Are We There Yet: Have mfas Realized the Potential of Digital Diplomacy?

Results from a Cross-National Comparison

in Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Despite growing interest in digital diplomacy, few studies to date have evaluated the extent to which foreign ministries have been able to realize its potential. Studies have also neglected to understand the manner in which diplomats define digital diplomacy and envision its practice. This article explores the digital diplomacy model employed by four foreign ministries through interviews and questionnaires with practitioners. Results from a cross national comparison suggest that foreign ministries have been able to institutionalize the use of social media through the development of best practices and training for diplomats. However, foreign ministries seem to utilize social media to influence elite audiences rather than to foster dialogue with foreign populations. Results also suggest that both ministries and social media audiences are negotiating their respective roles in the online communication process. Although social media is used to overcome the limitations of traditional diplomacy, and manage the national image, foreign ministries fail to collaborate with non-state actors or use social media as a source of information for policy makers. Thus, while diplomacy is networked, it is still state-centric. Finally, at the embassy level, ambassadors now serve as digital gatekeepers.

Sections

References

AbbasiM. A.KumarS.Andrade FilhoJ. A.LiuH. Lessons Learned in Using Social Media for Disaster Relief-asu Crisis Response Game Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 282 289

Al-SaggafY.WilliamsonK. Online Communities in Saudi Arabia: Evaluating the Impact on Culture Through Online Semi-structured Interviews Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2004 September Vol. 5 No. 3

ArchettiC. The Impact of New Media on Diplomatic Practice: An Evolutionary Model of Change The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2012 7 2 181 206

AttiasS. Israel’s New Peer-to-peer Diplomacy The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2012 7 4 473 482

BélangerF.CarterL. Trust and Risk in E-government Adoption The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2008 17 2 165 176

BjolaC. The Ethics of Secret Diplomacy: A Contextual Approach Journal of Global Ethics 2014 10 1 85 100

BjolaC.HolmesM. Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice 2015 New York Routledge

BjolaC.JiangL. BjolaC.HolmesM. Social Media and Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of the Digital Diplomatic Strategies of the eu, us and Japan in China Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 71 88

BortreeD. S.SeltzerT. Dialogic Strategies and Outcomes: An Analysis of Environmental Advocacy Groups’ Facebook Profiles Public Relations Review 2009 35 3 317 319

BoydD.EllisonN. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 2007 13 1 210 230

BrittenN. Qualitative Interviews in Medical Research BMJ: British Medical Journal 1995 311 6999 251 251

BrownR. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. The Politics of Relational Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 44 55

CastellsM. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and culture 2011 Vol. 1 John Wiley & Sons

CauseyC.HowardP. N. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. Delivering Digital Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 144 156

ChaH.YeoS.KimB. Social Media’s Dialogic Communication of Foreign Embassies in Korea and Public Diplomacy: Based on Dialogic Communication Theory 2014

ClarkeA. BjolaC.HolmesM. Business as Usual? An Evolution of British and Canadian Digital Diplomacy as Policy Change Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 111 126

ComorE.BeanH. America’s ‘Engagement’ Delusion: Critiquing a Public Diplomacy Consensus International Communication Gazette 2012 74 3 203 220

ComorE. Digital Engagement: America’s Use (and Misuse) of Marshall McLuhan New Political Science 2013 35 1 1 18

CopelandD. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. Taking Diplomacy Public Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 56 69

CorrieK. L. BjolaC.HolmesM. The International Criminal Court: Using Technology in Network Diplomacy Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 145 163

CowanG.ArsenaultA. Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layer of Public Diplomacy The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2008 616 1 10 30

CullN. J. Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2008 616 1 31 54

DearnleyC. A Reflection on the Use of Semi-structured Interviews Nurse Researcher 2005 13 1 19 28

DeitchI. #AskHamas Twitter Campaign Backfires on Gaza Group The Times of Israel 2015 March 13

Digital Disruption Short Fuse, Big Bang? Australia: Deloitte Australia 2012 Available online at http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/Building%20Lucky%20Country/deloitte-au-consulting-digital-disruption-whitepaper-0912.pdf

EntmanR. M. Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory 1993 390 397

EntmanR. M. Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11 Political Communication 2003 20 4 415 432

EntmanR. M. Theorizing Mediated Public Diplomacy: The us Case The International Journal of Press/Politics 2008 13 2 87 102

Eshet-AlkalaiY. Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2004 13 1 93 107

FanY. ‘Branding the Nation: Towards a Better Understanding,’ Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 2010 6 2 97 103

FisherA. Four Seasons in One Day: The Crowded House of Public Diplomacy in the uk Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy 2009 New York Routledge 251 261

FisherA. Mapping the Great Beyond: Identifying Meaningful Networks in Public Diplomacy cpd Perspectives on Public Diplomacy 2010 2 1 87

FitzpatrickK. R. Advancing the New Public Diplomacy: A Public Relations Perspective The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2007 2 3 187 211

FontanaA.FreyJ. The Art of Science The Handbook of Qualitative Research 1994 361 376

GolbergA.KaduckM. SteinJ. G. Where is Headquarters?: Diplomacy, Development and Defense Diplomacy in the Digital Age: Essays in Honour of Ambassador Allan Gotlieb 2011 Ontario Signal 125 140

Gravé-LaziL. idc Fights War on Another Front The Jerusalem Post 2014 July 16 Retrieved from http://www.jpost.com/PromoContent/IDC-fights-war-on-another-front-362989

GregoryB. American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2011 6 3–4 351 372

GrunigJ. E.HuntT. Managing Public Relations 1984 Vol. 343 New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston

HallamsE. Digital Diplomacy: The Internet, the Battle for Ideas & us Foreign Policy ceu Political Science Journal 2010 4 538 574

HamdyN.GomaaE. H. Framing the Egyptian Uprising in Arabic Language Newspapers and Social Media Journal of Communication 2012 62 2 195 211

HarrisB. Diplomacy 2.0: The Future of Social Media in Nation Branding Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy 2013 4 1 3 3

HaydenC. Social Media at State: Power, Practice, and Conceptual Limits for us Public Diplomacy Global Media Journal-American Edition 2012 11 21

HaynalG. SteinJ. G. Corporate Diplomacy in the Information Age: Catching Up to the Dispersal of Power Diplomacy in the Digital Age: Essays in Honour of Ambassador Allan Gotlieb 2011 Ontario Signal 209 224

HockingB.MelissenJ. Diplomacy in the Digital Age, Cligendael Report Cligendeal Netherlands Institute of International Relations 2015

HoffmanB. The Use of the Internet by Islamic Extremists 2006 May 4 Testimony Presented to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, on May 4, 2006. Available online at http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/2006/RAND_CT262-1.pdf

KampfR.ManorI.SegevE. Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-national Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2015 10 4 331 362

KhatibL.DuttonW.ThelwallM. Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Case Study of the us Digital Outreach Team The Middle East Journal 2012 66 3 453 472

KentM. L.TaylorM. Building Dialogic Relationships Through the World Wide Web Public Relations Review 1998 24 3 321 334

KotlerP.GertnerD. ‘Country as Brand, Product, and Beyond: A Place Marketing and Brand Management Perspective,’ Brand Management 2002 9 4–5 249 261

LeeG.KwakY. H. An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-based Public Engagement Government Information Quarterly 2012 29 4 492 503

LeightN.WaltonS. B.AnanianT.Cruz-EnriquezM.JarwaharlalK. PDiN Quarterly—Trends in Public Diplomacy: January, February and March 2011 Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 2011 7 2 136 149

LichtensteinJ. Digital Diplomacy 2010 July 17 Retrieved July 4 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/magazine/18web2-0-t.html

ManorI. How Kenya’s mfa Leads by Example Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 January 4 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/01/04/kenya/

ManorI. In Digital Diplomacy, a Narrowing Digital Divide—Part 1 Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 January 19 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/01/19/divide/

ManorI. On Hamas, Digital Diplomacy & Digital Hypocrisy Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 March 15 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/03/15/on-hamas-digital-diplomacy-digital-hypocrisy/

ManorI. Digital Diplomacy During #NepalEarthquake Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 May 21 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/05/21/digital-diplomacy-during-nepalearthquake/

ManorI. The Framing of #IranDeal on Digital Diplomacy Channels Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 July 14 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/07/14/the-framing-of-irandeal-on-digital-diplomacy-channels/

ManorI. Is Digital Diplomacy Really Cost Effective? Exploring Digital Diplomacy 2015 July 21 Retrieved from http://digdipblog.com/2015/07/21/is-digital-diplomacy-really-cost-effective/

ManorI.SegevE. BjolaC.HolmesM. America’s Selfie: How the us Portrays Itself on its Social Media Accounts Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 89 108

MacnamaraJ.SakinofskyP.BeattieJ. E-electoral Engagement: How Governments Use Social Media to Engage Voters Australian Journal of Political Science 2012 47 4 623 639

MacnamaraJ. Pre and Post-election 2010 Online: What Happened to the Conversation? 2011

MaloneD. SteinJ. G. New Friends in the Digital Age Diplomacy in the Digital Age 2011 Canada McClelland & Stewart 102 124

McNuttK. Public Engagement in the Web 2.0 Era: Social Collaborative Technologies in a Public Sector Context Canadian Public Administration 2014 57 1 49 70

MelissenJ. MelissenJ. The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations 2005 New York Palgrave Macmillan 3 27

MerazS.PapacharissiZ. Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt The International Journal of Press/Politics 2013 18 138 166

MetzgarE. T. Is it the Medium or the Message? Social Media, American Public Relations & Iran Global Media Journal 2012 1 16

Molad, the Center for Renewed Democracy Israeli Hasbara: Myths and Reality 2012 Jerusalem Molad

NatarajanK. Digital Public Diplomacy and a Strategic Narrative for India Strategic Analysis 2014 38 1 91 106

OciepkaB. Impact of New Technologies on International Communication: The Case of Public Diplomacy Information Science 2012 59 24 36

OgawaT. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. New Frontiers in Relational Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Rutledge 117 131

PammentJ. New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century 2013 New York Rutledge

PammentJ. Digital Diplomacy as Transmedia Engagement: Aligning Theories of Participatory Culture with International Advocacy Campaigns New Media & Society 2015 23 1 1 17

PapadopoulosN.HeslopL. ‘Country Equity and Country Branding: Problems and Prospects,’ Brand Management 2002 9 4–5 294 314

ParkH.ReberB. H. Relationship Building and the Use of Web Sites: How Fortune 500 Corporations Use Their Web Sites to Build Relationships Public Relations Review 2008 34 4 409 411

ParkS. J.LimY. S. Information Networks and Social Media Use in Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of South Korea and Japan Asian Journal of Communication 2014 24 1 79 98

Pew Research Center: The Evolving Role of News on Twitter and Facebook 2015 July 14 Retrieved September 3, 2015 from http://www.journalism.org/2015/07/14/the-evolving-role-of-news-on-twitter-and-facebook/

PorathZ. Letters from Jerusalem, 1947–1948 (n.d.) Retrieved August 19, 2014, from http://www.zionism-israel.com/ezine/Partition_A_Night_To_Remember.htm

PotterE. H. Managing Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century 2002 London McGill-Queen’s University Press

PrenskyM. Digital natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 On the Horizon 2001 9 5 1 6

QuelchJ. A.JoczK. E. Can Brand Obama Rescue Brand America? Brown J. World Aff. 2009 16 163 163

QuigleyK. ‘Man Plans, God Laughs’: Canada’s National Strategy for Protecting Critical Infrastructure.” Canadian Public Administration 2013 56 1 142 164

RanaK. S. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. Diaspora Diplomacy and Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Rutledge 70 85

RavidB. Israel Opens Virtual Embassy to Gulf States Retrieved August 21 2014 from http://blogs.haaretz.co.il/barakravid/773/

SaundersH. H. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. The Relational Paradigm and Sustained Dialogue Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 132 143

ScottB. In Defense of #BringBackOurGirls and Hashtag Activism (n.d.) Retrieved October 3, 2015, from http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/05/16/bringbackourgirls_a_defense_of_hashtag_activism.html

ScottJ. ‘Bill 3 & Privacy Implications.’ Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice 2012 25 3 209 235

SeibP. Real-time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era 2012 Palgrave Macmillan

SeoH. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. The ‘Virtual Last Three Feet.’ Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 157 169

SharpP. MelissenJ. Revolutionary States, Outlaw Regimes and the Techniques of Public Diplomacy The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations 2005 New York Palgrave Macmillan 106 124

ShenhavS. R.SheaferT.GabayI. Incoherent narrator: Israeli public diplomacy during the disengagement and the elections in the Palestinian Authority israel studies 2010 15 3 143 162

SlaughterA. M. America’s Edge Foreign Affairs 2009 88 1 94 113

SmithB. G. Socially Distributing Public Relations: Twitter, Haiti, and Interactivity in Social Media Public Relations Review 2010 36 4 329 335

StoltzfusK. Exploring us E-diplomacy and Non-state Actors’ Increasing Communicative Influence 2008 Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Digital Government Research 347 354

SotiriuS. BjolaC.HolmesM. Digital Diplomacy: Between Promises and Reality Digital Diplomacy 2015 New York Routledge 33 51

SteinJ. G. SteinJ. G. Introduction Diplomacy in the Digital Age 2011 Canada McClelland & Stewart 1 9

StocktonN. nasa’s Social Media Strategy Is Genius—And Kinda Maddening 2015 August 23 Retrieved August 26, 2015, from http://www.wired.com/2015/07/nasas-social-media-strategy-genius-kinda-maddening/

ToosiN. White House to Engage Iran Critics Through @TheIranDeal 2015 Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/white-house-to-engage-iran-critics-through-theirandeal-120408.html

The Economist Virtual Realtions The Economist 2012 September 22 Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21563284

The Economist God’s Ambassadors The Economist 2007 July 21 Retrieved September 5, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/node/9516461

The White House Remarks by President Obama on a New Beginning 2009 Retrieved July 13, 2014, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09

Twiploamcy Twiplomacy Study 2015 2015 Retrieved July 13, 2015

United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy 2015 Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting 2015 Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/247329.pdf

us Army fm-3-24 and mcwp 3-33.5 Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies 2014 Washington, D.C. Headquarters, Department of the Army Available online at https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24.pdf

Van HamP. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultA.FisherA. Social Power in Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 17 28

VancA. M. Post-9/11 us Public Diplomacy in Eastern Europe: Dialogue via New Technologies or Face-to-Face Communication? Global Media Journal—American Edition 2012 II 21

WatersR. D.BurnettE.LammA.LucasJ. Engaging Stakeholders Through Social Networking: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Using Facebook Public Relations Review 2009 35 2 102 106

WehrenfennigD. From an Analog Past to a Digital Future: Information and Communication Technology in Conflict Managment Cyberspace and Global Affairs 2012 Surrey Ashgate Publishing Limited 23 50

WendtA. On Constitution and Causation in International Relations Review of International Studies 1998 24 5 101 118

WhitingL. S. Semi-structured Interviews: Guidance for Novice Researchers Nursing Standard 2008 22 23 35 35

WilliamsonW. F.KelleyJ. R. #Kelleypd: Public Diplomacy 2.0 Classroom Global Media Journal—American Edition 2012 11 21

WichowskiA. BjolaC.HolmesM. ‘Secrecy is for Losers’: Why Diplomats Should Embrace Openness to Protect National Security Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice 2015 Oxon Routledge 52 70

XiguangL.JingW. Web-based Public Diplomacy: The Role of Social Media in the Iranian and Xinjiang Riots Journal of International Communication 2010 16 1 7 22

ZaharnaR. S.RughW. A. Issue Theme: The Use of Social Media in u.s. Public Diplomacy Global Media Journal—American Edition 2012 11 21 1 8

ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultE.FisherA. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultE.FisherA. The Connective Mindshift Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 144 156

ZaharnaR. S. ZaharnaR. S.ArsenaultE.FisherA. Network Purpose, Network Design: Dimensions of Network and Collaborative Public Diplomacy Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift 2013 Oxon Routledge 173 189

ZhangJ. A Strategic Issue Management (sim) Approach to Social Media Use in Public Diplomacy American Behavioral Scientist 2013 57 9 1312 1331

Figures

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 49 49 26
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0