Science diplomacy is becoming an important tool by which states can more effectively promote and secure their foreign policy agendas. Recognising the role science plays at national and international levels and identifying a state's national diplomatic style can help to construct a ‘national style' in science diplomacy. In turn, understanding science diplomacy can help one evaluate a state's potential for global governance and to address global issues on a systematic scale. By using a Realist framework and by testing proposed hypotheses, this study highlights how different national styles in science diplomacy affect competition between major powers and their shared responsibility for global problems. This study adds to our general understanding of the practice of diplomacy as it intersects with the sciences.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adamson, Matthew. ‘Les liaisons dangereuses: resource surveillance, uranium diplomacy and secret French–American collaboration in 1950s Morocco,' BJHS, vol. 49, no. 1 (March 2016), pp. 79-105.
Armitage, David. ‘The Atlantic Ocean' in David Armitage, Alison Bashford & Sujit Sivasundaram (ed.), Oceanic Histories (Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 85-110.
Aron, Raymond. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2003).
Balme, Richard. ‘Revisiting French diplomacy in the age of globalization,' French Politics, vol. 8, no. 1, (2010), pp. 91-95.
Balter, Michael. ‘Storming the Bastille,' Science, vol. 296 (26 April 2002), pp. 649-651.
Berridge, G. R. Diplomacy. Theory and Practice (The UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
Berridge, G. R. ‘Machiavelli' in G. R. Berridge, Maurice Keens-Soper & T. G. Otte (ed.), Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger (Palgrave, 2001).
Berridge, G. R., Maurice Keens-Soper & T. G. Otte (ed.), Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001).
Biberman, Yelena. ‘The Politics of Diplomatic Service Reforms in Post-Soviet Russia,' Political Science Quarterly, vol. 126, no. 4, (2011), pp. 669-680.
Bjola, Corneliu & Markus Kornprobst, Understanding International Diplomacy. Theory, practice and ethics (New York, NY: Routledge, 2013).
Blanga, Yehuda U. “Between Two and Four': The French Initiative and the Multi-Power Diplomatic Initiatives to Resolve the Middle East Crisis,' Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 27, no. 1 (2016), pp. 93-120.
Butterfield, Herbert. ‘The Balance of Power' in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wigh (ed.), Diplomatic Investigations. Essays in the Theory of International Politics (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1966).
Byford, Andy. ‘Turning Pedagogy into a Science: Teachers and Psychologists in Late Imperial Russia (1897-1917),' in Michael Gordin, Karl Hall and Alexei Kojevnikov (ed.), Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860-1960, Osiris, Second Series, vol. 23 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008), pp. 50-81.
Ceccarelli, Leah. On the Frontier of Science: An American Rhetoric of Exploration and Exploitation (East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University, 2013).
Chalecki, Elizabeth L. ‘Knowledge in Sheep's Clothing: How Science Informs American Diplomacy,' Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 19 (2008), pp. 1-19.
Chan, Gerald. Chinese Perspectives on International Relations. A Framework for Analysis (Palgrave Macmillan, 1999), pp. 140-143.
Clary, David C. ‘A Scientist in the Foreign Office,' Science & Diplomacy (September 2013).
Cohen, Eliot A. The big Stick. The Limits of Soft Power & the Necessity of Military Force (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2016).
Colglazier, William. ‘Science and Diplomacy,' Science, vol. 335 (17 February 2012), p. 775.
Constantinou, Costas M. & James Der Derian, ‘Sustaining Global Hope: Sovereignty, Power and the Transformation of Diplomacy,' in Costas M. Constantinou and James Der Derian (ed.), Sustainable Diplomacies (The UK: Palgrave Macmillan 2010), pp. 1-22.
Copeland, Daryl. ‘Science Diplomacy: What's It All About?' CEPI-CIPS Policy Brief 13 (November 2011).
Dar, Humaira. ‘Nuclear Diplomacy: A Case Study of French and Pakistani Behaviour,' Pakistan Vision, vol. 18, no. 2 (2017), pp. 211-236.
Dasque, Isabelle. ‘Diplomats and Diplomacy,' Encyclopédie pour une histoire nouvelle de l'Europe, (9 November, 2017).
Dasque, Isabelle. ‘La diplomatie française au lendemain de la Grande Guerre. Bastion d'une aristocratie au service de l'État?' Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire, 2008/3 (n° 99), pp. 33-49.
Devin, Guillaume. ‘Burst Diplomacy The Diplomacies of Foreign Policy: Actors and Methods,' Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 4, no. 2 (2010) pp. 60-77.
Dittmer, Jason. Diplomatic Material: Affect, Assemblage, and Foreign Policy (Duke University Press, 2017).
Dittmer, Jason & Fiona McConnell (ed.), Diplomatic Cultures and International Politics: Translations, Spaces and Alternatives (New York, NY: Routledge, 2017).
Dobbins, James. Foreign Service: Five Decades on the Frontlines of American Diplomacy, (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2017).
Economy, Elizabeth. The Third Revolution. Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State (NY, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018).
Ezell, Edward Clinton & Linda Neuman Ezell, The Partnership, a History of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (The US: NASA, 1978).
Fähnrich, Birte. ‘Science diplomacy: Investigating the perspective of scholars on politics – science collaboration in international affairs,' Public Understanding of Science (2015), pp. 1-16.
Farrow, Ronan. War on Peace: The End of Diplomacy and the Decline of American Influence, (New York, London: W.W. Norton, 2018).
Fedoroff, Nina V. ‘Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century,' Cell, 136 (9 January 2009), pp. 9-11.
Fink, Gerald R., Alan I. Leshner, & Vaughan C. Turekian, ‘Science diplomacy with Cuba,' Science, vol. 344, issue 6188 (06 June 2014).
Flink, Tim & Ulrich Schreiterer, ‘Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches,' Science and Public Policy, vol. 37(9) (November 2010), pp. 665-677.
Gascoigne, John. ‘Science and the British Empire from its Beginnings to 1850' in Brett M. Bennett & Joseph M. Hodge (ed.), Science and Empire. Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire, 1800-1970 (The UK: Palgrave Macmillan 2011).
Geeraerts, Gustaaf & Men Jing, ‘International Relations Theory in China,' Global Society, vol. 15, no. 3 (2001), pp. 251-276.
Gil, Jeffrey. ‘China's Cultural Projection: A Discussion of the Confucius Institutes,' China: An International Journal, vol. 13, no. 1 (April 2015), pp. 200-226.
Gordin, Michael, Karl Hall & Alexei Kojevnikov (ed.), Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860-1960, Osiris, Second Series, vol. 23 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008).
Gordin, Michael D. and Karl Hall, ‘Introduction: Intelligentsia Science inside and outside Russia,' in Michael Gordin, Karl Hall and Alexei Kojevnikov (ed.), Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860-1960, Osiris, Second Series, vol. 23 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008), pp. 1-19.
Gordin, Michael. ‘The Heidelberg Circle: German Inflections on the Professionalization of Russian Chemistry in the 1860s,' in Michael Gordin, Karl Hall & Alexei Kojevnikov (ed.), Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860-1960, Osiris, Second Series, vol. 23 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2008), pp. 23-46.
Graham, Loren R. ‘Big Science in the Last Years of the Big Soviet Union,' Osiris, 7 (1992), pp. 49-71.
Graham, Loren R. Science in Russia and the Soviet Union. A Short History (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Graham, Loren R. ‘When Ideology and Controversy Collide: The Case of Soviet Science,' The Hastings Center Report, vol. 12, no. 2 (April 1982), pp. 26-32.
Grieco, Joseph M. ‘The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union and the Neo-Realist Research Programme,' Review of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 1 (January 1995), pp. 21-40.
Grimes, Robin W. & Claire McNulty, ‘The Newton Fund: Science and Innovation for Development and Diplomacy,' Science & Diplomacy (December 2016).
Guldi, Jo & David Armitage, The History Manifesto (The UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Gunitsky, Seva. ‘Complexity and Theories of Change in International Politics,' International Theory, vol. 5, no. 1 (2013), pp. 35-63.
Haass, Richard. A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order (Penguin Books, 2018).
Hanson, Thomas. ‘The Traditions and Travails of Career Diplomacy in the United States,' in Paul Sharp and Geoffrey Wiseman (ed.), American Diplomacy (Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands 2012), pp. 199-216.
Harrison, Carol & Ann Johnson (ed.), National Identity: The Role of Science and Technology, Osiris, vol. 24 (2009).
Harrison, Carol & Ann Johnson, ‘Introduction: science and national identity,' in Science and National Identity, Osiris vol. 24, no. 1 (The University of Chicago Press, 2009), pp. 1-14.
Hartig, Falk. Chinese Public Diplomacy (London and New York: Routledge 2016).
Hartig, Falk. ‘New Public Diplomacy Meets Old Public Diplomacy – the Case of China and Its Confucius Institutes,” New Global Studies, vol. 8, issue 3 (2014), pp. 331-352.
Harwood, Jonathan. ‘National Styles in Science: Genetics in Germany and the United States between the World Wars,' Isis, vol. 78 (1987), pp. 390-414.
Hassner, Pierre. ‘Frustrated but Frozen: Europe and the Atlantic Relationship,' International Journal, vol. 39, no. 2 (1984), pp. 410-428.
Hassner, Pierre. ‘Raymond Aron: Too Realistic to Be a Realist?' Constellations, vol. 14, no. 4 (2007), pp. 498-505.
Hassner, Pierre. ‘Russia's Transition to Autocracy,' Journal of Democracy, vol. 19, no. 2 (April 2008), pp. 5-15.
Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt & Jonathan Perraton, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture (Stanford University Press, 1999).
Hoffman, Philip T. ‘Why Was It Europeans Who Conquered the World?' The Journal of Economic History, vol. 72, no. 3 (September 2012), pp. 601-633.
Hoffmann, Stanley. ‘Raymond Aron and the Theory of International Relations,' International Studies Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1 (March 1985), pp. 13-27.
Hogg, Jonathan & Christoph Laucht, ‘Introduction: British nuclear culture,' BJHS, vol. 45, no. 4 (December 2012), pp. 479-493.
Holmes, Alison & J. Simon Rofe, Global Diplomacy: Theories, Types, and Models (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2016).
Holmes, Marcus, Face-to-Face Diplomacy. Social Neuroscience and International Relations (The UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018).
Hotez, Peter J. ‘Russian–United States Vaccine Science Diplomacy: Preserving the Legacy', PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 11(5): e0005320.
Hotez, Peter J. ‘“Vaccine Diplomacy”: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions', PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 8(6): e2808.
Huff, Toby E. The Rise of Early Modern Science (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Ibragimova, K. A., ‘EU Science Diplomacy and Framework Programmes as Instruments of STI Cooperation,' MGIMO Review on International Relations, vol. 5(56) (2017), pp. 151-168. (In Russian).
Ibragimova, K. A. & O. N. Barabanov, ‘About the Prospects of the Russian Science Diplomacy,' Vestnik RFFI [Russian Foundation for Basic Research Herald], no 1 (97) (January-March 2018), pp. 57-59.
Ismailov, A. I. & K. K. Bazarbayev, ‘History and Traditions of Russian Diplomacy,' Historical Sciences, no. 6 (2012), p. 5, (in Russian).
Jervis, Robert. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate' in Colin Elman & Miriam Fendius Elman (ed.), Progress in International Relations Theory. Appraising the Field (The US: MIT Press 2003).
Jönsson, Christer. ‘Global Governance: Challenges to Diplomatic Communication, Representation, and Recognition' in Andrew F. Cooper, Brian Hocking & William Maley (ed.), Global Governance and Diplomacy. Worlds Apart? (The UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
Just, Tony. The Burden of Responsibility. Blum, Camus, Aron, and the French Twentieth Century (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Kagan, Korina. ‘The Myth of the European Concert: The Realist‐Institutionalist Debate and Great Power Behavior in the Eastern Question, 1821-41,' Security Studies, vol. 7, no. 2 (1997), pp. 1-57.
Kahler, Miles. ‘Global Governance: Three Futures,' International Studies Review, vol. 20 (2018), pp. 239-246.
Keiger, John. ‘Wielding Finance as a Weapon of Diplomacy: France and Britain in the 1920s,' Contemporary British History, vol. 25, no. 1, (2011), pp. 29-47.
Kennan, George F. American Diplomacy: Sixtieth-Anniversary Expanded Edition (The University of Chicago Press, 2012).
Kissinger, Henry. Diplomacy (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1994).
Kissinger, Henry. World Order (Penguin Books, 2015).
Knight, David. The Age of Science (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).
Krasnyak, Olga. ‘Science Diplomacy: An Underestimated Toolkit of South Korea's Foreign Policy,' On Korea: Academic Paper Series 2018, Korea Economic Institute of America (12 April 2018), p. 4.
Krasnyak, Olga. ‘The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: Construction of an Ideal Type of Science Diplomacy,' The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 13, no. 4 (2018).
Kuznetsov, Alexandr. “Inheriting legends sanctified by the time …' From the history of the Russian foreign policy doctrine,' Politia, no. 4 (2004), p. 2, (in Russian).
Lane, Philippe. French Scientific and Cultural Diplomacy, (The UK: Liverpool University Press, 2013).
Laven, Mary. Mission to China. Matteo Ricci and the Jesuit Encounter with the East (The UK: Faber & Faber 2011).
Lavrov, Sergey. ‘Russia's Foreign Policy in a Historical Perspective,' Russia in Global Affairs (20 March 2018).
Lebedeva, Marina M. & Maxim V. Kharkevich, ‘Theory of International Relations in the Mirror of Contemporary Russian International Studies,' MGIMO Review on International Relations, vol. 5(50) (2016), pp. 7-19, (in Russian).
Lloyd, Davis & Robert G. Patman (ed.), Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn? (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2015).
Lord, Kristin M. & Vaughan C. Turekian, ‘Time for a New Era of Science Diplomacy,' Science, New Series, vol. 315, no. 5813 (9 February, 2007), pp. 769-770.
Lundborg, Tom. ‘The ethics of neorealism: Waltz and the time of international life,' European Journal of International Relations (2018).
Manela, Erez. ‘A Pox on Your Narrative: Writing Disease Control into Cold War History,' Diplomatic History, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2010), pp. 299-323.
Mayer, Anna-K. ‘Setting up a discipline, II: British history of science and “the end of ideology,” 1931-1948,' Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 35 (2004), pp. 41-72.
McKercher, B. J. C. ‘The Foreign Office, 1930-39: Strategy, Permanent Interests and National Security,' Contemporary British History, vol. 18, no. 3 (2004), pp. 87-109.
McKinney, Larry. ‘Continue U.S.–Cuban science diplomacy,' Science, vol. 358, issue 6370 (22 Dec 2017), p. 1549.
Mearsheimer, John J. ‘Introduction' in George F. Kennan, American Diplomacy: Sixtieth-Anniversary Expanded Edition (The University of Chicago Press 2012).
Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2014).
Mearsheimer, John J. Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities (Yale University Press, 2018).
Milne, David. Worldmaking: The Art and Science of American Diplomacy (NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017).
Milner, Anthony. ‘Culture and the international relations of Asia,' The Pacific Review, vol. 30, no. 6 (2017), pp. 857-869.
Moedas, Carlos. ‘Science Diplomacy in the European Union,' Science & Diplomacy (March 2016).
Moreno, Ana Elorza et. al. ‘Spanish Science Diplomacy: A Global and Collaborative Bottom-Up Approach,' Science & Diplomacy (March 2017).
Morgenthau, Hans J. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Great Britain: Latimer House Limited, 1947).
Murray, Stuart et. al. ‘The Present and Future of Diplomacy and Diplomatic Studies,' International Studies Review, vol. 13 (2011), pp. 709-728.
Nicolson, Harold. Diplomacy (Oxford University Press, 1942).
Niebuhr, Reinhold. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics (New York City, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1932).
Nye, Joseph. Soft Power – The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs, 2009).
Nye, Joseph. ‘How Sharp Power Threatens Soft Power,' Foreign Affairs (24 January, 2018).
Nye, Mary Jo. ‘National Styles? French and English Chemistry in the Nineteen and Early Twentieth Centuries,' Osiris 2, no. 8 (1993), pp. 30-49.
Nye, Mary Jo. ‘Recent Sources and Problems in the History of French Science,' Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2 (1983), pp. 401-415.
Nye, Mary Jo. ‘The Republic vs. The Collective: Two Histories of Collaboration and Competition in Modern Science,' N.T.M., vol. 24 (2016), pp. 169-194.
Nye, Mary Jo. ‘What price politics? Scientists and political controversy,' Endeavour, vol. 23, no. 4 (1999), pp. 148-154.
Opondo, Sam Okoth. ‘Decolonizing Diplomacy: Reflections on African Estrangement and Exclusion,' in Costas M. Constantinou & James Der Derian (ed.), Sustainable Diplomacies (The UK: Palgrave Macmillan 2010), pp. 109-127.
Otte, T. G. ‘Nicolson' in G. R. Berridge, Maurice Keens-Soper & T. G. Otte (ed.), Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001).
Otte, T. G. ‘Old Diplomacy: Reflections on the Foreign Office before 1914,' Contemporary British History, vol. 18, no. 3, (2004), pp. 31-52.
Pamment, James. ‘The Mediatization of Diplomacy,' The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 9 (2014), pp. 253-280.
Pickett, Warren E., Anthony J. Leggett & Paul C. W. Chu, ‘Science Diplomacy with Iran,' Nature Physics, vol. 10 (July 2014), pp. 465-467.
Polyakova, Alina & Benjamin Haddad, ‘Europe in the New Era of Great Power Competition. How the EU Can Stand Up to Trump and China,' Foreign Affairs (17 July, 2018).
Pouliot, Vincent. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy (UK, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Proud, Virginia. ‘The Hunt for Science Diplomacy: Practice and Perceptions in the Horizon 2020 Scientific community,' EL-CSID Working Paper, issue 2018/18 (June 2018).
Pyenson, Lewis. ‘An end to national science: the meaning and the extension of local knowledge,' History of Science, vol. 40 (2002), pp. 251-290.
Qin, Yaqing. ‘Development of International Relations Theory in China: Progress Through Debates,' International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, vol. 11 (2011), pp. 231-257.
Rathbun, Brian C. Diplomacy's Value: Creating Security in 1920s Europe and the Contemporary Middle East (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014).
Reingold, Nathan. ‘National Styles in the Sciences: The United States Case,' in E. G. Forbes (ed.), Human Implications of Scientific Advance (Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press, 1978), pp. 163-173.
Reus-Smit, Christian. ‘Cultural Diversity and International Order,' International Organization, vol. 71 (2017), pp. 851-885.
Robertson, Jeffrey. Diplomatic Style and Foreign Policy: A Case Study of South Korea (London and New York: Routledge, 2016).
Robertson, Jeffrey. ‘Middle-power definitions: confusion reigns supreme,' Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 71, no. 3 (March 2017), pp. 1-16.
Roman, Alea Lopes De San & Simon Schutz, ‘Understanding European Union Science Diplomacy,' Journal of Common Market Studies (2017), pp. 1-20.
Roman, Joe, James Kraska, ‘Reboot Gitmo for U.S.-Cuba research diplomacy,' Science, vol. 351, issue 6279 (18 Mar 2016), pp. 1258-1260.
Romanova, M. D. ‘Science Diplomacy: Dimensions and Practices,' Science, Innovation, Education [Nauka, Innovatsii, Obrazovanie], no. 1 (23) 2017, pp. 38-52, (in Russian).
Rostow, W. W. ‘The American National Style,' Daedalus, vol. 87, no. 2 (Spring 1958), pp. 110-144.
Rüffin, Nicolas & Ulrich Schreiterer, ‘Case Study Science and Technology Agreements in the Toolbox of Science Diplomacy: Effective Instruments or Insignificant Add-ons?' EL-CSID Working Paper, issue 2017/6 (September 2017).
Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations (Berlin: Springer, 2017).
Schmid, Sonja D. ‘Organizational Culture and Professional Identities in the Soviet Nuclear Power Industry,' in Michael Gordin, Karl Hall and Alexei Kojevnikov (ed.), Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860-1960, Osiris, Second Series, vol. 23 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2008), pp. 82-111.
Schlegel, Flavia, Olivier Jacot & Marc Fetscherin, ‘Science diplomacy with swissnex China: A Swiss nation brand initiative,' Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, vol. 7, issue 4 (November 2011), pp. 289-298.
Sending, Ole Jacob, Vincent Pouliot & Iver B. Neumann, ‘The Future of Diplomacy,' International Journal, vol. 66, no. 3 (2011), pp. 527-542.
Shakleyina, Tatyana A. & Aleksei D. Bogaturov, ‘Russian Realist School of International Relations,' Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 37, issue 1 (March 2004), pp. 37-51.
Shestopal, Alexei V. & Nikolay V. Litvak, ‘Science Diplomacy: French Experience,' MGIMO Review on International Relations, vol. 5(50) (2016), pp. 106-114. (In Russian).
Sharp, Paul. Diplomatic Theory of International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Sharp, Paul & Geoffrey Wiseman (ed.), American Diplomacy (Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2012).
Siddiqi, Asif A. ‘Competing Technologies, National(ist) Narratives, and Universal Claims: Toward a Global History of Space Exploration,' Technology and Culture, vol. 51, no. 2 (April 2010), pp. 425-443.
Siddiqi, Asif A. ‘Imagining the Cosmos: Utopians, Mystics, and the Popular Culture of Spaceflight in Revolutionary Russia,' in Michael Gordin, Karl Hall and Alexei Kojevnikov (ed.), Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860-1960. Osiris, Second Series, vol. 23 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2008), pp. 260-288.
Singer, Peter. Ethics in the Real World: 82 Brief Essays on Things That Matter (Princeton University Press, 2016).
Sivovolov, Dmitry. ‘The Role of Russian Diplomacy in the Construction of ‘Electronic Governmet' in Russia,' MGIMO Review on International Relations, [Vestrnik MGIMO] vol. 5 (32) (2013), pp. 54-57, (in Russian).
Spangenburg, Ray & Diane Kit Moser, Modern Science, 1896-1945 (New York, NY: Facts On File, Inc. 2004).
Spence, David. ‘Taking Stock: 50 Years of European Diplomacy,' The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 4 (2009), pp. 235-259.
Streltsov, Dmitry & Artem Lukin, ‘Russian-Japanese Rapprochement Through the Lens of IR theory. Neo-classical Realism, Constructivism, and Two Level Games,' International Trends, vol. 15, no. 2 (April-June 2017), pp. 44-63, (in Russian).
Swire, Hugo. ‘The UK, Brazil and Science Diplomacy,' a speech delivered on 15 December 2014.
Taylor, Brendan. The Four Flashpoints: How Asia Goes to War (Australia: La Trobe University Press, 2018).
Trager, Robert F. Diplomacy: Communication and the Origins of International Order (The UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017).
Trenn, Thaddeus. ‘The central role of energy in Soddy's holistic and critical approach to nuclear science, economics, and social responsibility,' BJHS, vol. 12 (1979), pp. 261-276.
Tsygankov, Andrei. The Russian International Theory: The Three Traditions (Russia, Moscow: RuScience 2018), (in Russian).
Van Langenhove, Luk. ‘Tools for an EU Science Diplomacy' (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017).
Van Langenhove, Luk & Elke Boers, ‘Science Diplomacy in search of a purpose in the populist era,' United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS), issue 2018/4 (March 2018).
Van Langenhove, Luk. ‘Global Science Diplomacy for Multilateralism 2.0,' Science & Diplomacy, vol. 5, no. 3 (December 2016).
Walker, Mark. ‘The ‘national' in international and transnational science,' BJHS, vol. 45, no. 3 (September 2012), pp. 359-376.
Walsh, John. ‘Some New Targets Defined for French Science Policy,' Science, vol. 156 (5 May 1967), pp. 626-631.
Walzt, Kenneth. Theory in International Politics (Addison-Wesley, 1979).
Wang, Yiwei. ‘China. Between copying and constructing' in Arlene B. Tickner & Ole Wæver (ed.), International Relations. Scholarship Around the World (New York, NY: Routledge, 2009), pp. 103-119.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics (The UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Wessely, Anna. ‘Transposing ‘Style' from the History of Art to the History of Science,' Science in Context, vol. 4 (1991), pp. 265-278.
Wiseman, Geoffrey. ‘Distinctive Characteristics of American Diplomacy,' The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 6 (2011), pp. 235-259.
Wiseman, Geoffrey. ‘Evolution of (my) thinking about diplomatic culture,' ISA Annual convention San Francisco 2018, conference paper.
Wiseman, Geoffrey. ‘Pax Americana: Bumping into Diplomatic culture,' International Studies Perspectives, vol. 6, (2005), pp. 409-430.
Xuetong, Yan. ‘Chinese Values vs. Liberalism: What Ideology Will Shape the International Normative Order?' The Chinese Journal of International Politics, (2018), pp. 1-22.
Yakushiji, Taizo. ‘The Potential of Science and Technology Diplomacy,' Asia-Pacific Review, vol. 16 (1) (2009), pp. 1-7.
Young, J. W. ‘Review article. French Diplomacy,' History, vol. 75, issue 245 (October 1990), pp. 425-429.
Ziegler, Charles E. ‘Diplomacy' in Andrei P. Tsygankov (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Russian Foreign Policy (New York, NY: Routledge, 2018).
Zonova, Tatiana V. ‘Diplomatic Cultures: Comparing Russia and the West in Terms of a ‘Modern Model of Diplomacy,” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 2 (2007), pp. 1-23.
The AAAS & The Royal Society, ‘New frontiers in science diplomacy' (2010).
Government of Spain, ‘Report on Science, Technology, and Innovation Diplomacy' (2016).
Houses of Parliament, 'Science Diplomacy,' number 568 (February 2018).
National Academy of Sciences, ‘U.S. and International Perspectives on Global Science Policy and Science Diplomacy: Report of a Workshop' (2012).
The White House, 'National Security Strategy of the United States of America' (December 2017).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2108 | 303 | 18 |
Full Text Views | 245 | 17 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 256 | 32 | 0 |
Science diplomacy is becoming an important tool by which states can more effectively promote and secure their foreign policy agendas. Recognising the role science plays at national and international levels and identifying a state's national diplomatic style can help to construct a ‘national style' in science diplomacy. In turn, understanding science diplomacy can help one evaluate a state's potential for global governance and to address global issues on a systematic scale. By using a Realist framework and by testing proposed hypotheses, this study highlights how different national styles in science diplomacy affect competition between major powers and their shared responsibility for global problems. This study adds to our general understanding of the practice of diplomacy as it intersects with the sciences.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2108 | 303 | 18 |
Full Text Views | 245 | 17 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 256 | 32 | 0 |