Case Studies of the Catholic Church in Hong Kong, Macau, Taipei, and Shanghai

in Review of Religion and Chinese Society
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

The levels of civic engagement in terms of social services and civic activism in the Catholic churches of Hong Kong, Macau, Taipei, and Shanghai are very different. While the former three churches have a higher level of social services, Shanghai does not. Hong Kong has a higher level of civic activism than the other three dioceses. This paper explains the similarities and differences among these cities by using an analytical model of political, cultural, and individual opportunity structures. Our findings and analysis are derived from a collaborative research project on the Catholic Church’s civic engagement in the four cities using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. In a time of rapid political, economic, and social transformation in China, religion is beginning to play an increasingly important role. Our study sheds light on what roles Catholicism or other religions might play in this process, and it has important implications for church-state relations in greater China.

Sections
References
  • AdlerRichard P. and GogginJudy. 2005. “What Do We Mean by ‘Civic Engagement’?Journal of Transformative Education 3: 236353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BarnesSandra L. 2005. “Black Church Culture and Community Action.” Social Forces 84: 967994.

  • BellahRobert. 1992. The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • BorgonoviFrancesa. 2008. “Divided We Stand, United We Fall: Religious Pluralism, Giving, and Volunteering.” American Sociological Review 73: 105128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CasanovaJose. 2001a. “2000 Presidential Address: Religion, the New Millennium, and Globalization.” Sociology of Religion 62: 415441.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——. 2001b. “Civil Society and Religion: Retrospective Reflections on Catholicism and Prospective Reflections on Islam.” Social Research 68: 10411080.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChanKin-Man and ZhouYan. 2013. “Political Opportunity and the Anti-dam Movement in China: A Case Study of Nu River.” In Social Issues in China: Gender Ethnicity Labor and the Environment edited by HaoZhidong and ChenSheying pp. 311330. New York: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChavesMark and CannDavid E.. 1992. “Regulation, Pluralism, and Religious Market Structure.” Rationality and Society 4: 272290.

  • ChavesMark and GorskiPhilip S.. 2001. “Religious Pluralism and Religious Participation.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 261281.

  • ChenHon Fai 陈汉辉. 2013. “Gongmin quanli yu renge zhuyi: Aomen Tianzhujiao yu gongmin shehui chutan” 剬民权利与人格主义:澳门天主教与剬民社会初探 [Civic rights and personalism: A preliminary exploration of the relationship between the Catholic Church and civil society in Macau]. In Gongmin shehui: Zhongguo Dalu yu Gang Ao Tai 剬民社会:中国大陆与港澳台 [Civil society: Mainland China Hong Kong Macau and Taiwan] edited by Hao 郝志东Zhidong pp. 206220. Singapore: World Scientific Press; Macau: University of Macau.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClearyEdward L. 1997. “The Brazilian Catholic Church and Church-State Relations: Nation-Building.” Journal of Church and State 39: 253272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de TocquevilleAlexis. 2004 [1835 1840]. Democracy in America. New York: Library of America.

  • de VriesManfred F.R. Kets and MillerDanny. 1986. “Personality, Culture, and Organization.” The Academy of Management Review 11: 266279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DisalvoKatherine. 2008. “Understanding an Outlier: How Parish Culture Matters in a Highly Participatory Catholic Church.” Review of Religious Research 49: 438455.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EcklundElaine Howard. 2006. “Organizational Culture and Women’s Leadership: A Study of Six Catholic Parishes.” Sociology of Religion 67: 8198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FinkeRoger. 1990. “Religious Deregulation: Origins and Consequences.” Journal of Church and State 32: 609626.

  • HaoZhidong. 2011. Macau History and Society. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; Macau: University of Macau.

  • HarperCharles L. and Schulte-MurrayRebecca K.. 1998. “Religion and the Sociology of Culture: Exploring the Organizational Cultures of Two Midwestern Roman Catholic Dioceses.Review of Religious Research 40: 101119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LichtermanPaul. 2007. Review of Civil Society, Civic Engagement and Catholicism in the U.S., edited by Antonius Liedhegener and Werner Kremp (Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2007). Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 47: 523524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KuangLo Archbishop Stanislaus 罗光. 1989. “Tianzhujiao zai Zhonghua Minguo Diwei” 天主教在中华民国地位 [The role of Catholicism in the Republic of China]. Yi Shi Pinglun Zongjiao Pian 益世评论宗教篇1 [Yi Shi Comments on Religion 1] Yi Shi Pinglun 益世评论 [Yi Shi Comments].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MadsenRichard. 1998. China’s Catholics: Tragedy and Hope in an Emerging Civil Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • ——. 2003. “Catholic Revival during the Reform Era.” The China Quarterly. 174: 468487.

  • MarianiPaul P. 2011. Church Militant: Bishop Kung and Catholic Resistance in Communist Shanghai. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McAdamDoug. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings edited by McAdamDougMcCarthyJohn D. and ZaldMayer N. pp. 2340. Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pattillo-McCoyMary. 1998. “Church Culture as a Strategy of Action in the Black Community.” American Sociological Review 63: 767784.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PutnamRobert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • RomeroCatalina. 2001. “Globalization, Civil Society and Religion from a Latin American Standpoint.” Sociology of Religion 62: 475490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StarkRodney and BainbridgeWilliam Simms. 1985. The Future of Religion: Secularization Revival and Cult Formation. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StarkRodney and FinkeRoger. 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StarkRodney and McCannJames C.. 1993. “Market Forces and Catholic Commitment: Exploring the New Paradigm.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32: 111124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SwidlerAnn. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273286.

  • SzonyiMichael. 2009. “Secularization theories and the Study of Chinese Religions.” Social Compass 56: 312327.

  • WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WeinandyThomas G. 2006. “The Catholic Laity, Priests, Prophets and Kings: Address to Catholic Students and Laity at Furman College, Greenville, South Carolina.Voices 21 (3). http://www.wf-f.org/06-3CatholicLaity.html (accessed June 30 2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WilsonJohn and JanoskiThomas. 1995. “The Contribution of Religion to Volunteer Work.” Sociology of Religion 56: 137152.

  • WuthnowRobert. 2004. Saving America? Faith-Based Services and the Future of Civil Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • YangFenggang. 2006. “The Red, Black, and Gray Markets of Religion in China.” The Sociological Quarterly 47: 93122.

  • “Zhizhun luying: Chen Rijun Zhujiao yu Li Zhuming Yiyuan tan ‘zhengjao guanyi’” 只准录影:陈日君主教与李柱铭议员谈“政教关系” [You can only videotape: Bishop Zen Ze-kiun and legislator Martin Lee talk about “the relationship between state and religion]. Parish Media Center October 22 2001. http://www.hkdavc.com/bischan/b1029.html (accessed June 30 2013).

Figures
Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 138 133 3
Full Text Views 200 200 1
PDF Downloads 12 12 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0