In the second half of the nineteenth century, many people lost their faith in the Christian God. Nevertheless, they were eager to show that this move towards a secular world picture did not mean the end of morality and that it could continue as much before. In a Darwinian age this was not possible and the Christian cherishing of the virtue of meekness was replaced by a moral respect for vigor and effort directed both towards self-realization and to the well-being of society. We compare the British moves to those promoted by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. There are significant similarities but also differences that reflect the British industrialized notion of progress versus the German idealistic notion of progress.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bannister, R. 1979. Social Darwinism: Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bowler, P.J. 1984. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bowler, P.J. 1990. The Invention of Progress: the Victorians and the Past. Oxford: Blackwell.
Budd, S. 1977. Varieties of Unbelief: Atheists and Agnostics in English Society 1850–1960. London: Heinemann.
Browne, J. 1995. Charles Darwin: Voyaging. Volume I of a Biography. New York: Knopf.
Browne, J. 2002. Charles Darwin: The Power of Place Volume II of a Biography. New York: Knopf.
Clark, M. 1994. “Nietzsche’s immoralism and the concept of morality.” In Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Editor Richard Schacht. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Crook, P. 1994. Darwinism: War and History. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. 1861. Origin of Species (Third Edition). London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
Desmond, A. 1997. Huxley: From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest. New York: Basic Books.
Dixon, Thomas. 2008. The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gissing, G. 1976. New Grub Street. London: Penguin.
Hardy, T. [1895] 1960. Jude the Obscure. London: Macmillan.
Hardy, T. 1994. Collected Poems. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Poetry Library.
Hawkins, M. 1997. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1988. Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Translator L. Rauch. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Hegel, G.W.F. 2015. The Philosophy of Right. Translator A. White. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Hitler, A. 1925. Mein Kampf. London: Secker and Warburg.
Hofstadter, R. 1959. Social Darwinism in American Thought. New York: Braziller.
Huxley, T.H. [1893] 2009. Evolution and Ethics with a New Introduction. Edited by M. Ruse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hursthouse, R. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huxley, T.H. [1893] 2009. Evolution and Ethics with a New Introduction. Edited by M. Ruse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ingham, P. 2003. Thomas Hardy (Authors in Context). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, D.R. 2013. Nietzsche’s anti-Darwinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, G. 1980. Social Darwinism and English Thought. Brighton: Harvester.
Kaufmann, W. 1974. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. 4th edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Leonard, T.C. 2009. “Origins of the myth of social Darwinism: The ambiguous legacy of Richard Hofstadter’s Social Darwinism in American Thought.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71: 37–51.
Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1993. On Liberty and Utilitarianism. New York: Bantam.
Moore, Gregory. 2002. Nietzsche, Biology, and Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myers, F.W.H. 1881. “George Eliot.” The Century Magazine: November, 47.
Nietzsche, F. 1920. The Antichrist. Translator H.L. Mencken. New York: Knopf.
Nietzsche, F. 1954: Twilight of the Idols, in The Portable Nietzsche. Editor and translator W. Kaufmann. New York: Viking Press.
Nietzsche, F. 1966. Beyond Good and Evil. Translator W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books.
Nietzsche, F. Untimely Meditations. Translator R.J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Nietzsche, F. 1997. Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality. Editors M. Clark and B. Leiter. Translator R.J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Nietzsche, F. 1998. On the Genealogy of Morality. Translators M. Clark and A. Swensen. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Nietzsche, F. 2001. The Gay Science. Translator J. Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nietzsche, F. 2006. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Editors A. Del Caro and R. Pippin. Translator A. Del Caro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nietzsche, F. and Common, T. 1901. Nietzsche as Critic, Poet, and Prophet: Choice Selections from His Works. Compiler Thomas Common. New York: E.P. Dutton & co.
Nussbaum, M. 1994. Pity and Mercy: Nietzsche’s Stoicism. In Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Editor Richard Schacht. University of California Press.
Ospovat, D. 1981. The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, R.J. 1992. The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richards, R.J. 2003. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richards, R.J. 2013. Was Hitler a Darwinian? Disputed Questions in the History of Evolutionary Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richardson, John. 2004. Nietzsche’s New Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruse, M. 1996. Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Ruse, M. 2005. The Evolution-Creation Struggle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Ruse, M. 2017a. Darwinism as Religion: What Literature Tells Us About Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruse, M. 2017b. “Social Darwinism.” On Human Nature: Biology, Psychology, Ethics, Politics, and Religion. Editors Ayala, F.J. and Tibayrence, M., 651–660. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan.
Smith, A. [1776] 1937. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.
Spencer, H. 1851. Social Statics; Or the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified and the First of them Developed. London: J. Chapman.
Spencer, H. 1857. “Progress: Its law and cause.” Westminster ReviewLXVII: 244–267.
Spencer, H. 1879. The Data of Ethics. London: Williams & Norgate.
Spencer, H. 1892. The Principles of Ethics. London: Williams & Norgate.
Strauss, D.F. [1835] 1892. The Life of Jesus Critically Examined. Translator George Eliot. New York: Macmillan & Co.
Strauss, D.F. 1872. The Old Faith & the New. Translator M. Blind. New York: Prometheus Books.
Sumner, W.G. 1914. The Challenge of Facts and Other Essays. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Trivers, R.L. 1971. “The evolution of reciprocal altruism.” Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57.
von Bernhardi, F. 1912. Germany and the Next War. London: Edward Arnold.
Ward, Mrs. H. 1888. Robert Elsmere. London: Macmillan.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 817 | 445 | 41 |
Full Text Views | 45 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 76 | 2 | 0 |
In the second half of the nineteenth century, many people lost their faith in the Christian God. Nevertheless, they were eager to show that this move towards a secular world picture did not mean the end of morality and that it could continue as much before. In a Darwinian age this was not possible and the Christian cherishing of the virtue of meekness was replaced by a moral respect for vigor and effort directed both towards self-realization and to the well-being of society. We compare the British moves to those promoted by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. There are significant similarities but also differences that reflect the British industrialized notion of progress versus the German idealistic notion of progress.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 817 | 445 | 41 |
Full Text Views | 45 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 76 | 2 | 0 |