Save

Why Did Financial Openness Reforms Succeed in Russia and Not in China?

In: Russian Politics
Author:
Igor Logvinenko Associate Professor, Diplomacy & World Affairs, Occidental College Los Angeles, CA USA

Search for other papers by Igor Logvinenko in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3110-5943
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The twenty-year period of modernization of the Russian economy under the leadership of Vladimir Putin, prior to the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, was characterized by a consistent trend towards a statist domestic orientation, coupled with an increasingly radical policy of financial openness. Despite numerous domestic economic reforms, which were oriented towards free-market principles, being either reversed or significantly altered, foreign economic policy reforms proved to be more enduring. In this paper, I argue that the differential outcomes along the axis of internal and external economic reforms are interrelated. The absence of a robust rule of law domestically enabled the reversal of privatization reforms, but also made financial openness policies more appealing to political elites. Furthermore, the society’s expectation of welfare paternalism enabled the regime to tolerate the negative aspects of greater integration by relying on distributive policies rather than widespread repression. In contrast, I demonstrate that the inheritance of a less developed welfare state and an over-reliance on repression led the Chinese Communist Party to adopt a more cautious approach towards financial integration.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 225 131 6
Full Text Views 154 68 0
PDF Views & Downloads 172 79 0