Principles of Evidence in Public International Law as Applied by Investor-State Tribunals: Burden and Standards of Proof

In: Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration

Abstract

Principles of Evidence in Public International Law as Applied by Investor-State Tribunals explores the fundamental principles of evidence and how these principles relating to burden of proof and standards of proof are derived.

By tracing the applications of major principles recognized by the International Court of Justice and applied by investor-state tribunal jurisprudence, the authors offer valuable insight into the interpretation, understanding, and nuances of indispensable principles of evidence, an area that has been ignored in both investor-state arbitration and public international law more generally. Each principle is analyzed through historical and modern lenses to provide clarity and cohesion in understanding how fundamental principles of evidence will affect evidentiary dispositions of parties in investment arbitration and public international law cases.

  • Aghahosseini, Mohsen, Evidence Before the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 1 Int’l Law FORUM du Droit Int’l 208 (1999).

  • Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan, Evidence in International Litigation (2005).

  • Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan, Law of the International Civil Service (1994).

  • Binder, Peter, Analytical Commentary to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 262 (2013).

  • Buergenthal, Thomas, Judicial Fact-Finding: The Inter-American Human Rights Court, in Fact-Finding by International Tribunals (Lillich ed. 1991).

  • Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law as applied by International Courts and Tribunals (2006).

  • Clermont, Kevin M. & Emily Sherwin, A Comparative View of Standards of Proof, 50 Am. J. Comp. L. 243 (2002).

  • Clermont, Kevin M., Procedure’s Magical Number Three: Psychological Bases for Standards of Decision, 72 Cornell L. Rev. 1115 (1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frowein, Jochen A., Fact-Finding by the European Commission on Human Rights, in Fact-Finding by International Tribunals (Lillich ed. 1991).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glendon, Mary Ann, Michael Wallace Gordon & Christopher Osakwe, Comparative Legal Traditions (1985).

  • Grando, Michelle Terezinha, The Process of Fact-Finding before International Tribunals: A Study of the WTO Dispute Settlement System (2008).

  • Hanotiau, Bernard, Satisfying the Burden of Proof; The Viewpoint of a ‘Civil Law’ Lawyer, in Alan Redfernet al., The Standards and Burden of Proof in International Arbitration, 10 Arbitration Int’l 317 (Kluwer Law Int’l 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heydon, J.D., Cases and Materials on Evidence (Butterworths, London, 1975).

  • IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (May 29, 2010).

  • Kaplan, Benjamin, Arthur T. von Mehren & Rudolf Schaefer, Phases of German Civil Procedure I, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 1193 (1957).

  • Kazazi, Mojtaba, Burden of Proof and Related Studies: A Study on Evidence Before International Tribunals (Kluwer Law International 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kokott, Juliane, The Burden of Proof in Comparative and International Human Rights Law (1996).

  • Kolb, Robert, The International Court of Justice (Hart Publishing 2013).

  • Kreindler, Richard, Application for “Revision” in Investment Arbitration: Selected Current Issues, in M.Á. Fernández-Ballesteros & David Arias, Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades (Wolters Kluwer 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lew, Julian D.M., ‘Document Disclosure, Evidentiary Value of Documents and Burden of Evidence’ in Teresa Giovannini and Alexis Mouree (eds), Written Evidence and Discovery in International Arbitration: New Issues and Tendencies (Dossiers ICC Institute of World Business Law 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mani, V.S., International Adjudication: Procedural Aspects (1980).

  • Maritime Arbitration Association of the United States, Arbitration Rules, available at http://www.maritimearbitration.com/File-a-Case/Arbitration-Rules.

  • Martin, A.T., International Arbitration and Corruption: An Evolving Standard (2004), available at https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article .asp?key=88.

    • Export Citation
  • Mosk, Richard M., The Role of Facts in International Dispute Resolution (Recueil des cours 2003).

  • Nappert, Sophie, Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2010: A Practitioner’s Guide 103–04 (2012).

  • O’Malley, Nathan D., Rules of Evidence in International Arbitration: An Annotated Guide (Informa 2012).

  • PCIJ, Twenty-Fifth Meeting, Continuation of the discussion on the Draft Rules of Court submitted by the Drafting Committee 142 (March 9, 1922), available at http://www.icj-cij.org/files/permanent-court-of-international-justice/serie_D/D_02_ preparation_reglement.pdf.

  • Pfitzer, James H. & Sheila Sabune, Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement: Contemplating Preponderance of the Evidence, 9 ICTSD Dispute Settlement and Legal Aspects of Int’l Trade 6 (April 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Philip, Allan, Description in the Award of the Standard of Proof Sought and Satisfied, in Alan Redfernet al., The Standards and Burden of Proof in International Arbitration, 10 Arbitration Int’l 361 (Kluwer Law Int’l 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pietrowski, Robert, Evidence in International Arbitration, 22 Arb. Int’l 373 (2006).

  • Quintana, Juan José, Litigation at the International Court of Justice: Practice and Procedure (Brill 2015).

  • Redfern, Alan, Claude Reymond, Andreas Reiner, Bernard Hanotiau, Edward Lord Eveleigh, Ian W. Menzies, and Allan Philip, The Standards and Burden of Proof in International Arbitration, 10 Arbitration Int’l 335 (Kluwer Law Int’l 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reymond, Claude, The Practical Distinction Between the Burden of Proof and Taking of Evidence—A Further Perspective, 10 Arbitration Int’l 326 (1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Riddell, Anna & Brendan Plant, Evidence Before the International Court of Justice (2009).

  • Riddell, Anna, ‘Evidence, Fact-Finding, and Experts’ in Cesare P.R. Romano, Karen J. Alter and Yuval Shany (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sanchez Rodriguez, L.I., L’uti possidetis et les effectivités dans les contentieux territoriaux et frontaliers, 263 CCHAIL 295 (1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sandifer, Durward V., Evidence Before International Tribunals 126–127 (1939).

  • Schreuer, Christoph H. et al., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary 669 (2009).

  • Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), 14 April 1978 (Amended on 14 April 2005).

  • Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), 16 December 1920 (Amended by the Protocol of September 14, 1929), available at http://www.icj-cij.org/files/permanent-court-of-international-justice/serie_D/D_01_4e_edition.pdf.

  • Valencia-Ospina, Eduardo, Evidence before the International Court of Justice, 1 Int’l L. Forum du Droit Int’l 202 (1999).

  • Van Houtte, Vera, ‘Adverse Inferences in International Arbitration’ in Teresa Giovannini and Alexis Mouree (eds), Written Evidence and Discovery in International Arbitration: New Issues and Tendencies (Dossiers ICC Institute of World Business Law 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • von Mehren, George M. & Claudia T. Salomon, Submitting Evidence in an International Arbitration: The Common Lawyer’s Guide, 20 J. Int’l Arbitration 285 (2003).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waincymer, Jeffrey, Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration (2012).

  • World Trade Organization (WTO), Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) Annex 2, Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement Of Disputes, available at https://www.wto.org/english/Tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm.

  • Zimmermann, Andreas et al., The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2d ed. 2012).

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 434 434 30
Full Text Views 68 68 7
PDF Downloads 45 45 8