Nothing Is Not Something

On Replacing Nonreligion with Identities

In: Secular Studies
View More View Less
  • 1 The University of TampaUSATampa, FL
  • | 2 University of North TexasUSADenton, TX

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



With the advance of secularization in numerous countries and the growth of those who report no religious affiliation, more attention is being given to individuals who are not religious. Various scholars have proposed names for the individuals who report no religious affiliation and researchers have created categories for such individuals. The de facto term is now “nonreligion” or “nonreligious.” However, even when the term “nonreligious” (Lee 2012) was put forward, there were serious reservations about labeling a group of people by what they are not. In this article, we detail why this is such a serious problem, and how this is only going to become more of a problem as this segment of national populations grows. We propose that we discontinue referring to such individuals as “nonreligious” and instead focus on the positive substance of their identities.

  • Bagg, Samuel and David Voas, 2010. “The Triumph of Indifference: Irreligion in British Society,” in Atheism and Secularity: Volume 2—Global Expressions, ed. Phil Zuckerman (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger), pp. 91–112.

  • Baker, Joseph O. and Buster G. Smith. 2015. American Secularism: Cultural Contours of Nonreligious Belief Systems. New York: NYU Press.

  • Berger, Peter. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

  • Berlinerblau, Jacques. 2013. How to Be Secular: A Call to Arms for Religious Freedom. Boston: Mariner Books.

  • Blau, Peter. 1974. “Presidential address: Parameters of social structure,” American Sociological Review 39.5:615–635.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1969. Intellectual field and creative project. Information (International Social Science Council) 8.2:89–119.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bouma, Gary. 2007. Australian Soul: Religion and Spirituality in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press.

  • Bruce, Steve. 2013. Secularization: In Defence of an Unfashionable Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Burke, Peter J. and Jan E. Stets. 1999. “Trust and Commitment through Self-Verification.” Social Psychology Quarterly 62.4:347–366

  • Burke, Peter and Jan Stets. 2009. Identity Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Burke, Peter and Jan Stets. 2015. “Identity Verification and the Social Order,” in Order on the Edge of Chaos: Social Psychology and the Problem of Social Order, eds. Edward J. Lawler, Shane R. Thye, and Jeongkoo Yoon (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 145–164.

  • Burke, Peter and Jan Stets. Forthcoming. “The Microsociology of Self and Identity,” in Theoretical Sociology, eds. Seth Abrutyn and Kevin McCaffree (New York: Routledge).

  • Caldwell-Harris, C.L., Wilson, A.L., LoTempio, E., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2011). Exploring the atheist personality: Well-being, awe, and magical thinking in atheists, Buddhists, and Christians. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14.7:659–672.

  • Campbell, Colin. 1971. Toward a Sociology of Irreligion. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

  • Chaves, Mark. 2011. American Religion: Contemporary Trends. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Collett, Jessica L., Vercel, Kelcie, & Pierce, Kayla D.R. 2019. “The Role of Significant Others in Shaping Fathers’ Identities and Behavior,” in Identities in Everyday Life, ed. Jan E. Stets and Richard T. Serpe, (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 359–380.

  • Cragun, Ryan T. 2019. “Questions You Should Never Ask an Atheist: Towards Better Measures of Nonreligion and Secularity.” Secularism and Nonreligion 8:1–6.

  • Davie, Grace. 1994. Religion in Britain Since 1945: Believing Without Belonging. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Farias, M., Newheiser, A.K., Kahane, G., & de Toledo, Z. 2013. “Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49.6:1210–1213.

  • Furseth, Inger. 2019. “From Theories of Secularization and Return of Religion to Religious Complexity,” in Political Religion, Everyday Religion: Sociological Trends, ed. Pål Repstad (Leiden: Brill), pp. 34–48.

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1986. Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews. London: Verso.

  • Hill, Peter C. and Ralph W. Hood, eds. 1999. Measures of Religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.

  • Jones, Stephen H., Fern Elsdon-Baker, Rebecca Catto, and Tom Kaden. Forthcoming. “What Science Means to Me: Understanding Personal Identification with (Evolutionary) Science Using the Sociology of (Non)Religion.” Public Understanding of Science.

  • Kasselstrand, Isabella. 2019. “Secularity and Irreligion in Cross-National Context: A Nonlinear Approach,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 58.3:626–642.

  • Keysar, Ariela. 2014. “Shifts Along the American Religious-Secular Spectrum,” Secularism and Nonreligion 3:1–16.

  • Kosmin, Barry A. 2007. “Introduction: Contemporary Secularity and Secularism,” in Secularism and Secularity: Contemporary International Perspectives, eds. Ariela Keysar and Barry A. Kosmin (Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture), pp. 1–16

  • Langston, Joseph A., Joseph H. Hammer, Ryan T. Cragun, and Mary Ellen Sikes. 2017. “Inside The Minds and Movement of America’s Nonbelievers: Organizational Functions, (Non)Participation, and Attitudes Toward Religion,” in Organized Secularism in the United States, Religion and Its Others: Studies in Religion, Nonreligion, and Secularity, eds. Ryan T. Cragun, Christel J. Manning, and Lori Fazzino (Berlin: De Gruyter), pp. 191–219.

  • Lee, Lois. 2012. “Research Note: Talking about a Revolution: Terminology for the New Field of Non-Religion Studies,” Journal of Contemporary Religion 27.1:129–139.

  • Lee, Lois. 2015. Recognizing the Non-Religious: Reimagining the Secular. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Lim, Chaeyoon, Carol Ann MacGregor, and Robert D. Putnam. 2010. “Secular and Liminal: Discovering Heterogeneity Among Religious Nones,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49.4:596–618.

  • Lindeman, Marjaana, Michiel van Elk, Jari Lipsanen, Pinja Marin, and Uffe Schjødt. 2019. “Religious Unbelief in Three Western European Countries: Identifying and Characterizing Unbeliever Types Using Latent Class Analysis,” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 29.3:184–203.

  • Lizardo, Omar. 2004. “The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34.4:375–401.

  • McCaffree, Kevin. In Progress. Islam in Exile.

  • McCaffree, K. 2017. The Secular Landscape: The Decline of Religion in America. New York: Springer.

  • McPherson, Miller. 2004. “A Blau Space Primer: Prolegomenon to an Ecology of Affiliation,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 13.1:263–280.

  • McPherson, Miller and James Ranger-Moore. 1991. “Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Blau Space,” Social Forces, 70.1:19–42.

  • Miller, Warren B. 2011. “Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B Framework,” Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9:19–29.

  • Pew Research Center. 2019. In U.S., Decline of Christianity Continues at Rapid Pace: An Update On America’s Changing Religious Landscape. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.

  • Quack, Johannes. 2014. “Outline of a Relational Approach to ‘Nonreligion,’ ” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 26.4–5:439–469.

  • Quack, Johannes, and Cora Schuh. 2017. Religious Indifference: New Perspectives From Studies on Secularization and Nonreligion. Springer.

  • Rogers, Everett M. 2006. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition. New York: Free Press.

  • Saide, Anondah, Kevin McCaffree, and Rebekah Richert. In progress. “Predicting Belief in Science.”

  • Sherkat, Darren E. 2014. Changing Faith: The Dynamics and Consequences of Americans’ Shifting Religious Identities. New York: NYU Press.

  • Stark, Rodney and Charles Y. Glock. 1968. American Piety. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Stets, Jan, Phillip Brenner, Peter Burke and Richard Serpe. 2017. “The Science Identity and Entering a Science Occupation,” Social Science Research, 64:1–14.

  • Stets, Jan E. and Peter J. Burke. 2014. “Self-Esteem and Identities,” Sociological Perspectives 57:1–25.

  • Storm, Ingrid. 2009. “Halfway to Heaven: Four Types of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48.4:702–718.

  • Strawn, Kelley D. 2019. “What’s Behind the ‘Nones-Sense’? Change Over Time in Factors Predicting Likelihood of Religious Nonaffiliation in the United States,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 58.3:707–724.

  • Taves, Ann. 2018. “What is Nonreligion? On the Virtues of a Meaning Systems Framework for Studying Nonreligious and Religious Worldviews in the Context of Everyday Life. Secularism and Nonreligion,” 7.1:1–9.

  • Taves, Ann, Egil Asprem, and Elliott Ihm. 2018. “Psychology, Meaning Making, and the Study of Worldviews: Beyond Religion and Non-Religion,” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 10.3:207–217.

  • Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C.D. (2018). “The Nature of Science Identity and Its Role as the Driver of Student Choices,” International Journal of STEM Education, 5.1:1–12.

  • Voas, David and Alasdair Crockett. 2005. “Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging,” Sociology 39.1:11–28.

  • Voas, David. 2008. “The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe,” European Sociological Review, 25.2:155–168.

  • Zuckerman, Phil. 2008. Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment. New York: NYU Press.

  • Zuckerman, Phil, Luke Galen and Frank Pasquale. 2016. The Nonreligious: Understanding Secular People and Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 50 8
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Views & Downloads 4 4 1