Psychology and Religion within an Ideological Surround

in Brill Research Perspectives in Religion and Psychology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

For over three decades, an Ideological Surround Model (ISM) has pursued theoretical and methodological innovations designed to enhance the ‘truth’ and ‘objectivity’ of research into psychology and religion. The foundational argument of the ISM is that psychology as well as religion unavoidably operates within the limits of an ideological surround. Methodological theism, therefore, needs to supplement the methodological atheism that dominates the contemporary social sciences. Methodological theism should operationalize the meaningfulness of religious traditions and demonstrate empirically that the influences of ideology cannot be ignored. The ISM more generally suggests that contemporary social scientific rationalities need to be supplemented my more complex dialogical rationalities. Beliefs in secularization should also be supplemented by beliefs in trans-rationality.

Sections
References
  • Abu-RaiyaHisham. (2012). “Towards a Systematic Qura’nic Theory of Personality.” Mental Health Religion & Culture 15: 217233. doi:10.1080/13674676.2011.640622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abu-RaiyaHisham. (2014). “Western Psychology and Muslim Psychology in Dialogue: Comparisons between a Qura’nic Theory of Personality and Freud’s and Jung’s Ideas.” Journal of Religion and Health 53: 326338. doi:10.1007/s10943-012-9630-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abu RaiyaHishamKenneth I. PargamentAnnette Mahoney and Catherine Stein. (2008). “A Psychological Measure of Islamic Religiousness: Development and Evidence for Reliability and Validity.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 18: 291315. doi:10.1080/10508610802229270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AltemeyerBob and Bruce Hunsberger. (1992). “Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2: 113133. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AltemeyerBob and Bruce Hunsberger. (2004). “A Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The Short and Sweet of It.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 14: 4754. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AndrewsBenjaminP. J. WatsonZhuo J. Chen and Ronald J. Morris. (2017). “Postmodernism, Positive Psychology, and Posttraumatic Growth within a Christian Ideological Surround.” Journal of Positive Psychology 12: 489500. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1228004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AppleyardBryan. (1992). Understanding the Present. New York: Doubleday.

  • BaronReuben M. and David A. Kenny. (1986). “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 11731182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BatsonCharles DanielPatricia Schoenrade and W. Larry Ventis. (1993). Religion and the Individual. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.2307/1386643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BergerPeter. (1967). The Scared Canopy. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

  • BiddleMark E. (2005). Missing the Mark. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

  • Boenig-LiptsinMargo. (2015). “The Intermediary Case.” In Can We Survive Our Origins? edited by Pierpaola Antonello and Paul Gifford pp. 267273. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. doi:10.14321/j.ctt14bs0q3.18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrauerSimon. (2018). “The Surprising Predictable Decline of Religion in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 57: 654675. doi:10.1111/jssr.12551.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BudnerStanley. (1962). “Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable.” Journal of Personality 30: 2950. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuffordRodger K.Timothy A. Sisemore and Amanda M. Blackburn. (2017). “Dimensions of Grace: Factor Analysis of Three Grace Scales.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 9: 5669. doi:10.1037/rel0000064.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BussDavid M. and David P. Schmitt. (1993). “Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating.” Psychological Review 100: 204232. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.100.2.204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CavanaughWilliam T. (2009). The Myth of Religious Violence. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1086/656653.

  • CoeJohn H. and Todd W. Hall. (2010). “A Transformational Psychology View.” In Psychology and Christianity: Five views (2nd ed.) edited by Eric L. Johnson pp. 199226. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DescartesRené. (1968). Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. London: Penguin Books. (Original works published in 1637 and 1641.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DoverHananMaureen Miner and Martin Dowson. (2007). “The Nature and Structure of Muslim Religious Reflection.” Journal of Muslim Mental Health 2: 189210. doi:10.1080/15564900701614858.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DumouchelPaul. (2015). “Misrecognition of ‘Misrecognition.’” In Can We Survive Our Origins? edited by Pierpaola Antonello and Paul Gifford pp. 273279. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. doi:10.1080/0048721x.2016.1209035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DupuyJean-Pierre. (2015). “Nuclear Apocalypse: The Balance of Terror and Girardian ‘Misrecognition.’” In Can We Survive Our Origins? edited by Pierpaola Antonello and Paul Gifford pp. 253266. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. doi:10.14321/j.ctt14bs0q3.17.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DuriezBartBart Soenens and Dirk Hutsebaut. (2005). “Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale.” Personality and Individual Differences 38: 851857. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EllisAlbert. (1962). Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy. Secaucus NJ: Citadel Press.

  • EllisAlbert. (1980). “Psychotherapy and Atheistic Values: A Response to A. E. Bergin’s ‘Psychotherapy and Religious Values.’Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 48: 635639. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.48.5.635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoxGeorge. (1985). The Journal of George Fox. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends. (Original work published 1694.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FrancisLeslie J.Abdullah Sahin and Fahad Al-Failakawi. (2008). “Psychometric Properties of Two Islamic Measures among Young Adults in Kuwait: The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Islam and the Sahin Index of Islamic Moral Values.” Journal of Muslim Mental Health 3(1): 924. doi:10.1080/15564900802035201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FreudSigmund. (1961a). The Future of an Illusion. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company. (Original work published in 1927.)

  • FreudSigmund. (1961b). Civilization and Its Discontents. New York, NY: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1930.)

  • FreudSigmund. (1964). New Introductory Lectures. Standard edition (Vol. 22 pp. 3182). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1933.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FreudSigmund. (1990). The Ego and the Id. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1923.)

  • FukuyamaFrancis. (2006). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

  • GaukrogerStephen. (1995). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • GellnerErnest. (1992). Postmodernism Reason and Religion. London: Routledge.

  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonNaser Aghababaei and Zhuo J. Chen. (2014). “Transliminality and Mystical Experience: Common Thread Hypothesis, Religious Commitment, and Psychological Adjustment in Iran.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 6: 268275. doi:10.1037/a0037432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonMahmood Amirbeigi and Zhuo J. Chen. (2016). “Religious Schema within a Muslim Ideological Surround: Religious and Psychological Adjustment in Iran.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 38: 253277. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonMansureh Asadi and Zhuo J. Chen. (2018). Muslim Religion and Spirituality in Cadets: Further Evidence of Complexity and Diversity in Iranian Religious Commitments. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonZhuo J. Chen and Hanan Dover. (2013). “Varieties of Openness in Tehran and Qom: Psychological and Religious Parallels of Faith and Intellect Oriented Islamic Religious Reflection.” Mental Health Religion & Culture 16: 123137. doi:10.1080/13674676.2011.647809.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonShiva Geranmayepour and Zhuo J. Chen. (2013). “Analyzing the Spirituality of Muslim Experiential Religiousness: Relationships with Psychological Measures of Islamic Religiousness in Iran.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 35: 233258. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonShiva Geranmayepour and Zhuo J. Chen. (2014a). “Measuring Muslim Spirituality: Relationships of Muslim Experiential Religiousness with Religious and Psychological Adjustment in Iran.” Journal of Muslim Mental Health 8: 7794. doi:10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0008.105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonShiva Geranmayepour and Zhuo J. Chen. (2014b). “Muslim Experiential Religiousness: Relationships with Attitude toward Islam, Religious Reflection, and Basic Needs Satisfaction in Iranians.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 25: 5372. doi:10.1163/9789004272385_005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonHamid R. Gharibi and Zhuo J. Chen. (2018). “Model of Muslim Religious Spirituality: Impact of Muslim Experiential Religiousness on Religious Orientations and Psychological Adjustment among Iranian Muslims.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 40: doi:10.1163/15736121-12341354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonHamed Kashanaki and Zhuo J. Chen. (2017). “Diversity and Complexity of Religion and Spirituality in Iran: Relationships with Self-Compassion and Self-Forgiveness.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 27: 157171. doi:10.1080/10508619.2017.1340100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. Watson and Ziasma H. Khan. (2007). “Theoretical, Empirical, and Potential Ideological Dimensions of Using Western Conceptualizations to Measure Muslim Religious Commitments.” Journal of Muslim Mental Health 2: 113131. doi:10.1080/15564900701613041.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonMaryam Madani and Zhuo J. Chen. (2016). “Muslim Experiential Religiousness: Spirituality Relationships with Psychological and Religious Adjustment in Iran.” Journal of Spirituality and Mental Health 18: 300315. doi:10.1080/19349637.2016.1162676.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonFatemeh Rabiee and Zhuo J. Chen. (2018). Religious Fundamentalism in Iran: Religious and Psychological Adjustment within a Muslim Cultural Context. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonZoha SaeediZhuo J. Chen and Christopher F. Silver. (2012). “Religious Problem-Solving and the Complexity of Religious Rationality within an Iranian Muslim Ideological Surround.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51: 656675. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01686.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonZahra Sarmast and Zhuo J. Chen. (2018). “Post-critical Beliefs and Religious Reflection: Religious Openness Hypothesis in Iranian University and Islamic Seminary Students.” Journal of Empirical Theology 31: 4970. doi:10.1163/15709256-12341367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonKadijeh Shamohammadi and Christopher J. L. Cunningham. (2009). “Post-critical Beliefs in Iran: Predicting Religious and Psychological Functioning.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 20: 151194. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004175624.i-334.50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonFazlollah Tavakoli and Zhuo J. Chen. (2016). “Self-Control within a Muslim Ideological Surround: Empirical Translation Schemes and the Adjustment of Muslim Seminarians in Iran.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 27: 6893. doi:10.1163/9789004322035_005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhorbaniNimaP. J. WatsonFazlollah Tavakoli and Zhuo J. Chen. (2018). “Mindfulness within a Muslim Ideological Surround: Empirical Translation Schemes and Religious and Psychological Functioning of Islamic Seminarians in Iran.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 29: 305308. doi:10.1163/9789004382640_016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GiddensAnthony. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • GiffordPaul. (2015). “Survival without Salvation?” In Can We Survive Our Origins? edited by Pierpaola Antonello and Paul Gifford pp. 279284. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. doi:10.1080/0048721x.2016.1209035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GirardRené. (1978). Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • GirardRené. (2010). Battling to the End. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

  • GorsuchRichard L. and Susan E. McPherson. (1989). “Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E Revised and Single-Item Scales.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28: 348354. doi:10.2307/1386745.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HabermasJürgen. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon.

  • HardinMichael (ed.). (2015). Reading the Bible with René Girard: Conversations with Steven E. Berry. JDL Press.

  • HartDavid B. (2009). Atheist Delusions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • HavenCynthia L. (2018). The Evolution of Desire: A Life of René Girard. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

  • HermansHubert J. M. and Harry J. G. Kempen. (1993). The Dialogical Self. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • HodgeDavid R. (2003). “The Intrinsic Spirituality Scale: A New Six-Item Instrument for Assessing the Salience of Spirituality as a Motivational Construct.” Journal of Social Service Research 30: 4161. doi:10.1300/J079v30n01_03.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HunsbergerBruce. (1996). “Religious Fundamentalism, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, and Hostility toward Homosexuals in Non-Christian Religious Groups.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 6: 3949. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0601_5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HunterJames D. (1991). Culture Wars. New York: Basic Books.

  • IngleH. Larry. (1994). First among Friends. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • JalalAyesha. (2008). Partisans of Allah. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • JohnsonEric L. (2007). Foundations for Soul Care. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.

  • JonasonPeter K. and Gregory D. Webster. (2010). “The Dirty Dozen: A Concise Measure of the Dark Triad.” Psychological Assessment 22: 420432. doi:10.1037/a0019265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JonesAlvin and Rick Crandall. (1986). “Validation of a Short Index of Self-Actualization.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12: 6373. doi:10.1177/0146167286121007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JonesStanton. (2010). “An Integration View.” In Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd ed.) edited by Eric L. Johnson pp. 101128. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KaltnerJohn. (2011). Introducing the Qur’an for Today’s Reader. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

  • KambleShanmukh V.P. J. WatsonDeepti B. Duggi and Zhuo J. Chen. (2018). “Fundamentalism within an Indian Ideological Surround: Commitment to Religious Tradition Predicts Hindu Openness.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 29: 329351. doi:10.1163/9789004382640_017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KambleShanmukh V.P. J. WatsonSavitri Marigoudar and Zhuo J. Chen. (2014). “Varieties of Openness and Religious Commitment in India: Relationships of Attitudes toward Hinduism, Hindu Religious Reflection, and Religious Schema.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 36: 172198. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KaufmannWalter. (1974). Nietzsche: Philosopher Psychologist Antichrist (4th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • KhanZiasma H.P. J. WatsonHafiza N. Ali and Zhuo J. Chen. (Forthcoming). “Greater jihad of Society and Self: Religious and Psychological Implications in Pakistani Madrassa and University Students.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. doi:10.1080/10508619.2018.1517016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KhanZiasma H.P. J. Watson and Zhuo J. Chen. (2016). “Muslim Spirituality, Religious Coping, and Reactions to Terrorism among Pakistani University Students.” Journal of Religion and Health 55: 20862098. doi:10.1007/s10943-016-0263-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KhanZiasma H.P. J. Watson and Zhuo J. Chen. (2018). “Religious Reflection in Pakistan: Further Evidence of Integration between Muslim Faith and Intellect.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 39: 258262. doi:10.1080/13617672.2017.1292725.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KingMartin L.Jr. (1963). “I have a dream….” Retrieved August 10 2018 from https://www.archives.gov/files/press/exhibits/dream-speech.pdf.

    • Export Citation
  • LoewenthalKate M. (2013). “Religion, Spirituality, and Culture: Clarifying the Direction of Effects.” In APA Handbook of Psychology Religion and Spirituality (vol. 1): Context Theory and Research edited by Kenneth I. PargamentJulie J. Exline and James W. Jones pp. 239255. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi.org/10.1037/14045-013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacIntyreAlasdair. (1978). Against the Self-Images of the Age. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • MacIntyreAlasdair. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • MacIntyreAlasdair. (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • MacIntyreAlasdair. (2009). God Philosophy Universities. London: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.

  • MarlerPenny L. and C. Kirk Hadaway. (2002). “‘Being Religious’ or ‘Being Spiritual’ in America: A Zero-Sum Proposition?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41: 289300. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MaslowAbraham. (1993). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Arkana/Penguin. (Original work published 1971.)

  • MekhennetSouad. (2017). I Was Told to Come Alone: My Journey behind the Lines of Jihad. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

  • MyersDavid G. (2010). “A Levels-of-Explanation View.” In Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd ed.) edited by Eric L. Johnson pp. 4978. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NarramoreS. Bruce. (1984). No Condemnation. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

  • NasrSeyyed H. (2002). The Heart of Islam. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco.

  • NietzscheFriedrich. (1967). “On the Genealogy of Morals.” In On the Genealogy of Morals and ecce homo edited by Walter Kaufman pp. 13163. New York: Random House. (Original work published in 1887.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NorthcottM. (2015). “Girard, Climate Change, and Apocalypse.” In Can We Survive Our Origins? edited by Pierpaola Antonello and Paul Gifford pp. 287309. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. doi:10.14321/j.ctt14bs0q3.18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PargamentKenneth I. (2013). “Searching for the Sacred: Toward a Nonreductionistic Theory of Spirituality.” In APA Handbook of Psychology Religion and Spirituality (vol. 1): Context Theory and Research edited by Kenneth I. PargamentJulie J. Exline and James W. Jones pp. 257273. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14045-014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PargamentKenneth I.Margaret Feuille and Donna Burdzy. (2011). “The Brief RCOPE: Current Psychometric Status of a Short Measure of Religious Coping.” Religions 2: 5176. doi:10.3390/rel2010051.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PargamentKenneth. I.Joseph KennellWilliam HathawayNancy GrevengoedJon Newman and Wendy Jones. (1988). “Religion and the Problem-Solving Process: Three Styles of Coping.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 27: 90104. doi:10.2307/1387404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PlacherWilliam C. (1994). Narratives of a Vulnerable God. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

  • PopperKarl R. and John C. Eccles. (1983). The Self and Its Brain. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • PorporaDouglas V. (2006). “Methodological Atheism, Methodological Agnosticism and Religious Experience.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36: 5775. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00296.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PowlisonDavid. (2010). “A Biblical Counseling View.” In Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd ed.) edited by Eric L. Johnson pp. 245273. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PrattoFeliciaJim SidaniusLisa M. Stallworth and Bertram F. Malle. (1994). “Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 741763. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.741.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RammBernard L. (1985). Offense to Reason: A Theology of Sin. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row.

  • RobertsRobert C. and P. J. Watson. (2010). “A Christian Psychology View.” In Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd ed.) edited by Eric L. Johnson pp. 149178. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RosenauPauline M. (1992). Post-modernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • RothPaul A. (1987). Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • SampsonEdward E. (1993). Celebrating the Other: A Dialogical Account of Human Nature. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • SandageSteven J.Peter J. JankowskiSarah A. Crabtree and Maria L. Schweer-Collins. (2017). “Calvinism, Gender Ideology, and Relational Spirituality: An Empirical Investigation of Worldview Differences.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 45: 1732. doi:10.1177/009164711704500102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SenRaginiWolfgang Wagner and Caroline Howarth. (2014). Secularism and Religion in Multi-faith Societies: The Case of India. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.utc.edu/10.1007/978-3-319-01922-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ShostrumE. L. (1974). Manual for the Personal Orientation Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

  • SmithBrewster. (1973). “On Self-Actualization: A Transambivalent Examination of a Focal Theme in Maslow’s Psychology.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 13: 1733. doi:10.1177/002216787301300203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmitherRobert and Alireza Khorsandi. (2009). “The Implicit Personality Theory of Islam.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 1: 8196. doi:10.1037/a0015737.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SorokinPitirim A. (1992). The Crisis of Our Time. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. (Original work published 1941.)

  • StoutJeffrey. (1988). Ethics after Babel. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • StreibHeinzRalph W. HoodJr. and Constantin Klein. (2010). “The Religious Schema Scale: Construction and Initial Validation of a Quantitative Measure for Religious Styles.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 20: 151172. doi:10.1080/10508619.2010.481223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TangneyJune P.Roy F. Baumeister and Angie L. Boone. (2004). “High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success.” Journal of Personality 72: 271322. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TarnasRichard. (1991). Passions of the Western Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

  • TaylorCharles. (1989). Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • TaylorCharles. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

  • TekkeMustafaP. J. WatsonNik A. Hirsham İsmail and Zhuo J. Chen. (2015). “Muslim Religious Openness and ilm: Relationships with Islamic Religious Reflection, Religious Schema, and Religious Commitments in Malaysia.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 37: 295320. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThaubergerPatrick C. and Daniel Sydiaha-SymorD. (1977). “The Relationship between an Avoidance of Existential Confrontation and Neuroticism: A Psychometric Test.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 17: 8991. doi:10.1177/002216787701700109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ToulminStephen E. (1990). Cosmopolis. New York: Free Press.

  • Van der LansJan M. (1987). “The Value of Sundén’s Role-Theory Demonstrated and Tested with Respect to Religious Experiences in Meditation.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 26: 401412. doi:10.2307/1386443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (1993). “Apologetics and Ethnocentrism: Psychology and Religion within an Ideological Surround.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 3: 120. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0301_1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (1998). “Girard and Integration: Desire, Violence, and the Mimesis of Christ as Foundation for Postmodernity.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 26: 311321. doi:10.1177/009164719802600401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (2004). “After Postmodernism: Perspectivism, a Christian Epistemology of Love, and the Ideological Surround.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 32: 248261. doi:10.1177/009164710403200309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (2006). “Friends of the Truth, Violence, and the Ideological Surround: Social Science as Meetings for Clearness.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 28: 123132. doi:10.1163/008467206777832643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (2008). “Faithful Translation and Postmodernism: Norms and Linguistic Relativity within a Christian Ideological Surround.” Edification: Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology 2(1): 518. Retrieved November 29 2018 from http://www.christianpsych.org/wp_scp/wp-content/uploads/edification-journal-21.pdf#page=4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (2010). “Christian Rationality and the Postmodern Context: The Example of Rational-Emotive Therapy within a Christian Ideological Surround.” Edification: The Transdisciplinary Journal of Christian Psychology 4(1): 6474. Retrieved November 29 2018 from http://www.christianpsych.org/wp_scp/wp-content/uploads/Edification-4.1.pdf#page=64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (2011). “Whose Psychology? Which Rationality? Christian Psychology within an Ideological Surround after Postmodernism.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 30: 307316. Retrieved on December 19 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281442553_Whose_Psychology_Which_Rationality_Christian_Psychology_within_an_Ideological_Surround_after_Postmodernism.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. (2014). “Transition beyond Postmodernism: Pluralistic Culture, Incommensurable Rationalities, and Future Objectivity.” Review & Expositor 111: 3340. doi.org/10.1177/0034637313510480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhou J. Chen and Nima Ghorbani. (2014). “Extrinsic Cultural Religious Orientation: Analysis of an Iranian Measure in University Students in the United States.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 35: 6178. doi:10.1080/13617672.2014.884849.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhou J. ChenNima Ghorbani and Meghdi Vartanian. (2015). “Religious Openness Hypothesis: I. Religious Reflection, Schemas, and Orientations within Religious Fundamentalist and Biblical Foundationalist Ideological Surrounds.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 34: 99113. Retrieved December 11 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Watson4/publication/281294398_Religious_Openness_Hypothesis_I_Religious_Reflection_Schemas_and_Orientations_within_Religious_Fundamentalist_and_Biblical_Foundationalist_Ideological_Surrounds/links/55e09da308ae6abe6e897508.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhuo J. Chen and Ralph W. HoodJr. (2011). “Biblical Foundationalism and Religious Reflection: Polarization of Faith and Intellect Oriented Epistemologies within a Christian Ideological Surround.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 39: 111121. doi:10.1177/009164711103900202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhuo J. Chen and Ronald J. Morris. (2014). “Varieties of Quest and the Religious Openness Hypothesis within Religious Fundamentalist and Biblical Foundationalist Ideological Surrounds.” Religions 5: 120. doi:10.3390/rel5010001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhuo J. Chen and Ronald J. Morris. (2018). “Sanctification of Learning and Religious Openness: Contrasts across Religious Fundamentalist and Biblical Foundationalist Ideological Surrounds.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 29: 352376. doi:10.1163/9789004382640_018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhuo J. ChenRonald J. Morris and Nima Ghorbani. (2017). “Religious Problem-Solving Styles within an American Religious Ideological Surround.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 28: 2251. doi:10.1163/9789004348936_003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhuo J. ChenRonald J. Morris and Nima Ghorbani. (2018). “Religion within a Dark Triad Ideological Surround: Pluralistic Self as Dialogue across Private, Communal, and Public Space.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 29: 377400. doi:10.1163/9789004382640_019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Zhuo J. ChenRonald J. Morris and Erin Stephenson. (2015). “Religious Openness Hypothesis: III. Defense against Secularism within Fundamentalist and Biblical Foundationalist Ideological Surrounds.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 34: 125140. Retrieved December 11 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281294655_Religious_Openness_Hypothesis_III_Defense_against_Secularism_within_Fundamentalist_and_Biblical_Foundationalist_Ideological_Surrounds.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Nima GhorbaniMeghdi Vartanian and Zhuo J. Chen. (2015). “Religious Openness Hypothesis: II. Religious Reflection and Orientations, Mystical Experience, and Psychological Openness of Christians in Iran.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 34: 114124. Retrieved December 11 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281294403_Religious_Openness_Hypothesis_II_Religious_Reflection_and_Orientations_Mystical_Experience_and_Psychological_Openness_of_Christians_in_Iran.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Ralph W. HoodJr. and Ronald J. Morris. (1985). “Dimensions of Religiosity and Empathy.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 4(3): 7385. Retrieved December 11 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232432379_Dimensions_of_Religiosity_and_Empathy.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Ralph W. HoodJr. and Ronald J. Morris. (1988). “Existential Confrontation and Religiosity.” Counseling and Values 33: 4754. doi:10.1002/j.2161-007x.1988 .tb00735.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.J. Trevor MillironRonald J. Morris and Ralph W. HoodJr. (1994). “Religion and Rationality: II. Comparative Analysis of Rational-Emotive and Intrinsically Religious Rationalities.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 13: 373384. Retrieved on December 19 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232526470_Religion_and_rationality_II_Comparative_analysis_of_rational-emotive_and_intrinsically_religious_irrationalities.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.J. Trevor MillironRonald J. Morris and Ralph W. HoodJr. (1995). “Religion and the Self as Text: Toward a Christian Translation of Self-Actualization.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 23: 180189. doi:10.1177/009164719502300304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. and Ronald J. Morris. (2006). “Intolerance of Ambiguity within a Religious Ideological Surround: Christian Translations and Relationships with Religious Orientation, Need for Cognition, and Uncertainty Response.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 28: 81101. doi:10.1163/008467206777832634.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J. and Ronald J. Morris. (2008). “Self-Control within a Christian Ideological Surround.” Edification: Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology 2(2): 6272. Retrieved on November 29 2018 from http://www.christianpsych.org/wp_scp/wp-content/uploads/edification-22.pdf#page=62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Ronald J. Morris and Ralph W. HoodJr. (1987). “Antireligious Humanistic Values, Guilt, and Self-Esteem.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 26: 535546. doi:10.2307/1387103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Ronald J. Morris and Ralph W. HoodJr. (1988a). “Sin and Self-Functioning, Part 1: Grace, Guilt, and Self-Consciousness.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 16: 254269. doi:10.1177/009164718801600305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Ronald J. Morris and Ralph W. HoodJr. (1988b). “Sin and Self-Functioning, Part 2: Grace, Guilt, and Psychological Adjustment.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 16: 270281. doi:10.1177/009164718801600306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Ronald J. Morris and Ralph W. HoodJr. (1989). “Sin and Self-Functioning, Part 5: Antireligious Humanistic Values, Individualism, and the Community.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 17: 157172. doi:10.1177/009164718901700210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Ronald J. MorrisTaylor LoyMichael B. Hamrick and Sheldon Grizzle. (2007). “Beliefs about Sin: Adaptive Implications in Relationships with Religious Orientation, Self-Esteem, and Measures of the Narcissistic, Depressed and Anxious Self.” Edification: Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology 1: 5767. Retrieved December 1 2018 from http://www.christianpsych.org/wp_scp/wp-content/uploads/edification-journal-113.pdf#page=57.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Benjamin S. ReaganZhuo J. Chen and Ronald J. Morris. (Forthcoming). “Xenophilia and the Religious Openness Hypothesis: Love of the ‘Stranger’ within Religious Fundamentalist and Biblical Foundationalist Ideological Surrounds.” Journal of Psychology and Theology. doi:10.1177/0091647118807184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatsonP. J.Pauline SawyersRonald J. MorrisMark L. CarpenterRachael S. JimenezKatherine A. Jonas and David L. Robinson. (2003). “Reanalysis within a Christian Ideological Surround: Relationships of Intrinsic Religious Orientation with Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 31: 315328. doi:10.1177/009164710303100402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WilliamsonW. PaulRalph W. HoodJr.Aneeq AhmadMahmood Sadiq and Peter C. Hill. (2010). “The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: Cross-cultural Application, Validity Evidence, and Relationship with Religious Orientation and the Big 5 Factor Markers.” Mental Health Religion & Culture 13: 721747. doi:10.1080/13674670802643047.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WoolmanJohn. (1961). The Journal of John Woolman. Secaucus, NJ: The Citadel Press. (Original work published in 1774.)

  • WulffDavid M. (1997). Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporary. (Second ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • ZinnbauerBrian J.Kenneth I. PargamentBrenda ColeMark S. RyeEric M. ButterTimothy G. Belavich and Jill L. Kadar. (1997). “Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36: 549564. doi:10.2307/1387689.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Figures
  • View in gallery
  • View in gallery
    Triumphalist Model with monological objectivity defined within theistic, naturalistic, and postmodern ideological surrounds
  • View in gallery
    Dialogical Model with future objectivity defined by an eschatological meta-perspective coordinated between a higher eschatological ultimate standard above and dialogical considerations of home and outside social rationalities below
Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 85 85 50
Full Text Views 7 7 2
PDF Downloads 5 5 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0