Drawing from visual studies scholarship, we highlight current and persistent critiques of sociological visualization, note recent developments in visualization tools for sociologists, and propose how sociologists can be reflective about their visualization choices. As a case study, we outline the visualization development and selection process in our project of mapping Chinese religious venues. We explain the visualization challenges we faced, the visual biases we hoped to manage, the strengths and limitations of various visualization methods we identified, and how we selected visualizations for varying research queries. In addition, we provide a list of considerations for fellow sociologists working to visualize geospatial point data.
基於可視化研究的學術領域,我們提出對於社會學可視化研究已有的和持續的批評,指出可視化工具的新近發展,對於社會學學者在可視化選擇過程中應有的反思提出建議。作為一個案例研究,我們簡要概述在製作中國宗教場所地圖過程中關於可視化的種種選擇,坦承解釋所遇到的種種挑戰,如何盡力減少視覺偏見,檢討不同可視化方法的優點和侷限,以及如何根據研究問題而選定可視方式。最後,我們提供一個需要考慮因素的清單,或許可以作為社會學學者在地理空間點狀數據的可視化中的參考。
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Carroll, B. E. 2015. “Religion in Space: Spatial Approaches to American Religious Studies.” Religion: Oxford Research Encyclopedias. August. http://religion.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-13 (accessed May 4, 2017).
Du Bois, W. E. B. 1898 (1967). The Philadelphia Negro. New York: Shocken.
Eliade, Mircea. 1957. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harper and Row.
Fyfe, Gordon, and John Law. 1988. “Introduction: On the Invisibility of the Visual.” The Sociological Review 35, no. 1, suppl. (1987): 1–14.
Grady, John. 1996. “The Scope of Visual Sociology.” Visual Studies 11 (2): 10–24. doi: 10.1080/14725869608583762.
Harper, Douglas. 1988. “Visual Sociology: Expanding Sociological Vision.” American Sociologist 19 (1): 54–70. doi:10.1007/BF02692374.
Harper, Douglas. 1997. “Visualizing Structure: Reading Surfaces of Social Life.” Qualitative Sociology 20 (1): 57–77. doi:10.1023/A:1024764214854.
Healy, Kieran, and James Moody. 2014. “Data Visualization in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 105–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551.
Heng, Terence. 2015. “An Appropriation of Ashes: Transient Aesthetic Markers and Spiritual Place-Making as Performances of Alternative Ethnic Identities.” Sociological Review 63 (1): 57–78. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12235.
Heng, Terence. 2016. Visual Methods in the Field: Photography for the Social Sciences. London: Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=lIapjwEACAAJ&pgis=1.
Heng, Terence. 2020. Of Gods, Gifts and Ghosts: Spiritual Places in Urban Spaces. London: Routledge.
Hill, Rosemary Lucy. 2017. “The Political Potential of Numbers: Data Visualization in the Abortion Debate.” Women, Gender and Research (1): 1–13. eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/118537/3/HILL%20Persuasive%20power%20of%20visualisations.pdf.
Holliday, Ruth. 2000. “We’ve Been Framed: Visualising Methodology.” Sociological Review 48 (4): 503–521. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00230.
Johnson, Ian. 2017. The Soul of China: The Return of Religion after Mao. New York: Pantheon.
Kennedy, Helen, and Rosemary Lucy Hill. 2017. “The Pleasure and Pain of Visualizing Data in Times of Data Power.” Television & New Media 18 (8): 769–782. doi: 10.1177/1527476416667823.
Kennedy, Helen, and Rosemary Lucy Hill. 2018. “The Feeling of Numbers: Emotions in Everyday Engagements with Data and Their Visualization.” Sociology 52 (4): 830–848. doi:10.1177/0038038516674675.
Kennedy, Helen, Rosemary Lucy Hill, Giorgia Aiello, and William Allen. 2016. “The Work that Visualization Conventions Do.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (6): 715–735. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153126.
Krase, Jerome. 2004. “Visualizing Ethnic Vernacular Landscapes.” In Race and Ethnicity in New York City, Research in Urban Sociology 7, edited by Ray Hutchison, 1–24. Bradford: Emerald Group.
Lomax, Helen. 2015. “Seen and Heard? Ethics and Agency in Participatory Visual Research with Children, Young People and Families.” Families, Relationships and Societies 4 (3): 493–502. doi:10.1332/204674315X14326324216211.
Pink, Sarah. 2021. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: SAGE Publications.
Prosser, Jon D. 2012. “Visual Methodology: Towards a More Seeing Research.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 177–198. London: Sage Publications.
Rose, Gillian. 2012. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
Stasz, Clarice. 1979. “Texts, Images and Display Conventions in Sociology.” Qualitative Sociology 2 (1): 29–38. doi:10.1007/BF02390132.
Stump, R. W. 2008. The Geography of Religion: Faith, Place, and Space. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Tweed, T. A. 2006. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wheeldon, Johannes, and Danielle Harris. 2015. “Expanding Visual Criminology: Definitions, Data and Dissemination.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 27: 141–162. heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/cicj27&i=159.
Yang, Fenggang. 2006. “The Red, Black, and Gray Markets of Religion in China.” Sociological Quarterly 47: 93–122.
Yang, Fenggang. 2011. Religion in China: Survival and Revival under Communist Rule. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yang, Fenggang. 2018. Atlas of Religion in China: Social and Geographical Contexts. Leiden: Brill Academic.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 778 | 333 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 115 | 7 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 150 | 20 | 0 |
Drawing from visual studies scholarship, we highlight current and persistent critiques of sociological visualization, note recent developments in visualization tools for sociologists, and propose how sociologists can be reflective about their visualization choices. As a case study, we outline the visualization development and selection process in our project of mapping Chinese religious venues. We explain the visualization challenges we faced, the visual biases we hoped to manage, the strengths and limitations of various visualization methods we identified, and how we selected visualizations for varying research queries. In addition, we provide a list of considerations for fellow sociologists working to visualize geospatial point data.
基於可視化研究的學術領域,我們提出對於社會學可視化研究已有的和持續的批評,指出可視化工具的新近發展,對於社會學學者在可視化選擇過程中應有的反思提出建議。作為一個案例研究,我們簡要概述在製作中國宗教場所地圖過程中關於可視化的種種選擇,坦承解釋所遇到的種種挑戰,如何盡力減少視覺偏見,檢討不同可視化方法的優點和侷限,以及如何根據研究問題而選定可視方式。最後,我們提供一個需要考慮因素的清單,或許可以作為社會學學者在地理空間點狀數據的可視化中的參考。
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 778 | 333 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 115 | 7 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 150 | 20 | 0 |