This article discusses the works of Athippakkam A. Venkatachala Nayagar (1799–1897), a radical secular thinker of 19th-century South India. Nayagar was part of an atheist organization called Madras Secular Society, and was one of the founding members of a lower-caste association. He wrote two significant works that challenged the dominance of Brahmins and other upper-caste communities in the Tamil country. His works have spawned reprints from both anti-caste secular organizations and caste associations, which occupy polarized positions on social issues. By building on Joseph Blankholm’s Secular Paradox, this paper explores the paradoxes generated by these reprints. It also critically studies the efforts undertaken by both groups to reconcile these paradoxes through multiple negotiations with caste, religion, and secularism. Through Nayagar’s case, it explores the intricate relationship between secular organizations and lower-caste associations in the colonial and post-colonial public sphere.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aloysius, G. 1998. Religion as Emancipatory Identity: A Buddhist Movement among the Tamils under Colonialism. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited.
Anaimuthu, V., ed. 2014a. Intumata Ācāra Āpāca Tariciṉi. Chennai: Periyar Nool Veliyittagam.
Anaimuthu, V., ed. 2014b. Pāyakkārikaḷukkum Mirācutārarkaḷukkum Uṇṭāyirukkiṟa Vivātam. Chennai: Periyar Nool Veliyittagam.
Arasu, V., ed. 2012. Ceṉṉai Laukika Caṅkam (Volumes 1–6). Chennai: New Century Book House Pvt. Ltd.
Arasu, V., ed. 2013. Attippākkam A. Veṅkaṭācalaṉār Ākkaṅkaḷ Tiraṭṭu. Chennai: New Century Book House Pvt. Ltd.
Bandopadhyay, Arun. 2009. “Agrarian Change and Social Mobility in Colonial Conditions: The Mirasi Question in Nineteenth Century Tamil Nadu.” Indian Historical Review 36 (2): 237–256.
Bhargava, Rajeev, ed. 1998. Secularism and its Critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Binder, Stefan. 2020. Total Atheism: Secular Activism and the Politics of Difference in South India. New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Blankholm, Joseph. 2022. The Secular Paradox: On the Religiosity of the Not Religious. New York: New York University Press.
Cohn, Bernard. 1987. “The Census, Social Structure and Objectification in South Asia.” In An Anthropologist Among the Historians and Other Essays, 224–254. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Geetha, V. 2021. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar and the Question of Socialism in India. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Geetha, V., and S.V. Rajadurai. 2011. Towards a Non-Brahmin Millennium: From Iyothee Thass to Periyar. Kolkata: Samya.
Iraivan, N. 2023. Varalāṟṟil Vaṉṉiyar Makāvamcam: Cāṉṟōrkaḷ. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. Chennai: Achamillai Arakkattalai.
Irschick, Eugene F. 1994. Dialogue and History: Constructing South India, 1795–1895. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Kopf, David. 1979. The Brahmo Samaj and the Shaping of the Modern Indian Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lee, Lois. 2015. Recognizing the Non-Religious: Reimagining the Secular. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manoharan, Karthick Ram. 2022. Periyar: A Study in Political Atheism. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.
O’Hanlon, Rosalind. 1985. Caste, Conflict and Ideology: Mahatma Jotirao Phule and Low Caste Protest in Nineteenth-Century Western India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pandian, M.S.S. 2007. Brahmin and Non-Brahmin: Genealogies of Tamil Political Present. New Delhi: Permanent Black.
Pazhamalai, T. 2022a. Intu Mata Ācāra Āpāca Tariciṉi: Eḷiya Urainaṭaiyum 802 Ceyyuḷkaḷum. Villupuram: Perumitham Veliyidu.
Pazhamalai, T. 2022b. Intu Mata Ācāra Āpāca Tariciṉi: Ariya Kaṭṭuraikaḷ—Uyariya Oppīṭukaḷ. Villupuram: Perumitham Veliyidu.
Quack, Johannes. 2011. Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quack, Johannes. 2014. “Outline of a Relational Approach to ‘Nonreligion.’” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 26: 439–469.
Raja, R. Saravana. 2017. “The Associational Basis of Vanniyar Organizations in Tamil Nadu.” Studies in Indian Politics 5 (2): 181–192.
Raja, R. Saravana. 2020. “Vanniyar Claims to Mobility in Pluralist Tamil Nadu, 1900–1935.” South Asia Research 40 (1): 22–39.
Rajagopalan, Bhavan, dir. 2023. Vivesini. Laburnum Productions.
Raman, Srilata. 2022. The Transformation of Tamil Religion: Ramalinga Swamigal (1823–1874) and Modern Dravidian Sainthood. London & New York: Routledge.
Royle, Edward. 1974. Victorian Infidels: The Origins of the British Secularist Movement, 1791–1866. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Rudolph, Lloyd I., and Susanne Hoeber Rudolph. 1967. The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Srinivas, M.N. 1968. Social Change in Modern India. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Srinivasan, R. 1975–1976. “The Brahmo Samaj in Tamilnadu.” Journal of the University of Bombay 46: 214–229.
Tamilmagan. 2023. Ñālam. Chennai: Minnangadi Pathippagam.
Thurston, Edgar. 1909. Castes and Tribes of Southern India. Vol. 6. Madras: Government Press.
Venkatachalapathy, A.R. 2010. “‘More Kshatriya than Thou!’ Debating Caste and Ritual Ranking in Colonial Tamilnadu.” In Ritual, Caste, and Religion in Colonial South India, edited by Michael Bergunder, Heiko Frese, and Ulrike Schröder, 275–292. Delhi: Primus Books.
Viswanathan, Gauri. 1998. Outside the Fold: Conversion, Modernity, and Belief. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Washbrook, David. 1975. “The Development of Caste Organisation in South India 1880 to 1925.” In South India: Political Institutions and Political Change 1880–1940, edited by C.J. Baker and D.A. Washbrook, 150–203. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 506 | 506 | 61 |
Full Text Views | 16 | 16 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 34 | 34 | 8 |
This article discusses the works of Athippakkam A. Venkatachala Nayagar (1799–1897), a radical secular thinker of 19th-century South India. Nayagar was part of an atheist organization called Madras Secular Society, and was one of the founding members of a lower-caste association. He wrote two significant works that challenged the dominance of Brahmins and other upper-caste communities in the Tamil country. His works have spawned reprints from both anti-caste secular organizations and caste associations, which occupy polarized positions on social issues. By building on Joseph Blankholm’s Secular Paradox, this paper explores the paradoxes generated by these reprints. It also critically studies the efforts undertaken by both groups to reconcile these paradoxes through multiple negotiations with caste, religion, and secularism. Through Nayagar’s case, it explores the intricate relationship between secular organizations and lower-caste associations in the colonial and post-colonial public sphere.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 506 | 506 | 61 |
Full Text Views | 16 | 16 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 34 | 34 | 8 |