This essay engages the theme “Manufacturing Religion: From Christian Origins to Classical Islam” by challenging scholarly assumptions about the rapid reception and cohesion of new or developing philosophical and religious movements in Greek and Roman antiquity. To illustrate this issue, I present two interrelated case studies: late Republic/early imperial Stoicism and its possible intersections with the later Christ movement of the first century. At a time when engagement with literate culture conferred a great deal of social capital, I suggest that the relative flexibility and “openness” of these two movements allowed for those seeking prestige, social mobility, or distinction – or those who were otherwise excluded from the top tiers of society – to participate in intellectual practices that emulated the standards of the elite. This model for understanding early Christianity counters traditional approaches within the study of religion that tend to foreground notions like belief, conversion and so forth as an explanatory model for membership over sociological and material motivations. This discussion also troubles understandings of Stoicism that tend to link it anachronistically with its later and more exalted imperial associations.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Berthelot, Katell. “Grecs, Barbares et Juifs dans l’oeuvre de Philon.” Pages 47–61 in Philon d’Alexandrie. Un penseur à l’intersection des cultures gréco-romaine, orientale, juive et chrétienne. Edited by Bernard Decharneux and Sabrina Inowlocki. Monothéismes et Philosophie 12. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.
Berthelot, Katell. “Philo’s Perception of the Roman Empire.” JSJ 42, no. 2 (2011): 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006311X544373.
Bodel, John. “The Cena Trimalchionis.” Pages 38–51 in Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context. Edited by Heinz Hofmann. London; New York, NY: Routledge, 1999.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996 [1979].
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Translated, edited, and introduced by Randal Johnson. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.
Colish, Marcia L. “Stoicism and the New Testament: An Essay in Historiography.” Pages 334–379 in ANRW. Part 2, Principat, 26.1. Edited by Wolfgang Haase. Berlin; Boston, MA: de Gruyter, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852714-008.
Coogan, Jeremiah, Candida R. Moss, Joseph A. Howley. “The Socioeconomics of Fabrication: Textuality, Authenticity, and Social Status in the Roman Mediterranean.” Arethusa 57, no. 2 (2024): 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2024.a934134.
Elizabeth Rawson, Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.
Elliott, Jackie. “Cato’s Origines and Self-Commemoration at Rome.” American Journal of Philology 144, no. 4 (2023): 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2023.a927940.
Frampton, Stephanie Ann. “What to Do with Books in the De finibus,” TAPA 146, no. 1 (2016): 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2016.a619103.
Gevaert, Bert, and Christian Laes, “What’s in a Monster? Pliny the Elder, Teratology, and Bodily Disability.” Pages 211–230 in Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies A Capite ad Calcem. Edited by Christian Laes, Chris Goodey, and M. Lynn Rose. MnemosyneSup 356. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251250_010.
Howley, Joseph A. Aulus Gellius and Roman Reading Culture: Text, Presence, and Imperial Knowledge in the Noctes Atticae. New York, NY; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Keddie, Tony. “The Pliny-Trajan Correspondence about Christians as Epistolary Fiction.” Pages 161–185 in The Social Worlds of Ancient Jews and Christians: Essays in Honor of L. Michael White. Edited by Jaimie Gunderson, Anthony Keddie, and Douglas Boin. NovTSup 189. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004524866_009.
Keulen, Wytse. Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights. MnemosyneSup 297. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 2009.
Kloppenborg, John S. Christ’s Associations: Connecting and Belonging in the Ancient City. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 2019.
Konstan, David. “The Active Reader and the Ancient Novel.” Pages 1–17 in Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel. Edited by Michael Paschalis, Stelios Panayotakis, and Gareth Schmeling. Ancient Narrative Sup 12. Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing, 2009.
Lucian, vol. 5. Translated by A.M. Harmon. LCL 302. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936. https://archive.org/details/lucianhar05luciuoft/page/n7/mode/2up.
Malherbe, Abraham J. “Hellenistic Moralists and the New Testament.” Pages 267–333 in ANRW. Part 2, Principat, 26.1. Edited by Wolfgang Haase. Berlin; Boston, MA: de Gruyter, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852714-007.
McCutcheon, Russell T. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Issues in the Study of Religion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2001.
Moss, Candida. God’s Ghostwriters: Enslaved Christians and the Making of the Bible. New York, NY; Boston, MA; London: Little, Brown and Company, 2024.
Niehoff, Maren R. Philo of Alexandria: An Intellectual Biography. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 2018.
Origenes Werke, Bd 1: Die Schrift vom Martyrium; Buch I–IV Gegen Celsus. Edited by Paul Koetschau. GCS. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung, 1899. https://archive.org/details/origeneswerke01orig/page/n7/mode/2up.
Petsalis-Diomidis, Alexia. Truly Beyond Wonders: Aelius Aristides and the Cult of Asklepios. Oxford Studies in Ancient Culture and Representation. New York, NY; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Porphyrios, Contra Christianos: Neue Samlung der Fragmenten, Testimonien und Dubia mit Einleitung und Anmerkungen. Edited by Matthias Becker. TK 52. Berlin; Boston, MA: de Gruyter 2016. https://archive.org/details/becker-contra-christianos-gr-deu-2016/mode/2up.
Rothe, Ursula. The Toga and Roman Identity. London; New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.
Rowe, C. Kavin. One True Life: The Stoics and Early Christians as Rival Traditions. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 2016.
Secord, Jared. Christian Intellectuals and the Roman Empire: From Justin Martyr to Origen. Inventing Christianity 2. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2020.
Shaw, Brent. “The Divine Economy: Stoicism as Ideology.” Latomus 44, no. 1 (1985): 16–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41543542.
Sigsbee, David Lee. “The Ridicule of the Stoic Paradoxes in Ancient Satirical Literature.” PhD diss., University of Michigan, 1968.
Stowers, Stanley. “The Apostle Paul.” Pages 145–157 in The History of Western Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 1: Ancient Philosophy of Religion. Edited by Graham Robert Oppy and Nick Trakakis. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2014.
Stowers, Stanley. Christian Beginnings: A Study in Ancient Mediterranean Religion. Edinburgh Studies in Religion in Antiquity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024.
Stowers, Stanley. History and the Study of Religion: The Ancient Mediterranean as a Test Case. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2024.
Thorsteinsson, Runar. Roman Christianity and Roman Stoicism: A Comparative Study of Ancient Morality. New York, NY; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Tuccinardi, Enrico. “An Application of a Profile-Based Method for Authorship Verification: Investigating the Authenticity of Pliny the Younger’s Letter to Trajan Concerning the Christians.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32, no. 2 (2017): 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw001.
Rasimus, Tuomas, Troels Engberg-Pedersen, and Ismo Dunderberg, eds. Stoicism in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010.
Vardi, Amiel. “Gellius Against the Professors.” ZPE 137 (2001): 41–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20190933.
Walsh, P.G. The Roman Novel. 2nd ed. London: Bristol Classical Press, 1995.
Walsh, Robyn Faith. “IVDAEA DEVICTA: The Gospels as Imperial ‘Captive Literature’.” Pages 89–114 in Class Struggle in the New Testament. Edited by Robert J. Myles. Lanham, MD; London: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2019.
Walsh, Robyn Faith. The Origins of Early Christian Literature: Contextualizing the New Testament within Greco-Roman Literary Culture. New York, NY; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108883573.
Whealey, Alice. Josephus on Jesus: The Testimonium Flavianum Controversy from Late Antiquity to Modern Times. Studies in Biblical Literature 36. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2003.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 226 | 226 | 68 |
Full Text Views | 8 | 8 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 121 | 4 |
This essay engages the theme “Manufacturing Religion: From Christian Origins to Classical Islam” by challenging scholarly assumptions about the rapid reception and cohesion of new or developing philosophical and religious movements in Greek and Roman antiquity. To illustrate this issue, I present two interrelated case studies: late Republic/early imperial Stoicism and its possible intersections with the later Christ movement of the first century. At a time when engagement with literate culture conferred a great deal of social capital, I suggest that the relative flexibility and “openness” of these two movements allowed for those seeking prestige, social mobility, or distinction – or those who were otherwise excluded from the top tiers of society – to participate in intellectual practices that emulated the standards of the elite. This model for understanding early Christianity counters traditional approaches within the study of religion that tend to foreground notions like belief, conversion and so forth as an explanatory model for membership over sociological and material motivations. This discussion also troubles understandings of Stoicism that tend to link it anachronistically with its later and more exalted imperial associations.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 226 | 226 | 68 |
Full Text Views | 8 | 8 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 121 | 4 |