The article uses statistical data and all-Russian sociological surveys conducted in 2003–2013 to analyze changes in poverty in Russian society.1 It is shown that, on the one hand, the scope of poverty in Russia decreased before the ongoing economic crisis started in 2014; on the other hand, those who remained poor have become the base for the formation of a “new periphery” which is significantly different from the rest of the population. The “new periphery” formation zone in 2013 covered about 30% of the population, and this group consisted of the poor identified using both absolute and relative approaches to poverty that complement rather than duplicate each other in conditions of Russian social reality. Factors that account for becoming part of the “new periphery” are analyzed, the key one being the position on the labor market; its qualitative features are demonstrated, including living standards of its representatives, and the population’s perceptions of the causes of poverty are described.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abrahamson P. “ Social Exclusion in Europe: Old Wine in New Bottles?” Družboslovne razprave (1995): 19–20.
Alkire S., & Santos M. “ Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries”, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (ophi), Working Paper 38 (Oxford: University of Oxford, 2010).
Bednost’ i Neravenstva v Sovremennoi Rossii: Desyat’ Let Spustya (Institut Sotsiologii, RAN, March 2013).
Bobkov V.N. “ Kakim Byt’ Regional’nomu Neravenstvu Kachestva i Urovnya zhizni?” Mir Rossii, 18, no 3 (2009).
Bogatye i Bednye v Sovremennoi Rossii (Institut Kompleksnykh Sotsial’nykh Issledovanii RAN, March 2013).
Castells M., “ Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: A Theoretical Blueprint”, in Castells M. ed., The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2004).
European Commission, Joint Report on Social Inclusion 2004 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004).
European Commission, “ Poverty and Social Exclusion”, http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=751.
Federal State Statistic Service, accessed February 13, 2016a. http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/urov/urov_51g.doc.
Federal State Statistic Service, accessed February 13, 2016b. http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b15_02/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d010/4-08.doc.
Federal State Statistic Service, accessed February 13, 2016c. http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/bednost/tabl/2-09.doc.
Federal State Statistic Service, accessed February 13, 2016d. http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b15_44/IssWWW.exe/Stg/06-17.doc.
Federal State Statistic Service, accessed February 13, 2016e. http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b15_01/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d12/3-1-2.doc.
Federal State Statistic Service, accessed February 13, 2016f. http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/doc_2015/Ind/ind03.rar.
Inglehart R., & Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Karabchuk T.S., , Pashinova T.R., , & Soboleva N.E. “ Bednost’ domokhozyaistv v Rossii: chto govoryat danye rmez vez”, Mir Rossii, 22, no 1 (2013).
Mack J., , & Lansley S. Poor Britain (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1985).
Maleva T.M. Ed. Bednost’: Al’ternativnye Podkhod k Opredeleniyu i Izmereniyu(Moscow: Moscow Center Carnegie, 1998).
Manning N., & Tikhonova N. eds., Poverty and Social Exclusion in the New Russia (uk: Ashgate, 2004).
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Crisis Squeezes Income and Puts Pressure on Inequality and Poverty (2013).
Ovcharova L.N.Teoreticheskie I Prakticheskie Podkhody k Otsenke Urovnya, Profilya i Faktorov Bednosti: Rossiiskii i Mezhdunarodnyi Opyt (Moscow: M-Studio, 2009).
Ravallion M., , Lokshin M. “ Who Cares about Relative Deprivation?” International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies 73, no 2 (2010).
Razumov A.A., , Yagodkina M.A.Bednost’ v Sovremennoi Rossii (Moscow: Formula Prava, 2007).
Rowntree B., Poverty: A Study in Town Life (London: Macmillian and Co., 1901).
Sen A. “ Poor, Relatively Speaking”, Oxford Economic Papers, 35 (1983).
Sen A. Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1985).
Slobodenyk E.D., , Tikhonova N.E. “ Yevristicheskie Vozmozhnosti Absolyutnogo i Otnositel’nogo Podkhodov i Izucheniyu Bednosi v Rossiiskikh Usloviyakh”, Sotsiologiya: 4, no 33 (2011).
Touraine A. “ Face à l’exclusion”. Esprit, no 141 (1991).
Townsend P. Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979).
Wacquant L. “ The Rise of Advanced Marginality: Notes on its Nature and Implications”, Acta Sociologica, 39, no 2 (1996).
World Bank, “World Development Indicators 2012” (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2012).
B. Rowntree, Poverty: A Study in Town Life (London: Macmillian and Co., 1901).
A. Sen, “Poor, Relatively Speaking”, Oxford Economic Papers, 35 (1983); A. Sen, Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1985).
P. Townsend, Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979).
J. Mack & S. Lansley, Poor Britain (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1985).
European Commission, Joint Report on Social Inclusion 2004 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004).
P. Abrahamson, “Social Exclusion in Europe: Old Wine in New Bottles?” Družboslovne razprave (1995).
L. Wacquant, “The Rise of Advanced Marginality: Notes on its Nature and Implications”, Acta Sociologica, 39, no 2 (1996).
R. Inglehart & C. Welzel, Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 559 | 108 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 193 | 2 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 1 | 0 |
The article uses statistical data and all-Russian sociological surveys conducted in 2003–2013 to analyze changes in poverty in Russian society.1 It is shown that, on the one hand, the scope of poverty in Russia decreased before the ongoing economic crisis started in 2014; on the other hand, those who remained poor have become the base for the formation of a “new periphery” which is significantly different from the rest of the population. The “new periphery” formation zone in 2013 covered about 30% of the population, and this group consisted of the poor identified using both absolute and relative approaches to poverty that complement rather than duplicate each other in conditions of Russian social reality. Factors that account for becoming part of the “new periphery” are analyzed, the key one being the position on the labor market; its qualitative features are demonstrated, including living standards of its representatives, and the population’s perceptions of the causes of poverty are described.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 559 | 108 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 193 | 2 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 1 | 0 |