Fair and Equitable Treatment: Its Interaction with the Minimum Standard and Its Customary Status

in Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



The book addresses two questions which have been debated by scholars in the last 20 years regarding the fair and equitable treatment (‘fet’) standard found in bits. It examines the interaction between the ‘minimum standard of treatment’ (mst) and the fet standard. It first analyses the fascinating story of how the concept of the mst emerged in the early 20th Century, its subsequent decline from 1960s until the 1990s and its surprising recent ‘resurrection’ in the year 2000. This evolution has had a direct impact on the emergence and subsequent development of the fet standard and explains why States started referring to that standard instead of the mst in their investment treaties. One question addressed in this book, is whether fet is an autonomous standard of protection to be accorded to foreign investors, or is a mere reference to the mst under customary international law. Given the fact that the fet standard is found in the overwhelming majority of bits, another question which arose is whether or not it should now be considered in and of itself as a rule of customary international law.



Al Faruque, Abdullah, ‘Creating Customary International Law Through Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Critical Appraisal’ (2004) 44 Indian JIL 312313.

Alvarez, Jose E., ‘Bit on Custom’ (20092010) 42 NYU J. Int’l L. & Pol.

d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘International Customary Investment Law: Story of a Paradox’ in T. Gazzini & E. de Brabandere (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 33.

Borchard, Edwin, ‘The, “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1939) 33 ASIL Proc. 55.

Blandford, Andrew C., ‘The History of Fair and Equitable Treatment before the Second World War’, (2017) 32(2) icsid Rev.

Cai Congyan, ‘International Investment Treaties and the Formation, Application and Transformation of Customary International Law Rules’, (2008) 7 Chinese JIL.

Choudhury, Barnali, ‘Evolution or Devolution? Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law’, (2005) 6(2) J. World Invest. & Trade.

Dickerson, Hollin, ‘Minimum Standards’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 9, 2013).

Diehl, Alexandra, The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment (Wolters Kluwer 2012).

Dolzer R. & A. von Walter, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment – Lines of Jurisprudence on Customary Law’ in F. Ortino (ed), Investment Treaty Law, Current Issues II (2007).

Dolzer, R., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties’, (2005) 39(1) Int’I Law, 360.

Dumberry, Patrick, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide to NAFTA Case Law on Article 1105 (Wolters Kluwer 2013).

Dumberry, Patrick, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (Cambridge UP 2016).

Dumberry, Patrick, ‘The Practice of States as Evidence of Custom: Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Clauses in States’ Foreign Investment Laws’, (2015–16) 2 McGill JDR 6681.

Dumberry, Patrick, ‘Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard become a Rule of Customary international Law?’ (2017) 8(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 155178.

Dumberry, P. ‘The ‘Minimum Standard of Treatment’ in International Investment Law: The Fascinating Story of the Emergence, the Decline and the Recent Resurrection of a Concept’, in: Luca Pasquet, Klara Polackova Van der Ploeg, and Léon Castellanos Jankiewicz (eds), International Law and Time: Narratives and Techniques: Proceedings of the conference International Law and Time (Springer, 2018).

Dumberry, P., ‘The Importation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Through MFN Clauses: An Empirical Study of BITs’, (2016) 17 icsid Rev. 229259.

Dumberry, P., ‘Shopping for a Better Deal: The Use of mfn Clauses to Get ‘Better’ Fair and Equitable Treatment Protection’, (2016) Arb. Int. 116.

Dumberry, P., ‘A Few Observations on the Remaining Fundamental Importance of Customary Rules in the Age of Treatification of International Investment Law’, (2016) 43(1) ASA Bull. 4161.

Dumberry, P., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’, in: Stefanie Schacherer & Makane Moïse Mbengue ‎(eds), Foreign Investment under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (Springer 2018).

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘The Role of Customary International Law in the Field of Foreign Investment’ (2007) 8 Journal of World Investment and Trade.

Haeri, Hussein, ‘A Tale of Two Standards: ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ and the Minimum Standard in International Law’ (2011) 27 Arb. Int’l 3132.

International Law Association, ‘Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law’, Final Report of the Committee on the Formation of Customary Law, Conference Report London (2000).

Kishoiyan, B., ‘The Utility of Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Formulation of Customary International Law’ (1993) 14(2) Northwestern J. Int’l L.

Kill, T., ‘Don’t Cross the Streams: Past and Present Overstatement of Customary International Law in Connection with Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations’ (2008) 106 Michigan LR.

Kläger, Roland, Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law (Cambridge UP 2011).

Klein Bronfman, Marcela, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Evolving Standard’ (2006) 10 Max Planck Yrbk. UNL 624.

Laird, I., ‘Betrayal, Shock and Outrage – Recent Developments in NAFTA Article 1105’, in T. Weiler (ed.), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future Prospects (Transnational Publ., 2004).

Mayeda, Graham, ‘Playing Fair: The Meaning of Fair and Equitable Treatment in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2007) 41(2) J. World Trade 273291, 280.

oecd, Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law (2004) No. 2004/3 Working Papers on International Investment Law.

Orellana, M.A. ‘International Law on Investment: The Minimum Standard of Treatment (MST)’ (2004) 3 Transnational Disp. Mgmt. 12.

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘The Normative Basis of, “Fair and Equitable Treatment”: General International Law on Foreign Investment?’ (2008) 1 Archive des Völkerrechts.

Paparinskis, Martins, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford UP 2013).

Paradell, L., ‘The BIT Experience of The Fair And Equitable Treatment Standard’, in Federico Ortinoet al (eds), Investment Treaty Law, Current Issues II (British IICL 2007).

Paulsson, Jan, ‘Neer-lv Misled?’ Miami Law Research Paper 247 (see also: J. Paulsson & G. Petrochilos, ‘Neer-ly Misled?’ (2007) 22(2) icsid Rev. 242–257).

Picherack, J. Roman, ‘The Expanding Scope of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Have Recent Tribunals Gone Too Far?’ (2008) 9(4) J. World Invest. & Trade.

Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona, ‘The Life and Death (and Re-Birth) of “Fair and” “Equitable Treatment:” A Historical Examination of Twentieth Century International Trade and Investment Law Treaty-Making and Political Decision-Making’ (Ph.D. Thesis, University of London (King’s College), 2017.

Roth, Andreas Hans, The Minimum Standard of International Law Applied to Aliens, La Haye: A.W. Sijthoff, 1949.

Schill, Stephan, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’, in R. Hofmann & C. Tams (eds), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Nomos 2007).

Schreuer, C., ‘Fair and Equitable Standard (fet): Interaction with Other Standards’, (2007) 4(5) TDM.

Schreuer, C. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’, (2005) 6 J. World Invest. & Trade.

Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘Is Neer far from Fair and Equitable?’ (2011) 27(4) Arb. Int’l 555561.

Sornarajah, M., ‘The Fair and Equitable Standard of Treatment: Whose Fairness? Whose Equity?’ in Federico Ortinoet al. (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues II (BIICL 2007).

Thomas, J.C., ‘Reflections on Article 1105 of nafta: History, State Practice and the Influence of Commentators’ (2002) 17(1) ICSID Rev.

Tudor, Ioana, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law (Oxford UP 2008).

unctad, Fair and Equitable Treatment, unctad Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (1999).

unctad, Fair and Equitable Treatment, (2012) unctad Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements ii.

Vasciannie, Stephen, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (1999) 70 British YIL 99.

Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment’ (2010) 43 NYU J. Int’l L. & Pol.

Weiler, Todd, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).

Weiler, Todd, ‘An Historical Analysis of the Function of the Minimum Standard of Treatment in International Investment Law’ in Todd Weiler & Freya Baetens (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: In Memoriam Thomas Wälde (Martinus Nijhoff, 2011).

Yannaca-Small, Katia, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Recent Developments’, in A. Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection, (Oxford UP 2008).


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 73 73 27
Full Text Views 17 17 16
PDF Downloads 9 9 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0