Orthodoxies in the Field of Production

in Religion and Theology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

A revised version of the introduction to my own Entanglements: Marking Place in the Field of Religion (Sheffield: Equinox Publishers, 2014), this essay identifies some of the rhetorical techniques and institutional conditions that make possible the establishment of an exclusive orthodoxy in the modern academic study of religion – an orthodoxy that polices the limits of the field by determining not only what counts as legitimate methods, data, and findings but also who counts as a legitimate practitioner.

Orthodoxies in the Field of Production

in Religion and Theology

Sections

References

3

Russell McCutcheonThe Discipline of Religion: Structure Meaning Rhetoric (New York: Routledge2003).

8

Russell McCutcheon“Naming the Unnameable: Theological Language and the Academic Study of Religion,” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2 no. 2 (1990): 213–229.

9

BourdieuHomo Academicus68.

10

Russell McCutcheonManufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia (New York: Oxford University Press1997).

11

For instance see Aaron HughesSituating Islam: The Past and Future of an Academy Discipline (Sheffield: Equinox Publishers2008); idem Abrahamic Religions: On the Uses and Abuses of History (New York: Oxford University Press 2012); and idem Theorizing Islam: Disciplinary Deconstruction and Construction (Sheffield: Equinox Publishers 2012).

16

Maurice Bloch“Why Religion is Nothing Special but is Central,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363 (2008): 2055–2061.

22

Bruce LincolnGods and Demons Priests and Scholars: Critical Explorations in the History of Religions (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press2012) 53.

23

Donald Wiebe“The Reinvention or Degradation of Religious Studies? Tales from the Tuscaloosa Woods,” Reviews in Religion & Theology 11 no. 1 (2004): 3.

27

Teemu Taira“Making Space for Discursive Study in Religious Studies,” Religion 43 no. 1 (2012): 26–45.

28

Bruce LincolnDiscourse and the Construction of Society: Comparative Studies of Myth Ritual and Classification (New York: Oxford University Press1989) 9.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 18 18 7
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0