The Minsk Accords and the Political Weakness of the “Other Ukraine”
In: Russian PoliticsSearch for other papers by Volodymyr Ishchenko in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The article discusses the political contention around the implementation of the Minsk Accords in Ukraine, and why the pluralist nation-building project required for the success of these accords failed. The much-debated cleavage between the more ‘pro-Western’ and more ‘pro-Russian’ regions of Ukraine requires that such an alternative be taken seriously. The article argues that neither the change of the balance in favor of the pro-Western electorate in 2014, nor the rise of Ukraine’s civic identity in response to Russian aggression can adequately explain the failure to develop a positive, pluralist nation-building project in the context of Minsk. It argues instead that the profound class and political asymmetry between Ukraine’s ‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ political camps created different capacities for the universalization of their particular interests, and for effective political mobilization for and against the Minsk Accords in the context of Euromaidan’s revolutionary dynamics.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1758 | 1263 | 203 |
| Full Text Views | 754 | 27 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1015 | 71 | 8 |
The Minsk Accords and the Political Weakness of the “Other Ukraine”
In: Russian PoliticsSearch for other papers by Volodymyr Ishchenko in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The article discusses the political contention around the implementation of the Minsk Accords in Ukraine, and why the pluralist nation-building project required for the success of these accords failed. The much-debated cleavage between the more ‘pro-Western’ and more ‘pro-Russian’ regions of Ukraine requires that such an alternative be taken seriously. The article argues that neither the change of the balance in favor of the pro-Western electorate in 2014, nor the rise of Ukraine’s civic identity in response to Russian aggression can adequately explain the failure to develop a positive, pluralist nation-building project in the context of Minsk. It argues instead that the profound class and political asymmetry between Ukraine’s ‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ political camps created different capacities for the universalization of their particular interests, and for effective political mobilization for and against the Minsk Accords in the context of Euromaidan’s revolutionary dynamics.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1758 | 1263 | 203 |
| Full Text Views | 754 | 27 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1015 | 71 | 8 |