巫術與中國現代性:有関性别與身體宗教性的初步探討
摘要
近期在溫州農村和小鎮的實地考察显示出巫術、巫醫和靈媒在後毛澤東時代再次出現,減緩了其經歷明清時期新儒學佔據統治地位,和毛澤東時代壓制形成的長期下降趨勢。與同時期台灣、福建和其他華裔生活的東南亞地區,以及我們所熟知的中華帝國晚期的巫術文化不同,如今在溫州大部分的靈媒都是女性,並且,她們沒有像男巫師一樣在她們主導的剬開宗教儀式裡進行血腥和暴力的禮儀行為。本篇論文探討了四個可能的原因,解釋當今中國官方和主流社會對巫術和靈媒的反感和憎惡。文章中提出的第四個原因,關於巫師儀式表演和巫師的性別問題,至今未在有關中國巫術的研究中被深入挖掘。因此,這個問題需要在今後研究現代中國的靈魂控制等相關課題時得到更多的重視,不應把中國巫術作為一個孤立的個案,而應該把中國巫術研究放在更大的全球環境中,共同探討其在全球現代化中身體構造的重新組合。
Recent fieldwork in rural and small-town Wenzhou reveals that shamans, ritual healers, and spirit mediums have reemerged in the post-Mao era, slowing a long decline that may have started with the ascendancy of Neo-Confucianism in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, and that was exacerbated by Maoist-era suppressions. Unlike the shamanistic cultures of contemporary Taiwan, Fujian, and Chinese ethnic enclaves in Southeast Asia, and what we know of China in late imperial times, most spirit mediums in Wenzhou today are women who do not engage in the bloody and violent public ritual performances found in those areas where male shamans predominate. This article reflects upon four possible explanations for the modern animosity toward shamanism and spirit possession by Chinese officialdom and mainstream Chinese society today. It suggests that the fourth possible explanation, one focusing on the bodily performances and gender of shamans, has not been adequately explored in the study of Chinese shamanism. This fourth explanation deserves attention in any future studies of spirit possession in contemporary China, as it does not treat China as an isolated case of shamanism in the world, but places Chinese shamanism in the larger global context of a shared reconfiguration of the human body in global modernity.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Anagnost Ann. 1987. “Politics and Magic in Contemporary China.” Modern China 13:1: 40–61.
Bodde Derk, . 1961. “Myths of Ancient China.” In Mythologies of the Ancient World, edited by Kramer Samuel N., pp. 367–408. New York: Doubleday.
Boddy Janice. 1994. “Spirit Possession Revisited: Beyond Instrumentality.” Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 407–434.
———. 1995. “Managing Tradition: ‘Superstition’ and the Making of National Identity among Sudanese Refugees.” In The Pursuit of Certainty: Religious and Cultural Formulations, edited by James Wendy, pp. 15–44. London: Routledge.
Boretz Avron. 2011. Gods, Ghosts, and Gangsters: Ritual Violence, Martial Arts, and Masculinity on the Margins of Chinese Society. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Buyandelger Manduhai. 2013. Tragic Spirits: Shamanism, Memory, and Gender in Contemporary Mongolia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Central Chinese Television Station (cctv) 中央電視台. 2000. “Huangtang de jingying” 荒唐的經營 (A ridiculous economy). Jiaodian Fangtan 焦點訪談 (Focus Interviews). Beijing.
Chang Kwang-chih. 1983. Art, Myth, and Ritual: The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1986. The Archaeology of Ancient China. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chatterjee Partha. 1993. “The Nation and Its Women.” In The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories, pp. 116–157. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chau Adam Yuet. 2006. Miraculous Response: Doing Popular Religion in Contemporary China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Choe Sang-hun. 2007. “Shamanism Enjoys Revival in Techno-Savvy South Korea.” The New York Times, July 7. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/07/world/asia/07korea.html (accessed January 13, 2013).
Comaroff Jean. 1985. Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance: The Culture and History of a South African People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Da Ming Lu, 大明律 (The Ming Legal Code). 1999. Edited by Xiaofeng Huai 懷效鋒编. Beijing: Legal Publishing Co.
Dean Kenneth, dir. 2011. Bored in Heaven 天堂無聊. Documentary film.
———. 1993. Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dean Kenneth, , and Zhengman Zhen. 2010. Ritual Alliances of the Putian Plain, vol. 1, Historical Introduction to the Return of the Gods. Leiden: Brill.
Debernardi Jean. 2006. The Way That Lives in the Heart: Chinese Popular Religion and Spirit Mediums in Penang, Malaysia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
De Groot, , Jan Jakob M.1901. Sectarianism and Religious Persecution in China: A Page in the History of Religions. Leiden: Brill.
———. 1910. The Religious System of China: Its Ancient Forms, Evolution, History, and Present Aspect, Manners, Customs, and Social Institutions Connected Therewith, vol. 6, book 2. Leiden: Brill.
Eliade Mircea. 1989. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Translated by Willard R. Trask. London: Penguin Arkana.
Foucault Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
———. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Burchell Graham, , Gordon Colin, , and Miller Peter, pp. 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gole Nilufer. 1996. The Forbidden Modern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Johnson Paul Chistopher. 2011. “An Atlantic Genealogy of ‘Spirit Possession.’” Comparative Studies in Society and History 53: 393–425.
Kang Xiaofei. 2006. The Cult of the Fox: Power, Gender, and Popular Religion in Late Imperial and Modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 2014. “The Gender of Superstition: Revolutionary Masculinity and the Anti-Medium Campaign in Yan’an, 1944–45.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Academy of Religion, San Diego, CA.
Kehoe A. B., , and Giletti D. H.. 1981. “Women’s Preponderance in Possession Cults: The Calcium Deficiency Hypothesis Extended.” American Anthropologist 83: 549–561.
Kendall Laurel. 2009. Shamans, Nostalgias, and the imf: South Korean Popular Religion in Motion. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Kim Seong-nae, . 2003. “Korean Shamanic Heritage in Cyber Culture.” In Re-Discovery of Shamanic Heritage, edited by Hoppal Mihaly, and Kosa Gabor, pp. 279–295. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
Lewis Ivan Myrddin. 2003. Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Luo Jianjian 駱建建著. 2008. “Bianqian zhi shen: yige xiangcun simiao chongjian de shehui jiedu” 變遷之神:一個鄉村寺廟重建的社會解讀 (A god in the midst of change: A social deconstruction of a village temple’s restoration). In Zhongguo zongjiao yu shehui gaofeng luntan lunwenji 《中國宗教與社會高峰論壇論文集》下 (Proceedings of the Conference on Chinese Religions and Society Summit Forum, vol. 2). Beijing: Beijing University Center for the Study of Chinese Religions and Society and Purdue University Center for the Study of Chinese Religions and Society.
Overmyer Daniel L.1976. Folk Buddhist Religion: Dissenting Sects in Late Traditional China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Palmer David A.2007. Qigong Fever: Body, Science, and Utopia in China. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 2008. “Heretical Doctrines, Reactionary Secret Societies, Evil Cults: Labeling Heterodoxy in Twentieth-Century China.” In Chinese Religiosities: Afflictions of Modernity and State Formation, edited by Yang Mayfair, 113–134. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Puett Michael J.2002. To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Raybeck D., , Shoob J., , and Grauberger J.. 1989. “Women, Stress, and Participation in Possession Cults: A Re-examination of the Calcium Deficiency Hypothesis.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 3:2: 139–161.
Schipper Kristofer. 1993. The Taoist Body. Translated by Karen Duval. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sutton Donald. 2000. “From Credulity to Scorn: Confucians Confront the Spirit Mediums in Late Imperial China.” Late Imperial China 21:2: 1–39.
Szonyi Michael. 2002. Practicing Kinship: Lineage and Descent in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tang Zhendong 湯鎭東收集整理, compiler. 2008. Wenzhou Guci Nanyou Zhuan 温州鼓詞南游傳 (Wenzhou drum chant: Journeys through the South). Lanzhou: Gansu People’s Publishing Co.
Taylor Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Teiser Stephen F.1988. The Ghost Festival in Medieval China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 1994. The Scripture on the Ten Kings and the Making of Purgatory in Medieval Chinese Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Ter Haar B. J.1999. The White Lotus: Teachings in Chinese Religious History. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Thomas Keith. 1971. Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tian Dongkui 田東奎著. 2005. “MingQing ludian zhong de wushu fanzui” 明清律典中的巫術犯罪 (Shamanistic crimes in the Ming and Qing dynasty legal codes). Tangdu Xuekan 唐都學刊 21:1.
Wallace Julia. 2014. “Workers of the World, Faint!” The New York Times, Sunday Review section, January 18. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/opinion/workers-of-the-world-faint.html?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Ar%2C%7B%221%22%3A%22RI%3A9%22%7D&_r=0 (accessed October 19, 2014).
Weber Max. (1904) 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Weller Robert P.1987. Unities and Diversities in Chinese Religion. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
———. 1999. Alternate Civilities: Democracy and Culture in China and Taiwan. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Yang Mayfair Mei-hui, . 2008. “Introduction.” In Chinese Religiosities: Afflictions of Modernity and State Formation, edited by Yang Mayfair, pp. 1–40. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ye Dabing, 葉大兵 and Liya Ye 葉麗婭著. 1992. “Chen Jinggu Xinyang jiqi Chuanshuo de yanjiu” 陳靖姑信仰及其傳說的研究 (A study of the Chen Jinggu cult and its legends). Zhongguo Minsu 中國民俗學 1992: 1–9.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1567 | 370 | 42 |
Full Text Views | 324 | 23 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 288 | 49 | 4 |
巫術與中國現代性:有関性别與身體宗教性的初步探討
摘要
近期在溫州農村和小鎮的實地考察显示出巫術、巫醫和靈媒在後毛澤東時代再次出現,減緩了其經歷明清時期新儒學佔據統治地位,和毛澤東時代壓制形成的長期下降趨勢。與同時期台灣、福建和其他華裔生活的東南亞地區,以及我們所熟知的中華帝國晚期的巫術文化不同,如今在溫州大部分的靈媒都是女性,並且,她們沒有像男巫師一樣在她們主導的剬開宗教儀式裡進行血腥和暴力的禮儀行為。本篇論文探討了四個可能的原因,解釋當今中國官方和主流社會對巫術和靈媒的反感和憎惡。文章中提出的第四個原因,關於巫師儀式表演和巫師的性別問題,至今未在有關中國巫術的研究中被深入挖掘。因此,這個問題需要在今後研究現代中國的靈魂控制等相關課題時得到更多的重視,不應把中國巫術作為一個孤立的個案,而應該把中國巫術研究放在更大的全球環境中,共同探討其在全球現代化中身體構造的重新組合。
Recent fieldwork in rural and small-town Wenzhou reveals that shamans, ritual healers, and spirit mediums have reemerged in the post-Mao era, slowing a long decline that may have started with the ascendancy of Neo-Confucianism in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, and that was exacerbated by Maoist-era suppressions. Unlike the shamanistic cultures of contemporary Taiwan, Fujian, and Chinese ethnic enclaves in Southeast Asia, and what we know of China in late imperial times, most spirit mediums in Wenzhou today are women who do not engage in the bloody and violent public ritual performances found in those areas where male shamans predominate. This article reflects upon four possible explanations for the modern animosity toward shamanism and spirit possession by Chinese officialdom and mainstream Chinese society today. It suggests that the fourth possible explanation, one focusing on the bodily performances and gender of shamans, has not been adequately explored in the study of Chinese shamanism. This fourth explanation deserves attention in any future studies of spirit possession in contemporary China, as it does not treat China as an isolated case of shamanism in the world, but places Chinese shamanism in the larger global context of a shared reconfiguration of the human body in global modernity.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1567 | 370 | 42 |
Full Text Views | 324 | 23 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 288 | 49 | 4 |