Lay Buddhists and Moral Activism in Contemporary China (当代中国的佛教居士与道德能动主义)
In: Review of Religion and Chinese SocietySearch for other papers by Gareth Fisher in
Current site
Google Scholar
The last few decades have seen the rise of grassroots groups of lay Buddhists in post-Mao China who, through the composition, exchange, and discussion of Buddhist-themed media, foster moral discourses that critique what they perceive as the materialistic direction of contemporary Chinese society. Disseminated at legal but unregulated spaces within Buddhist temples, these discourses empower the economically marginalized lay practitioners who gather there and provide them with new purpose in life. Practitioners are also able to transmit these moral discourses through networks to other temple spaces. However, they do not yet possess the means to use them to influence the social direction of Chinese society at large. This is due to (1) political restrictions against the circulation of religious-themed materials outside of approved religious activity sites; (2) economic obstacles faced by the practitioners who seek to spread anti-materialistic messages; (3) a lack of organizational cohesiveness among the practitioners; and (4) the influence on practitioners of doctrines within Buddhism that caution against proselytizing to those who do not already possess a pre-fated bond with the Buddha and his teachings. As a result, lay Buddhists do not as yet constitute a social movement in the way the term is conventionally used by sociologists.
佛教居士组成的草根社会团体在毛时代之后的几十年快速发展。通过书写、交流与讨论与佛教主题相关的文献，他们促进形成了一套批判当前中国社会拜金主义倾向的道德话语。这套话语在合法且相对自由的佛教寺院中传播，鼓励了经济窘迫的信徒，帮助他们获得新的生活目的。这一道德话语也借由信徒进一步传播给其他的寺院。但是因为以下原因，这些草根团体无力影响中国社会的整体方向：1)宗教政策限制了宗教思想在寺庙以外的传播；2)信徒的经济地位较低，难以宣传反对拜金主义的话语；3)信徒中间缺乏组织凝聚力；4)反对向那些与佛陀无缘的人宣传佛家思想的信条。因此到目前为止，佛教居士团体还没有形成社会学意义上的社会运动。
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Cao Nanlai . 2011. Constructing China’s Jerusalem: Christians, Power, and Place in Contemporary Wenzhou . Stanford, ca: Stanford University Press.
-
Chen Boda 陈柏达. 2011. Wu fu lin men 五福临门 (Reaching the Gateway of the Five Blessings). Bound book distributed at the Temple of Universal Rescue, July 19.
-
Davis Sara . 2005. Song and Silence: Ethnic Revival on China’s Southwest Frontier. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Fan Lizhu , Whitehead Evelyn Eaton , and Whitehead James D. . 2005. “The Spiritual Search in Shenzhen: Adopting and Adapting China’s Common Spiritual Heritage.” Nova Religio 9 (2): 50–61.
-
Fisher Gareth . 2008. “The Spiritual Land Rush: Merit and Morality in New Chinese Buddhist Temple Construction.” Journal of Asian Studies 67 (1): 143–170.
-
Fisher Gareth . 2014. From Comrades to Bodhisattvas: Moral Dimensions of Lay Buddhist Practice in Contemporary China . Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
-
Fisher Gareth . 2016. “A Lay Buddhist Leader: Jiang Xiuqin.” In Figures of Buddhist Modernity, edited by Samuels Jeffrey , McDaniel Justin Thomas , and Rowe Mark Michael , pp. 128–130. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
-
Fleischer Friederike . 2011. “For the Love of God: Finding Support in the Church-Community: A Case Study from China.” Religion, State and Society 39: 443–459.
-
Gayley Holly . 2013. “Reimagining Buddhist Ethics on the Tibetan Plateau.” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20: 247–286.
-
Handlin-Smith Joanna F. 1999. “Liberating Animals in Ming-Qing China: Buddhist Inspiration and Elite Imagination.” Journal of Asian Studies 58 (1): 51–84.
-
Huang Julia . 2009. Charisma and Compassion: Cheng Yen and the Buddhist Tzu Chi Movement . Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.
-
Huang Julia , and Weller Robert P. . 1998. “Merit and Mothering: Women and Social Welfare in Taiwanese Buddhism.” Journal of Asian Studies 57 (2): 379–396.
-
Jessup J. Brooks . 2016. “Buddhist Activism, Urban Space, and Ambivalent Modernity in 1920s Shanghai.” In Recovering Buddhism in Modern China , edited by Brooks Jessup J. and Kiely Jan , pp. 37–78. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Ji Zhe . 2011. “Buddhism in the Reform Era: A Secularized Revival?” In Religion in Contemporary China: Tradition and Innovation, edited by Chau Adam Yuet , pp. 32–52. London: Routledge.
-
Xu Jin 谨序. 2010. Zoujin Fojiao 走进佛教 (Entering into Buddhism). Bound book distributed at the Temple of Universal Rescue, June 12.
-
Jones Charles . 1999. Buddhism in Taiwan: Religion and the State, 1660–1990. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
-
Klein Jakob . 2017. “Buddhist Vegetarian Restaurants and the Changing Meaning of Meat in Urban China.” Ethnos 82 (2): 252–276.
-
Laliberté André . 2004. The Politics of Buddhist Organizations in Taiwan, 1989–2003: Safeguard the Faith, Build a Pure Land, Help the Poor . New York: Routledge.
-
Laliberté André . 2012. “Buddhist Charities and China’s Social Policy: An Opportunity for Alternate Civility?” Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 158 (April–June): 95–117.
-
Madsen Richard . 2007. Democracy’s Dharma: Religious Renaissance and Political Development in Taiwan . Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
McCarthy Susan K. 2013. “Serving Society, Repurposing the State: Religious Charity and Resistance in China.” China Journal 70: 48–72.
-
Naquin Susan . 1976. Millenarian Rebellion in China: Eight Trigrams Uprising of 1813 . New Haven, ct: Yale University Press.
-
Scott Gregory . 2016. “A Revolution of Ink: Chinese Buddhist Periodicals in the Early Republic.” In Recovering Buddhism in Modern China , edited by Brooks Jessup J. and Kiely Jan , pp. 111–140. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Staggenborg Suzanne . 1998. Gender, Family, and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, ca: Pine Forge Press.
-
Sudaji 素达吉. 2004. Beican shijie 悲惨世界 (The miserable world). Bound book distributed at the Temple of Universal Rescue, April 26.
-
Yanfei Sun . 2010. “Religions in Sociopolitical Context: The Reconfiguration of Religious Ecology in Post-Mao China.” PhD diss., University of Chicago.
-
ter Haar Barend . 1992. The White Lotus Teachings in Chinese Religious History. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
-
ter Haar Barend . 2001. “Buddhist-Inspired Options: Aspects of Lay Religious Life in the Lower Yangzi from 1100 until 1340.” T’oung Pao 87: 93–151.
-
Welch Holmes. 1972. Buddhism under Mao . Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.
-
Weller Robert P. 2000. “Living at the Edge: Religion, Capitalism, and the End of the Nation-State in Taiwan.” Public Culture 12 (2): 477–498.
-
Yang Fenggang . 2005. “Lost in the Market, Saved at McDonald’s: Conversion to Christianity in Modern China.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44: 423–441.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 476 | 141 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 409 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 149 | 8 | 0 |
Lay Buddhists and Moral Activism in Contemporary China (当代中国的佛教居士与道德能动主义)
In: Review of Religion and Chinese SocietySearch for other papers by Gareth Fisher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The last few decades have seen the rise of grassroots groups of lay Buddhists in post-Mao China who, through the composition, exchange, and discussion of Buddhist-themed media, foster moral discourses that critique what they perceive as the materialistic direction of contemporary Chinese society. Disseminated at legal but unregulated spaces within Buddhist temples, these discourses empower the economically marginalized lay practitioners who gather there and provide them with new purpose in life. Practitioners are also able to transmit these moral discourses through networks to other temple spaces. However, they do not yet possess the means to use them to influence the social direction of Chinese society at large. This is due to (1) political restrictions against the circulation of religious-themed materials outside of approved religious activity sites; (2) economic obstacles faced by the practitioners who seek to spread anti-materialistic messages; (3) a lack of organizational cohesiveness among the practitioners; and (4) the influence on practitioners of doctrines within Buddhism that caution against proselytizing to those who do not already possess a pre-fated bond with the Buddha and his teachings. As a result, lay Buddhists do not as yet constitute a social movement in the way the term is conventionally used by sociologists.
佛教居士组成的草根社会团体在毛时代之后的几十年快速发展。通过书写、交流与讨论与佛教主题相关的文献，他们促进形成了一套批判当前中国社会拜金主义倾向的道德话语。这套话语在合法且相对自由的佛教寺院中传播，鼓励了经济窘迫的信徒，帮助他们获得新的生活目的。这一道德话语也借由信徒进一步传播给其他的寺院。但是因为以下原因，这些草根团体无力影响中国社会的整体方向：1)宗教政策限制了宗教思想在寺庙以外的传播；2)信徒的经济地位较低，难以宣传反对拜金主义的话语；3)信徒中间缺乏组织凝聚力；4)反对向那些与佛陀无缘的人宣传佛家思想的信条。因此到目前为止，佛教居士团体还没有形成社会学意义上的社会运动。
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 476 | 141 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 409 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 149 | 8 | 0 |
