Modifying Electoral Authoritarianism. What the 2016 Parliamentary Elections Tell us about the Nature and Resilience of the Putin Regime

in Russian Politics
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Through a focus on the 2016 Russian parliamentary election, this article seeks to assess the strength of the Putin regime and the nature of the system itself. In contrast to those who have heralded its imminent decline, it is argued that the regime continues to display great resilience, the election providing evidence of the regime’s adaptability and its ability to cope with challenges. The nature of the regime is also questioned. It has become commonplace for scholars to refer to Russia’s political system under the presidency of Vladimir Putin as “electoral authoritarian”. The article examines the function of elections in such systems, with a particular emphasis on the way in which elections provide the regime with legitimacy. The conduct and outcome of the elections not only points to the confidence and resilience of the Putin regime but might also suggest that a declining reliance on elections to sustain the regime may lead to a re-appraisal of the electoral authoritarian model as a compelling conceptualization of the Russian political system.

Sections

References

2

Mikhail Rostovsky, “Skuchnaya kampaniya s neskuchnymi itogami”, Moskovsky komsomolets,http://www.mk.ru/politics/2016/09/18/po-rezultatam-vyborov-v-gosdumu-putin-primet-vazhnye-resheniya.html (accessed 18 September 2016).

3

Jennifer Gandhi, Political Institutions under Dictatorship (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008): xxi.

5

Alexander J. Motyl, “Lights Out for the Putin Regime: The Coming Russian Collapse”, Foreign Affairs, 27 January 2016, New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2016, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2016-01-27/lights-out-putin-regime (accessed 4 ­September 2017); Nikolai Petrov, “Putin’s Downfall: The Coming Crisis of the Russian ­Regime”, London: European Council on Foreign Relations, 2016, available at: http://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/putins_downfall_the_coming_crisis_of_the_russian_regime7006 (accessed 4 September 2017).

6

 See, for instance: Archie Brown, “Reading Russia: Forms Without Substance”, Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2009): 47–51; Grigorii V. Golosov, “The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia”, Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 4 (2011): 623–640; Cameron Ross, “­Federalism and Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia”, Demokratizatsiya 13, no. 3 (2005): 347–371; ­Cameron Ross, “Regional Elections and Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia”, Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 4 (2011): 641–662; David White, “Taking it to the Streets: Raising the Costs of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14, no. 4 (2013): 582–598.

7

Thomas Carothers, “The End of the Transition Paradigm”, Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1 (2002): 5–21.

11

Johannes Gerschewski, “The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and ­Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes”, Democratization 20, no. 1 (2013): 13–38.

23

Derek S. Hutcheson, “Party Cartels beyond Western Europe: Evidence from Russia”, Party Politics 19, no. 6 (2013): 907–924.

25

Vladimir Gel’man, “The Rise and Decline of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia”, ­Demokratizatsiya 22, no. 4 (2014): 503–522; Geddes, “Why Parties and Elections?”.

29

Andreas Schedler, “The Menu of Manipulation”, Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 36–50.

32

Graeme Gill, Building an Authoritarian Polity: Russia in Post-Soviet Times (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015): 108.

35

Edwin Bacon,“Electoral Manipulation and the Development of Russia’s Political System”, East European Politics, 28, no. 2 (2012): 105–118.

36

Lee Morgenbesser, “The Autocratic Mandate: Elections, Legitimacy and Regime Stability in Singapore”, The Pacific Review 30, no. 1 (2016): 205–231.

43

Elena Kostyuchenko, “Bolotnaya Ploshchad >100000”, Novaya Gazeta, 10 December 2011, https://www.novayagazeta.ru/news/2011/12/10/52372-bolotnaya-­ploschad-100000 (access­ed 7 September 2017).

44

Guy Faulconbridge, “Analysis: Russia’s Putin risks losing touch amid protests”, Reuters, 26 December 2011, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-putin-idUSTRE7BP0GH20111226 (accessed 4 September 2017).

47

Andrei Kolesnikov, “Razve Putin mozhet byt neprav?”, Kommersant, 9 April 2007, https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/757109 (accessed 4 September 2017).

48

Peter Hobson, “Legitimized Elections: The Kremlin Plays a New Game”, Moscow Times, 10 March 2016, https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/legitimized-elections-the-kremlin-plays-a-new-game-52118 (accessed 4 September 2017). In the event, the responsibility for web-cams was left with regional and local authorities and their installation was not as widespread as had been the case in 2012.

49

Vladimir Gel’man, “2016 in Review: Russian Domestic Politics”, Russian Analytical Digest 195 (2016): 16–18, http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD195.pdf (accessed 4 September 2017).

50

Mikhail Zubov, “Chego khochet vlast’: privlech’ izbiratelya ili otpugnut’ ego?”, Moskovsky Komsomolets, 30 August 2016, http://www.mk.ru/politics/2016/08/29/kak-putin-budet-regulirovat-yavku-na-vybory-v-gosdumu.html (accessed 4 September 2017).

54

Max Bader, “The Role of Precinct Commissions in Electoral Manipulation in Russia: Does Party Affiliation Matter?”, Russian Politics 2, no. 4 (2017): 434–453.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 6
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0