Is Social Media a Digital Pulpit? How Evangelical Leaders Use Twitter to Encourage the Faithful and Publicize Their Work
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureSearch for other papers by Ryan P. Burge in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Miles D. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
Social media is altering how some religious leaders communicate with their followers and with the public. This has the potential to challenge theories of religious communication that have been developed through the study of traditional modes such as sermons. This study examines how leaders in U.S. evangelicalism take advantage of the public platform provided by Twitter. Using over 85,000 tweets from 88 prominent evangelical leaders, we find that these leaders often use their social media platforms as a natural extension of their current modes of communication. More specifically, evangelical leaders use their account to encourage and inspire their followers, while also conveying information about upcoming personal projects such as tours and book releases. In a small number of cases, evangelical leaders do make reference to political issues, but those individuals are ones who have already built a brand based on political commentary. Speaking broadly, the usage of political language by evangelical leaders is rare. The paper concludes with a discussion of how this analysis advances theories of religion and communication.KeywordsTwitter – social media – evangelicals – leaders
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Agarwal A. , Xie B. , Vovsha I. , Rambow O. , and Passonneau R. (2011). Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Language and Social Media . Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 30–38.
-
Bebbington D.W. (2003). Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History From the 1730s to the 1980s. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Brewer P.R. (2014). Public Opinion About Gay Rights and Gay Marriage. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26 (3), pp. 279–82. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu029.
-
Calfano B.R. (2009). Choosing Constituent Cues: Reference Group Influence on Clergy Political Speech*. Social Science Quarterly 90 (1), pp. 88–102. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00604.x.
-
Campbell E.Q. , and Pettigrew T.F. (1959). Christians in Racial Crisis A Study of Little Rock’s Ministry. Nabu Press.
-
Ceron A. , Curini L. , Iacus S.M. , and Porro G. (2014). Every Tweet Counts? How Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Can Improve Our Knowledge of Citizens’ Political Preferences With an Application to Italy and France. New Media & Society 16 (2), pp. 340–358. doi:10.1177/1461444813480466.
-
Cheong P. (2014). Tweet the Message? Religious Authority and Social Media Innovation. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture 3 (3), pp. 1–19. doi:10.1163/21659214-90000059.
-
Click M.A. , Lee H. , and Holladay H.W. (2013). Making Monsters: Lady Gaga, Fan Identification, and Social Media. Popular Music & Society 36 (3), pp. 360–379. doi:10.1080/03007766.2013.798546.
-
Codone S. (2014). Megachurch Pastor Twitter Activity: An Analysis of Rick Warren and Andy Stanley, Two of America’s Social Pastors. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture 3 (2), pp. 1–32. doi: 10.1163/21659214-90000050.
-
Conover M.D. , Ratkiewicz J. , Franscisco M. , Goncalves B. , Flammini A. , and Menczer F. (2011). Political Polarization on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Menlo Park: AAAI Press. pp. 89–96. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/ download/2847/3275.
-
Dias E. (2016, May 9). Trump’s Feud With Evangelical Leader Shows Fault Lines. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/4323009/donald-trump-southern-baptist-russell-moore-evangelicals-christianity/.
-
Djupe P.A. , and Gilbert C.P. (2002). The Political Voice of Clergy. The Journal of Politics 64 (2), pp. 596–609.
-
Djupe P. , and Calfano B. (2013). God Talk: Experimenting With the Religious Causes of Public Opinion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
Gentry J. (2015). “twitteR: R Based Twitter Client.” R package version 1.1.9. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=twitteR.
-
Global Survey of Evangelical Protestant Leaders. (2011, June 22). Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2011/06/22/global-survey-beliefs/.
-
Greenwood D.N. (2013). Fame, Facebook, and Twitter: How Attitudes about Fame Predict Frequency and Nature of Social Media Use. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 2 (4), pp. 222–236. doi:10.1037/ppm0000013.
-
Grimmer J. , and Stewart B.M. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis 21 (3), pp. 267–297.
-
Hadden J.K. (1969). The Gathering Storm in the Churches. New York: Doubleday.
-
Hadden J.K. (1993). The Rise and Fall of American Televangelism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 527 (1), pp. 113–130.
-
Hackett C. , and Lindsay D.M. (2008). Measuring Evangelicalism: Consequences of Different Operationalization Strategies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47 (3), pp. 499–514.
-
Hess A. (2016, February 18). “How Trump Wins Twitter.” Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/02/donald_trump_is_the_best_at_twitter_here_s_why.html.
-
Hogenraad R. , McKenzie D.P. , and Martindale C. (1996). The Enemy Within: Autocorrelation Bias in Content Analysis of Narratives. Computers and the Humanities 30 (6), pp. 433–439.
-
Jurafsky D. , and Martin J.H. (2009). Syntactic Parsing. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson–Prentice Hall, pp. 427–459.
-
Kaplan A.M. , and Haelein M. (2012). The Britney Spears Universe: Social Media and Viral Marketing at Its Best. Business Horizons 55 (1), pp. 27–31. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.08.009.
-
Kurtzleben D. (2015, December 19). Are You an Evangelical? Are You Sure? NPR.org. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2015/12/19/458058251/are-you-an-evangelical-are-you-sure.
-
Levinson P. 2009. New New Media. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
-
Marshall P.D. (2010). The Promotion and Presentation of the Self: Celebrity as Marker of Presentational Media. Celebrity Studies 1 (1), pp. 35–48. doi:10.1080/19392390903519057.
-
Maxwell J.C. (2007). The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
-
Moore R. (2016, May 6). A White Church No More. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/opinion/a-white-church-no-more.html.
-
Neethu M.S. , and Rajasree R. (2013, July). Sentiment Analysis in Twitter Using Machine Learning Techniques. In: Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies, IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726818.
-
Neuendorf K.A. (2016). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
-
Pacheco J. (2014). Measuring and Evaluating Changes in State Opinion Across Eight Issues. American Politics Research 42 (6), pp. 986–1009. doi:10.1177/1532673X14524819.
-
Pennycook G. , Ross R.M. , Koehler D.J. , and Fugelsang J.A. (2017). Correction: Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective Than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 12 (4), p. e0176586. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176586.
-
Quealy K. (2016, December 6). How to Know What Donald Trump Really Cares About: Look at What He’s Insulting. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/06/upshot/how-to-know-what-donald-trump-really-cares-about-look-at-who-hes-insulting.html.
-
Quinley H.E. (1974). The Prophetic Clergy: Social Activism Among Protestant Ministers. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
-
Ritter R.S. , Preston J.L. , and Hernandez I. (2014). Happy Tweets: Christians Are Happier, More Socially Connected, and Less Analytical than Atheists on Twitter. Social Psychology and Personality Science 5 (2), pp. 243–249. doi:10.1177/1948550613492345.
-
Shellnutt K. (2016, December 21). Is It Too Late for Russell Moore to Say Sorry? ChristianityToday.com. Retrieved from http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2016/december-web-only/is-it-too-late-to-say-sorry-russell-moore-erlc-sbc-trump.html.
-
Shellnut K. (2016, October 27). LifeWay Stops Selling Jen Hatmaker Books over LGBT Beliefs. ChristianityToday.com. Retrieved from https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2016/october/lifeway-stops-selling-jen-hatmaker-books-lgbt-beliefs-chris.html.
-
Silge J. and Robinson D. (2016). tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R. The Journal of Open Source Software 1 (3). The Open Journal doi: 10.21105/joss.00037.
-
Stark R. , Foster B.D. , Glock C.Y. , and Quinley H.E. (1971). Wayward Shepherds, Prejudice and the Protestant Clergy. New York: Harper & Row.
-
Stemler S. (2001). An Overview of Content Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7 (17), pp. 137–146.
-
Taylor C.A. , Al-Hiyari R. , Lee S.J. , Priebe A. , Guerrero L.W. , and Bales A. (2016). Beliefs and Ideologies Linked With Approval of Corporal Punishment: A Content Analysis of Online Comments. Health Education Research 31 (4), pp. 563–575. doi:10.1093/her/cyw029.
-
Tumasjan A. , Sprenger T.O. , Sandner P.G. , and Welpe I.M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Menlo Park: AAAI Press. pp. 178–185. Retrieved from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1441/1852.
-
Wang H. , Can D. , Kazemzadeh A. , Bar F. , and Narayanan S. (2012). A System for Real-Time Twitter Sentiment Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 115–120. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2390490.
-
Wang X. , Wei F. , Liu X. , Zhou M. , and Zhang M. (2011). Topic Sentiment Analysis in Twitter: A Graph-Based Hashtag Sentiment Classification Approach. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1031–1040. doi:10.1145/2063576.2063726.
-
Yoshimo K. (2015). A New Birth of Freedom?: Obergefell v. Hodges. Harvard Law Review 129, p. 147.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1832 | 271 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 158 | 86 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 187 | 76 | 4 |
Is Social Media a Digital Pulpit? How Evangelical Leaders Use Twitter to Encourage the Faithful and Publicize Their Work
In: Journal of Religion, Media and Digital CultureSearch for other papers by Ryan P. Burge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miles D. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Social media is altering how some religious leaders communicate with their followers and with the public. This has the potential to challenge theories of religious communication that have been developed through the study of traditional modes such as sermons. This study examines how leaders in U.S. evangelicalism take advantage of the public platform provided by Twitter. Using over 85,000 tweets from 88 prominent evangelical leaders, we find that these leaders often use their social media platforms as a natural extension of their current modes of communication. More specifically, evangelical leaders use their account to encourage and inspire their followers, while also conveying information about upcoming personal projects such as tours and book releases. In a small number of cases, evangelical leaders do make reference to political issues, but those individuals are ones who have already built a brand based on political commentary. Speaking broadly, the usage of political language by evangelical leaders is rare. The paper concludes with a discussion of how this analysis advances theories of religion and communication.KeywordsTwitter – social media – evangelicals – leaders
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1832 | 271 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 158 | 86 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 187 | 76 | 4 |