With more than one million people living with HIV, Russia is facing the biggest HIV epidemic in Europe and is one of the few countries in the world where infection rates are increasing. The response to the epidemic is shaped by the way Russian state actors and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) view the issue of HIV and how they define policy priorities.
In order to understand the factors that underlie HIV policies in Russia, this contribution analyses the framing of HIV. It thereby makes use of framing theory. Based on document analysis and interviews with NGO experts, the article differentiates between four main framings in Russia: the framing of HIV as a medical issue, as a security threat, as a moral problem or as a human rights concern.
In Russia, the moral framing of HIV has become dominant over the past decade. The epidemic is increasingly viewed as the result of harmful influences from the West which need to be overcome. As a result, Russia has departed from evidence-based approaches to HIV. Instead, it solely focuses on strengthening so-called “traditional values”, e.g. by engaging in healthy lifestyle promotion. The moral framing of HIV has also impacted the mobilization potential of Russian NGOs, as it favour those organizations that relate to the dominant framing of HIV and support government priorities.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All-Russian Parent’s Assembly, “Open letter of the parents of Russia”, available at http://oodvrs.ru/article/index.php?id_page=21&id_articles=329, accessed on 17 July 2018.
Baunov Aleksandr , “Seksual’nyj suverenitet rodiny kak novaia vneshniaia politika Rossii,” Slon, 21 August, https://republic.ru/world/novaya_vneshnyaya_politika-980570.xhtml, accessed 1 October 2018.
Benford Robert D. and Snow David A. (2000), “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26, no 1 (2000): 611–639.
Bobrik Alexey and Twigg Judyth L. . “HIV/AIDS in Russia.” in Twigg Judyth L. ed., HIV/AIDS in Russia and Eurasia (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006): 1–40.
Bogdanova Elena , Cook Linda , and Kulmala Meri , “The Carrot or the Stick? Constraints and Opportunities of Russia’s CSO Policy”, Europe-Asia Studies 70, no 4 (2018): 501–513.
Brown Hannah , “Russia’s Blossoming Civil Society Holds the Key to HIV”, The Lancet 368, no. 9534 (2006): 37–440.
Busby Joshua W. and Kapstein Ethan B. , “Framing Global Health as Human Rights: Learning from the Case of HIV/AIDS,” Global Health Governance 10, no 3 (2016): 24–40.
Chaney Paul , “Civil Society, ‘Traditional Values’ and LGBT Resistance to Heteronormative Rights Hegemony: Analysis of the UN Universal Periodic Review in the Russian Federation”, Europe-Asia Studies 70, no 4 (2018): 638–665.
Cook Linda J. and Vinogradova Elena , “NGOs and Social Policy-Making in Russia’s Regions” Problems of Post-Communism 53, no. 5 (2006): 28–41.
Crotty Jo , “Making a Difference? NGOs and Civil Society Development in Russia”, Europe-Asia Studies 61, no 1 (2009): 85–108.
Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS, United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS, 25–27 June 2001, available at http://data.unaids.org/publications/irc-pub03/aidsdeclaration_en.pdf, accessed 7 July 2018.
Entman Robert M. , “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”, Journal of Communication 43, no. 4 (1993): 51–58.
Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, available at http://www.theglobalfund.org/, accessed 17 July 2018.
Goffman Erving , Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience (New York: Harper & Row, 1974).
Gorobets A. , “Promotion of sports, physical activity, and a healthy lifestyle in Russia”, The Lancet, 385, no 9986 (2015): 2459.
Henry Laura A. , “Shaping Social Activism in Post-Soviet Russia: Leadership, Organizational Diversity, and Innovation”, Post-Soviet Affairs 22, no. 2 (2006): 99–124.
Joachim Jutta , “Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights”, International Studies Quarterly 47 (2003): 247–274.
Keck Margaret K. and Kathryn Sikkink , Activists beyond Borders, Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1998).
Kontseptsiia uchastiia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi v bor’be s rasprostraneniem VICh/SPIDa i rabote s liud’mi, zhivushchimi s VICh/SPIDom, Russkaia Pravoslavnaia Tserkov, 24 June 2005.
Meier B.M. , Brugh K.N. and Halima Y. , “Conceptualizing a Human Right to Prevention in Global HIV/AIDS Policy”, Public Health Ethics 5, no 3 (2012): 263–282.
Morrison J. Stephen and Kates Jennifer (2006). The G-8, Russia’s Presidency, and HIV/AIDS in Eurasia. A Report of the CSIS Task Force on HIV/AIDS 70, no 4 (2018)in collaboration with the Kaiser Family Foundation (Washington, d.c.: Kaiser Family Foundation), https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/csisg8russpres.pdf, accessed 22 June 2018.
Positive Wave, available at https://pozvolna.ru/allrights/humanrights/2/, accessed 13 July 2018.
Putin Vladimir , “Opening Remarks at State Council Presidium Meeting on Urgent Measures to Combat the Spread of HIV-AIDS in the Russian Federation”, 21 April 2006, http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/23547, accessed 15 June 2018.
Russian Health Care Foundation, http://www.srhiv.mednet.ru/open/fund.php?&language=eng, accessed at 17 June 2018.
Russian Security Council, “Strategy of National Security of the Russian Federation until 2020, confirmed by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No 537 of 12 May 2009” as published in Krasnaya Zvezda, weekly edition 20–26 May 2009, accessed 15 June 2018.
Salamon Lester M. and S. Wojciech Sokolowski , “Beyond Nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the Third Sector”, Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations 27, no 4 (2016): 1515–1545.
Sharp Shombi , “The Economic Impact of HIV/AIDS in Russia: Current Trends and Perspectives”, in Twigg Judyth L. , ed. HIV/AIDS in Russia and Eurasia, Vol. 1 (New York: Palgrave, 2006), 77–102.
Skokova Yulia , Pape Ulla and Irina Krasnopolskaya , “The Non-profit Sector in Today’s Russia: Between Confrontation and Co-optation”, Europe-Asia Studies 70, no 4 (2018): 531–563.
Snow David A. and Robert D. Benford , “Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization”, International social movement research 1, no 1 (1988): 197–217.
Snow David A. and Robert D. Benford “Master frames and cycles of protest”, in Morris A.D. and Mueller C.M. (eds.) (1992). Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1992), 133–155.
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, available at https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/, accessed 5 July 2018.
Tsetsura Katerina “Challenges in framing women’s rights as human rights at the domestic level: A case study of NGOs in the post-Soviet countries”, Public Relations Review 39, no 4 (2013): 406–416.
UNAIDS, ‘Civil society: why engage?’, http://www.unaids.org/en/Partnerships/Civil+society/why_engage.asp, accessed 5 July 2018.
UNAIDS, Topic: Human rights, http://www.unaids.org/en/topic/rights, accessed 12 June 2017.
Wilkinson Cai , “Putting ‘Traditional Values’ Into Practice: The Rise and Contestation of Anti-Homopropaganda Laws in Russia”, Journal of Human Rights 13, no 3 (2014): 363–379.
Zigon Jarrett , “Morality and HIV/AIDS: A Comparison of Russian Orthodox Church and Secular NGO Approaches,” Religion, State & Society 37, no. 3 (2009): 311–325.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1994 | 1290 | 57 |
Full Text Views | 1536 | 9 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 1401 | 12 | 0 |
With more than one million people living with HIV, Russia is facing the biggest HIV epidemic in Europe and is one of the few countries in the world where infection rates are increasing. The response to the epidemic is shaped by the way Russian state actors and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) view the issue of HIV and how they define policy priorities.
In order to understand the factors that underlie HIV policies in Russia, this contribution analyses the framing of HIV. It thereby makes use of framing theory. Based on document analysis and interviews with NGO experts, the article differentiates between four main framings in Russia: the framing of HIV as a medical issue, as a security threat, as a moral problem or as a human rights concern.
In Russia, the moral framing of HIV has become dominant over the past decade. The epidemic is increasingly viewed as the result of harmful influences from the West which need to be overcome. As a result, Russia has departed from evidence-based approaches to HIV. Instead, it solely focuses on strengthening so-called “traditional values”, e.g. by engaging in healthy lifestyle promotion. The moral framing of HIV has also impacted the mobilization potential of Russian NGOs, as it favour those organizations that relate to the dominant framing of HIV and support government priorities.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1994 | 1290 | 57 |
Full Text Views | 1536 | 9 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 1401 | 12 | 0 |