://www.americanbible.org/uploads/content/state-of-the-bible-data-analysis-american-bible-society-2014.pdf.
-
Society American Bible (2015). The State of the Bible 2015. Retrieved from https://www.americanbible.org/uploads/content/State_of_the_Bible_2015_report.pdf.
-
Society American Bible (2016). The State of the Bible 2016. Retrieved from http://www.americanbible.org/uploads/content/State_of_the_Bible_2016_report_Politics.pdf.
-
Society American Bible (2017). The State of the Bible 2017. Retrieved from https://1s712.americanbible.org/cdn-www-ws03/uploads/content/State_of_the_Bible_2017_report_032317.pdf.
-
Society American Bible (2018). The State of the Bible 2018. Retrieved from https://1s712.americanbible.org/cdn-www-ws03/uploads/content/state-of-the-bible-2018.pdf.
-
Society American Bible (2019). The State of the Bible 2019. Retrieved from https://1s712.americanbible.org/cdn-www-ws03/uploads/content/state-of-the-bible-2018.pdf.
-
Baccino T. (2004). Lecture électronique. De la vision à la compréhension. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
-
Barna Group (2016). The Bible in America: The Changing Landscape of Perceptions and Engagement.
-
Baron N. S. (2015). Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World (1st ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
-
Barrett M. (2013). Dear Pastor, Bring Your Bible to Church. Retrieved from http://thegospelcoalition.org/article/dear-pastor-bring-your-bible-to-church.
-
Bebbington D. W. (1989). Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s . London: Unwin Hyman.
-
Benedetto S. , Drai-Zerbib V. , Pedrotti M. , Tissier G. , & Baccino T. (2013). E-Readers and Visual Fatigue. PLoS One , 8(12). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083676.
-
Bibb B. (2017). Readers and Their E-Bibles: The Shape and Authority of the Hypertext Canon. In Goff P. , Farnsley A. E. II , & Thuesen P. J. (Eds.), The Bible in American Life (pp. 266–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Bielo J. (2009). Words upon the Word: An Ethnography of Evangelical Group Bible Study New York: NYU Press.
-
Brasher B. (2001). Give Me That Online Religion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
-
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2014). American Time Use Survey – 2014 Results. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/atus_06242015.pdf.
-
Campbell H. A. (2012a). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds: Routledge.
-
Campbell H. A. (2012b). Understanding the Relationship between Religion Online and Offline in a Networked Society. Journal of the American Academy of Religion , 80(1), 64–93.
-
Chen G. , Cheng W. , Chang T.-W. , Zheng X. , & Huang R. (2014). A Comparison of Reading Comprehension across Paper, Computer Screens, and Tablets: Does Tablet Familiarity Matter? J. Comput. Educ. , 1(2–3), 213–225.
-
Clark C. (2012). Redefining or Undermining? The Role of Technology in the Reading Lives of Children and Young People: Findings from the National Literacy Trust’s annual survey 2012. London: National Literacy Trust. Retrieved from: https://literacytrust.org.uk/documents/152/2013_04_11_free_research_-_childrens_and_young_peoples_reading_in_2012_cyEveGL.pdf.
-
Collins P . (2014). Scripture Engagment. Retrieved from https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/scripture-engagement/.
-
Crapanzano V. (2000). Serving the Word: Literalism in America from the Pulpit to the Bench: The New Press.
-
Crosby R. (2012). The Social Network Gospel: How Interconnectivity Helps Us Better Engage the Bible. Christianity Today (June), 36–40.
-
Cushman W. H. (1986). Reading from Microfiche, vdt and the Printed Page: Subjective Fatigue and Performance. Human Factors , 28(1), 63–73.
-
Davids P. H. (2006). The Letters of 2 Peter and Jude. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
-
Dawson L. , & Cowan D. (2004). Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York, NY: Routledge.
-
DeStefano D. , & LeFevre J.-A. (2007). Cognitive Load in Hypertext Reading: A Review. Computers in Human Behavior , 23(3), 1616–1641.
-
Dillon A. (1992). Reading from Paper versus Screens: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature. Ergonomics , 35(10), 1297–1326.
-
Dyer John . (2019). The People of the Screen: How Evangelicals Created the Digital Bible and How It Shaped Their Relationship with Scripture . (Doctor of Philosophy), Durham University, Durham.
-
Eklundh K. S. (1992). Problems in Achieving a Global Perspective of the Text in Computer-based Writing. Instructional Science , 21(1), 73–84.
-
Friesen A. (2017). How American Men and Women Read the Bible. In Goff P. , Farnsley A. E. II , & Thuesen P. J. (Eds.), The Bible in American Life (pp. 266–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Gerlach J. , & Buxmann P. (2011). Investigating The Acceptance Of Electronic Books – The Impact Of Haptic Dissonance On Innovation Adoption. ecis 2011 Proceedings, Paper 141.
-
Goff P. ,Farnsley II A. E. , & Thuesen P. J. (2017). The Bible in American Life Today. In Goff P. , Farnsley A. E. II , & Thuesen P. J. (Eds.), The Bible in American Life (pp. 5–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Harbin D. (1998). Fiat Lux. In Hotchkiss V. R. & Ryrie C. C. (Eds.), Formatting the Word of God: An Exhibition at Bridwell Library. Dallas, Texas: Bridwell Library.
-
Hiemstra R. (2014). Confidence Conversation and Community: Bible Engagment in Canada, 2013. Toronto, Canada: Faith Today Publications.
-
Hillborn D. (2004). Principled Unity or Pragmatic Compromise? The Challenge of Pan-Evangelical Theology. Evangel , 22(3), 80–91.
-
Hillesund T. (2010). Digital Reading Spaces: How Expert Readers Handle Books, the Web and Electronic Paper. First Monday , 15(4–5). Retrieved from http://uncommonculture.org/ojs/index.php/fm/rt/printerFriendly/2762/2504.
-
Howard E. (2012). Lectio Divina in the Evangelical Tradition. Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care , 5(1).
-
Hughes J. (1987). Bits, Bytes and Biblical Studies Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
-
Hutchings T. (2010). The Internet and the Church: An Introduction. The Expository Times , 122(1), 11–19. doi:10.1177/0014524610377955.
-
Hutchings T. (2014). Now the Bible is an App: Digital Media and Changing Patterns of Religious Authority. In Granholm K. , Moberg M. , & Sjö S. (Eds.), Religion, Media, and Social Change. London: Routledge, pp. 143–161.
-
Hutchings T. (2015). E-Reading and the Christian Bible. Studies in Religion/Studies Religieuses , 44(4), 423–440.
-
Hutchings T. (2017). Design and the Digital Bible: Persuasive Technology and Religious Reading. Journal of Contemporary Religion , 32(2), 205–19.
-
Kang M. , & Eune J. (2012). Design Framework for Multimodal Reading Experience in Cross-Platform Computing Devices – Focus on a Digital Bible . Paper presented at the drs 2012 Bangkok, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
-
Kwok P. L. (2008). Holy Bible 3.0: Scripture in the Digital Age. Reflections , 95(1), 25–28.
-
Liu Z. (2005). Reading Behaviour in the Digital Environment: Changes in Reading Behaviour over the Past Ten Years. Journal of Documentation , 61(6), 700–712.
-
Logan S. , & Johnston R. (2010). Investigating Gender Differences in Reading. Eduational Review , 62(2), 175–187.
-
Mahlamäki T. (2012). Religion and Atheism from a Gender Perspective. Approaching Religion , 2(1), 58–65.
-
Malley B. (2004). How the Bible Works: An Anthropological Study of Evangelical Biblicism: AltaMira Press.
-
Mangen A. (2008). Hypertext Fiction Reading: Haptics and Immersion,. Journal of Research in Reading , 31(4), 404–419.
-
Mangen A. , Robinet P. , Olivier G. , & Velay J. L. (2015). Mystery Story Reading in Pocket Print Book and on Kindle: Possible Impact on Chronological Events Memory. Paper presented at the igel 2014.
-
Mangen A. , Walgermo B. R. , & Brønnick K. (2013). Reading Linear Texts on Paper versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research , 58, 61–68.
-
Margolin S. J. , Driscoll C. , Toland M. J. , & Kegler J. L. (2013). E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology , 27(4), 512–519. doi:10.1002/acp.2930.
-
Martin K. (2011). Scripture by the Screenful: How Bible Apps are Changing the Way We Read Scripture. Christian Examiner. Retrieved from http://www.christianexaminer.com/Articles/Articles%20Jul11/Art_Jul11_08.html.
-
Neff D. (2012). It Almost Looks Like a Bible. Christianity Today, January , 60.
-
Noyes J. M. , & Garland K. J. (2008). Computer- vs. Paper-based Tasks: Are They Equivalent? Ergonomics , 51(9), 1352–1375. doi:10.1080/00140130802170387.
-
O’Leary S. D. (1996). Cyberspace as Sacred Space: Communicating Religion on Computer Networks. Journal of American Academy of Religion , 64(4), 781–808.
-
O’Neill J. (2010). Digital Annotation: Not There Yet. Information Today , 27(7), 1+.
-
de Oliveira S. M. (2012). eTextbooks Usage by Students at Andrews University- A Study of Attitudes, Perceptions, and Behaviors. Proceedings of the iatul Conferences 2012.
-
Center Pew Research (2015). Technology Device Ownership : 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/technology-device-ownership-2015.
-
Pew Research Center (2018). Religious Landscape Study. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/gender-composition/.
-
Phillips P. (2018). The Pixelated Text : Reading the Bible within Digital Culture. Theology, 121 , 403–412.
-
Phillips P. (2019). The Bible, Social Media and Digital Culture. London: Routledge.
-
Piolat A. , Roussey J.-Y. , & Thunin O. (1996). Effects of Screen Presentation on Text Reading and Revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 47, 565–589.
-
Rakow K. (2016). The Bible in the Digital Age: Negotiating the Limits of ‘Bibleness’ of Different Bible Media. In Opas M. & Haapalainen A. (Eds.), Christianity and the Limits of Materiality. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 101–121.
-
Richardson K. B. , & Pardun C. J. (2015). The New Scroll Digital Devices, Bible Study and Worship. Journal of Media and Religion , 14(1), 16–28. doi:10.1080/15348423.2015.1011984.
-
Rowston D. J. (1975). The Most Neglected Book in the New Testament. New Testament Studies , 21(4), 554–563.
-
Schreiner T. R. (2003). 1, 2 Peter, Jude (Vol. 37). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
-
Siker J. (2017). Liquid Scripture: The Bible in a Digital World. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
-
Spratling C. (2012, August 20). Digital Bible Pops Up in More Pews, Pulpits. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2012-08-20/digital-bible/57157334/1.
-
Subrahmanyam K. , Michikyan M. , Clemmons C. , Carrillo R. , Uhls Y. T. , & Greenfield P. M. (2013). Learning from Paper, Learning from Screens. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning , 3(4), 1–27. doi:10.4018/ijcbpl.2013100101.
-
Summers K. (2013). Adult Reading Habits and Preferences in Relation to Gender Differences. Reference and User Services Quarterly , 52(3), 243–249.
-
Torma R. , & Teusner P. E. (2011). iReligion. Studies in World Christianity , 17(2), 137–155. doi:10.3366/swc.2011.0017 .
-
Trzebiatowska M. , & Bruce S. (2012). Why are Women More Religious than Men? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
van Peursen W. (2014). Is the Bible Losing Its Covers? Conceptualization and Use of the Bible on the Threshold of the Digital Order. hiphil Novum , 1(1), 44–58.
-
Wagner R. (2011). Godwired : Religion, Ritual, and Virtual Reality. London: Routledge.
-
Wästlund E. , Reinikka H. , Norlander T. , & Archer T. (2005). Effects of vdt and Paper Presentation on Consumption and Production of Information: Psychological and Physiological Factors. Computers in Human Behavior , 21(2), 377–394. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007.
-
Woody W. D. , Daniel D. B. , & Baker C. A. (2010). E-books or Textbooks: Students Prefer Textbooks. Computers & Education , 55(3), 945–948. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005.
-
YouVersion. (2014). Infographics. Retrieved from http://blog.youversion.com/infographics/.
-
YouVersion. (2015, April 6). Easter Bible Engagement Around the World. Retrieved from http://blog.youversion.com/2015/04/easter-bible-engagement-around-the-world/.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1963 | 421 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 91 | 29 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 62 | 12 |
The Habits and Hermeneutics of Digital Bible Readers: Comparing Print and Screen Engagement, Comprehension, and Behavior
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureChristians in general and American evangelicals in particular are increasingly using digital media to access Scripture, but it is unclear how this shift is influencing the behaviors they value most: regular reading and in-depth study. Using survey data, assessments of comprehension, and daily reading progress, this study examines how engagement with the Bible varies between print and screens. Results indicated that American evangelicals use a combination of print and digital forms of Scripture based on the kind of engagement they want to carry out (devotional reading, in-depth study, prayer, etc.). The data also suggest readers have lower comprehension when reading the Bible on screens compared to print. Readers using mobile devices are more likely to engage scripture daily than those using printed Bibles, and these effects are more pronounced in male readers than female readers.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1963 | 421 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 91 | 29 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 62 | 12 |