0 Richard Morrison Fellow in Water Law, Associate Professor of Law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, and Senior Research Fellow, Kyl Center for Water Policy, United States
The rich field of inter-state water law in the United States illustrates both successes and failures in transboundary water management and allocation. This monograph analyzes the three general approaches to water allocation between riparian states to certain shared watercourses in the United States, namely equitable apportionment, congressional apportionment, and inter-state compacts. This analysis is accompanied by a discussion and evaluation of the different cases of shared watercourses that applied these approaches, and a comparison of each of them to similar approaches in international water law. The monograph draws lessons for international water law from inter-state water law—highlighting the successful inter-state approaches that can be adopted by international water law, as well as the approaches that failed, and which should be avoided.
AbbottKenneth W. & DuncanSnidal‘Strengthening International Regulation through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit,’Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational LawVol. 42(2) (2009) pp. 501–578.
AbramsRobert H.‘Water, Climate Change, and the Law: Integrated Eastern States Water Management Founded on a New Cooperative Federalism,’Environmental Law Reporter News & AnalysisVol. 42(5) (2012) pp. 10433–10449.
Agreement Between the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the Management and Utilization of the Ground Waters of the Al-Sag/Al-Disi Layer (April202015) http://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/documents/regionaldocs/Disi_Aquifer_Agreement-English2015.pdf.
AllanJ. A.‘Virtual Water—The Water, Food, and Trade Nexus: Useful Concept or Misleading Metaphor?,’Water InternationalVol. 28(1) (2003) pp. 106–113.
AllanJ. A.‘Virtual Water—Part of an Invisible Synergy that Ameliorates Water Scarcity,’ in PeterRogersRamonLlamas & LuisMartinez-Cortina (eds.) Water Crisis: Myth or Reality pp. 131–150 (Taylor & Francis2006).
BlummMichael C. & Rachel D.Guthrie‘Internationalizing the Public Trust Doctrine: Natural Law and Constitutional and Statutory Approaches to Fulfilling the Saxion Vision,’UC Davis Law ReviewVol. 45(3) (2012) pp. 741–808.
Brown WeissEdith‘Water Transfers and International Trade Law,’ in EdithBrown WeissLaurenceBoisson de Chazournes & NathalieBernasconi-Osterwalder (eds.) Fresh Water and International Economic Law pp. 61–92 (Oxford University Press2005).
CraigRobin Kundis‘Comparative Guide to Western States’ Public Trust Doctrines: Public Values, Private Rights, and the Evolution Toward an Ecological Public Trust,’Ecology Law QuarterlyVol. 37(1) (2010) pp. 53–197.
DavenportJames H.‘Softening the Divides: The Seven Colorado River Basin States’ Recommendation to the Secretary of the Interior Regarding Lower Basin Shortage Guidelines and the Operation of Lakes Mead and Powell in the Low Reservoir Conditions,’University of Denver Water Law ReviewVol. 10 (2) (2007) pp. 287–312.
EcksteinGabriel‘Hydraulic Harmony or Water Whimsy? Guarani Aquifer Countries Sign Agreement,’International Water Law Project Blog (August52010) http://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/blog/2010/08/05/hydraulic-harmony-or-water-whimsy-guarani-aquifer-countries-sign-agreement/.
GilliganMichael J.‘The Transaction Costs Approach to International Institutions, Power, Interdependence and Non-State Actors,’ in Helen V.Milner & AndrewMoravcsik eds. Power Interdependence and Nonstate Actors in World Politics pp. 50–65 (Princeton University Press2009).
GlicksamRobert L. & Richard E.Levy‘A Collective Action Perspective on Ceiling Preemption by Federal Environmental Regulation: The Case of Global climate Change,’Northwestern University Law ReviewVol. 102(2) (2008) pp. 579–648.
HallNoah D. & BenjaminCavataro‘Inter-state Groundwater Law in the Snake Valley: Equitable Apportionment and a New Model for Transboundary Aquifer Management,’Utah Law ReviewVol. 2013 (3) (2013) pp. 1553–1626.
HardbergerAmy‘What Lies Beneath: Determining the Necessity of International Groundwater Policy Along the United States-Mexico Border and a Roadmap to an Agreement,’Texas Tech Law ReviewVol. 35(1) (2004) pp. 1211–1258.
International Boundary and Water CommissionMinute 319: Interim International Cooperative Measures in the Colorado River Basin through 2017 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative Measures to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley Baja California (November202012).
International Joint Commission‘Protection of the Waters of the Great Lakes, Final Report 6,’International Joint Commission (2000).
International Law AssociationFinal Report of the Water Resources Law Committee in Report of the Seventy-First Conference of the International Law Association’ International Law Association (2004) http://www.ila-hq.org/pdf/Water%20Resources/Final%20Report%202004.pdf.
Interstate Council on Water Policy‘Interstate River Basin Organization Source Water Protection Survey,’Interstate Council on Water Policy (February2012) http://www.icwp.org/cms/ic/Inter-stateReport_new.pdf.
KhaliliMortezaSr.et al.‘Results of Cloud Seeding Operations for Precipitation Enhancement in Iran during 1999–2007,’Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification/Weather Modification Association (April222008) http://ams.confex.com/ams/17WModWMA/techprogram/paper_139149.htm.
KingJonathan S.Peter W.Culp & Carlosde la Parra‘Getting to the Right Side of the River: Lessons for Binational Cooperation on the Road to Minute 319,’University of Denver Water Law ReviewVol. 18(1) (2014) pp. 35–114.
KouridesP. Nicholas‘The Influence of Islamic Law on Contemporary Middle Eastern Legal Systems: The Formation and Binding Force of Contracts,’Columbia Journal of Transnational LawVol. 9(1) (1970) pp. 384–435.
LarsonRhett B.‘The Case of Canadian Bulk Water Exports,’Canadian Global Affairs Institute (2015) https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cdfai/pages/609/attachments/original/1440452326/Canadian_Bulk_Water_Exports.pdf?1440452326.
MatsonJeffrey T.‘Interstate Water Compact Version 3.0: Missouri River Basin Compact Drafters Should Consider an Inter-Sovereign Approach to Accommodate Federal and Tribal Interests in Water Resources,’North Dakota Law ReviewVol. 88(1) (2012) pp. 97–138.
PPL Montana LLC v. Montana132 S. Ct. 1215 1235 (2012).
PriceDean Waters‘The Legal and Historical Barriers to Out-of-District Transfers from Mainstream Colorado River Irrigation Districts in Arizona,’University of Denver Water Law ReviewVol. 15(1) (2011) pp. 5–29.
Programme for the Development of a Regional Strategy for the Utilisation of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System—Terms of Reference for the Monitoring and Exchange of Groundwater Information of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (Tripoli October 5 2000).
RauscherH. Michael‘Ecosystem Management Decision Support for Federal Forests in the United States: A Review,’Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 114(2–3) (1999) pp. 173–197.
SchäferhoffMarcoet al.‘Transnational Public-Private Partnerships in International Relations: Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks, and Results,’International Studies ReviewVol. 11(3) (2009) pp. 451–474.
StanfordJ. A. & J. V.Ward‘Management of Aquatic Resources in Large Catchments: Recognizing Interactions between Ecosystem Connectivity and Environmental Disturbance,’ in Robert J.Naiman (ed.) Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change pp. 91–124(Springer2002).
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann133 S. Ct. 2120 (2013).
TaylorHolly‘Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann: Interpreting Silence in Inter-state Water Compacts with Respect to State Boundaries and the Right to Access Water,’University of Denver Water Law ReviewVol. 17(1) (2013) pp. 138–155.
TroendleCharlesMarcWilcoxGregBevenger & LauriePorth‘The Coon Creek Water Yield Augmentation Project: Implementation of Timber Harvesting Technology to Increase Streamflow,’Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 143(1–3) (2001) pp. 179–187.
WattersMolly M.‘Fish and Federalism: How the Asian Carp Litigation Highlights a Deficiency in the Federal Common Law Displacement Analysis,’Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative LawVol. 2(2) (2013) pp. 535–562.
WeberRobert F.‘New Governance, Financial Regulation, and Challenges to Legitimacy: The Example of Internal Models Approach to Capital Adequacy Regulation,’Administrative Law ReviewVol. 62(3) (2010) pp. 783–869.
WilliamsB. K.R. C.Szaro & C. D.Shapiro‘Adaptive Management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Guide,’Adaptive Management Working Group U.S. Department of the Interior (2009) https://www2.usgs.gov/sdc/doc/DOI-%20Adaptive%20ManagementTechGuide.pdf.