Researchers often define religion according to the presence (vs. absence) of supernaturalism. This has several serious shortcomings: (1) it construes religion narrowly as a historical/anthropological phenomenon, (2) it ignores the underlying evolved cognitive mechanisms facilitating tight group membership, which operate regardless of belief content and (3) it ensures that the study of religion will be obsolete if secularization continues. Instead of a slavish adherence to the criteria of supernaturalism, I suggest here a broader and more evolutionarily-informed definition of religion (and secularity): religion is what emerges when individuals become highly (perhaps overly-) integrated into a moral community; secularity is what emerges when individuals are moderately (perhaps under-) integrated into a moral community.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aron, Raymond.1962. The Opium of the Intellectuals. New York, NY: Norton and Company
Beit-Hallahmi, Benjamin. 2020. “The Secular Landscape: The Decline of Religion in America, by Kevin McCaffree,” Secular Studies, 2.1: 77–82.
Bellah, Robert. 1967. “Civil Religion in America,” Daedalus 96: 1–21.
Bruce, Steve. 2011. Secularization: In Defense of an Unfashionable Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Durkheim, Emile. [1912] 2008. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Vintage.
Pietraszewski, David, Oliver Scott Curry, Michael Bang Petersen, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby. 2015. “Constituents of Political Cognition: Race, Party Politics, and the Alliance Detection System,” Cognition 140: 24–39.
Schaller, Mark. 2018. “The Parental Care Motivational System and Why it Matters (For Everyone),” Current Directions in Psychological Science 27.5: 295–301.
Swann Jr, William B., Ángel Gómez, Michael D. Buhrmester, Lucía López-Rodríguez, Juan Jiménez, and Alexandra Vázquez. 2014. “Contemplating the Ultimate Sacrifice: Identity Fusion Channels Pro-Group Affect, Cognition, and Moral Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106.5: 713–727.
Tomasello, Michael. 2019. Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem and Mark Van Vugt. 2018. “Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13.6: 770–788.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 344 | 54 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 99 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 108 | 6 | 0 |
Researchers often define religion according to the presence (vs. absence) of supernaturalism. This has several serious shortcomings: (1) it construes religion narrowly as a historical/anthropological phenomenon, (2) it ignores the underlying evolved cognitive mechanisms facilitating tight group membership, which operate regardless of belief content and (3) it ensures that the study of religion will be obsolete if secularization continues. Instead of a slavish adherence to the criteria of supernaturalism, I suggest here a broader and more evolutionarily-informed definition of religion (and secularity): religion is what emerges when individuals become highly (perhaps overly-) integrated into a moral community; secularity is what emerges when individuals are moderately (perhaps under-) integrated into a moral community.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 344 | 54 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 99 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 108 | 6 | 0 |