Atheist Thanks to God
Exploring the Secular Paradox among Latin American ‘Nones’
In: Secular StudiesSearch for other papers by Carlos Nazario Mora Duro in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Arturo Fitz Herbert in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper explores the phenomenon of the non-religious (“nones”) in Latin America by examining the implications of the secular paradox within this population. The secular paradox refers to the tension that secular individuals experience when they engage with religious aspects. Our analysis shows that this tension is a prevalent occurrence in the experience of Latin Americans, nuanced by social representations such as the “atheist thanks to God.” These social imaginaries illustrate the inherent interplay and porosity between the religious and the secular in the region, characterised by its “baroque modernity:” a cultural configuration that both integrates and resists patterns promoted by capitalist and Western modernity. After analysing Latin American nations in terms of the prevalence of religious disaffiliation, the paper focuses on the intersections of the secular and the religious in specific cases such as Mexico and Argentina. The findings indicate that conceptions of religion among our interlocutors are linked to the historical Catholicism of the region, as well as to political secularism, which is both assertive and permeable to religious legitimation. Furthermore, the non-religious tend to purify certain elements of religion, prioritising social bonds while restricting secularism primarily to the intellectual level. By addressing the secular-religious tension among Latin American “nones,” this research contributes to a deeper understanding of secular identity beyond the modernity and secularisation of the Atlantic North.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ammerman, N.T. (2013), “Spiritual But Not Religious? Beyond Binary Choices in the Study of Religion”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 258–278, doi: 10.1111/jssr.12024.
-
Ansaldi, W. (2000), “La temporalidad mixta de América Larina, una expresión de multiculturalismo”, presented at the Identidades comunitarias y democracia, Trotta, España, pp. 167–184.
-
Argentina. (1995), “Constitución de la Nación Argentina”, Información Legislativa, available at: https://bit.ly/38qb2eO (accessed 19 February 2021).
-
Berger, P. (2002), “Secularization and de-secularization”, Religions in the Modern World: Traditions and Transformations, Routledge London, Vol. 336.
-
Berger, P. (2010), “Max Weber is alive and well, and living in Guatemala: The Protestant ethic today”, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 3–9.
-
Berger, P. (2014), The Many Altars of Modernity: Toward a Paradigm for Religion in a Pluralist Age, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Germany.
-
Berral, E.A. (2014), Buñuel, novela, de Max Aub. Un testimonio generacional y un reto literario: los materiales preparatorios para la obra, PhD Thesis, Universitat de València, Departamento de Filología Española, Valencia, España.
-
Blancarte, R. (2007), “Mexico: A mirror for the sociology of religion”, The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, Sage Publications, London, pp. 710–727.
-
Blancarte, R. (2008), “Laicidad y laicismo en América Latina”, Estudios Sociológicos, Vol. 26 No. 76, pp. 139–164.
-
Blancarte, R. (2011), “América Latina: entre pluri-confesionalidad y laicidad”, Civitas-Revista de Ciências Sociais, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 182–206.
-
Blancarte, R. (2015), “¿Por qué la religión ‘regresó’ a la esfera pública en un mundo secularizado?”, Estudios Sociológicos, Vol. XXXIII, núm 99, pp. 659–673.
-
Blankholm, J. (2022), The Secular Paradox: On the Religiosity of the Not Religious, Vol. 5, NYU Press, New York.
-
Casanova, J. (2007), “Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective”, Religion, Globalization, and Culture, Brill, pp. 101–120.
-
Casanova, J. (2018), “Parallel reformations in Latin America: a critical review of David Martin’s interpretation of the Pentecostal revolution”, David Martin and the Sociology of Religion, pp. 85–106.
-
Collins, R. (2007), “The classical tradition in sociology of religion”, Beckford, J. e Demmerath III. NJ (Orgs.) The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. London: Sage, pp. 19–38.
-
Cruz, J. and Mallimaci, F. (2018), “Políticas y religiones en América Latina y el Caribe: recomposiciones históricas, epistemológicas y conceptuales”, Anuario de Historia Regional y de Las Fronteras, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 13–24.
-
De Asúa, M. (2021), “Science, Catholicism, and the French (Latin) Pattern of Secularization. The Case of Argentina (1820–1958)”, Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 237–257.
-
De la Torre, R., Alberto Hernández Hernández, and Cristina Gutiérrez Zúñiga. (2016), Encuesta Nacional sobre Creencias y Prácticas Religiosas en México. Rifrem 2016, 1st ed., Red de Investigadores del Fenómeno Religiosos en México, México.
-
De la Torre, R., Nahayeilli Juárez Huet, Mora Duro, C.N., and María del Rosario Ramírez Morales. (2020), “Sin religión”, Tomo II. Diversidad Religiosa, 1a ed., Colegio de la Frontera Norte-CIESAS, Ciudad de México, pp. 127–154.
-
Durkheim, E. (1915), The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, translated by Swain, J.W., Ebook., The Project Gutenberg, London.
-
Durkheim, E. (2005), Suicide: A Study in Sociology, Routledge.
-
Echeverría, B. (2007), “Meditaciones sobre el barroquismo. II. El guadalupanismo y el ethos barroco en América”, Ponenciapresented at the Moving Worlds of the Baroque, University of Toronto, October.
-
Echeverría, B. (2019), Modernity and “Whiteness”, translated by Ferreira, R., 1st ed., Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
-
Esquivel, J.C., Funes, M.E. and Prieto, M.S. (2020), “Ateos, agnósticos y creyentes sin religión: Análisis cuantitativo de los sin filiación religiosa en la Argentina”, Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones Laborales.
-
Gill, A. (2008), The Political Origins of Religious Liberty, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
-
INEGI. (2020a), Clasificación de religiones 2020, Obras complementarias publicadas por el INEGI sobre el tema: Clasificación de religiones 2010, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Aguascalientes, p. 39.
-
INEGI. (2020b), “Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020”, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
-
Kuru, A.T. (2009), Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, United States of America.
-
Latinobarómetro. (2014), Las religiones en tiempos del Papa Francisco, Latinobarómetro, Santiago de Chile, p. 34.
-
Latinobarómetro. (2017), El papa Francisco y la religión en Chile y América Latina. Latinobarómetro 1995–2017, Latinobarómetro, Santiago de Chile, p. 28.
-
Latinobarómetro. (2024), “Latinobarómetro Online”, Latinobarómetro, Corporación, available at: https://www.latinobarometro.org/latOnline.jsp (accessed 25 April 2024).
-
Luckmann, T. (1967), The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society, Taylor & Francis.
-
Mallimaci, F. (2015), “El mito de la Argentina laica”, Catolicismo, Política y Estado. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual, Vol. 94.
-
Mallimaci, F., Giménez Béliveau, V., Esquivel, J.C. and Irrazábal, G. (2019), “Sociedad y religión en movimiento. Segunda Encuesta Nacional sobre Creencias y Actitudes Religiosas en la Argentina”, Informe de Investigación, Ceil-Conicet Buenos Aires, Vol. 25, pp. 1–72.
-
Mallimaci, F. and Giménez, V. (2007), “Creencias e increencia en el Cono Sur de América: Entre la religiosidad difusa, la pluralización del campo religioso y las relaciones con lo público y lo político”, Revista Argentina de Sociología, Vol. 5 No. 9, pp. 44–63.
-
Martin, D. (1993), A General Theory of Secularization, Gregg Revivals.
-
Mora Duro, C.N. (2017a), Creer sin iglesia y practicar sin Dios: población sin religión en el contexto urbano y rural de México en los albores del Siglo XXI, El Colegio de México, Ciudad de México, 24 January.
-
Mora Duro, C.N. (2017b), “Entre la crítica, la autonomía y la indiferencia: la población sin religión en México”, Estudos de Religião, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 157–178.
-
Mora Duro, C.N. (2018), “Población sin religión”, Diccionario de Religiones En América Latina, 1a ed., Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, pp. 475–485.
-
Mora Duro, C.N. (2019), “Agnostics and Atheists in Mexico”, in Gooren, H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Latin American Religions, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 66–70, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27078-4_369.
-
Mora Duro, C.N. (2022), “Religión en los procesos de integración: una mirada a la migración mexicana en Alemania”, Korpus 21, Vol. 2 No. 5, pp. 345–361.
-
Mora Duro, C.N. (2024), “Desecularisation of the State and Sacred Secularism: Politics and Religion in Mexico within the Latin-American Context”, Working Paper Series of the CASHSS “Multiple Secularities—Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities”, Leipzig University, No. 28, p. 64.
-
Morello, G., Romero, C., Rabbia, H. and Da Costa, N. (2017), “An enchanted modernity: Making sense of Latin America’s religious landscape”, Critical Research on Religion, SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 308–326.
-
Parker, C. (2005), “¿América Latina ya no es católica? Pluralismo cultural y religioso creciente”, América Latina Hoy, Vol. 41.
-
Pew Research Center. (2014), Religion in Latin America. Widespread Change in a Historically Catholic Region, Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project, Estados Unidos, p. 310.
-
Rabbia, H. (2017), “Explorando los ‘sin religión de pertenencia’ en Córdoba, Argentina”, Estudos de Religião, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 131–155.
-
Romero, C. and Lecaros, V. (2017), “Quiénes son los ‘sin religión’en Lima”, Estudos de Religião, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 111–130.
-
Sundt, C. (2009), “Religion and Power: The Appropriation of Da Vinci’s ‘The Last Supper In Viridiana’ and ‘L’ultima Cena’”, Romance Notes, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for its Department of Romance Studies, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 71–79.
-
Williams, G. (2016), “Secularization in Latin America”, The Encyclopedia of Postcolonial Studies, Wiley Online Library, pp. 1–10.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 816 | 816 | 201 |
| Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Atheist Thanks to God
Exploring the Secular Paradox among Latin American ‘Nones’
In: Secular StudiesSearch for other papers by Carlos Nazario Mora Duro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arturo Fitz Herbert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This paper explores the phenomenon of the non-religious (“nones”) in Latin America by examining the implications of the secular paradox within this population. The secular paradox refers to the tension that secular individuals experience when they engage with religious aspects. Our analysis shows that this tension is a prevalent occurrence in the experience of Latin Americans, nuanced by social representations such as the “atheist thanks to God.” These social imaginaries illustrate the inherent interplay and porosity between the religious and the secular in the region, characterised by its “baroque modernity:” a cultural configuration that both integrates and resists patterns promoted by capitalist and Western modernity. After analysing Latin American nations in terms of the prevalence of religious disaffiliation, the paper focuses on the intersections of the secular and the religious in specific cases such as Mexico and Argentina. The findings indicate that conceptions of religion among our interlocutors are linked to the historical Catholicism of the region, as well as to political secularism, which is both assertive and permeable to religious legitimation. Furthermore, the non-religious tend to purify certain elements of religion, prioritising social bonds while restricting secularism primarily to the intellectual level. By addressing the secular-religious tension among Latin American “nones,” this research contributes to a deeper understanding of secular identity beyond the modernity and secularisation of the Atlantic North.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 816 | 816 | 201 |
| Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 3 | 3 | 0 |
