Inter-State Water Law in the United States of America
What Lessons for International Water Law?
In: Brill Research Perspectives in International Water LawAbstract
The rich field of inter-state water law in the United States illustrates both successes and failures in transboundary water management and allocation. This monograph analyzes the three general approaches to water allocation between riparian states to certain shared watercourses in the United States, namely equitable apportionment, congressional apportionment, and inter-state compacts. This analysis is accompanied by a discussion and evaluation of the different cases of shared watercourses that applied these approaches, and a comparison of each of them to similar approaches in international water law. The monograph draws lessons for international water law from inter-state water law—highlighting the successful inter-state approaches that can be adopted by international water law, as well as the approaches that failed, and which should be avoided.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abbott, Kenneth W., & Duncan Snidal, ‘Strengthening International Regulation through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit,’ Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 42(2) (2009), pp. 501–578.
-
Abderrahman, Walid A., ‘Energy and Water in Arid Developing Countries: Saudi Arabia, A Case-Study,’ International Journal of Water Resources Development, Vol. 17(2) (2010), pp. 247–255.
-
Abrams, Robert H., ‘Transboundary Water Allocation Risks of Compacts: Who Wins When Legal Rules Face Adaptive Challenges,’ Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, Vol. 60, c. 9–1 (2014).
-
Abrams, Robert H., ‘Water, Climate Change, and the Law: Integrated Eastern States Water Management Founded on a New Cooperative Federalism,’ Environmental Law Reporter, News & Analysis, Vol. 42(5) (2012), pp. 10433–10449.
-
Acordo sobre o Aquífero Guarani [Agreement on the Guarani Aquifer], 2 August 2010, Argentina-Brazil-Paraguay-Uruguay, Ministério Das Relações Exteriores [Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs].
-
Adler, Robert W., ‘Climate Change and the Hegemony of State Water Law,’ Stanford Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 29(1) (2010), pp. 1–61.
-
Adler, Robert W., ‘The Ancient Mariner of Constitutional Law: The Historical, Yet Declining Role of Navigability,’ Washington University Law Review, Vol. 90(2) (2013), pp. 1643–1706.
-
Agreement Between the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the Management and Utilization of the Ground Waters of the Al-Sag/Al-Disi Layer (April 20, 2015), http://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/documents/regionaldocs/Disi_Aquifer_Agreement-English2015.pdf.
-
Allan, J. A., ‘Virtual Water—The Water, Food, and Trade Nexus: Useful Concept or Misleading Metaphor?,’ Water International, Vol. 28(1) (2003), pp. 106–113.
-
Allan, J. A., ‘Virtual Water—Part of an Invisible Synergy that Ameliorates Water Scarcity,’ in, Peter Rogers, Ramon Llamas, & Luis Martinez-Cortina (eds.), Water Crisis: Myth or Reality, pp. 131–150 (Taylor & Francis, 2006).
-
Anderson, Terry L., & Clay J. Landry, ‘Exporting Water to the World,’ Water Resources Update(Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education), Vol. 118(1), pp. 60–67 (2001).
-
Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 48–3771–3783 (2017).
-
Arizona v. California, 373 u.s. 546 (1963).
-
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette v. Zimmerman, 20 S.W.3d 301, 304.
-
Arnold, Craig Anthony, ‘Adaptive Watershed Planning and Climate Change,’ Environmental & Energy Law & Policy, Vol. 5(2) (2010), pp. 417–487.
-
Arnold, Craig Anthony, ‘Fourth-Generation Environmental Law: Integrationist and Multimodal,’ William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, Vol. 35(3) (2011), pp. 771–884.
-
August, Jack L., Jr., The Vision in the Desert: Carl Hayden and Hydropolitics in the American Southwest (Texas Christian University Press, 1999).
-
Bean v. Morris, 221 u.s. 485, 496–487 (1911).
-
Biber, Eric, ‘The Price of Admission: Causes, Effects, and Patterns of Conditions Imposed on States Entering the Union,’ American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 46(2) (2004), pp. 119–208.
-
Blomgren Bingham, Lisa, ‘The Next Generation of Administrative Law: Building the Legal Infrastructure for Collaborative Governance,’ Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2010(2) (2010), pp. 297–356.
-
Blumm, Michael C.,, & Rachel D. Guthrie, ‘Internationalizing the Public Trust Doctrine: Natural Law and Constitutional and Statutory Approaches to Fulfilling the Saxion Vision,’ UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 45(3) (2012), pp. 741–808.
-
Boelens, Rutgerd, Armando Guevara-Gil,, & Aldo Panfichi, ‘Indigenous Water Rights in the Andes: Struggles Over Resources and Legitimacy,’ Journal of Water Law, Vol. 20(5) (2009), pp. 268–277.
-
Bonnheim, Noah Byron, ‘History of Climate Engineering,’ Climate Change, Vol. 1(4) (2010), pp. 891–897.
-
Boulder Canyon Project Act, 45 Stat. 1057 (1928) (codified at 43 u.s.c. § 617–617u (2014)).
-
Bradshaw, Karen, & Dean Lueck (eds.), Wildfire Policy: Law and Economics Perspectives (RFF Press, 2012).
-
Bradshaw, Karen, & Dean Lueck, ‘Contracting for Control of Landscapes,’ Iowa Law Review, Vol. 100(6) (2015), pp. 2507–2549.
-
Bretsen, Stephen N., & Peter J. Hill, ‘Water Markets as a Tragedy of the Anticommons,’ William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, Vol. 33(3) (2009), pp. 723–783.
-
Brown Weiss, Edith, ‘The Coming Water Crisis: A Common Concern of Humankind,’ Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 1(1) (2012), pp. 153–168.
-
Brown Weiss, Edith, ‘Water Transfers and International Trade Law,’ in, Edith Brown Weiss, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes & Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder (eds.), Fresh Water and International Economic Law, pp. 61–92 (Oxford University Press, 2005).
-
Bruhl, Aaron-Andrew P., ‘Hierarchically Variable Deference to Agency Interpretations,’ Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 89(2) (2013), pp. 727–784.
-
Bureau of Reclamation, Colorado River Interim Guidelines for the Operation of Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, 73 f.r. 19873–19801 (2008).
-
Campbell, Robert L. & Anthony T. Jones, ‘Appropriate Disposal of Effluent from Coastal Desalination Facilities,’ Desalination, Vol. 182(1) (2005), pp. 365–372.
-
Cannon, Bill, Texas: Land of Legend and Lore (Republic of Texas Press, 2004).
-
Cappaert v. United States, 426 u.s. 128, 141 (1976).
-
Carstens, Anne-Marie C., ‘Lurking in the Shadows of Judicial Process: Special Masters in the Court’s Original Jurisdiction Cases,’ Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 86(2) (2002), pp. 625–715.
-
Cazurra, Tomás, ‘Water Reuse of South Barcelona’s Wastewater Reclamation Plant,’ Desalination, Vol. 218(1) (2008), pp. 43–51.
-
Coase, Ronald, ‘The Problem of Social Cost,’ Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 3(1) (1960), pp. 1–44.
-
Colorado River Compact, 70 Cong. Rec. 325 (1928).
-
Colorado v. Kansas, 320 u.s. 383, 392 (1943).
-
Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 u.s. 176 (1982).
-
Complaint at 2–7, Wind River Resources LLC v. Frisby, No. 2:08-cv-00653-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. May 21, 2008).
-
Constitution of Ecuador (2008).
-
Convention on the Law of Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses, g.a. Res. 51 Res. 51/229, un gaor, 51st Sess., Supp. No. 49, un Doc. A/RES/51/229 (July 8, 1997).
-
Convention on the Protection, Utilisation, Recharge and Monitoring of the Franco-Swiss Genevois Aquifer (January 1, 2008).
-
Cooter, Robert D., The Strategic Constitution (Princeton University Press, 2000).
-
Craig, Robin Kundis, “ ‘Stationarity is Dead’—Long Live Transformation: Five Principles for Climate Change Adaptation Law,” Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 34(1) (2009), pp. 9–73.
-
Craig, Robin Kundis, ‘Comparative Guide to Western States’ Public Trust Doctrines: Public Values, Private Rights, and the Evolution Toward an Ecological Public Trust,’ Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 37(1) (2010), pp. 53–197.
-
Craig, Robin Kundis, ‘Constitutional Contours for the Design and Implementation of Multistate Renewable Energy Programs and Projects,’ University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 81(3) (2010), pp. 771–832.
-
Craig, Robin Kundis, ‘Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking), Federalism, and the Water-Energy Nexus,’ Idaho Law Review, Vol. 49(2) (2013), pp. 242–264.
-
Culyer v. Adams, 449 u.s. 433, 438 (1981).
-
Davenport, James H., ‘Softening the Divides: The Seven Colorado River Basin States’ Recommendation to the Secretary of the Interior Regarding Lower Basin Shortage Guidelines and the Operation of Lakes Mead and Powell in the Low Reservoir Conditions,’ University of Denver Water Law Review, Vol. 10 (2) (2007), pp. 287–312.
-
Davis, Seth, ‘The False Promise of Fiduciary Government,’ Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 89(3) (2014), pp. 1145–1207.
-
Davis, Seth, ‘Tribal Rights of Action,’ Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 45(2) (2014), pp. 499–551.
-
deBuys, William, ed., Seeing Things Whole: The Essential John Wesley Powell (Island Press, 2001).
-
Delaware River Basin Compact, Pub. L. No. 87–328, 75 Stat. 688 (1961), http://www.state.nj.us/drbc/library/documents/compact.pdf.
-
Dellapenna, Joseph W., ‘Interstate Struggles Over Rivers: The Southeastern States and the Struggle Over the *Hooch,’ NYU Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 12(1) (2005), pp. 828–900.
-
Dellapenna, Joseph W., ‘The Evolution of Riparianism in the United States,’ Marquette Law Review, Vol. 95(2) (2011), pp. 53–90.
-
Dennis, Arnett S., ‘Weather Modification by Cloud Seeding,’ International Geophysics Series, Vol. 24(3) (1980).
-
Eckstein, Gabriel, ‘A Hydrogeological Perspective on the Status of Groundwater Resources under the UN Watercourse Convention,’ Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 30(2) (2005), pp. 525–564.
-
Eckstein, Gabriel, ‘Hydraulic Harmony or Water Whimsy? Guarani Aquifer Countries Sign Agreement,’ International Water Law Project Blog (August 5, 2010), http://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/blog/2010/08/05/hydraulic-harmony-or-water-whimsy-guarani-aquifer-countries-sign-agreement/.
-
Engel, Kirsten, ‘State Environmental Standard-Setting: Is There a ‘Race’ and is it ‘To the Bottom’?,’ Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 48(3) (1997), pp. 271–398.
-
Evans, Allison, ‘The Groundwater/Surface Water Dilemma in Arizona: A Look Back and a Look Ahead Toward Conjunctive Management Reform,’ Phoenix Law Review, Vol. 3(1) (2010), pp. 269–292.
-
Featherstone, Jeffrey P., ‘Existing Interstate Compacts: The Law and the Lessons,’ Toledo Journal of Great Lakes Law, Science, and Policy, Vol. 4(2) (2001), pp. 271–282.
-
Fleck, John, ‘On the Brink of a Major Deal to Reduce Colorado River Water Use,’ Inkstain (November 6, 2016), http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/2016/11/brink-major-deal-reduce-colorado-river-water-use/.
-
Fleming, James R., ‘The Climate Engineers,’ The Wilson Quarterly, Vol. 31(2) (2007), pp. 46–60.
-
Frank, Richard M., ‘The Public Trust Doctrine: Assessing its Recent Past and Charting its Future,’ UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 45(3) (2012), pp. 665–691.
-
Garner, Eric L., & Michelle Ouellette, ‘Future Shock? The Law of the Colorado River in the Twenty-First Century,’ Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 27(3) (1995), pp. 469–506.
-
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, October 30, 1947, 61 Stat. A-11, 55 unts 194.
-
Getches, David H., ‘Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Water Under International Norms,’ Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 16(1) (2005), pp. 259–294.
-
Getches, David H., Water Law in a Nutshell 4th ed. (West Academic Publishing, 2009).
-
Getzler, Joshua, A History of Water Rights at Common Law (Oxford University Press, 2004).
-
Gilligan, Michael J., ‘The Transaction Costs Approach to International Institutions, Power, Interdependence and Non-State Actors,’ in, Helen V. Milner & Andrew Moravcsik, eds., Power, Interdependence and Nonstate Actors in World Politics, pp. 50–65 (Princeton University Press, 2009).
-
Girardot, Joseph W., ‘Toward a Rational Scheme of Inter-state Water Compact Adjudication,’ University of Michigan Journal of Legal Reform, Vol. 23(1) (1989), pp. 151–177.
-
Glennon, Robert, & Jacob Kavkewitz, “ ‘A Smashing Victory?’ Was Arizona v. California a Victory for the State of Arizona?,” Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 4(1) (2013), pp. 1–38.
-
Glennon, Robert, & Thomas Maddock III, ‘In Search of Subflow: Arizona’s Futile Effort to Separate Groundwater from Surface Water,’ Arizona Law Review, Vol. 36(2) (1994), pp. 567–607.
-
Glicksam, Robert L., & Richard E. Levy, ‘A Collective Action Perspective on Ceiling Preemption by Federal Environmental Regulation: The Case of Global climate Change,’ Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 102(2) (2008), pp. 579–648.
-
Grant, Douglas L., ‘Inter-state Water Allocation Compacts: When the Virtue of Permanence Becomes the Vice of Inflexibility,’ University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 74(4) (2003), pp. 105–180.
-
Hall, Noah D., ‘Inter-state Water Compacts and Climate Change Adaptation,’ Environmental & Energy Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 5(2) (2010), pp. 237–323.
-
Hall, Noah D., & Benjamin Cavataro, ‘Inter-state Groundwater Law in the Snake Valley: Equitable Apportionment and a New Model for Transboundary Aquifer Management,’ Utah Law Review, Vol. 2013 (3) (2013), pp. 1553–1626.
-
Hardberger, Amy, ‘Powering the Tap Dry: Regulatory Alternatives for the Energy-Water Nexus,’ University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 84(3) (2013), pp. 529–579.
-
Hardberger, Amy, ‘What Lies Beneath: Determining the Necessity of International Groundwater Policy Along the United States-Mexico Border and a Roadmap to an Agreement,’ Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 35(1) (2004), pp. 1211–1258.
-
Harse, Grant, ‘Nebraska’s Costs of Compliance with the Republican River Compact: An Equitable Solution,’ Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 19(1) (2009), pp. 124–147.
-
Hasday, Jill Elaine, ‘Inter-state Compacts in a Democratic Society: The Problem of Permanency,’ Florida Law Review, Vol. 49(1) (1997), pp. 1–47.
-
Hayton, Robert D., & Albert E. Utton, ‘Transboundary Groundwaters: The Bellagio Draft Treaty,’ Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 29(3) (1989), pp. 663–722.
-
Heller, Michael A., ‘The Boundaries of Private Property,’ Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108(2) (1999), pp. 1163–1223.
-
Hibbert, Alden R., ‘Water Yield Improvement Potential by Vegetation Management on Western Rangelands,’ Journal of American Water Resources Association, Vol. 19(3) (1983), pp. 375–381.
-
Hirokawa, Keith, ‘Some Pragmatic Observations about Radical Critique in Environmental Law,’ Stanford Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 21(1) (2002), pp. 225–235.
-
Hobbs, Gregory J., Jr., ‘Eighth Update to Colorado Water Law: An Historical Overview,’ University of Denver Water Law Review, Vol. 16(1) (2012), 137.
-
Hobbs, Gregory J., Jr., ‘The Role of Climate in Shaping Western Water Institutions,’ University of Denver Water Law Review, Vol. 7(1) (2003), pp. 1–46.
-
Hoekstra, Y., & A. K. Chapagain, ‘Water Footprints of Nations: Water Use by People as a Function of Their Consumption Pattern,’ Water Resources Management, Vol. 21(1) (2007), pp, 35–48.
-
Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 u.s. 349 (1908).
-
Hudson, Blake, ‘Reconstituting Land-Use Federalism to Address Transitory and Perpetual Disasters: The Bimodal Federalism Framework,’ BYU Law Review, Vol. 2011(6) (2011), pp. 1991–2061.
-
Hughes v. Oklahoma, 441 u.s. 322, 336 (1979).
-
In re Gen. Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in Big Horn River System, 753 P.2d 76, 101 (Wyo. 1988).
-
In re the Gen. Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source, 35 P.3d 68, 78–80 (Ariz. 2001).
-
International Law Association, Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers and Comments, Report of the Fifty-Second Conference (1966).
-
Inter-American Charter of Social Guarantees, 1948, reprinted in Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Relations 763, 1012 (Edmund Jan Osmanczyk ed., 2003).
-
International Boundary and Water Commission, Minute 319: Interim International Cooperative Measures in the Colorado River Basin through 2017 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative Measures to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California (November 20, 2012).
-
International Joint Commission, ‘Protection of the Waters of the Great Lakes, Final Report 6,’ International Joint Commission (2000).
-
International Law Association, Final Report of the Water Resources Law Committee, in Report of the Seventy-First Conference of the International Law Association,’ International Law Association (2004), http://www.ila-hq.org/pdf/Water%20Resources/Final%20Report%202004.pdf.
-
Interstate Council on Water Policy, ‘Interstate River Basin Organization Source Water Protection Survey,’ Interstate Council on Water Policy (February 2012), http://www.icwp.org/cms/ic/Inter-stateReport_new.pdf.
-
Interstate Water Apportionment Compacts, u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/compact.html.
-
Johnson, Nathan C., ‘Protecting Our Water Compacts: The Looming Threat of Unilateral Congressional Interaction,’ Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2010(3) (2010), pp. 875–905.
-
Kansas v. Colorado, 206 u.s. 46 (1907).
-
Kansas v. Nebraska, 135 S. Ct. 1042 (2015).
-
Kemmis, Denial, This Sovereign Land: A New Vision for Governing the West (Island Press, 2001).
-
Khalili, Morteza Sr., et al., ‘Results of Cloud Seeding Operations for Precipitation Enhancement in Iran during 1999–2007,’ Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification/Weather Modification Association (April 22, 2008), http://ams.confex.com/ams/17WModWMA/techprogram/paper_139149.htm.
-
Kibel, Paul S., ‘Grasp on Water: A Natural Resource that Eludes NAFTA’s Notion of Investment,’ Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 34(2) (2007), pp. 655–672.
-
Kim, Young M., et al., ‘Overview of Systems Engineering Approaches for Large-Scale Seawater Desalination Plant with a Reverse Osmosis Network,’ Desalination, Vol. 238(3) (2009), pp. 312–332.
-
King, Jonathan S., Peter W. Culp, & Carlos de la Parra, ‘Getting to the Right Side of the River: Lessons for Binational Cooperation on the Road to Minute 319,’ University of Denver Water Law Review, Vol. 18(1) (2014), pp. 35–114.
-
Kitze, Rachel A., ‘Moving Past Preemption: Enhancing the Power of Local Governments Over Hydraulic Fracturing,’ Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 98(1) (2013), pp. 385–418.
-
Klein, Christine A., ‘The Dormant Commerce Clause and Water Export: Toward a New Analytical Paradigm,’ Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 35(1) (2011), pp. 131–154.
-
Klein, Christine A., ‘The Environmental Commerce Clause,’ Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 27(1) (2003), pp. 1–70.
-
Klein, Christine A., ‘Water Bankruptcy,’ Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 97(2) (2012), pp. 560–624.
-
Kohloff, Karl, & David Roberts, ‘Beyond the Colorado River: Is an International Water Augmentation Consortium in Arizona’s Future?,’ Arizona Law Review, Vol. 49(2) (2007), pp. 257–286.
-
Kourides, P. Nicholas, ‘The Influence of Islamic Law on Contemporary Middle Eastern Legal Systems: The Formation and Binding Force of Contracts,’ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 9(1) (1970), pp. 384–435.
-
Kyl, Jon, & Ryan A Smith, ‘Forward: Water Law and Policy Conference,’ Arizona Law Review, Vol. 49(2) (2007), pp. 209–216.
-
Larson, Rhett B., ‘Augmented Water Law,’ Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 48(3) (2016), pp. 757–781.
-
Larson, Rhett B., ‘Holy Water and Human Rights: Indigenous Peoples’ Religious-Rights Claims to Water Resources,’ Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 2(1) (2011), pp. 81–109.
-
Larson, Rhett B., ‘Innovation and International Commons: The Case of Desalination under International Law,’ Utah Law Review, Vol. 2012(2) (2012), pp. 759–819.
-
Larson, Rhett B., ‘Interstitial Federalism,’ UCLA Law Review, Vol. 62(4) (2015), pp. 908–968.
-
Larson, Rhett B., ‘Reconciling Energy and Food Security,’ University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 48(4) (2014), pp, 929–958.
-
Larson, Rhett B., ‘The Case of Canadian Bulk Water Exports,’ Canadian Global Affairs Institute (2015), https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cdfai/pages/609/attachments/original/1440452326/Canadian_Bulk_Water_Exports.pdf?1440452326.
-
Larson, Rhett B., ‘The New Right in Water,’ Washington & Lee Law Review, Vol. 70(4) (2013), pp. 2181–2267.
-
Larson, Rhett, & Kelly Kennedy, ‘Bankrupt Rivers,’ UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 49(4) (2016), pp. 1335–1383.
-
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, International Law and Freshwater: The Multiple Challenges (Edward Elgar, 2013).
-
Lehigh Falls Fishing Club v. Andrejewski, 123 A.2d 636 (Pa. 1956).
-
Leib, Ethan J., David L. Ponet, & Michael Serota, ‘A Fiduciary Theory of Judging,’ California Law Review, Vol. 101(3) (2013), pp. 699–753.
-
Leib, Ethan J., David L. Ponet,, & Michael Serota, ‘Translating Fiduciary Principles into Public Law,’ Harvard Law Review Forum, Vol. 126(3) (2013), pp. 91–101.
-
Lincecum, Jerry B., ‘Red River Bridge War,’ in, Kenneth L. Untied (ed.), Folklore in Motion: Texas Travel Lore, pp. 25–34 (University of North Texas Press, 2007).
-
Long, Elisabeth, ‘Wyoming v. USDA: A Look Down the Road at Management of Inventoried Roadless Areas for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation,’ Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 40(2) (2013), pp. 329–383.
-
Loomis, Brandon, ‘Reduction in Tree Cover Over Rivers Could Mean More Water Flow,’ The Arizona Republic (October 30, 2015).
-
Loucks, Daniel P., ‘Managing America’s Rivers: Who’s Doing It?,’ International Journal of River Basin Management, Vol. 1(1) (2003), pp. 21–31.
-
Louisiana v. Mississippi, 516 u.s. 221 (1995).
-
Lubowski, Ruben, Marlow Vesterby, Shawn Bucholtz, Alba Baez, and Michael J. Roberts, Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002, EIB-14 (u.s. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2006).
-
MacDonnell, Lawrence J., ‘Arizona v. California: Its Meaning and Significance for the Colorado River and Beyond After Fifty Years,’ Arizona Journal of Environmental law & Policy, Vol. 4(1) (2013), pp. 88–129.
-
Maravilla, Christopher S., ‘The Canadian Bulk Water Moratorium and its Implications for NAFTA,’ Currents: International Trade Law Journal, Vol. 10(1) (2001), pp. 29–35.
-
Martin v. Waddell’s Lessee, 41 u.s. 367, 411 (1842).
-
Matson, Jeffrey T., ‘Interstate Water Compact Version 3.0: Missouri River Basin Compact Drafters Should Consider an Inter-Sovereign Approach to Accommodate Federal and Tribal Interests in Water Resources,’ North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 88(1) (2012), pp. 97–138.
-
Mayland, Kirt, ‘Navigating the Murky Waters of Connecticut’s Water Allocation Scheme,’ Quinnipiac Law Review, Vol. 24(2), 885 (2006).
-
McCaffrey, Stephen C., ‘The International Law Commission Adopts Draft Articles on International Watercourses,’ American Journal of International Law, Vol. 89(2) (1995), pp. 395–404.
-
McConkey, Diane E., ‘Federal Reserved Rights to Instream Flows in the National Forests,’ Virginia Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 13(2) (1994), pp. 305–322.
-
McCormick, Zachary L., ‘Interstate Water Allocation Compacts in the Western United States—Some Suggestions,’ Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 30(3) (1994), pp. 385–395.
-
Missouri v. Illinois, 200 u.s. 496, 521 (1906).
-
Montana v. Wyoming, 131 S.Ct. 1765 (2011).
-
Morrison, Michael D., & Keith Dollahite, ‘The Public Trust Doctrine: Insuring the Needs of Texas Bays and Estuaries,’ Baylor Law Review, Vol. 37(3) (1985), pp. 365–424.
-
Naff, Thomas, ‘Islamic Law and the Politics of Water,’ in, Joseph W. Delapenna & Joyeeta Gupta (eds.), The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water, pp. 37–52 (Springer, 2008).
-
Naff, Thomas, & Joseph Dellapenna, ‘Can There Be a Confluence? A Comparative Consideration of Western and Islamic Fresh Water Law,’ Water Policy, Vol. 4(6) (2002), pp. 465–489.
-
National Park & Conservation Association v. Stanton, 54 F. Supp. 2d 7 (d.d.c. 1999).
-
Nebraska Revise Statutes § 46–613.01 (2015).
-
Nebraska v. Iowa, 143 u.s. 359 (1892).
-
Nebraska v. Wyoming, 325 u.s. 589 (1945).
-
Nebraska v. Wyoming, 515 u.s. 1115 (1995).
-
North American Free Trade Agreement, December 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2057, 32 i.l.m. 289.
-
O’Leary, Marilyn C., ‘The Bellagio Draft Treaty as a Tool for Solving Border Groundwater Issues,’ U.S.-Mexico Law Journal, Vol. 11(1) (2003), pp. 57–60.
-
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, ‘Transitions Towards Adaptive Management of Water Facing Climate and Global Change,’ Water Resource Management, Vol. 21(1) (2007), pp. 49–62.
-
Parlow, Matthew J., ‘Civic Republicanism, Public Choice Theory, and Neighborhood Councils: A New Model for Civic Engagement,’ University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 79(3) (2008), pp. 137–188.
-
Paschal Osborn, Rachael, ‘Climate Change and the Columbia River Treaty,’ Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 2(1) (2012), pp. 75–123.
-
Patashnik, Josh, ‘Arizona v. California and the Equitable Apportionment of Interstate Waterways,’ Arizona Law Review, Vol. 56(1) (2014), pp. 1–51.
-
Pedraza-Fariña, Laura, ‘Conceptions of Civil Society in International Lawmaking and Implementation: A Theoretical Framework,’ Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 34(3) (2013), pp. 605–673.
-
Pike v. Bruce Church, 397 u.s. 137, 142 (1970).
-
Pollard’s Lessee v. Hagen, 44 u.s. 212, 216 (1845).
-
PPL Montana, LLC v. Montana, 132 S. Ct. 1215, 1235 (2012).
-
Price, Dean Waters, ‘The Legal and Historical Barriers to Out-of-District Transfers from Mainstream Colorado River Irrigation Districts in Arizona,’ University of Denver Water Law Review, Vol. 15(1) (2011), pp. 5–29.
-
Programme for the Development of a Regional Strategy for the Utilisation of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System—Terms of Reference for the Monitoring and Exchange of Groundwater Information of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (Tripoli, October 5, 2000).
-
Rauscher, H. Michael, ‘Ecosystem Management Decision Support for Federal Forests in the United States: A Review,’ Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 114(2–3) (1999), pp. 173–197.
-
Red River Compact Act of December 22, 1980, Pub. L. No. 96–564, 94 Stat. 3305.
-
Reeder, Laura, ‘Creating a Legal Framework for Regulation of Natural Gas Extraction from the Marcellus Shale Formation,’ William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, Vol. 34(3) (2010), pp. 999–1026.
-
Reiblich, Jesse, & Christine A. Klein, ‘Climate Change and Water Transfers,’ Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 41(3) (2014), pp. 439–508.
-
Reisner, Marc, Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water (Penguin Books, 1993).
-
Republican River Compact, Kan. Stat. Ann. §82a–518 (1942).
-
Rose, Carol, ‘The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce, and Inherently Public Property,’ University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 53(3) (1986), pp. 711–781.
-
Rosenbloom, Jonathan, ‘New Day at the Pool: State Preemption, Common Pool Resources, and Non-Place Based Municipal Collaborations,’ Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 36(2) (2012), pp. 445–485.
-
Rowberry, Ryan, ‘Drinking from the Same Cup: Federal Reserved Water Rights and National Parks in the Eastern United States,’ Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 29(4) (2013), pp. 987–1023.
-
Ruhl, J. B., ‘General Design Principles for Resilience and Adaptive Capacity in Legal Systems—With Application to Climate Change Adaptation,’ North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 89(5) (2011), pp. 1373–1403.
-
Ryan, Erin, ‘Negotiating Federalism,’ Boston College Law Review, Vol. 52(1) (2011), pp. 1–136.
-
Sadoff, Claudia W., & David Grey, ‘Beyond the River: The Benefits of Cooperation on International Rivers,’ Water Policy, Vol. 4(5) (2002), pp. 389–403.
-
Salman, Salman, ‘The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Law,’ Water Resources Development, Vol. 23(4) (2007), pp. 625–640.
-
Salman, Salman, ‘Inter-States Water Disputes in India: An Analysis of the Settlement Process,’ Water Policy, Vol. 4(3) (2002), pp. 223–237.
-
Sarine, L. Elizabeth, ‘The Supreme Court’s Problematic Deference to Special Masters in Interstate Water Disputes,’ Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 39(2) (2012), pp. 535–569.
-
Sax, Joseph L., ‘The Limits of Private Rights in Public Waters,’ Environmental Law, Vol. 19(2) (1989), pp. 473–483.
-
Sax, Joseph L., ‘The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention,’ Michigan Law Review, Vol. 68(1) (1970), pp. 471–566.
-
Sax, Joseph L., et al., Legal Control of Water Resources, Cases and Materials 4th ed. (Thomson West, 2006).
-
Saxer, Shelley Ross, ‘The Fluid Nature of Property Rights in Water,’ Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Vol. 21(1) (2010), pp. 49–112.
-
Schäferhoff, Marco et al., ‘Transnational Public-Private Partnerships in International Relations: Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks, and Results,’ International Studies Review, Vol. 11(3) (2009), pp. 451–474.
-
Shively v. Bowlby, 152 u.s. 1 (1894).
-
Smit, Erica C., ‘Geoengineering: Issues of Accountability in International Law,’ Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 15(2) (2015), pp. 1060–1089.
-
South Carolina v. North Carolina, 130 S. Ct. 854 (2010).
-
Sporhase v. Nebraska, 458 u.s. 941 (1982).
-
Squillace, Mark, & Alexander Hood, ‘NEPA, Climate Change, and Public Lands Decision-Making,’ Environmental Law, Vol. 42(2) (2012), pp. 469–526.
-
Stanford, J. A., & J. V. Ward, ‘Management of Aquatic Resources in Large Catchments: Recognizing Interactions between Ecosystem Connectivity and Environmental Disturbance,’ in, Robert J. Naiman (ed.), Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change, pp. 91–124(Springer, 2002).
-
Stegner, Wallace, Beyond the Hundredth Meridian: John Wesley Powell and the Second Opening of the West (Penguin Books, 1954).
-
Stoa, Ryan B., ‘The United Nations Watercourses Convention on the Dawn of Entry Into Force,’ Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 47(5) (2014), pp. 1321–1370.
-
Strifling, David A., ‘An Ecosystem Based Approach to Slowing the Synergistic Effects of Invasive Species and Climate Change,’ Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Vol. 22(1) (2011), pp. 145–193.
-
Tarlock, A. Dan, ‘The Creation of New Risk Sharing Water Entitlement Regimes: The Case of the Truckee-Carson Settlement,’ Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 25(4) (1999), pp. 674–691.
-
Tarlock, A. Dan, ‘The Law of Equitable Apportionment Revisited, Updated, and Restated,’ University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 56(4) (1985), pp. 381–411.
-
Tarlock, A. Dan, ‘The Potential Role of Local Governments in Watershed Management,’ Pace Environmental Law Review, Vol. 20(1) (2002), pp. 149–176.
-
Tarlock, A. Dan, ‘Towards a More Robust International Water Law of Cooperation to Address Droughts and Ecosystem Conservation,’ Georgetown Environmental Law Review, Vol. 28(2) (2016), pp. 261–290.
-
Tarlock, A. Dan, Safeguarding International River Ecosystems in Times of Scarcity, University of Denver Water Law Review, Vol. 3(1) (2000), pp. 231–272.
-
Tarlock, A. Dan, Law of Water Rights and Resource (Thomson Reuters, 2000).
-
Tarlock, A. Dan, & Patricia Wouters, ‘Are Shared Benefits of International Waters an Equitable Apportionment?,’ Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 18(1) (2007), pp. 523–536.
-
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann, 133 S. Ct. 2120 (2013).
-
Taylor, Holly, ‘Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann: Interpreting Silence in Inter-state Water Compacts with Respect to State Boundaries and the Right to Access Water,’ University of Denver Water Law Review, Vol. 17(1) (2013), pp. 138–155.
-
Teclaff, Ludwik A., ‘Evolution of the River Basin Concept in National and International Water Law,’ Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 36(2) (1996), pp. 359–391.
-
Teclaff, Ludwik A., ‘The River Basin Concept and Global Climate Change,’ Pace Environmental Law Review, Vol. 8(2) (1991), pp. 355–388.
-
Tellinghuisen, Stacy, ‘Water for Power Generation: What’s the Value?,’ Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 50(3) (2010), pp. 683–720.
-
Texas v. New Mexico, 482 u.s. 124, 128 (1987).
-
Charter of Waters of the Senegal River, 2002, http://iea.uoregon.edu/pages/view_treaty.php?t=2002-SenegalRiverWaterCharter.EN.txt&par=view_treaty_html [http://perma.cc/6C3R-4KWU].
-
The Daniel Ball, 77 u.s. 557 (1871).
-
Thompson, Barton H., Jr., ‘A Federal Act to Promote Integrated Water Management: Is the CZMA a Useful Model?,’ Environmental Law, Vol. 42(1) (2012), pp. 201–240.
-
Thompson, Barton H., Jr., ‘The Public Trust Doctrine: A Conservative Reconstruction & Defense,’ Southeastern Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 15(1) (2006), pp. 47–70.
-
Tir, Jaroslav, & Douglas M. Stinnett, ‘The Institutional Design of Riparian Treaties: The Role of River Issues,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution , Vol. 55(4) (2011), pp. 606–631.
-
Treaty Between Canada and the United States of American Relating to Cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin, January 17, 1961, 542 UNTS 244 (1964).
-
Treaty Between the United States of America and Mexico Respecting the Utilization of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, February 3, 1944, 59 Stat. 1219.
-
Trelease, Frank J., ‘State Water and State Lines: Commerce in Water Resources,’ University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 56(4) (1985), pp. 347–379.
-
Troendle, Charles, Marc Wilcox, Greg Bevenger, & Laurie Porth, ‘The Coon Creek Water Yield Augmentation Project: Implementation of Timber Harvesting Technology to Increase Streamflow,’ Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 143(1–3) (2001), pp. 179–187.
-
Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights Settlement Act, Pub.L. No. 101–618, 104 Stat. 3294 (1990).
-
United Haulers Association, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, 550 u.s. 330, 338 (2007).
-
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Agenda 21, un Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. II) (1992).
-
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, g.a. Res. 61/295, un Doc. A/RES61/295 (September 13, 2007).
-
United State Constitution.
-
[See Lubowski above]United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394, 1414 (9th Cir. 1983).
-
United States v. New Mexico, 438 u.s. 696, 718 (1978).
-
Urbina, Ian, ‘Drilling Down: Regulation Lax as Gas Wells’ Tainted Water Hits River,’ New York Times (February 26, 2011), http://www.bctwa.org/FrkBC-DrillingDown-NewYorkTimes.pdf.
-
Vick, Margaret J., ‘The Law of International Waters: Reasonable Utilization,’ Chicago-Kent Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 12(1) (2012), pp. 141–178.
-
Ware, Eugene F., Roman Water Law: Translated from the Pendects of Justinian (West Publishing, 1905).
-
Watters, Molly M., ‘Fish and Federalism: How the Asian Carp Litigation Highlights a Deficiency in the Federal Common Law Displacement Analysis,’ Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, Vol. 2(2) (2013), pp. 535–562.
-
Weber, Robert F., ‘New Governance, Financial Regulation, and Challenges to Legitimacy: The Example of Internal Models Approach to Capital Adequacy Regulation,’ Administrative Law Review, Vol. 62(3) (2010), pp. 783–869.
-
Wesley Powell, John, Report on the Lands of the Arid Region of the United States, with a More Detailed Account of the Lands of Utah (Harvard Common Press, 1983).
-
Wesley Powell, John, The Exploration of the Colorado River and Its Canyons (Dover Publications Inc., 1961).
-
West, Chad A., ‘For Body, Soul, or Wealth: The Distinction, Evolution, and Policy Implications of a Water Ethic,’ Stanford Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 26(1) (2007), pp. 201–234.
-
Wiener, Jonathan B. Wiener, ‘Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context,’ Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108(2) (1999), pp. 677–800.
-
Williams, B. K., R. C. Szaro, & C. D. Shapiro, ‘Adaptive Management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Guide,’ Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S. Department of the Interior (2009), https://www2.usgs.gov/sdc/doc/DOI-%20Adaptive%20ManagementTechGuide.pdf.
-
Winters v. United States, 207 u.s. 564 (1908).
-
Woodhouse, Melvin, ‘Is Public Participation a Rule of the Law of International Watercourses?,’ Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 43(1) (2003), pp. 137–183.
-
World Water Council, ‘E-Conference Synthesis: Virtual Water Trade—Conscious Choices,’ World Water Council (2004), http://www.waterfootprint.org/Reports/virtual_water_final_synthesis.pdf.
-
Worster, Donald, A River Running West: The Life of John Wesley Powell (Oxford University Press, 2001).
-
Wyoming v. Colorado, 259 u.s. 419 (1922).
-
Wyoming v. United States, 492 u.s. 406 (1989).
-
El-Sayed, Y. M., ‘The Rising Potential of Competitive Solar Desalination,’ Desalination, Vol. 216(1–3) (2007), pp. 314–324.
-
Young, Ernest A., ‘The Rehnquist Court’s Two Federalisms,’ Texas Law Review, Vol. 83(1) (2004), pp. 1–165.
-
Younos, Tamim, ‘Environmental Issues of Desalination,’ Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, Vol. 132(1) (2005), pp. 11–18.
-
Zellmer, Sandra, ‘The Anti-Speculation Doctrine and its Implications for Collaborative Water Management,’ Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 8(3) (2008), pp. 994–1030.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 761 | 152 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 252 | 9 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 44 | 7 | 3 |
Inter-State Water Law in the United States of America
What Lessons for International Water Law?
In: Brill Research Perspectives in International Water LawAbstract
The rich field of inter-state water law in the United States illustrates both successes and failures in transboundary water management and allocation. This monograph analyzes the three general approaches to water allocation between riparian states to certain shared watercourses in the United States, namely equitable apportionment, congressional apportionment, and inter-state compacts. This analysis is accompanied by a discussion and evaluation of the different cases of shared watercourses that applied these approaches, and a comparison of each of them to similar approaches in international water law. The monograph draws lessons for international water law from inter-state water law—highlighting the successful inter-state approaches that can be adopted by international water law, as well as the approaches that failed, and which should be avoided.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 761 | 152 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 252 | 9 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 44 | 7 | 3 |