Despite growing interest in digital diplomacy, few studies to date have evaluated the extent to which foreign ministries have been able to realize its potential. Studies have also neglected to understand the manner in which diplomats define digital diplomacy and envision its practice. This article explores the digital diplomacy model employed by four foreign ministries through interviews and questionnaires with practitioners. Results from a cross national comparison suggest that foreign ministries have been able to institutionalize the use of social media through the development of best practices and training for diplomats. However, foreign ministries seem to utilize social media to influence elite audiences rather than to foster dialogue with foreign populations. Results also suggest that both ministries and social media audiences are negotiating their respective roles in the online communication process. Although social media is used to overcome the limitations of traditional diplomacy, and manage the national image, foreign ministries fail to collaborate with non-state actors or use social media as a source of information for policy makers. Thus, while diplomacy is networked, it is still state-centric. Finally, at the embassy level, ambassadors now serve as digital gatekeepers.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abbasi M. A. , Kumar S. , Andrade Filho J. A. & Liu H. Lessons Learned in Using Social Media for Disaster Relief-asu Crisis Response Game Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 282 289
Al-Saggaf Y. & Williamson K. Online Communities in Saudi Arabia: Evaluating the Impact on Culture Through Online Semi-structured Interviews Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2004 September Vol. 5 No. 3
Archetti C. The Impact of New Media on Diplomatic Practice: An Evolutionary Model of Change The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2012 7 2 181 206
Attias S. Israel’s New Peer-to-peer Diplomacy The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2012 7 4 473 482
Bélanger F. & Carter L. Trust and Risk in E-government Adoption The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2008 17 2 165 176
Bjola C. The Ethics of Secret Diplomacy: A Contextual Approach Journal of Global Ethics 2014 10 1 85 100
Bjola C. & Holmes M. Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice 2015 New York Routledge
Bjola C. & Jiang L. Bjola C. & Holmes M. Social Media and Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of the Digital Diplomatic Strategies of the eu, us and Japan in China Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 71 88
Bortree D. S. & Seltzer T. Dialogic Strategies and Outcomes: An Analysis of Environmental Advocacy Groups’ Facebook Profiles Public Relations Review 2009 35 3 317 319
Boyd D. & Ellison N. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 2007 13 1 210 230
Britten N. Qualitative Interviews in Medical Research BMJ: British Medical Journal 1995 311 6999 251 251
Brown R. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. The Politics of Relational Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 44 55
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and culture 2011 Vol. 1 John Wiley & Sons
Causey C. & Howard P. N. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. Delivering Digital Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 144 156
Cha H. , Yeo S. & Kim B. Social Media’s Dialogic Communication of Foreign Embassies in Korea and Public Diplomacy: Based on Dialogic Communication Theory 2014
Clarke A. Bjola C. & Holmes M. Business as Usual? An Evolution of British and Canadian Digital Diplomacy as Policy Change Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 111 126
Comor E. & Bean H. America’s ‘Engagement’ Delusion: Critiquing a Public Diplomacy Consensus International Communication Gazette 2012 74 3 203 220
Comor E. Digital Engagement: America’s Use (and Misuse) of Marshall McLuhan New Political Science 2013 35 1 1 18
Copeland D. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. Taking Diplomacy Public Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 56 69
Corrie K. L. Bjola C. & Holmes M. The International Criminal Court: Using Technology in Network Diplomacy Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 145 163
Cowan G. & Arsenault A. Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layer of Public Diplomacy The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2008 616 1 10 30
Cull N. J. Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2008 616 1 31 54
Dearnley C. A Reflection on the Use of Semi-structured Interviews Nurse Researcher 2005 13 1 19 28
Deitch I. #AskHamas Twitter Campaign Backfires on Gaza Group The Times of Israel 2015 March 13
Digital Disruption Short Fuse, Big Bang? Australia: Deloitte Australia 2012 Available online at http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/Building%20Lucky%20Country/deloitte-au-consulting-digital-disruption-whitepaper-0912.pdf
Entman R. M. Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory 1993 390 397
Entman R. M. Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11 Political Communication 2003 20 4 415 432
Entman R. M. Theorizing Mediated Public Diplomacy: The us Case The International Journal of Press/Politics 2008 13 2 87 102
Eshet-Alkalai Y. Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2004 13 1 93 107
Fan Y. ‘Branding the Nation: Towards a Better Understanding,’ Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 2010 6 2 97 103
Fisher A. Four Seasons in One Day: The Crowded House of Public Diplomacy in the uk Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy 2009 New York Routledge 251 261
Fisher A. Mapping the Great Beyond: Identifying Meaningful Networks in Public Diplomacy cpd Perspectives on Public Diplomacy 2010 2 1 87
Fitzpatrick K. R. Advancing the New Public Diplomacy: A Public Relations Perspective The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2007 2 3 187 211
Fontana A. & Frey J. The Art of Science The Handbook of Qualitative Research 1994 361 376
Golberg A. & Kaduck M. Stein J. G. Where is Headquarters?: Diplomacy, Development and Defense Diplomacy in the Digital Age: Essays in Honour of Ambassador Allan Gotlieb 2011 Ontario Signal 125 140
Gravé-Lazi L. idc Fights War on Another Front The Jerusalem Post 2014 July 16 Retrieved from http://www.jpost.com/PromoContent/IDC-fights-war-on-another-front-362989
Gregory B. American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2011 6 3–4 351 372
Grunig J. E. & Hunt T. Managing Public Relations 1984 Vol. 343 New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Hallams E. Digital Diplomacy: The Internet, the Battle for Ideas & us Foreign Policy ceu Political Science Journal 2010 4 538 574
Hamdy N. & Gomaa E. H. Framing the Egyptian Uprising in Arabic Language Newspapers and Social Media Journal of Communication 2012 62 2 195 211
Harris B. Diplomacy 2.0: The Future of Social Media in Nation Branding Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy 2013 4 1 3 3
Hayden C. Social Media at State: Power, Practice, and Conceptual Limits for us Public Diplomacy Global Media Journal-American Edition 2012 11 21
Haynal G. Stein J. G. Corporate Diplomacy in the Information Age: Catching Up to the Dispersal of Power Diplomacy in the Digital Age: Essays in Honour of Ambassador Allan Gotlieb 2011 Ontario Signal 209 224
Hocking B. & Melissen J. Diplomacy in the Digital Age, Cligendael Report Cligendeal Netherlands Institute of International Relations 2015
Hoffman B. The Use of the Internet by Islamic Extremists 2006 May 4 Testimony Presented to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, on May 4, 2006. Available online at http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/2006/RAND_CT262-1.pdf
Kampf R. , Manor I. & Segev E. Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-national Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2015 10 4 331 362
Khatib L. , Dutton W. & Thelwall M. Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Case Study of the us Digital Outreach Team The Middle East Journal 2012 66 3 453 472
Kent M. L. & Taylor M. Building Dialogic Relationships Through the World Wide Web Public Relations Review 1998 24 3 321 334
Kotler P. & Gertner D. ‘Country as Brand, Product, and Beyond: A Place Marketing and Brand Management Perspective,’ Brand Management 2002 9 4–5 249 261
Lee G. & Kwak Y. H. An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-based Public Engagement Government Information Quarterly 2012 29 4 492 503
Leight N. , Walton S. B. , Ananian T. , Cruz-Enriquez M. & Jarwaharlal K. PDiN Quarterly—Trends in Public Diplomacy: January, February and March 2011 Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 2011 7 2 136 149
Lichtenstein J. Digital Diplomacy 2010 July 17 Retrieved July 4 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/magazine/18web2-0-t.html
Manor I. How Kenya’s mfa Leads by Example Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 January 4 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/01/04/kenya/
Manor I. In Digital Diplomacy, a Narrowing Digital Divide—Part 1 Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 January 19 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/01/19/divide/
Manor I. On Hamas, Digital Diplomacy & Digital Hypocrisy Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 March 15 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/03/15/on-hamas-digital-diplomacy-digital-hypocrisy/
Manor I. Digital Diplomacy During #NepalEarthquake Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 May 21 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/05/21/digital-diplomacy-during-nepalearthquake/
Manor I. The Framing of #IranDeal on Digital Diplomacy Channels Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 July 14 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/07/14/the-framing-of-irandeal-on-digital-diplomacy-channels/
Manor I. Is Digital Diplomacy Really Cost Effective? Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 July 21 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/07/21/is-digital-diplomacy-really-cost-effective/
Manor I. & Segev E. Bjola C. & Holmes M. America’s Selfie: How the us Portrays Itself on its Social Media Accounts Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 89 108
Macnamara J. , Sakinofsky P. & Beattie J. E-electoral Engagement: How Governments Use Social Media to Engage Voters Australian Journal of Political Science 2012 47 4 623 639
Macnamara J. Pre and Post-election 2010 Online: What Happened to the Conversation? 2011
Malone D. Stein J. G. New Friends in the Digital Age Diplomacy in the Digital Age 2011 Canada McClelland & Stewart 102 124
McNutt K. Public Engagement in the Web 2.0 Era: Social Collaborative Technologies in a Public Sector Context Canadian Public Administration 2014 57 1 49 70
Melissen J. Melissen J. The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations 2005 New York Palgrave Macmillan 3 27
Meraz S. & Papacharissi Z. Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt The International Journal of Press/Politics 2013 18 138 166
Metzgar E. T. Is it the Medium or the Message? Social Media, American Public Relations & Iran Global Media Journal 2012 1 16
Molad, the Center for Renewed Democracy Israeli Hasbara: Myths and Reality 2012 Jerusalem Molad
Natarajan K. Digital Public Diplomacy and a Strategic Narrative for India Strategic Analysis 2014 38 1 91 106
Ociepka B. Impact of New Technologies on International Communication: The Case of Public Diplomacy Information Science 2012 59 24 36
Ogawa T. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. New Frontiers in Relational Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Rutledge 117 131
Pamment J. New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century 2013 New York Rutledge
Pamment J. Digital Diplomacy as Transmedia Engagement: Aligning Theories of Participatory Culture with International Advocacy Campaigns New Media & Society 2015 23 1 1 17
Papadopoulos N. & Heslop L. ‘Country Equity and Country Branding: Problems and Prospects,’ Brand Management 2002 9 4–5 294 314
Park H. & Reber B. H. Relationship Building and the Use of Web Sites: How Fortune 500 Corporations Use Their Web Sites to Build Relationships Public Relations Review 2008 34 4 409 411
Park S. J. & Lim Y. S. Information Networks and Social Media Use in Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of South Korea and Japan Asian Journal of Communication 2014 24 1 79 98
Pew Research Center: The Evolving Role of News on Twitter and Facebook 2015 July 14 Retrieved September 3, 2015 from http://www.journalism.org/2015/07/14/the-evolving-role-of-news-on-twitter-and-facebook/
Porath Z. Letters from Jerusalem, 1947–1948 (n.d.) Retrieved August 19, 2014, from http://www.zionism-israel.com/ezine/Partition_A_Night_To_Remember.htm
Potter E. H. Managing Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century 2002 London McGill-Queen’s University Press
Prensky M. Digital natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 On the Horizon 2001 9 5 1 6
Quelch J. A. & Jocz K. E. Can Brand Obama Rescue Brand America? Brown J. World Aff. 2009 16 163 163
Quigley K. ‘Man Plans, God Laughs’: Canada’s National Strategy for Protecting Critical Infrastructure.” Canadian Public Administration 2013 56 1 142 164
Rana K. S. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. Diaspora Diplomacy and Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Rutledge 70 85
Ravid B. Israel Opens Virtual Embassy to Gulf States Retrieved August 21 2014 from http://blogs.haaretz.co.il/barakravid/773/
Saunders H. H. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. The Relational Paradigm and Sustained Dialogue Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 132 143
Scott B. In Defense of #BringBackOurGirls and Hashtag Activism (n.d.) Retrieved October 3, 2015, from http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/05/16/bringbackourgirls_a_defense_of_hashtag_activism.html
Scott J. ‘Bill 3 & Privacy Implications.’ Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice 2012 25 3 209 235
Seib P. Real-time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era 2012 Palgrave Macmillan
Seo H. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. The ‘Virtual Last Three Feet.’ Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 157 169
Sharp P. Melissen J. Revolutionary States, Outlaw Regimes and the Techniques of Public Diplomacy The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations 2005 New York Palgrave Macmillan 106 124
Shenhav S. R. , Sheafer T. & Gabay I. Incoherent narrator: Israeli public diplomacy during the disengagement and the elections in the Palestinian Authority israel studies 2010 15 3 143 162
Slaughter A. M. America’s Edge Foreign Affairs 2009 88 1 94 113
Smith B. G. Socially Distributing Public Relations: Twitter, Haiti, and Interactivity in Social Media Public Relations Review 2010 36 4 329 335
Stoltzfus K. Exploring us E-diplomacy and Non-state Actors’ Increasing Communicative Influence 2008 Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Digital Government Research 347 354
Sotiriu S. Bjola C. & Holmes M. Digital Diplomacy: Between Promises and Reality Digital Diplomacy 2015 New York Routledge 33 51
Stein J. G. Stein J. G. Introduction Diplomacy in the Digital Age 2011 Canada McClelland & Stewart 1 9
Stockton N. nasa’s Social Media Strategy Is Genius—And Kinda Maddening 2015 August 23 Retrieved August 26, 2015, from http://www.wired.com/2015/07/nasas-social-media-strategy-genius-kinda-maddening/
Toosi N. White House to Engage Iran Critics Through @TheIranDeal 2015 Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/white-house-to-engage-iran-critics-through-theirandeal-120408.html
The Economist Virtual Realtions The Economist 2012 September 22 Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21563284
The Economist God’s Ambassadors The Economist 2007 July 21 Retrieved September 5, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/node/9516461
The White House Remarks by President Obama on a New Beginning 2009 Retrieved July 13, 2014, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09
Twiploamcy Twiplomacy Study 2015 2015 Retrieved July 13, 2015
United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy 2015 Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting 2015 Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/247329.pdf
us Army fm-3-24 and mcwp 3-33.5 Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies 2014 Washington, D.C. Headquarters, Department of the Army Available online at https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24.pdf
Van Ham P. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault A. & Fisher A. Social Power in Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 17 28
Vanc A. M. Post-9/11 us Public Diplomacy in Eastern Europe: Dialogue via New Technologies or Face-to-Face Communication? Global Media Journal—American Edition 2012 II 21
Waters R. D. , Burnett E. , Lamm A. & Lucas J. Engaging Stakeholders Through Social Networking: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Using Facebook Public Relations Review 2009 35 2 102 106
Wehrenfennig D. From an Analog Past to a Digital Future: Information and Communication Technology in Conflict Managment Cyberspace and Global Affairs 2012 Surrey Ashgate Publishing Limited 23 50
Wendt A. On Constitution and Causation in International Relations Review of International Studies 1998 24 5 101 118
Whiting L. S. Semi-structured Interviews: Guidance for Novice Researchers Nursing Standard 2008 22 23 35 35
Williamson W. F. & Kelley J. R. #Kelleypd: Public Diplomacy 2.0 Classroom Global Media Journal—American Edition 2012 11 21
Wichowski A. Bjola C. & Holmes M. ‘Secrecy is for Losers’: Why Diplomats Should Embrace Openness to Protect National Security Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 52 70
Xiguang L. & Jing W. Web-based Public Diplomacy: The Role of Social Media in the Iranian and Xinjiang Riots Journal of International Communication 2010 16 1 7 22
Zaharna R. S. & Rugh W. A. Issue Theme: The Use of Social Media in u.s. Public Diplomacy Global Media Journal—American Edition 2012 11 21 1 8
Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault E. & Fisher A. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault E. & Fisher A. The Connective Mindshift Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 144 156
Zaharna R. S. Zaharna R. S. , Arsenault E. & Fisher A. Network Purpose, Network Design: Dimensions of Network and Collaborative Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 173 189
Zhang J. A Strategic Issue Management (sim) Approach to Social Media Use in Public Diplomacy American Behavioral Scientist 2013 57 9 1312 1331
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3384 | 949 | 267 |
Full Text Views | 431 | 73 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 294 | 105 | 2 |
Despite growing interest in digital diplomacy, few studies to date have evaluated the extent to which foreign ministries have been able to realize its potential. Studies have also neglected to understand the manner in which diplomats define digital diplomacy and envision its practice. This article explores the digital diplomacy model employed by four foreign ministries through interviews and questionnaires with practitioners. Results from a cross national comparison suggest that foreign ministries have been able to institutionalize the use of social media through the development of best practices and training for diplomats. However, foreign ministries seem to utilize social media to influence elite audiences rather than to foster dialogue with foreign populations. Results also suggest that both ministries and social media audiences are negotiating their respective roles in the online communication process. Although social media is used to overcome the limitations of traditional diplomacy, and manage the national image, foreign ministries fail to collaborate with non-state actors or use social media as a source of information for policy makers. Thus, while diplomacy is networked, it is still state-centric. Finally, at the embassy level, ambassadors now serve as digital gatekeepers.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3384 | 949 | 267 |
Full Text Views | 431 | 73 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 294 | 105 | 2 |