This essay analyses the imbalance identifiable in critical approaches to the gendering of Beckett’s influences with respect to his autographic writing. Contrasting Beckett’s Company with Gertrude Stein’s The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, I unravel the particulars that have led to Stein’s marginalisation as a figure against which we can situate Beckett’s autographic writings, with a view to further understanding why the remarkable correspondence between Beckett and Stein’s autographic praxes has continually evaded critical attention. Building on Porter Abbott’s description of autography as self-writing, I propose that Stein’s autography be considered an example of self-rewriting, and Beckett’s of self-unwriting.
Cet article analyse le déséquilibre notable dans les approches critiques centrées sur les influences genrées de Samuel Beckett en lien avec son écriture autographique. Je compare Compagnie de Beckett et L’ Autobiographie d’ Alice Toklas de Gertrude Stein pour examiner ce qui a pu conduire à la marginalisation de Stein en tant que figure par rapport à laquelle nous pouvons situer les écrits autographiques de Beckett. Il s’ agit de mieux comprendre pourquoi la remarquable correspondance entre les pratiques autographiques de Beckett et de Stein n’ a cessé d’ échapper à l’ attention de la critique. En m’ appuyant sur la description que fait Porter Abbott de l’ autographie en tant qu’ écriture de soi, je propose de voir l’ autographie de Stein comme un exemple d’ auto-réécriture, et celle de Beckett comme un exemple de désécriture de soi.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Armstrong, Nancy, Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel, (New York: Oxford UP, 1987).
Bair, Deirdre, “‘Back the Way He Came … or in Some Quite Different Direction’: Company in the Canon of Samuel Beckett’s Writing”, in Pennsylvania English Essays in Film and the Humanities 9 (Fall, 1982), 12–19.
Beckett, Samuel, Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment, ed. Ruby Cohn (London: Calder, 2001).
Beckett, Samuel, Company/ Ill Seen Ill Said/ Worstward Ho/ Stirrings Still, ed. by Dirk van Hulle (London: Faber, 2009a).
Beckett, Samuel, The Letters of Samuel Beckett, volume I: 1929–1940, ed. George Craig, Martha Dow Fehsenfeld, Dan Gunn, and Lois More Overbeck (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009b).
Boyd, Janet, and Sharon J. Kirsch (eds.), Primary Stein: Returning to the Writing of Gertrude Stein (Lexington Books, 2014).
Carville, Conor, ‘Late and Belated Modernism: Duchamp … Stein.Feininger … Beckett’ in Beckett and Modernism, eds. Olga Beloborodova, Dirk Van Hulle, Pim Verhulst. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), 53–67.
Daniels, Lucy, Critical Lives: Gertrude Stein (London: Reaktion, 2005).
Dydo, Ulla E., Gertrude Stein: The Language That Rises: 1923–1934 (Illinois: Northwestern UP, 2003).
Gontarski, S.E., The Intent of Undoing in Samuel Beckett’s Dramatic Texts (Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1985).
Jolas, Eugene, ed., “Testimony against Gertrude Stein”, in Transition Pamphlet no. 1. Supplement to Transition 23. July 1935. (The Hague: Servire P, 1935).
Knowlson, James, Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett (London: Bloomsbury, 1996).
Lewis, Wyndham, Time and Western Man, (London: Chatto & Windus, 1927).
Long, Joseph, “Divine Intertextuality: Samuel Beckett, ‘Company, Le Dépeupleur’”, in: Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 9:1 (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994), 145–157.
Malcolm, Janet, Two Lives: Gertrude and Alice (New Haven; London: Yale UP, 2007).
Meyer, Stephen, Irresistible Dictation: Gertrude Stein and the correlations of writing and science (California: Stanford UP, 2001).
Nugent-Folan, Georgina, The Making of Samuel Beckett’s Company / Compagnie, (Brussels/ London: UPA/ Bloomsbury, 2021).
Nugent-Folan, Georgina, “Personal Apperception: Samuel Beckett, Gertrude Stein, and Paul Cézanne’s La Montagne Saint Victoire”, Samuel Beckett Today/ Aujhourd’hui 27.1 (2015), ed. by Mark Nixon and Conor Carville (Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi, 2015), 87–102.
Nugent-Folan, Georgina, “‘Ill buttoned’: Comparing the representation of objects in Samuel Beckett’s Ill Seen Ill Said and Gertrude Stein’s Tender Buttons,” Journal of Beckett Studies 22.1 (2013), (Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2013), 54–82.
Porter Abbott, H., Beckett Writing Beckett: The author and the autograph, (Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1996).
Posman, Sarah and Laura Luise Schultz, Gertrude Stein in Europe: Reconfigurations Across Media, Disciplines, and Traditions (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015).
Powell, Joshua, “Gertrude Stein, Samuel Beckett and the Aesthetics of Inattention”, in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui 30.2 (Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi, 2018): 239–252.
Powell, Joshua, Samuel Beckett and Experimental Psychology: Perception, Attention, Imagery (London: Bloomsbury, 2020).
Saunders, Max, Self Impression: Life-Writing, Autobiografiction, and the Forms of Modern Literature, (Oxford UP, 2010).
Skinner, B.F., “Has Gertrude Stein a Secret” in Atlantic Monthly (January 1934), 50–57.
Solomons, Leo, and Gertrude Stein, “Normal Motor Automatism” in Psychological Review 3:5 (September, 1896), 492–512.
Stein, Gertrude, “Cultivated Motor Automatism; a study of character in its relation to attention,” Psychological Review 5:3 (May, 1898), 295–306.
Stein, Gertrude, The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas (London, Penguin, 2001).
Voris, Linda, The Composition of Sense in Gertrude Stein’s Landscape Writing (London: Palgrave, 2016).
Wineapple, Brenda, Sister Brother: Gertrude and Leo Stein (Lincoln: London: U of Nebraska P, 2008).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 233 | 53 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 23 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 59 | 8 | 0 |
This essay analyses the imbalance identifiable in critical approaches to the gendering of Beckett’s influences with respect to his autographic writing. Contrasting Beckett’s Company with Gertrude Stein’s The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, I unravel the particulars that have led to Stein’s marginalisation as a figure against which we can situate Beckett’s autographic writings, with a view to further understanding why the remarkable correspondence between Beckett and Stein’s autographic praxes has continually evaded critical attention. Building on Porter Abbott’s description of autography as self-writing, I propose that Stein’s autography be considered an example of self-rewriting, and Beckett’s of self-unwriting.
Cet article analyse le déséquilibre notable dans les approches critiques centrées sur les influences genrées de Samuel Beckett en lien avec son écriture autographique. Je compare Compagnie de Beckett et L’ Autobiographie d’ Alice Toklas de Gertrude Stein pour examiner ce qui a pu conduire à la marginalisation de Stein en tant que figure par rapport à laquelle nous pouvons situer les écrits autographiques de Beckett. Il s’ agit de mieux comprendre pourquoi la remarquable correspondance entre les pratiques autographiques de Beckett et de Stein n’ a cessé d’ échapper à l’ attention de la critique. En m’ appuyant sur la description que fait Porter Abbott de l’ autographie en tant qu’ écriture de soi, je propose de voir l’ autographie de Stein comme un exemple d’ auto-réécriture, et celle de Beckett comme un exemple de désécriture de soi.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 233 | 53 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 23 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 59 | 8 | 0 |