International Investment Law and Arbitration: History, Modern Practice, and Future Prospects

In: Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration

Abstract

International Investment Law is one of the most dynamically growing fields of International Law as shown by the volume of Bilateral Investment Treaties (bits), and investment chapters in a growing numbers of regional and mega-regional trade agreements. This paper explores the origin, evolution and operation of International Investment Law. It discusses the main actors, the protections afforded to foreign investments and investors, and the content of modern bits. The legal issues and challenges International Investment Law faces today are brought into perspective. Particularly, this paper provides an assessment of the measures put forth by the European Union aimed at transforming the traditional investor-State arbitration system to an Investment Court System. An examination of the nafta re-negotiations is also presented, including the impact that ceta, a trade deal between the eu and Canada could have in the outcome of the current re-negotiations.

  • Alvarez, Jose Enrique, The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment, 344 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 193, (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Local Remedies in International Law (2nd ed. 2004).

  • Bergsten, Eric, Americanization of International Arbitration, 18 Pace Int’l L. Rev. 289, (2006).

  • Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie, The Draft Investment Chapter of the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement: A Step Backwards for the EU and Canada?, Investment Treaty News (June 26, 2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bierbrauer, Elfriede, Negotiations on the eu-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (ceta) Concluded, Directorate-Gen. for External Policies, European Parliament, (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Birch, Nicholas J., Laird, Ian, Sabahi, Borzu, International Investment Law Regime and the Rule of Law as a Precondition for International Development, in New Directions in International Economic Law (Todd Weiler & Freya Baetens eds., 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bishop, R. Doak & Reed, Lucy, Practical Guidelines for Interviewing, Selecting and Challenging Party-Appointed Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration, 14 Arb. Int’l 2 (1998).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Björklund, Andrea K., Investment Treaty Arbitral Decisions as Jurisprudence Constante, in International Economic Law: The State and Future of the Discipline (Colin Picker, Isabella Bunn & Douglas Arner eds., 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borchard, Edwin, the Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (1915).

  • Borchard, Edwin, Minimum Standard of Treatment of Aliens, (1939) 33 ASIL Proc. 51.

  • Bottini, Gabriel, Reform of the Investor-State Arbitration Regime: The Appeal Proposal, reshaping investor-state dispute settlement system, journey for the 21st century (Jean E Kalicki and Anna Joubin-Bret eds. 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Broches, Aron, Development of International Law by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in Proceedings of ASIL 33, 81 (1965).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, Chester, Introduction: The Development and Importance of the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, in Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Chester Brown ed., 2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (6th ed. 2003).

  • Busse, Matthias, Königer, Jens and Nunnenkamp, Peter, FDI promotion through bilateral investment treaties: more than a bit?, Review of World Economics / Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 146, No. 1 (April 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheng, Tai-Heng, Positivism, New Haven Jurisprudence, and the Fragmentation of International Law, in New Directions in International Economic Law (Todd Weiler & Freya Baetens eds., 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Commission, Jeffery P., Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Citation Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence, 24 j. Int’l Arb. 129 (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed. 2012).

  • Cremades, Bernardo M., Disputes Arising Out of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: A New Look at the Calvo Doctrine and Other Jurisdictional Issues, 59 Disp. Res. J. 78 (2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Mestral, Armand, Pre-Entry Obligations under International Law, in International Investment Law (Bungenberg, Griebel, Hobe, Reinisch eds., CH Beck Hart Nomos 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Mestral, Armand, When Does the Exception Become the Rule? Conserving Regulatory Space under CETA, 18 J. Int’l Econ. L. 641, 643 (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dolzer, Rudolf & Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed., 2012).

  • Dolzer, Rudolf & Stevens, Margrete, Bilateral Investment Treaties 50 (1995).

  • Douglas, Zachary, The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration, 74 Brit. Y.B. Int’l L. 151, (2003).

  • Dugan, Christopher f., Wallace, Don, Rubins, Noah & Sabahi, Borzu, Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford UP 2008).

  • Elkins, Zacharyet al., Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000, 2008 u. Ill. L. Rev. 265 (2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fitch, Stephen D., The Harriman Manganese Concession in the Soviet Union: Lessons for Today, 9 Int’l Tax & Bus. L. 209 (1991).

  • García Amador, F.V., Fourth Report of the Special Rapporteur, Responsibility of the State for Injuries Caused in its Territory to the Person or Property of Aliens—Measures Affecting Acquired Rights, 2 Y.B. Int’l L. Comm. 1 (United Nations 1959).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gardner, John, Legal Positivism: 5 ½ Myths, 46 Am J. of Juris. 199 (2001).

  • Giorgetti, Chiara, Between Legitimacy and Control: Challenges and Recusals of Judges and Arbitrators in International Courts and Tribunals, 49 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 205 (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goebel, Julius Jr., The International Responsibility of States for Injuries Sustained by Aliens on Account of Mob Violence, Insurrections and Civil Wars, 8 Am. J. Int’l L. 802 (1914).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gómez-Palacio, Ignacio & Muchlinski, Peter, Admission and Establishment, in The Oxford Handbook on International Investment Law (Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, & Christoph Schreuer eds., 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gonzalez Garcia, Luis, Making Impossible Investor-State Reform Possible, reshaping investor-state dispute settlement system, journey for the 21st century (Jean E Kalicki and Anna Joubin-Bret eds. 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gordon, K. & Pohl, J., Investment Treaties over Time—Treaty Practice and Interpretation in a Changing World (oecd Publ’n, Working Paper No. 2, 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grierson-Weiler, Todd J. & Laird, Ian A., Standards of Treatments, in The Oxford Handbook, in The Oxford Handbook on International Investment Law (Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, & Christoph Schreuer eds., 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gudgeon, K., United States Bilateral Investment Treaties: Comments on Their Origin, Purposes, and General Treatment Standards, 4 Int’l Tax & Bus. L. 105 (1986).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gus Van, Harten, The Public-Private Distinction in the International Arbitration of Individual Claims Against the State, 56 International & Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ) 371 (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hackworth, Green H., 3 Digest of International Law 655 (1942).

  • Harvard Law School Research in International Law, The Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners, 23 Am. J. Int’l L., Special Supp. 131 (1929).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hawkins, Harry C., Commercial Treaties and Agreements: Principles and Practice (New York: Rinehart & Company Inc., 1951).

  • Houde, Marie-France & Yannaca-Small, K. Relationships between International Investment Agreements (oecd Publ’n Working Paper No. 1, 2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houde, Marie-France, Novel Features in Recent OECD Bilateral Investment Treaties, in International Investment Perspectives (2006).

  • Jackson, John H., Davey, William J. & Sykes, Alan O., Legal Problems of International Economic Relations (4th ed. 2001).

  • Kahale, III, George, Is Investor-State Arbitration Broken? TDM, October 2012.

  • Kahn, Philip and Wälde, Thomas, Report for the Hague Academy 2004 in connection with the program “New Aspects of International Investment Law / Les aspects nouveaux du droit des investissements internationaux” (Ph. Kahn and T. W. Wälde eds., 2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?, 23 Arb. Int’l 357 (2007).

  • Kingsbury, Benedict & Schill, Stephan, Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law (September 2, 2009), nyu School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 09–46.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kjos, Hege Elisabeth, Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay between National and International Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kurtz, Jurgen, A General Investment Agreement in the WTO—Lessons from Chapter 11 of NAFTA and the OECD Multilateral Agreement on Investment, 23 U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 756 (2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laird, Ian & Askew, Rebecca, Finality Versus Consistency: Does Investor-State Arbitration Need an Appellate System, 7 J. App. Prac. & Process 285 (2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lamm, Carolyn B., Greenwald, Brody K., and Young, Kristen M., From World Duty Free to Metal-Tech: A Review of International Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases Involving Allegations of Corruption, 29(2) ICSID Review 328 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lipstein, K., Conflict of Laws before International Tribunals, 29 transactions of the grotius society 51 (1944).

  • Llamzon, Aloysius, Corruption in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford 2014).

  • Lowenfeld, Adreas F., International Economic Law (2nd ed. 2008).

  • Mackaay, Ejan History of Law and Economics, in 1 Encyclopedia of Law and Economics 65 (Boudewijn Bouckaert & Gerrit De Geest eds., 2000).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manning-Cabrol, Denise, The Imminent Death of the Calvo Clause and the Rebirth of the Calvo Principle: Equality of Foreign and National Investors, 26 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 1169 (1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marboe, Irmgard calculation of compensation and damages in international investment law (OUP Oxford, 2009).

  • McLachlan, Campbell, Shore, Laurence & Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford University Press, 2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, Nancy, The Danger of Dreams: German and American Imperialism in Latin America (University of North Carolina Press, 1999).

  • Monagas, Yessika, U.S. Property in Jeopardy: Latin American Expropriations of U.S. Corporations’ Property Abroad, 34 Hous. J. Int’l L. 455 (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montt, Santiago, State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional Law and Administrative Law In The BIT Generation (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nafziger, Wayne E., The Economics of Developing Countries (3rd ed. 1997).

  • Newcombe, Andrew and Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nussbaum, Arthur, Arbitration Between the Lena Goldfields Ltd. and the Soviet Government, 36 Cornell L. Rev. 31 (1950).

  • Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise 111 (4th Ed., 1926).

  • Parlett, Kate, The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park, Eun Young, Appellate Review in Investor-State Arbitration, reshaping investor-state dispute settlement system, journey for the 21st century (Jean E Kalicki and Anna Joubin-Bret eds. 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parra, Antonio, The History of ICSID (Oxford 2012).

  • Paulsson, Jan, Arbitration without Privity, ICSID Review (1995).

  • Paulsson, Jan, Moral Hazard in International Dispute Resolution, TDM, June 10, 2010.

  • Pauwelyn, Joost, At the Edge of Chaos? Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed, 29 ICSID Rev. 372 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ralston, Jackson Harvey, The Law and Procedure of Tribunals Being a Résumé of the Views of Arbitrators Questions Arising under the Law of Nations (Stanford University Press rev. ed. 1926).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reisman, Michael W., The View from the New Haven School of International Law, American Society of International Law, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting 118 (1992).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinisch, August, & Malintoppi, Loretta, Methods of Dispute Resolution, in The Oxford Handbook on International Investment Law (Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, & Christoph Schreuer eds., 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reisman, Michael, & Arsanjani, Mahnoush, Interpreting Treaties for the Benefit of Third Parties: The “Salvors Doctrine” and the Use of Legislative History in Investment Treaties, 104 Am. J. Int’l L. 597 (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ripinsky, Sergey and Williams, Kevin damages in international investment law (BIILC, 2008).

  • Roberts, Anthea, Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System, 107 Am. J. Int’l L. 45 (2013).

  • Root, Elihu, The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad, 4 Am. J. Int’l L. 517 (1910).

  • Roth, Andreas H., The minimum standard of international law applied to aliens (Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1949).

  • Sabahi, Borzu, compensation and restitution in investor-state arbitration: principles and practice (OUP Oxford, 2011).

  • Sabahi, Borzu & Duggal, Kabir, Philip Morris Brands Sarl v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay International Decisions, 108 Am. J. Int’l L. 67 (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schill, Stephan W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).

  • Schreuer, Christoph, Consent to Arbitration, in The Oxford Handbook, in The Oxford Handbook on International Investment Law (Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, & Christoph Schreuer eds., 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreuer, Christoph, Malintoppi, Loretta, Reinisch, August, and Sinclair, Anthony, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2nd ed., Cambridge, 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwarzenberger, Georg, The Abs-Shawcross Draft Convention on Investments Abroad: A Critical Commentary, 9 J. Pub. L. 147 (1960).

  • Shihata, Ibrahim F. I. MIGA and Foreign Investment (1988).

  • Sikkink, Kathryn, Reconceptualizing Sovereignty in the Americas: Historical Precursors and Current Practices, 19 Hous. J. Int’l L. 705 (1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simma, Bruno & Paulus, Andreas L., Symposium on Method in International Law: The Responsibility of Individuals for Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View, 93 Am. J. Int’l L. 302 (1999).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skovgaard Poulsen, Lauge N., book review [Karl P. Sauvant, and Lisa E. Sachs. (eds). The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows.] Eur J Int Law (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sloss, David, The Domestication of International Human Rights: Non-Self-Executing Declarations and Human Rights Treaties, 24 Yale J. Int’l L. 129 (1999).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sornarajah, M., Resistance and Change in the International Law of Foreign Investment (2015).

  • Sourgens, Frédéric G. a Nascent Common Law (Brill | Nijhoff, 2015).

  • Spiegel, Hans W., Origin and Development of Denial of Justice, 32 Am. J. Int’l L. 63 (1938).

  • Steingruber, Andrea Marco, Consent in International Arbitration (Oxford 2012).

  • unctad, National Treatment, in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II (1999).

  • unctad, World Investment Report—Foreign direct investment and the challenge of development (1999).

  • unctad, Admission and Establishment, in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (2002).

  • unctad, Most-Favoured Nation Treatment, in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II (2010).

  • unctad, Fair and Equitable Treatment, in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II (2012).

  • unctad, Expropriation: A Sequel, in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II (2012).

  • unctad, Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement in Search of a Roadmap, Issue N. 3 (June 2013).

  • unctad, World Investment Report—Reforming International Investment Governance (2015).

  • Van Haersolte-Van Hof, Jacomijn J., & Hoffmann, Anne K, The Relationship Between International Tribunals and Domestic Courts, in The Oxford Handbook on International Investment Law (Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, & Christoph Schreuer eds., 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vandevelde, Kenneth J., The Bilateral Investment Treaty Program of the United States, 21 Cornell Int’l L.J. 201 (1988).

  • Vandevelde, Kenneth J. Reassessing the Hickenlooper Amendment, 29 Va. J. Int’l L. 115 (1988).

  • Vandevelde, Kenneth J., The Political Economy of a Bilateral Investment Treaty, 92 Am. J. Int’l L. 621 (1998).

  • Vattel, E. the Law of Nations, or the Principles of Natural Law (Béla Kapossy & Richard Whatmore eds. 2008.

  • Veeder, V.V., The Lena Goldfields Arbitration: The Historical Roots Of Three Ideas, 47 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 718 (1998).

  • Vesel, Scott, Clearing A Path Through A Tangled Jurisprudence: Most-Favored-Nation Clauses and Dispute Settlement Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 32 Yale J. Int’l L. 125 (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waibelet al. (eds), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (Kluwer Law, 2010).

  • Wälde, Thomas, Investment Arbitration as a Discipline for Good Governance: Overview and Epilogue, [Oil, Gas & Energy Law], issue 2, 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wälde, Thomas ‘The “Umbrella” Clause in Investment Arbitration: A Comment on Original Intentions and Recent Cases’, 6 J. World Investment & Trade 183 (2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walker Jr., Herman, Modern Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, 42 Minn. L. Rev. 805 (1958).

  • Wallace Jr., Don, Case Study under nafta: Lessons for the Wise?, in arbitrating foreign investment disputes: procedural and substantive legal aspects (Stefan Michael Kroll and Norbert Horn eds. Kluwer Law International 2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wallace, Jr., Don, Fair and Equitable Treatment and Denial of Justice: Loewen v us and Chattin v Mexico, in International Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (Todd Weiler ed., 2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weiler, Todd, Interpretation of International Investment Law (Martinus Nijhoff, 2013).

  • Wilson, Robert R., United States Commercial Treaties and International Law (New Orleans: The Hauser Press, 1960).

  • Wong, Jarrod, Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treaty Violations, and the Divide Between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes, Geo. Mason L. Rev. 135 (2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yackee, Jason W., Bilateral Investment Treaties, Credible Commitment, and the Rule of (International) Law: Do BITs Promote Foreign Direct Investment?, 42 Law & Society Review 805 (2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Uruguay, icsid Case No. arb/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction (July 2, 2013).

  • aes Summit Generation Limited and aes-Tisza Erömü Kft v. The Republic of Hungary, icsid Case No. arb/07/22, iic 455 (2010), Award (17 September, 2010).

  • Alasdair Ross Anderson and Others v Costa Rica, icsid Case No arb(af)/07/3, iic 437, Award (May 10th, 2010).

  • Americas, Inc. v. The United Mexican States, icsid Case No. arb (af)/04/5 (Rovine Separate Opinion, 20 September 2007).

  • Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi, icsid Case No arb/01/2, Award, (June 21, 2012).

  • Aramco v. Saudi Arabia (1963) 27 i.l.r. 117.

  • Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (aapl) v. Republic of Sri Lanka. Case No. arb/87/3, 30 ilm 577 (1991).

  • Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, icsid Case No. arb/03/29, iic 27 (2005), Decision on Jurisdiction, (November 14th, 2005).

  • bp Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd. v. Government of the Libyan Arab Republic, 53 ilr 297 (October 10, 1973).

  • Burlington Resources Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, icsid Case No. arb/08/5, Decision on the Proposal for Disqualification of Professor Francisco Orrego Vicuña (13 De. 2013).

  • Burlington Resources Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, icsid Case No. arb/08/5, Decision on Ecuador’s Counterclaims (February 7th, 2017).

  • cme Czech Republic B.V. v. The Czech Republic, Ad hoc Tribunal (uncitral) Final award and separate opinion, (March 14th, 2003).

  • Government of the State of Kuwait v. The American Independent Oil Company (aminoil) 21 ilm 976 (March 24, 1982).

  • Inceysa Vallisoletane, sl v El Salvador, Award, icsid Case No arb/03/26, iic 134, Award, (August 2, 2006).

  • Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GmbH and others v Ukraine, icsid Case No. arb/08/8, Award (Mar. 1, 2012).

  • Lauder v. Czech Republic, 9 icsid Rep. 62 (2001).

  • Libyan American Oil Company v Libyan Arab Republic, 62 ilr 140 (April 12, 1977).

  • Loewen Group, Inc. v. United States of America, icsid Case No. arb(af)/98/3, Award (June 26, 2003).

  • Maffezini v. Spain, icsid Case No. arb/97/7 (Jan. 25, 2000), 5 icsid Rep. 396 (2002).

  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, uncitral Award (August 3rd, 2005).

  • Malaysian Historical Salvors v. Malaysia, icsid Case No. arb/05/10, Decision on Application for Annulment (Apr. 16, 2009).

  • mtd Equity Sdn. Bhd. and mtd Chile s.a. v. Republic of Chile, icsid Case No. arb/01/7, iic 174, Award (May 25th, 2004).

  • Neer v. United Mexican States, 4 R. Int’l Arb. Awards 60 (Mex-u.s. Cl. Comm’n Oct. 15, 1926).

  • Occidental Petroleum Corp and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, icsid Case No. arb/06/11, Award, (Oct. 5th, 2012).

  • Perenco Ecuador Ltd. v. The Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador), icsid Case No. arb/08/6, Interim Decision on the Environmental Counterclaim (August 11, 2015).

  • Petroleum Development (Trucial Coast) Ltd. v. Sheikh of Abu Dhabi (1951) 18 i.l.r. 144, (1951) 18 I. L. R. 144.

  • Philip Morris Brands Sàrl, Philip Morris Products s.a. and Abal Hermanos s.a. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, icsid Case No. arb/10/7 (2016).

  • Phoenix Action, Ltd. v. The Czech Republic, icsid Case No. arb/06/5 (April 15th, 2009).

  • Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, icsid Case No. arb/03/24, iic 338, Award (August 27th, 2008).

  • Romak S.A. (Switzerland) v. The Republic of Uzbekistan, uncitral, pca Case No. AA280 (2009).

  • Ruler of Qatar v. International Marine Oil. Co. Ltd, (1953) 20. ilr 534.

  • Salini Costruttori s.p.a. v. Morocco, icsid Case No. arb/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction (July 23, 2001), 42 i.l.m. 609 (2003).

  • Société Général de Surveillance s.a. v. Pakistan, icsid Case No. arb/01/13, Objections to Jurisdiction, (Aug. 5, 2003), 18 icsid Rev. 301 (2003).

  • Société Général de Surveillance s.a. v. Philippines, icsid Case No. arb/02/6, Objections to Jurisdiction, 136–55 (Jan. 29, 2004), 8 icsid Rep. 518 (2005).

  • Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company and California Asiatic Oil Company v Government of Libya, (Preliminary Award), 53 ilr 389 (Nov. 27, 1975).

  • Tidewater Inc., Tidewater Investment srl, Tidewater Caribe, C.A., et al. v. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, icsid Case No. arb/10/5, Decision on Claimants’ Proposal to Disqualify Professor Brigitte Stern, Arbitrator (23 Dec. 2010).

  • Venezuela Holdings v. Venezuela, icsid Case No. arb/07/27, Decision on jurisdiction (June 10, 2010).

  • World Duty Free Company Limited v. Republic of Kenya, icsid Case No. arb/00/7, Award (October 2006).

  • Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. The Russian Federation, uncitral, pca Case N. aa 227, Final Award (July 18th 2014).

  • Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. (u.k. v. Iran), 1952 i.c.j. 93 (July 22).

  • Barcelona Traction Light and Power (Belg. v. Spain) 1964 i.c.j. 6 (July 24).

  • Case Concerning The Factory at Chorzow, 1928 p.c.j.i. (ser. A) No. 17 (Sept. 13).

  • Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (elsi) (u.s. v. It.), 1989 i.c.j. 15 (July 20).

  • Factory at Chorzów, Judgment 1928 p.c.i.j. (ser. A) No. 17 p. 47. (Sept. 13).

  • The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, 1924 p.c.j.i. (ser. A) No. 2 (Aug. 30).

  • Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Costa Rica and the Government of Canada for the Protection and Promotion of Investment (18 March 1998), entered into force 29 September 1999 (Costa Rica-Canada bit).

  • Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of the Philippines on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (April 18, 1997) entered into force 29 September 1999 (Germany-Philippines bit).

  • Agreement Between the Government of Japan and the Government of the Russian Federation Concerning the Promotion and Protection of Investment, Japan-Russ., Nov. 13, 1998.

  • Agreement for the Reciprocal Protection of Investments signed between the Republic of El Salvador and the Kingdom of Spain, (14 February 1995) 1983 unts 349, entered into force 20 February 1996.

  • Bilateral Investment Treaty between the Government of India and the Government of [Country] Model bit.

  • Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States adopted Mar. 18, 1965, 575 u.n.t.s. 159.

  • Havana Charter for an International Trade Organization, u.n. Doc. E/Conf. 2/78, at 14 (Mar. 24, 1948).

  • North American Free Trade Agreement, Dec. 8–Dec. 17, 1993, 32 i.l.m. 289 (1993).

  • oecd Draft Convention on Protection of Foreign Property, 7 i.l.m. 117 (1967).

  • The Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (comesa) Investment Agreement (2007).

  • The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, between Canada, the European Union and its Member States, European Comm’n, Consolidated ceta Text (2014).

  • Energy Charter Treaty, 2080 unts 95 (1994).

  • eu—Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (Open for signature Dec. 2 2015, not yet in effect).

  • eu—Mexico Free Trade Agreement (updated text as of April 2017, not in effect).

  • -France-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty (1994).

  • Southern African Development Community (sadc) Model bit (July 2012).

  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (tpp) Agreement (Opened for signature February 4 2016, not yet in effect).

  • Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Trade in Services, Investment and E Commerce 17, European Commission Draft Text ttip (updated as of 2015).

  • Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation, Between His Britannic Majesty and the

  • United States of America (Jay Treaty), us-u.k., Nov. 19, 1794, 8 Stat. 116, T.S. 105, 12 Bevans 13.

  • Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, Nov. 28, 1956, u.s.-s. Kor., art. xxiv, 8 u.s.t. 2217, t.i.a.s. No. 3947.

  • Treaty of Friendship, Establishment and Navigation, Feb. 23, 1962, U.S.-Lu., art. xvii, 14 u.s.t. 251, t.i.a.s. No. 5306.

  • Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, Aug. 23, 1951, U.S.-Isr., art. xxiv, 5 u.s.t. 550, t.i.a.s. No. 2948.

  • Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection Investment [us Model bit 2012].

  • U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement, U.S.-Colom., Nov. 22, 2006.

  • U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement, U.S.-Peru, April 12, 2006.

  • Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, g.a. Res. 3281 (xxix), u.n. Doc. A/9631 (Dec. 12, 1974).

  • Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order, g.a. Res. 3201 (S-VI), u.n. Doc. A/res/S-6/3201 (May 1, 1974).

  • Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, in Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-third Session, un gaor, 56th Sess., Supp. No. 10, at 43, un Doc. A/56/10 (2001).

  • uncitral Arbitration Rules, g.a. Res. 65/22, un Doc. A/res/65/22 (2010).

  • u.n. Secretary-General, The Promotion of the International Flow of Private Capital, u.n. Doc. E/3325 (1960).

  • Encyclopædia Britannica, http://www.britannica.com/event/Don-Pacifico-affair

  • European Commission website, https://ec.europa.eu/

  • Global Affairs Canada, NAFTA Free Trade Commission, http://www.international.gc.ca/

  • ICSID website, https://icsid.worldbank.org/

  • Investment Policy Hub, http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA/AdvancedSearchBITResults

  • Office of the United States Trade Representatives (USTR): Summary of Objectives for the NAFTA Renegotiation, https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/NAFTAObjectives.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), http://asean.org/

  • Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA), https://ustr.gov/TiSA

  • The Group of 77, http://www.g77.org/doc/

  • the new york times, https://www.nytimes.com

  • the washington post, https://www.washingtonpost.com

  • United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/adp/adp.html

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, https://www.commerce.gov

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 451 316 21
Full Text Views 329 156 7
PDF Downloads 103 90 4