Fair and Equitable Treatment: Its Interaction with the Minimum Standard and Its Customary Status

in Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

The book addresses two questions which have been debated by scholars in the last 20 years regarding the fair and equitable treatment (‘fet’) standard found in bits. It examines the interaction between the ‘minimum standard of treatment’ (mst) and the fet standard. It first analyses the fascinating story of how the concept of the mst emerged in the early 20th Century, its subsequent decline from 1960s until the 1990s and its surprising recent ‘resurrection’ in the year 2000. This evolution has had a direct impact on the emergence and subsequent development of the fet standard and explains why States started referring to that standard instead of the mst in their investment treaties. One question addressed in this book, is whether fet is an autonomous standard of protection to be accorded to foreign investors, or is a mere reference to the mst under customary international law. Given the fact that the fet standard is found in the overwhelming majority of bits, another question which arose is whether or not it should now be considered in and of itself as a rule of customary international law.

Sections
References
  • Al FaruqueAbdullah‘Creating Customary International Law Through Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Critical Appraisal’ (2004) 44 Indian JIL 312313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AlvarezJose E.‘Bit on Custom’ (20092010) 42 NYU J. Int’l L. & Pol.

  • d’AspremontJean‘International Customary Investment Law: Story of a Paradox’ in T. Gazzini & E. de Brabandere (eds.) International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 33.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BorchardEdwin‘The “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1939) 33 ASIL Proc. 55.

  • BlandfordAndrew C.‘The History of Fair and Equitable Treatment before the Second World War’ (2017) 32(2) icsid Rev.

  • Cai Congyan‘International Investment Treaties and the Formation Application and Transformation of Customary International Law Rules’ (2008) 7 Chinese JIL.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChoudhuryBarnali‘Evolution or Devolution? Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law’ (2005) 6(2) J. World Invest. & Trade.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DickersonHollin‘Minimum Standards’Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Pressvol. 92013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DiehlAlexandraThe Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment (Wolters Kluwer 2012).

  • Dolzer R. & A. von Walter‘Fair and Equitable Treatment – Lines of Jurisprudence on Customary Law’ in F. Ortino (ed) Investment Treaty Law Current Issues II (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DolzerR.‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties’ (2005) 39(1) Int’I Law 360.

  • DumberryPatrickThe Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide to NAFTA Case Law on Article 1105 (Wolters Kluwer 2013).

  • DumberryPatrickThe Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (Cambridge UP 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumberryPatrick‘The Practice of States as Evidence of Custom: Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Clauses in States’ Foreign Investment Laws’ (2015–16) 2 McGill JDR 6681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumberryPatrick‘Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard become a Rule of Customary international Law?’ (2017) 8(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement155178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumberryP. ‘The ‘Minimum Standard of Treatment’ in International Investment Law: The Fascinating Story of the Emergence, the Decline and the Recent Resurrection of a Concept’ in: Luca PasquetKlara Polackova Van der Ploeg and Léon Castellanos Jankiewicz (eds) International Law and Time: Narratives and Techniques: Proceedings of the conference International Law and Time (Springer2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumberryP.‘The Importation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Through MFN Clauses: An Empirical Study of BITs’ (2016) 17 icsid Rev. 229259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumberryP.‘Shopping for a Better Deal: The Use of mfn Clauses to Get ‘Better’ Fair and Equitable Treatment Protection’ (2016) Arb. Int. 116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumberryP.‘A Few Observations on the Remaining Fundamental Importance of Customary Rules in the Age of Treatification of International Investment Law’ (2016) 43(1) ASA Bull. 4161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumberryP.‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in: Stefanie Schacherer & Makane Moïse Mbengue ‎(eds) Foreign Investment under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (Springer 2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GazziniTarcisio‘The Role of Customary International Law in the Field of Foreign Investment’ (2007) 8 Journal of World Investment and Trade.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HaeriHussein‘A Tale of Two Standards: ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ and the Minimum Standard in International Law’ (2011) 27 Arb. Int’l 3132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Law Association‘Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law’Final Report of the Committee on the Formation of Customary Law Conference Report London (2000).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KishoiyanB.‘The Utility of Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Formulation of Customary International Law’ (1993) 14(2) Northwestern J. Int’l L.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KillT.‘Don’t Cross the Streams: Past and Present Overstatement of Customary International Law in Connection with Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations’ (2008) 106 Michigan LR.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KlägerRolandFair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law (Cambridge UP 2011).

  • Klein BronfmanMarcela‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Evolving Standard’ (2006) 10 Max Planck Yrbk. UNL 624.

  • LairdI.‘Betrayal, Shock and Outrage – Recent Developments in NAFTA Article 1105’ in T. Weiler (ed.) NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues Current Practice Future Prospects (Transnational Publ.2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MayedaGraham‘Playing Fair: The Meaning of Fair and Equitable Treatment in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2007) 41(2) J. World Trade 273291280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • oecdFair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law (2004) No. 2004/3 Working Papers on International Investment Law.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OrellanaM.A. ‘International Law on Investment: The Minimum Standard of Treatment (MST)’ (2004) 3 Transnational Disp. Mgmt. 12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OrakhelashviliAlexander‘The Normative Basis of “Fair and Equitable Treatment”: General International Law on Foreign Investment?’ (2008) 1 Archive des Völkerrechts.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PaparinskisMartinsThe International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford UP 2013).

  • ParadellL.‘The BIT Experience of The Fair And Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Federico Ortinoet al (eds) Investment Treaty Law Current Issues II (British IICL 2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PaulssonJan‘Neer-lv Misled?’ Miami Law Research Paper 247 (see also: J. Paulsson & G. Petrochilos ‘Neer-ly Misled?’ (2007) 22(2) icsid Rev. 242–257).

    • Export Citation
  • PicherackJ. Roman‘The Expanding Scope of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Have Recent Tribunals Gone Too Far?’ (2008) 9(4) J. World Invest. & Trade.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinchis-PaulsenMona‘The Life and Death (and Re-Birth) of “Fair and” “Equitable Treatment:” A Historical Examination of Twentieth Century International Trade and Investment Law Treaty-Making and Political Decision-Making’ (Ph.D. Thesis University of London (King’s College)2017.

    • Export Citation
  • RothAndreas HansThe Minimum Standard of International Law Applied to AliensLa Haye: A.W. Sijthoff1949.

  • SchillStephan‘Fair and Equitable Treatment as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’ in R. Hofmann & C. Tams (eds) The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Nomos 2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchreuerC.‘Fair and Equitable Standard (fet): Interaction with Other Standards’ (2007) 4(5) TDM.

  • SchreuerC. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6 J. World Invest. & Trade.

  • SchwebelStephen M.‘Is Neer far from Fair and Equitable?’ (2011) 27(4) Arb. Int’l 555561.

  • SornarajahM.‘The Fair and Equitable Standard of Treatment: Whose Fairness? Whose Equity?’ in Federico Ortinoet al. (eds) Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues II (BIICL 2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThomasJ.C.‘Reflections on Article 1105 of nafta: History, State Practice and the Influence of Commentators’ (2002) 17(1) ICSID Rev.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TudorIoanaThe Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law (Oxford UP 2008).

  • unctadFair and Equitable Treatmentunctad Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (1999).

  • unctadFair and Equitable Treatment (2012) unctad Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements ii.

  • VasciannieStephen‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (1999) 70 British YIL 99.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VandeveldeKenneth J.‘A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment’ (2010) 43 NYU J. Int’l L. & Pol.

  • WeilerToddThe Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality Discrimination and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WeilerTodd‘An Historical Analysis of the Function of the Minimum Standard of Treatment in International Investment Law’ in Todd Weiler & Freya Baetens (eds.) New Directions in International Economic Law: In Memoriam Thomas Wälde (Martinus Nijhoff2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yannaca-SmallKatia‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Recent Developments’ in A. Reinisch (ed) Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford UP 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 329 284 31
Full Text Views 281 281 5
PDF Downloads 55 55 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0