Navalny’s Gamesters: Protest, Opposition Innovation, and Authoritarian Stability in Russia

in Russian Politics
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This paper explores the legacy of the For Fair Elections (ffe) protest movement in 2011–2012 for electoral competition in Russia. We argue that through strategic innovation, oppositions in authoritarian countries can challenge the autocratic state on multiple fronts by transferring resources from street protests to the electoral arena. Our empirical focus is on Alexei Navalny’s campaign for Moscow mayor in late summer 2013. The successful mass mobilization in the movement enabled the campaign to implement a model of electoral innovation based on ideational frames, resources, and tactics drawn from the protest movement. Voter response was stronger than expected, demonstrating the persistence of voter opposition in the face of genuine electoral choice. Relying on press reports, blogs, campaign materials and interviews with activists, we investigate the campaign’s strategy and show why it presented a particular challenge to the regime. Our conclusion underscores the state’s advantage in countering elite opposition innovation, but also highlights how effective opposition innovation can lead to significant changes in strategies to maintain regime stability.

Navalny’s Gamesters: Protest, Opposition Innovation, and Authoritarian Stability in Russia

in Russian Politics

Sections

References

  • 3

    Vladimir Kara-Murza“Politics in Russia: the Kremlin’s troubles”World Affairs 176 no. 5 (2014): 47–55.

  • 15

    Kenneth Greene“Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in Dominant Party Re-gimes. A Theory and the Case of Mexico,” Comparative Political Studies 35 no. 7 (2002): 755–783.

  • 19

    Jonathan Fox“The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico,” World Politics 46 no. 02 (1994): 151–184.

  • 20

    Kenneth Greene“Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in Dominant Party Regimes. A Theory and the Case of Mexico,” Comparative Political Studies 35 no. 7 (2002): 755–783.

  • 21

    Regina Smyth and Sarah Oates“Mind the Gaps: Media Use and Mass Action in Russia,” Europe-Asia Studies 67 no.2 (2015):285–305doi:10.1080/09668136.2014.1002682.

  • 28

    Marlene Laruelle“Alexei Navalny and Challenges in Reconciling ‘Nationalism’ and ‘Liberalism’,” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 no. 4 (2014): 1–22; Natalia Moen-Larsen “Normal Nationalism”: Alexei Navalny “LiveJournal and ‘the Other’”East European Politics 30 no. 4 (2014): 548–567.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 77 77 25
Full Text Views 155 155 29
PDF Downloads 19 19 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0