Explaining Party Support in the 2016 Russian State Duma Election

in Russian Politics
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Because of the predicable outcomes of recent Russian elections, voters are often characterized as passive actors in the electoral process. However, as we show in this article, political and social factors still underpin the motivations for people’s voting behavior. The article analyzes voting behavior in the 2016 State Duma election, using a post-election, nationally representative survey to assess the differences between the four parliamentary parties’ support bases. It finds that voting decisions in the 2016 election were strongly related to voters’ attitudes to the national president, Vladimir Putin, as well as to their attitudes to corruption and the economic situation. Voters who were more positive to the president and viewed the economic crisis more benignly were more likely to vote for the ‘party of power’, United Russia. Moreover, the four parties’ electorates had distinctive social profiles that were consistent with long-term patterns established in previous State Duma elections.




Max Bader, “The Role of Precinct Commissions in Electoral Manipulation in Russia: Does Party Affiliation Matter?”, Russian Politics 2, no. 4 (2017): 434–453; David White, “Modifying Electoral Authoritarianism: What the 2016 Parliamentary Elections Tell Us About the Nature and Resilience of the Putin Regime”, Russian Politics 2, no. 4 (2017): 482–501.<


Derek S. Hutcheson, “Party Cartels beyond Western Europe: Evidence from Russia”, Party Politics 19, no. 6 (2013): 907–924.


Derek S. Hutcheson, “Contextualizing the 2016 Russian State Duma Election”, Russian Politics 2, no. 4 (2017): 383–410.


Ted Brader and Joshua A. Tucker, “Pathways to Partisanship: Evidence from Russia”, Post-Soviet Affairs, 24, no. 3 (2008): 263–300; Arthur H. Miller and Thomas F. Klobucar, “The Development of Party Identification in Post-Soviet Societies,” American Journal of Political Science 44, no. 4 (2000): 667–686.


Yury Korgunyuk, “Cleavage Theory and Elections in Post-Soviet Russia”, Perspectives on European Politics & Society 15, no. 4 (2014): 401–415.


Christopher J. Anderson, “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic”, Annual Review of Political Science 10 (2007): 271–296.


Ian McAllister and Stephen White, “‘It’s the Economy, Comrade!’ Parties and Voters in the 2007 Russian Duma Election”, Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 6 (2008): 931–957.


Aleksei Obukhov, “‘Deneg net, khoroshego vam nastroeniya’: Medvedev ‘uteshil’ krymskuyu pensionerku”, Moskovskii Komsomolets, 24 May 2016, http://www.mk.ru/politics/2016/05/24/deneg-net-khoroshego-vam-nastroeniya-medvedev-uteshil-krymskuyu-pensionerku.html (accessed 9 August 2017).


Vladimir N. Brovkin, “Corruption in the 20th Century Russia”, Crime, Law & Social Change 40 no. 2/3 (2003) 195–230; Anastassia Obydenkova & Alexander Libman, “Understanding the Survival of Post-Communist Corruption in Contemporary Russia: The Influence of Historical Legacies”, Post-Soviet Affairs 31 no. 4 (2015): 304–338.


Sarah Oates, “The Neo-Soviet Model of the Media”, Europe-Asia Studies, 59 no. 8 (2007): 1279–97.


Ilya Kiriya, “The Impact of International Sanctions on Russia’s Media Economy”, Russian Politics 2, no. 1 (2017): 80–97; Derek S. Hutcheson, Parliamentary Elections in Russia: A Quarter-Century of Multiparty Politics (Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press. 2018 forthcoming), chapter 5.


Emil Edenborg, Nothing More to See: Contestations of Belonging and Visibility in Russian Media (Malmö/Lund: Malmö University, 2016): 70.


David White, “Modifying Electoral Authoritarianism: What the 2016 Parliamentary ­Elections Tell Us About the Nature and Resilience of the Putin Regime”, Russian Politics 2, no. 4 (2017): 482–501.



Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5 5 3
Full Text Views 10 10 8
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 3 3 3