In accordance with Terror Management Theory research, secular beliefs can serve an important role for mitigating existential concerns by providing atheists with a method to attain personal meaning and bolster self-esteem. Although much research has suggested that religious beliefs are powerful defense mechanisms, these effects are limited or reveal more nuanced effects when attempting to explain atheists’ (non)belief structures. The possibility of nonbelief that provides meaning in the “here and now” is reinforced by the importance placed on scientific discovery, education, and social activism by many atheists. Thus, these values and ideologies can, and do, allow for empirically testable claims within a Terror Management framework. Although religious individuals can and largely do use religion as a defense strategy against existential concerns, purely secular ideologies are more effective for atheists providing evidence for a hierarchical approach and individual differences within worldview defenses. Evidence for and implications of these arguments are discussed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Allport, Gordon Willard. 1966. “The Religious Context of Prejudice.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 5(3): 447. doi:10.2307/1384172.
Angel, Hans-Ferdinand, Lluis Oviedo, Raymond F. Paloutzian, Anne L.C. Runehov, and Rüdiger J. Seitz. 2017. Processes of Believing: The Acquisition, Maintenance, and Change in Creditions. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Arndt, Jamie, Jeff Greenberg, and Alison Cook. 2002. “Mortality Salience and the Spreading Activation of Worldview-Relevant Constructs: Exploring the Cognitive Architecture of Terror Management.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131(3): 307–324. doi:10.1037//0096–3445.131.3.307.
Arrowood, Robert B., and Brian J. Pope. 2014. “Terror Management Theory: A Theoretical Perspective on Origination, Maintenance, and Research.” Modern Psychological Studies 20(1): 87–96.
Arrowood, Robert B., Brian J. Pope, and Tom Harlow. 2014. “The Relationship of Religiosity to Psychopathology: The Predictive Ability of Religious Orientation for Stress and Depression in College Undergraduates.” Modern Psychological Studies 19:2, (2014): 37–46.
Arrowood, Robert B., Thomas J. Coleman III, Sally B. Swanson, Ralph W. Hood, and Cathy R. Cox. 2018. “Death, Quest, and Self-Esteem: Re-Examining the Role of Self-Esteem and Religion Following Mortality Salience.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 8(1): 69–76. doi:10.1080/2153599x.2016.1238843.
Banerjee, Konika, and Paul Bloom. 2013. “Would Tarzan Believe In God? Conditions for the Emergence of Religious Belief.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(1): 7–8. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.005.
Barrett, Justin L., and Jonathan A. Lanman. 2008. “The Science of Religious Beliefs.” Religion 38(2): 109–124. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007.
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. “Perceptual Symbol Systems.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(04). doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149.
Baumard, Nicolas, and Pascal Boyer. 2013. “Religious Beliefs as Reflective Elaborations on Intuitions: A Modified Dual-Process Model”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22(4): 295–300. doi:10.1177/0963721413478610.
Baumeister, Roy F. 1991. Meanings of Life. New York: Guilford Press.
Becker, Ernest. 1973. The Denial of Death. New York, NY: Free Press.
Beit-Hallahmi, Benjamin. 2015. Psychological Perspectives on Religion and Religiosity. East Sussex: Routledge.
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine L. 2012. “Understanding Atheism/Non-Belief as an Expected Individual-Differences Variable.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 2(1): 4–23. doi:10.1080/2153599x.2012.668395.
Coleman III, Thomas J. 2013. Implicit Frameworks: The Tyrannical Hegemonic Discourse. The Nonreligion & Secularity Research Network Official Blog, Methods and Methodologies. http://blog.nsrn.net/2013/11/01/implicit-frameworks-the-tyrannical-hegemonic-discourse/ (accessed July 24, 2019)
Coleman III, Thomas J., and Kyle J. Messick. in press. “Keeping the Secular Deck Intact”. Implicit Religion [Peer Commentary on the Paper “Is Secularism a World Religion?” By D. Schaefer and C. Cotter].
Coleman III, Thomas J., and Robert B. Arrowood. 2015. “Only We Can Save Ourselves: An Atheist’s ‘Salvation’.” In Alternative Salvations: Engaging the Sacred and the Secular, ed. Hannah Bacon, Wendy Dossett, and Steve Knowles (London, England: Bloomsbury Academic): pp. 11–20. doi: 10.5040/9781474220101.0007
Coleman III, Thomas J., Jonathan Jong, and Valerie van Mulukom. 2018. “Introduction to the Special Issue: What Are Religious Beliefs?” Contemporary Pragmatism 15(3): 279–283. doi:10.1163/18758185-01503001.
Coleman III, Thomas J., Ralph W. Hood Jr., and John R. Shook. 2015. “An Introduction to Atheism, Secularity, and Science.” Science, Religion and Culture 2(3): 1–14. doi:10.17582/journal.src/2015/2.3.1.14.
Coleman III, Thomas J., Ralph W. Hood Jr., and Heinz Streib. 2018. “An Introduction to Atheism, Agnosticism, and Nonreligious Worldviews.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 10 (3): 203–206. doi:10.1037/rel0000213.
Coleman III, Thomas J., and Ralph W. Hood Jr. 2015. “Reconsidering Everything: From Folk Categories to Existential Theory of Mind. [Peer Commentary on the Paper “From Weird Experiences to Revelatory Events” By A. Taves].” Religion and Society: Advances in Research 6(1): 18–22. doi:10.3167/arrs.2015.060102
Coleman III, Thomas J., Christopher F. Silver, and Ralph W. Hood Jr. 2016. “ “… If the Universe Is Beautiful, We’re Part of That Beauty.”—A ‘Neither Religious nor Spiritual’ Biography as Horizontal Transcendence.” In: Streib H., Hood, Jr. R. (eds) Semantics and Psychology of Spirituality. (Springer, Cham): pp. 355–372. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_22
Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby. 2000. “Consider the Source: The Evolution of Adaptations for Decoupling and Metarepresentation.” In: Sperber D. (Ed) Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (New York: Oxford): pp. 53–115.
Davis, William E., Jacob Juhl, and Clay Routledge. 2011. “Death and Design: The Terror Management Function of Teleological Beliefs.” Motivation and Emotion 35(1): 98–104. doi:10.1007/s11031-010-9193-6.
Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.
De Cruz, Helen. 2016. “Divine Hiddenness and the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Chapter. In Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives, edited by Adam Green and Eleonore Stump, 53–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139939621.004.
Dechesne, Mark, Tom Pyszczynski, Jamie Arndt, Sean Ransom, Kennon M. Sheldon, Ad van Knippenberg, and Jacques Janssen. 2003. “Literal and Symbolic Immortality: The Effect of Evidence of Literal Immortality on Self-Esteem Striving in Response to Mortality Salience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(4): 722–737. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.84.4.722.
Farias, Miguel, Anna-Kaisa Newheiser, Guy Kahane, and Zoe de Toledo. 2013. “Scientific Faith: Belief in Science Increases in the Face of Stress and Existential Anxiety.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6): 1210–1213. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.008.
Fazio, Russell H., and Michael A. Olson. 2003. “Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use.” Annual Review of Psychology 54(1): 297–327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.
Fazio, Russell H. 2007. “Attitudes as Object–Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength.” Social Cognition 25(5): 603–637. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603.
Fritsche, Immo, Eva Jonas, Peter Fischer, Nicolas Koranyi, Nicole Berger, and Beatrice Fleischmann. 2007. “Mortality Salience and the Desire for Offspring.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(5): 753–762. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.003.
Galen, Luke W. 2012. “Does Religious Belief Promote Prosociality? A Critical Examination.” Psychological Bulletin 138(5): 876–906. doi:10.1037/a0028251.
Galen, Luke William, and James D. Kloet. 2011. “Mental Well-Being in the Religious and the Non-Religious: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship”. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 14(7): 673–689. doi:10.1080/13674676.2010.510829.
Galen, Luke. 2015. “Atheism, Wellbeing, And The Wager: Why Not Believing in God (With Others) Is Good for You.” Science, Religion and Culture 2(3): 54–69. doi:10.17582/journal.src/2015/2.3.54.69.
Geertz, Armin W., and Guðmundur Ingi Markússon. 2010. “Religion is Natural, Atheism is Not: on Why Everybody is Both Right and Wrong.” Religion 40(3): 152–165. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2009.11.003.
Geertz, Armin. 2013. Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture. Durham: Acumen.
Gervais, Will M., Aiyana K. Willard, Ara Norenzayan, and Joseph Henrich. 2011. “The Cultural Transmission of Faith: Why Innate Intuitions are Necessary, But Insufficient, To Explain Religious Belief.” Religion 41(3): 389–410. doi:10.1080/0048721x.2011.604510.
Gervais, Will M., Michiel van Elk, Dimitris Xygalatas, Ryan T. Mckay, Mark Aveyard, Emma E. Buchtel, and Ilan Dar-Nimrod et al. 2018. “Analytic Atheism: A Cross-Culturally Weak and Fickle Phenomenon?” Judgment and Decision Making 13(3): 268–274.
Gervais, Will M. 2015. “Override The Controversy: Analytic Thinking Predicts Endorsement of Evolution.” Cognition 142: 312–321. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011.
Greenberg, Jeff, Linda Simon, Tom Pyszczynski, Sheldon Solomon, and Dan Chatel. 1992. “Terror Management and Tolerance: Does Mortality Salience Always Intensify Negative Reactions to Others Who Threaten One’s Worldview?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(2): 212–220. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.63.2.212.
Greenberg, Jeff, Tom Pyszczynski, and Sheldon Solomon. 1986. “The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory”. In Public Self and Private Self. R. Baumeister (Ed) (New York, NY: Springer-Verlag): pp. 189–212.
Greenwald, Anthony G., Debbie E. McGhee, and Jordan L.K. Schwartz. 1998. “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–1480. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.74.6.1464.
Hanft, Ruth S. 1981. “Use of Social Science Data for Policy Analysis and Policy-Making.” The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society 59(4): 596. doi:10.2307/3349743.
Heflick, Nathan A., and Jamie L. Goldenberg. 2011. “No Atheists in Foxholes: Arguments for (But Not Against) Afterlife Belief Buffers Mortality Salience Effects for Atheists.” British Journal of Social Psychology 51(2): 385–392. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02058.x.
Heiphetz, Larisa, Jonathan D. Lane, Adam Waytz, and Liane L. Young. 2015. “How Children and Adults Represent God’s Mind.” Cognitive Science, 1–24. doi:10.1111/cogs.12232.
Henrich, Joseph. 2009. “The Evolution of Costly Displays, Cooperation and Religion.” Evolution and Human Behavior 30(4): 244–260. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005.
Hood, Ralph W., and W. Paul Williamson. 2008. Them That Believe. Berkeley: University of California Press.
“How Not to Criticize the (Evolutionary) Cognitive Science of Religion.” 2014. [Review of the Book Evolution, Religion, & Cognitive Science: Critical & Constructive Essays, (Eds.), F. Watts & L. Turner] Marginalia Review Of Books. doi: http://marginalia.lareviewofbooks.org/criticize-evolutionary-cognitive-science-religion/.
Jonas, Eva, and Peter Fischer. 2006. “Terror Management and Religion: Evidence That Intrinsic Religiousness Mitigates Worldview Defense Following Mortality Salience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(3): 553–567. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.91.3.553.
Jong, Jonathan, and Jamin Halberstadt. 2016. Death, Anxiety, and Religious Belief. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Jong, Jonathan. 2018. “Beliefs are Object-Attribute Associations of Varying Strength.” Contemporary Pragmatism 15(3): 284–301. doi:10.1163/18758185-01503002.
Jong, Jonathan. 2013. “Implicit Measures in the Experimental Psychology of Religion.” In A New Science of Religion, 65–78. New York: Routledge.
Krause, Neal, and R. David Hayward. 2014. “Religious Involvement and Death Anxiety.” OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying 69(1): 59–78. doi:10.2190/om.69.1.d.
Kurtz, P., and E. Wilson. 1973. “Humanist Manifesto II.” American Humanist Association. https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/manifesto2/. (accessed July 24, 2019)
Lanman, Jonathan A. 2008. “In Defence Of “Belief”: A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism.” Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 3(3): 49–62. doi:10.21301/eap.v3i3.3.
Lanman, Jonathan. 2013. “Atheism and Cognitive Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. S. Bullivant and M. Ruse (eds) (Oxford: Oxford University Press): pp. 483–496.
Lavrič, Miran, and Sergej Flere. 2010. “Trait Anxiety and Measures of Religiosity in Four Cultural Settings.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture 13(7–8): 667–682. doi:10.1080/13674670701414961.
McCauley, Robert N. 2011. Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
McRae, Ken, and Michael Jones. 2013. “Semantic Memory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology. D. Reisberg (Ed) (New York: Oxford University Press): pp. 206–231.
Morgan, Jonathan. 2014. “Religion and Dual-Process Cognition: A Continuum of Styles or Distinct Types?” Religion, Brain & Behavior 6(2): 112–129. doi:10.1080/2153599x.2014.966315.
Norenzayan, Ara, Will M. Gervais, and Kali H. Trzesniewski. 2012. “Mentalizing Deficits Constrain Belief in a Personal God.” Plos ONE 7(5): e36880. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036880.
Olson, Michael A., Russell H. Fazio, and H. Anna Han. 2009. “Conceptualizing Personal and Extrapersonal Associations.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3(2): 152–170. doi:10.1111/j.1751–9004.2008.00164.x.
Payne, Brian Keith. 2001. “Prejudice and Perception: The Role of Automatic and Controlled Processes in Misperceiving a Weapon.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(2): 181–192. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.81.2.181.
Pecher, Diane. 2013. “The Perceptual Representation of Mental Categories.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology. D. Reisberg (Ed) (New York: Oxford University Press): pp. 358–373.
Pennycook, Gordon, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, and Jonathan A. Fugelsang. 2013. “Cognitive Style and Religiosity: The Role of Conflict Detection.” Memory & Cognition 42(1): 1–10. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7.
Pennycook, Gordon, Robert M. Ross, Derek J. Koehler, and Jonathan A. Fugelsang. 2016. “Atheists and Agnostics are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis.” PLOS ONE 11(4): e0153039. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153039.
Rosmarin, David H., Elizabeth J. Krumrei, and Gerhard Andersson. 2009. “Religion as a Predictor of Psychological Distress in Two Religious Communities.” Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 38(1): 54–64. doi:10.1080/16506070802477222.
Rutjens, Bastiaan T., Frenk van Harreveld, Joop van der Pligt, Michiel van Elk, and Tom Pyszczynski. 2014. “A March to a Better World? Religiosity and the Existential Function of Belief in Social-Moral Progress.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 26(1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/10508619.2014.990345.
Schimel, Jeff, Linda Simon, Jeff Greenberg, Tom Pyszczynski, Sheldon Solomon, Jeannette Waxmonsky, and Jamie Arndt. 1999. “Stereotypes and Terror Management: Evidence That Mortality Salience Enhances Stereotypic Thinking and Preferences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(5): 905–926. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.77.5.905.
Silver, Christopher F., Thomas J. Coleman III, Ralph W. Hood Jr., and Jenny M. Holcombe. 2014. “The Six Types of Nonbelief: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Type and Narrative.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture 17(10): 990–1001. doi:10.1080/13674676.2014.987743.
Speed, David, Thomas J. Coleman III, Luke W. Galen, and Karen Hwang. submitted. “In Doubt and Disbelief—How Mrdjenovich 2018 Misunderstands The (Non)Religion And Health Relationship”. Journal of Religion and Health.
Speed, David, Thomas J. Coleman III, and Joseph Langston. 2018. “What Do You Mean, “What Does It All Mean?” Atheism, Nonreligion, And Life Meaning”. SAGE Open 8 (1): 215824401775423. doi:10.1177/2158244017754238.
Stagaro, Michael N., Robert M. Ross, Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2019. “Cross-Cultural Support for a Link between Analytic Thinking and Disbelief in God: Evidence from India and the United Kingdom”. Judgment and Decision Making 14 (2): 179–186.
Swanson, Jane E., Laurie A. Rudman, and Anthony G. Greenwald. 2001. “Using the Implicit Association Test to Investigate Attitude-Behaviour Consistency for Stigmatised Behaviour”. Cognition & Emotion 15 (2): 207–230. doi:10.1080/02699930125706.
Taves, Ann. 2013. “Building Blocks of Sacralities”. In Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2nd ed., R. Paloutzian and C. Park (eds) (New York: Guliford Press): pp. 138–161.
Taves, Ann. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Taves, Ann. 2015. “Reverse Engineering Complex Cultural Concepts: Identifying Building Blocks of “Religion” ”. Journal of Cognition and Culture 15 (1–2): 191–216. doi:10.1163/15685373-12342146.
Tracy, Jessica L., Joshua Hart, and Jason P. Martens. 2011. “Death and Science: The Existential Underpinnings of Belief in Intelligent Design and Discomfort with Evolution”. Plos ONE 6 (3): e17349. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017349.
Uhlmann, E.L., T.A. Poehlman, and J.A. Bargh. 2008. “Implicit Theism”. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition Across Cultures. R. Sorrentino and S. Yamaguchi (eds) (Oxford, UK: Elsevier): pp. 71–94.
Vail, Kenneth E., Jamie Arndt, and Abdolhossein Abdollahi. 2012. “Exploring the Existential Function of Religion and Supernatural Agent Beliefs among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (10): 1288–1300. doi:10.1177/0146167212449361.
Vail, Kenneth E., Melissa Soenke, Brett Waggoner, and Ilianna Mavropoulou. 2019. “Natural, But Not Supernatural, Literal Immortality Affirmation Attenuates Mortality Salience Effects on Worldview Defense in Atheists”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616721985505. doi:10.1177/0146167219855051.
Vail, Kenneth E., Zachary K. Rothschild, Dave R. Weise, Sheldon Solomon, Tom Pyszczynski, and Jeff Greenberg. 2009. “A Terror Management Analysis of the Psychological Functions of Religion”. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14 (1): 84–94. doi:10.1177/1088868309351165.
van den Bos, Kees, Josha Buurman, Veerle de Theije, Bertjan Doosje, Annemarie Loseman, Danique van Laarhoven, Tanja van Veldhuizen, and Jenny Veldman. 2012. “On Shielding From Death as an Important Yet Malleable Motive of Worldview Defense: Christian Versus Muslim Beliefs Modulating the Self-Threat of Mortality Salience”. Social Cognition 30 (6): 778–802. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.778.
Van Leeuwen, Neil. 2014. “Religious Credence Is Not Factual Belief”. Cognition 133 (3): 698–715. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.015.
van Mulukom, Valerie, Hugh Turpin, Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Roosa Haimila, Theiss Bendixen, Eva Kundtová Klocová, Dan Řezníček, Thomas J. Coleman III, Everton Maraldi, Kenan Sevinç, Uffe Schjoedt, Bastiaan Rutjens, and Miguel Farias. submitted. “What Do Non-Religious Non-Believers Believe In? Secular Worldviews around the World.”
Von Eckardt, Barbara. 2012. “The Representational Theory of Mind”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science. K. Frankish and W. Ramsey (eds) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): pp. 29–49.
Wiers, Reinout W., Jade van de Luitgaarden, Esther van den Wildenberg, and Fren T.Y. Smulders. 2005. “Challenging Implicit and Explicit Alcohol-Related Cognitions in Young Heavy Drinkers”. Addiction 100 (6): 806–819. doi:10.1111/j.1360–0443.2005.01064.x.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1721 | 411 | 43 |
Full Text Views | 169 | 7 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 262 | 19 | 4 |
In accordance with Terror Management Theory research, secular beliefs can serve an important role for mitigating existential concerns by providing atheists with a method to attain personal meaning and bolster self-esteem. Although much research has suggested that religious beliefs are powerful defense mechanisms, these effects are limited or reveal more nuanced effects when attempting to explain atheists’ (non)belief structures. The possibility of nonbelief that provides meaning in the “here and now” is reinforced by the importance placed on scientific discovery, education, and social activism by many atheists. Thus, these values and ideologies can, and do, allow for empirically testable claims within a Terror Management framework. Although religious individuals can and largely do use religion as a defense strategy against existential concerns, purely secular ideologies are more effective for atheists providing evidence for a hierarchical approach and individual differences within worldview defenses. Evidence for and implications of these arguments are discussed.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1721 | 411 | 43 |
Full Text Views | 169 | 7 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 262 | 19 | 4 |