The Role of Precinct Commissions in Electoral Manipulation in Russia: Does Party Affiliation Matter?

in Russian Politics
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The occurrence of manipulation in Russian elections is highly uneven not just across regions, but also across precincts. Why do some precinct election commissions take part in manipulation while other commissions stay “clean”? Drawing on a new dataset, this study assesses the impact of the party affiliation of precinct election commission members on electoral manipulation in relation to the 2016 State Duma election. The data reveal that, while the composition of most precinct election commission is diverse, United Russia nominees are vastly overrepresented among commission chairs. The study then finds that commissions with a chairperson nominated by United Russia significantly more often reported anomalously high turnout and United Russia vote share than commissions without a United Russia chair. Surprisingly, this is also true for nominees of the other State Duma parties, especially if nominees from these parties jointly with nominees from United Russia occupy the leading positions in the commission. This suggests that nominees from United Russia and other State Duma parties collude to deliver election results that are favorable to the regime.




I.G. Verzilina, “Professionalizatsiya uchastkovykh izbiratel’nykh komissii: teoriya i praktika”, Vestnik Vyatskogo Gosudarstvennogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta no.1 (2014): 35–38.


Max Bader and Carolien van Ham, “What Explains Regional Variation in Election Fraud? Evidence from Russia: A Research Note”, Post-Soviet Affairs 31, no. 6 (2015): 514–528.


Vladimir Gel’man, “Calculus of Dissent: How the Kremlin Is Countering Its Rivals”, ­Russian Analytical Digest, 15 April 2015: 2–4 (3).


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 15 15 15
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0